Search

Search Results

• 1. [Article] West Fork Illinois River Watershed Analysis

  Abstract -- The West Fork Illinois River Watershed Analysis (Iteration 1.0) document was completed in June 1997 to provide an ecological context for proposed mineral development, including management recommendations. ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: West Fork Illinois River Watershed Analysis Abstract -- The West Fork Illinois River Watershed Analysis (Iteration 1.0) document was completed in June 1997 to provide an ecological context for proposed mineral development, including management recommendations. The focus of iteration 1.0 was the serpentine portion of the watershed on Forest Service lands. The purpose of the current document and analysis is to expand on this earlier analysis by adding the lower elevation BLM land areas. It identifies the various ecosystem components in the lower elevation areas of the West Fork Illinois River fifth field watershed and their interactions at a landscape scale. The analysis looks at historical ecological components, current ecological components and trends. It makes recommendations for future management actions that could be implemented to reach recommended ecological conditions. Title: West Fork Illinois River Watershed Analysis Abstract -- The West Fork Illinois River Watershed Analysis (Iteration 1.0) document was completed in June 1997 to provide an ecological context for proposed mineral development, including management recommendations. The focus of iteration 1.0 was the serpentine portion of the watershed on Forest Service lands. The purpose of the current document and analysis is to expand on this earlier analysis by adding the lower elevation BLM land areas. It identifies the various ecosystem components in the lower elevation areas of the West Fork Illinois River fifth field watershed and their interactions at a landscape scale. The analysis looks at historical ecological components, current ecological components and trends. It makes recommendations for future management actions that could be implemented to reach recommended ecological conditions. Close

• 2. [Article] Jordan/Alder Watershed Assessment

  The Jordan/Alder Watershed is a 2,459-acre watershed located in southwest Oregon immediately west of Canyonville in Douglas County. This watershed--a portion of the O'Shea Creek HUC6, or sixth-field watershed--lies ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Jordan/Alder Watershed Assessment Author: Barnes and Associates Inc. The Jordan/Alder Watershed is a 2,459-acre watershed located in southwest Oregon immediately west of Canyonville in Douglas County. This watershed--a portion of the O'Shea Creek HUC6, or sixth-field watershed--lies within the bounds of the South Umpqua River HUC5, or fifth-field watershed. Jordan Creek is a tributary to the South Umpqua River immediately downstream of the City of Canyonville, while Alder Creek is a tributary of Jordan Creek. The South Umpqua River bounds the watershed on the north. Title: Jordan/Alder Watershed Assessment Author: Barnes and Associates Inc. The Jordan/Alder Watershed is a 2,459-acre watershed located in southwest Oregon immediately west of Canyonville in Douglas County. This watershed--a portion of the O'Shea Creek HUC6, or sixth-field watershed--lies within the bounds of the South Umpqua River HUC5, or fifth-field watershed. Jordan Creek is a tributary to the South Umpqua River immediately downstream of the City of Canyonville, while Alder Creek is a tributary of Jordan Creek. The South Umpqua River bounds the watershed on the north. Close

• 3. [Article] Wildwood Footbridge maintenance decision record

  7 pp. Map. Township 2 South, Range 7 East, section 31. Captured February 16, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Wildwood Footbridge maintenance decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2008 7 pp. Map. Township 2 South, Range 7 East, section 31. Captured February 16, 2009. Title: Wildwood Footbridge maintenance decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2008 7 pp. Map. Township 2 South, Range 7 East, section 31. Captured February 16, 2009. Close

• 4. [Article] Elk Creek stream crossing upgrade project decision record

  2 pp. Sections 33 and 34, T.23S, R.4W; and Section 3, T.24S, R.4W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elk Creek stream crossing upgrade project decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2005 2 pp. Sections 33 and 34, T.23S, R.4W; and Section 3, T.24S, R.4W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Title: Elk Creek stream crossing upgrade project decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2005 2 pp. Sections 33 and 34, T.23S, R.4W; and Section 3, T.24S, R.4W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Close

• 5. [Article] Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project decision record

  2 pp. Section 17, T.21S., R.4W.; Sections 15 and 27, T.22S., R.4W.; Section 3, T.25S., R.4W.; and Section 17, T.26S., R.2W.; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2004 2 pp. Section 17, T.21S., R.4W.; Sections 15 and 27, T.22S., R.4W.; Section 3, T.25S., R.4W.; and Section 17, T.26S., R.2W.; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Title: Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2004 2 pp. Section 17, T.21S., R.4W.; Sections 15 and 27, T.22S., R.4W.; Section 3, T.25S., R.4W.; and Section 17, T.26S., R.2W.; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Close

• 6. [Article] Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project finding of no significant impact

  4 pp. Section 17, T.21S., R.4W.; Sections 15 and 27, T.22S., R.4W.; Section 3, T.25S., R.4W.; and Section 17, T.26S., R.2W. Captured July 27, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2004 4 pp. Section 17, T.21S., R.4W.; Sections 15 and 27, T.22S., R.4W.; Section 3, T.25S., R.4W.; and Section 17, T.26S., R.2W. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2004 4 pp. Section 17, T.21S., R.4W.; Sections 15 and 27, T.22S., R.4W.; Section 3, T.25S., R.4W.; and Section 17, T.26S., R.2W. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 7. [Article] Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impacts

  3 pp. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7, T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 11, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 3 pp. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7, T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 11, 2009. Title: Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 3 pp. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7, T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 11, 2009. Close

• 8. [Article] Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management decision record

  5 pp. Maps. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7 T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 11, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 5 pp. Maps. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7 T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 11, 2009. Title: Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 5 pp. Maps. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7 T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 11, 2009. Close

• 9. [Article] Elk Creek stream crossing upgrade project environmental assessment

  13 pp. References, map, appendices. Section 33 and 34, T.23S, R.4W; and Section 3, T.24S, R.4W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elk Creek stream crossing upgrade project environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2005 13 pp. References, map, appendices. Section 33 and 34, T.23S, R.4W; and Section 3, T.24S, R.4W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007. Title: Elk Creek stream crossing upgrade project environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2005 13 pp. References, map, appendices. Section 33 and 34, T.23S, R.4W; and Section 3, T.24S, R.4W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007. Close

• 10. [Article] Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact

  5 pp. Sections 14, 23, and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 5 pp. Sections 14, 23, and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 5 pp. Sections 14, 23, and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 11. [Article] Middle South Umpqua/Dumont Creek commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact

  6 pp. Sections 21 and 33, T. 29 S., R. 2 W., and Sections 3, 9, 11 and 15, T. 30 S., R. 2 W. Captured February 11, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Middle South Umpqua/Dumont Creek commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 6 pp. Sections 21 and 33, T. 29 S., R. 2 W., and Sections 3, 9, 11 and 15, T. 30 S., R. 2 W. Captured February 11, 2009. Title: Middle South Umpqua/Dumont Creek commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 6 pp. Sections 21 and 33, T. 29 S., R. 2 W., and Sections 3, 9, 11 and 15, T. 30 S., R. 2 W. Captured February 11, 2009. Close

• 12. [Article] BLM addendum for Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment : fifth field watershed

  Within the Lower North Umpqua watershed, BLM has acquired approximately 6,600 acres of land specifically to manage habitat to enhance the Columbian White-tailed Deer (CWTD). This area is called the North ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: BLM addendum for Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment : fifth field watershed Author: U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Within the Lower North Umpqua watershed, BLM has acquired approximately 6,600 acres of land specifically to manage habitat to enhance the Columbian White-tailed Deer (CWTD). This area is called the North Bank Habitat Management Area (NBHMA) and will be managed as described in the NBHMA Environmental Impact Statement. The BLM also manages an additional 5,780 acres for multiple use objectives. These lands are mostly scattered in the headwater region in the north and northwest of the watershed. Within the next five to ten years, it is likely that the Swiftwater Field Manager will need to be involved in some aspect of decision-making on those 5,780 acres with the following general areas. These areas have been used to help guide the key questions, the information to answer those questions, and the resulting management opportunities. A major assumption in the development of these key questions is that the Roseburg District Resource Management Plan (RMP) has given some prescriptive measures through the landscape land use allocations. Because the RMP sets standards and guidelines on each land use allocation and the kinds of activities that can occur in those land uses, this watershed assessment seeks to provide information to guide decision making within those overarching planning parameters. Title: BLM addendum for Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment : fifth field watershed Author: U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Within the Lower North Umpqua watershed, BLM has acquired approximately 6,600 acres of land specifically to manage habitat to enhance the Columbian White-tailed Deer (CWTD). This area is called the North Bank Habitat Management Area (NBHMA) and will be managed as described in the NBHMA Environmental Impact Statement. The BLM also manages an additional 5,780 acres for multiple use objectives. These lands are mostly scattered in the headwater region in the north and northwest of the watershed. Within the next five to ten years, it is likely that the Swiftwater Field Manager will need to be involved in some aspect of decision-making on those 5,780 acres with the following general areas. These areas have been used to help guide the key questions, the information to answer those questions, and the resulting management opportunities. A major assumption in the development of these key questions is that the Roseburg District Resource Management Plan (RMP) has given some prescriptive measures through the landscape land use allocations. Because the RMP sets standards and guidelines on each land use allocation and the kinds of activities that can occur in those land uses, this watershed assessment seeks to provide information to guide decision making within those overarching planning parameters. Close

• 13. [Article] Indian Creek aquatic restoration project environmental assessment -- preliminary analysis

  64 pp. Tables, maps, references, glossary, and illus. Township 15 South, Ranges 10 West; and Township 16 South, Range 9 and 10 West. Captured February 15, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Indian Creek aquatic restoration project environmental assessment -- preliminary analysis Author: South Zone Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2005 64 pp. Tables, maps, references, glossary, and illus. Township 15 South, Ranges 10 West; and Township 16 South, Range 9 and 10 West. Captured February 15, 2007. Title: Indian Creek aquatic restoration project environmental assessment -- preliminary analysis Author: South Zone Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2005 64 pp. Tables, maps, references, glossary, and illus. Township 15 South, Ranges 10 West; and Township 16 South, Range 9 and 10 West. Captured February 15, 2007. Close

• 14. [Article] Indian Creek aquatic restoration project environmental assessment

  74 pp. Tables, maps, references, glossary, appendices, and illus. Township 15 South, Ranges 10 West; and Township 16 South, Range 9 and 10 West. Captured July 2, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Indian Creek aquatic restoration project environmental assessment Author: South Zone Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2005 74 pp. Tables, maps, references, glossary, appendices, and illus. Township 15 South, Ranges 10 West; and Township 16 South, Range 9 and 10 West. Captured July 2, 2007. Title: Indian Creek aquatic restoration project environmental assessment Author: South Zone Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2005 74 pp. Tables, maps, references, glossary, appendices, and illus. Township 15 South, Ranges 10 West; and Township 16 South, Range 9 and 10 West. Captured July 2, 2007. Close

• 15. [Article] Indian Creek aquatic restoration project decision notice and finding of no significant impact

  10 pp. Table. Township 15 South, Range 10 West; and Township 16 South, Ranges 9 and 10. Captured May 10, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Indian Creek aquatic restoration project decision notice and finding of no significant impact Author: South Zone Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2005 10 pp. Table. Township 15 South, Range 10 West; and Township 16 South, Ranges 9 and 10. Captured May 10, 2007. Title: Indian Creek aquatic restoration project decision notice and finding of no significant impact Author: South Zone Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2005 10 pp. Table. Township 15 South, Range 10 West; and Township 16 South, Ranges 9 and 10. Captured May 10, 2007. Close

• 16. [Article] Upper Umpqua Watershed plan Raider-Hubbard stream crossing upgrade project decision record

  2 pp. This action will occur at three of those sites in Section 14, (Rader Creek); and Sections 19, and 20 (Hubbard Creek); T24S R8W. Captured July 24, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Upper Umpqua Watershed plan Raider-Hubbard stream crossing upgrade project decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2003 2 pp. This action will occur at three of those sites in Section 14, (Rader Creek); and Sections 19, and 20 (Hubbard Creek); T24S R8W. Captured July 24, 2007. Title: Upper Umpqua Watershed plan Raider-Hubbard stream crossing upgrade project decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2003 2 pp. This action will occur at three of those sites in Section 14, (Rader Creek); and Sections 19, and 20 (Hubbard Creek); T24S R8W. Captured July 24, 2007. Close

• 17. [Article] Dickerson Heights regeneration harvest timber sale environmental assessment

  89 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, illus. The proposed harvest would occur on approximately 150 acres located in Sections 9, 11, 15 and 21 of T. 29 S., R. 7 W., W.M., within the Olalla sixth-field ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Dickerson Heights regeneration harvest timber sale environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 89 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, illus. The proposed harvest would occur on approximately 150 acres located in Sections 9, 11, 15 and 21 of T. 29 S., R. 7 W., W.M., within the Olalla sixth-field subwatershed of the Olalla-Lookingglass fifth-field watershed. Captured July 26, 2007. Title: Dickerson Heights regeneration harvest timber sale environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 89 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, illus. The proposed harvest would occur on approximately 150 acres located in Sections 9, 11, 15 and 21 of T. 29 S., R. 7 W., W.M., within the Olalla sixth-field subwatershed of the Olalla-Lookingglass fifth-field watershed. Captured July 26, 2007. Close

• 18. [Article] Northeast Elk Creek density management environmental assessment

  74 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 27 and 35; T21S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Sections 9, ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Northeast Elk Creek density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 74 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 27 and 35; T21S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Sections 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, and 27; T22S R04W; W.M.; and Section 3; T23S R04W; W.M. Captured February 11, 2009. Title: Northeast Elk Creek density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 74 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 27 and 35; T21S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Sections 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, and 27; T22S R04W; W.M.; and Section 3; T23S R04W; W.M. Captured February 11, 2009. Close

• 19. [Article] Late-successional reserve 261 density management environmental assessment

  122 pp. Tables, figures, references, appendices, maps. Density management would be applied to approximately 665 acres of forest stands within the LSR in the Middle Fork Coquille River, East Fork Coquille ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Late-successional reserve 261 density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 122 pp. Tables, figures, references, appendices, maps. Density management would be applied to approximately 665 acres of forest stands within the LSR in the Middle Fork Coquille River, East Fork Coquille River, and Olalla Creek-Lookingglass Creek fifth-field watersheds; T 28, 29, 30 S, R 8, 9 W. Captured July 25, 2007. Title: Late-successional reserve 261 density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 122 pp. Tables, figures, references, appendices, maps. Density management would be applied to approximately 665 acres of forest stands within the LSR in the Middle Fork Coquille River, East Fork Coquille River, and Olalla Creek-Lookingglass Creek fifth-field watersheds; T 28, 29, 30 S, R 8, 9 W. Captured July 25, 2007. Close

• 20. [Article] Myrtle Creek commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment

  93 pp. References, appendices, maps. T 28 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 4 W. Captured July 26, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Myrtle Creek commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 93 pp. References, appendices, maps. T 28 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 4 W. Captured July 26, 2007. Title: Myrtle Creek commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 93 pp. References, appendices, maps. T 28 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 4 W. Captured July 26, 2007. Close

• 21. [Article] Olalla-Lookingglass LSR density management environmental assessment

  97 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. The acreage would be divided among 17 units comprising two timber sales, to be authorized individually, and designated as Deep Six (located in Section 27, T. ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Olalla-Lookingglass LSR density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 97 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. The acreage would be divided among 17 units comprising two timber sales, to be authorized individually, and designated as Deep Six (located in Section 27, T. 28 S., R. 8 W., W.M.) and Olly Cat (located in Sections 7 and 19, T. 30 S., R. 7 W., W.M.; and Sections 1, 11, 13, and 23, T. 30 S., R. 8 W., W.M.). Captured July 25, 2007. Title: Olalla-Lookingglass LSR density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 97 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. The acreage would be divided among 17 units comprising two timber sales, to be authorized individually, and designated as Deep Six (located in Section 27, T. 28 S., R. 8 W., W.M.) and Olly Cat (located in Sections 7 and 19, T. 30 S., R. 7 W., W.M.; and Sections 1, 11, 13, and 23, T. 30 S., R. 8 W., W.M.). Captured July 25, 2007. Close

• 22. [Article] Myrtle Creek commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact

  5 pp. T 28 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 4 W. Captured July 27, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Myrtle Creek commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2006 5 pp. T 28 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 4 W. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Myrtle Creek commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2006 5 pp. T 28 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 4 W. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 23. [Article] Luts Hedden CT timber sale decision documentation

  8 pp. Tables, maps. T. 22 S., R. 08 W., Sections 17, 18, and 19. Captured January 14, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Luts Hedden CT timber sale decision documentation Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Coos Bay District Year: 2009, 2008 8 pp. Tables, maps. T. 22 S., R. 08 W., Sections 17, 18, and 19. Captured January 14, 2009. Title: Luts Hedden CT timber sale decision documentation Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Coos Bay District Year: 2009, 2008 8 pp. Tables, maps. T. 22 S., R. 08 W., Sections 17, 18, and 19. Captured January 14, 2009. Close

• 24. [Article] Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management decision document

  15 pp. Tables. Sections 14, 23, and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 15 pp. Tables. Sections 14, 23, and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Title: Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 15 pp. Tables. Sections 14, 23, and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Close

• 25. [Article] Engineering road improvement and realignment decision document

  10 pp. Sections 19 and 21; T26S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Engineering road improvement and realignment decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 10 pp. Sections 19 and 21; T26S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Title: Engineering road improvement and realignment decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 10 pp. Sections 19 and 21; T26S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Close

• 26. [Article] Whatagas regeneration harvest decision document

  13 pp. Sections 7, and 19; T25S R3W, and Section 13; T25S R4W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Whatagas regeneration harvest decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2006 13 pp. Sections 7, and 19; T25S R3W, and Section 13; T25S R4W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Title: Whatagas regeneration harvest decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2006 13 pp. Sections 7, and 19; T25S R3W, and Section 13; T25S R4W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Close

• 27. [Article] Engineering improvement and realignment finding of no significant impact

  4 pp. Sections 19 and 21; T26S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Engineering improvement and realignment finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 4 pp. Sections 19 and 21; T26S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Engineering improvement and realignment finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 4 pp. Sections 19 and 21; T26S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 28. [Article] Powell's Bottle commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact

  4 pp. Sections 3, 5, and 9 of T. 25 S., R. 7 W., and Section 33 of T. 24 S., R. 7W. Captured March 7, 2008.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Powell's Bottle commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008 4 pp. Sections 3, 5, and 9 of T. 25 S., R. 7 W., and Section 33 of T. 24 S., R. 7W. Captured March 7, 2008. Title: Powell's Bottle commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008 4 pp. Sections 3, 5, and 9 of T. 25 S., R. 7 W., and Section 33 of T. 24 S., R. 7W. Captured March 7, 2008. Close

• 29. [Article] Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management August 20, 2007 finding of no significant impacts

  5 pp. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management August 20, 2007 finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008 5 pp. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008. Title: Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management August 20, 2007 finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008 5 pp. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008. Close

• 30. [Article] Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management August 21, 2007 finding of no significant impacts

  5 pp. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management August 21, 2007 finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 5 pp. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008. Title: Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management August 21, 2007 finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 5 pp. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008. Close

• 31. [Article] Whatagas regeneration harvest finding of no significant impact

  4 pp. Sections 7, and 19; T25S R3W, and Section 13; T25S R4W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Whatagas regeneration harvest finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2006 4 pp. Sections 7, and 19; T25S R3W, and Section 13; T25S R4W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Whatagas regeneration harvest finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2006 4 pp. Sections 7, and 19; T25S R3W, and Section 13; T25S R4W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 32. [Article] Northeast Elk Creek density management finding of no significant impacts

  3 pp. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 27 and 35; T21S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Sections 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, and 27; T22S R04W; W.M.; ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Northeast Elk Creek density management finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 3 pp. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 27 and 35; T21S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Sections 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, and 27; T22S R04W; W.M.; and Section 3; T23S R04W; W.M. Captured February 11, 2009. Title: Northeast Elk Creek density management finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 3 pp. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 27 and 35; T21S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Sections 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, and 27; T22S R04W; W.M.; and Section 3; T23S R04W; W.M. Captured February 11, 2009. Close

• 33. [Article] Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment

  63 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7 T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 12, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 63 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7 T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 12, 2009. Title: Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 63 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7 T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 12, 2009. Close

• 34. [Article] Dog Bone commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impacts

  4 pp. Sections 17, 18, and 19, T. 26 S., R. 07 W. Captured February 12, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Dog Bone commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 4 pp. Sections 17, 18, and 19, T. 26 S., R. 07 W. Captured February 12, 2009. Title: Dog Bone commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 4 pp. Sections 17, 18, and 19, T. 26 S., R. 07 W. Captured February 12, 2009. Close

• 35. [Article] Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment

  89 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Sections 14, 23 and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 89 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Sections 14, 23 and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007. Title: Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 89 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Sections 14, 23 and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007. Close

• 36. [Article] Purdy Creek DM timber sale decision documentation

  16 pp. Tables, maps. The Purdy Creek DM timber sale, composed of EA units 1A-8, as outlined in the Table below, is part of this EA and is located in T. 21 S., R. 09 W., Section 33 and T. 22 S., R. 09 W., ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Purdy Creek DM timber sale decision documentation Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Coos Bay District Year: 2008 16 pp. Tables, maps. The Purdy Creek DM timber sale, composed of EA units 1A-8, as outlined in the Table below, is part of this EA and is located in T. 21 S., R. 09 W., Section 33 and T. 22 S., R. 09 W., Sections 03, 04, 05, & 09, Willamette Meridian. Captured July 1, 2008. Title: Purdy Creek DM timber sale decision documentation Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Coos Bay District Year: 2008 16 pp. Tables, maps. The Purdy Creek DM timber sale, composed of EA units 1A-8, as outlined in the Table below, is part of this EA and is located in T. 21 S., R. 09 W., Section 33 and T. 22 S., R. 09 W., Sections 03, 04, 05, & 09, Willamette Meridian. Captured July 1, 2008. Close

• 37. [Article] Slater Rocks Environmental Assessment and finding of no significant impact

  119 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. 29 S, 9 W, Sections 9, 21, 29, 31, and 33; 29 S, 10 W, Section 35; 30 S, 9 W, Sections 5, 7, 17, 21, 33; 30 S, 10 W, Sections 9, and 15. Captured July 1, 2...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Slater Rocks Environmental Assessment and finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Coos Bay District Year: 2008 119 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. 29 S, 9 W, Sections 9, 21, 29, 31, and 33; 29 S, 10 W, Section 35; 30 S, 9 W, Sections 5, 7, 17, 21, 33; 30 S, 10 W, Sections 9, and 15. Captured July 1, 2008. Title: Slater Rocks Environmental Assessment and finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Coos Bay District Year: 2008 119 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. 29 S, 9 W, Sections 9, 21, 29, 31, and 33; 29 S, 10 W, Section 35; 30 S, 9 W, Sections 5, 7, 17, 21, 33; 30 S, 10 W, Sections 9, and 15. Captured July 1, 2008. Close

• 38. [Article] Elkhead commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment

  84 pp. Tables, references, appendices. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 7, 15, 19, 23, and 35; T23S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Section ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elkhead commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008 84 pp. Tables, references, appendices. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 7, 15, 19, 23, and 35; T23S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Section 13; T23S R05W; W.M.; and Section 3; T24S R04W; W.M. Captured July 7, 2008. Title: Elkhead commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008 84 pp. Tables, references, appendices. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 7, 15, 19, 23, and 35; T23S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Section 13; T23S R05W; W.M.; and Section 3; T24S R04W; W.M. Captured July 7, 2008. Close

• 39. [Article] Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment

  93 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Section 27; T21S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 93 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Section 27; T21S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007. Title: Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 93 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Section 27; T21S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007. Close

• 40. [Article] Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project 2001 environmental assessment

  17 pp. Table, references. Sections 2, and 35, T24S R1W; Section 36, T24S R2W; Sections 2, 3, 18, and 22, T25S R1W; Sections 15, 28 and 30, T25S R2W; Section 36, T25S R3W; and Section 1, T25S R8W; W.M. ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project 2001 environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2001 17 pp. Table, references. Sections 2, and 35, T24S R1W; Section 36, T24S R2W; Sections 2, 3, 18, and 22, T25S R1W; Sections 15, 28 and 30, T25S R2W; Section 36, T25S R3W; and Section 1, T25S R8W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project 2001 environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2001 17 pp. Table, references. Sections 2, and 35, T24S R1W; Section 36, T24S R2W; Sections 2, 3, 18, and 22, T25S R1W; Sections 15, 28 and 30, T25S R2W; Section 36, T25S R3W; and Section 1, T25S R8W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 41. [Article] Olalla-Lookingglass LSR density management finding of no significant impact

  5 pp. The units are located in: Section 27, T. 28 S., R. 8 W., W.M.; Sections 7 and 19, T. 30 S., R. 7 W., W.M.; and Sections 1, 11, 13, and 23, T. 30 S., R. 8 W., W.M. Captured July 27, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Olalla-Lookingglass LSR density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 5 pp. The units are located in: Section 27, T. 28 S., R. 8 W., W.M.; Sections 7 and 19, T. 30 S., R. 7 W., W.M.; and Sections 1, 11, 13, and 23, T. 30 S., R. 8 W., W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Olalla-Lookingglass LSR density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 5 pp. The units are located in: Section 27, T. 28 S., R. 8 W., W.M.; Sections 7 and 19, T. 30 S., R. 7 W., W.M.; and Sections 1, 11, 13, and 23, T. 30 S., R. 8 W., W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 42. [Article] Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan

  The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Calapooya Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999), the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000), and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Title: Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Calapooya Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999), the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000), and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Close

• 43. [Article] Deer Creek Watershed assessment and action plan

  The Deer Creek Watershed Assessment process has been followed by a group of local landowners. The organization of this document was constructed as a combination of the informational needs of the Deer Creek ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Deer Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Kincaid, Heidi The Deer Creek Watershed Assessment process has been followed by a group of local landowners. The organization of this document was constructed as a combination of the informational needs of the Deer Creek landowners and the framework of the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual. The group has met twelve times to review the data going into the document, followed by three meetings to review the assessment and develop the action plan. Members of the Deer Creek landowner group represented sheep ranches, cattle ranches, industry within Deer Creek, the City of Roseburg, private industrial timber companies, city residents, rural residents, the UBWC, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), the Douglas Soil and Water Conservation District (DSWCD), and the Douglas Small Woodlands Association. Title: Deer Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Kincaid, Heidi The Deer Creek Watershed Assessment process has been followed by a group of local landowners. The organization of this document was constructed as a combination of the informational needs of the Deer Creek landowners and the framework of the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual. The group has met twelve times to review the data going into the document, followed by three meetings to review the assessment and develop the action plan. Members of the Deer Creek landowner group represented sheep ranches, cattle ranches, industry within Deer Creek, the City of Roseburg, private industrial timber companies, city residents, rural residents, the UBWC, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), the Douglas Soil and Water Conservation District (DSWCD), and the Douglas Small Woodlands Association. Close

• 44. [Article] South River watershed restoration environmental assessment

  64 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, figures. Sections 26, 27, T 29 S, R 9 W; Section 33, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 27, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 13, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 22, T 30 S, R 3 W; Section ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: South River watershed restoration environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2000 64 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, figures. Sections 26, 27, T 29 S, R 9 W; Section 33, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 27, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 13, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 22, T 30 S, R 3 W; Section 2, T 31 S, R 6 W; Section 10, T 31 S, R 3 W; Section 1, T 29 S, R 8 W; Section 3, T 9 S, R 8 W; Section 3, T 30 S, R 7 W; Sections 10, 14, T 31 S, R 5 W; Section 23, T 29 S, R 4 W; Section 33, T 28 S, R 3 W. Captured July 26, 2007. Title: South River watershed restoration environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2000 64 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, figures. Sections 26, 27, T 29 S, R 9 W; Section 33, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 27, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 13, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 22, T 30 S, R 3 W; Section 2, T 31 S, R 6 W; Section 10, T 31 S, R 3 W; Section 1, T 29 S, R 8 W; Section 3, T 9 S, R 8 W; Section 3, T 30 S, R 7 W; Sections 10, 14, T 31 S, R 5 W; Section 23, T 29 S, R 4 W; Section 33, T 28 S, R 3 W. Captured July 26, 2007. Close

• 45. [Article] Saddle up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management decision document

  17 pp. Tables, map. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Saddle up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 17 pp. Tables, map. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008. Title: Saddle up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 17 pp. Tables, map. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008. Close

• 46. [Image] Final supplemental environmental impact statement: for clarification of language in the 1994 record of decision for the Northwest Forest Plan; national forests and Bureau of Land Management districts within the range of the northern spotted owl: proposal to amend wording about the aquatic conservation strategy

  	Abstract The Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior propose limited changes to language about how to demonstrate that projects follow the Aquatic Conservation Strategy, part of the Northwest Forest ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Final supplemental environmental impact statement: for clarification of language in the 1994 record of decision for the Northwest Forest Plan; national forests and Bureau of Land Management districts within the range of the northern spotted owl: proposal to amend wording about the aquatic conservation strategy Author: United States. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service; United States. Department of the Interior. Bureau of Land Managemen Year: 2003, 2006, 2005 Abstract The Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior propose limited changes to language about how to demonstrate that projects follow the Aquatic Conservation Strategy, part of the Northwest Forest Plan. Projects needed to achieve Northwest Forest Plan goals have been delayed or stopped due to misapplication of certain passages in the Aquatic Conservation Strategy. The agencies are responding to the underlying need for increased agency success planning and implementing projects, to the extent that the current wording has hindered the agencies ability to follow Northwest Forest Plan principles and achieve its goals. The goals of the Northwest Forest Plan cannot be achieved without project implementation. Three alternatives are considered in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, No Action, the Proposed Action, and Alternative A. No Action would not change existing language within the Aquatic Conservation Strategy. The Proposed Action and Alternative A would make l Title: Final supplemental environmental impact statement: for clarification of language in the 1994 record of decision for the Northwest Forest Plan; national forests and Bureau of Land Management districts within the range of the northern spotted owl: proposal to amend wording about the aquatic conservation strategy Author: United States. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service; United States. Department of the Interior. Bureau of Land Managemen Year: 2003, 2006, 2005 Abstract The Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior propose limited changes to language about how to demonstrate that projects follow the Aquatic Conservation Strategy, part of the Northwest Forest Plan. Projects needed to achieve Northwest Forest Plan goals have been delayed or stopped due to misapplication of certain passages in the Aquatic Conservation Strategy. The agencies are responding to the underlying need for increased agency success planning and implementing projects, to the extent that the current wording has hindered the agencies ability to follow Northwest Forest Plan principles and achieve its goals. The goals of the Northwest Forest Plan cannot be achieved without project implementation. Three alternatives are considered in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, No Action, the Proposed Action, and Alternative A. No Action would not change existing language within the Aquatic Conservation Strategy. The Proposed Action and Alternative A would make l Close

• 47. [Image] Annual program summary 2004

  	Annual Program Summary and Monitoring Report - FY2004 Table of Contents ANNUAL PROGRAM SUMMARY 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Summary of Accomplishments 3 3.0 Budget and Employment 6 4.0 Land ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual program summary 2004 Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office District Year: 2005 Annual Program Summary and Monitoring Report - FY2004 Table of Contents ANNUAL PROGRAM SUMMARY 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Summary of Accomplishments 3 3.0 Budget and Employment 6 4.0 Land Use Allocations within the Klamath Falls Resource Area 6 Late-Successional Reserves and Assessments 8 Matrix 8 5.0 Aquatic Conservation Strategy 9 Riparian Reserves 9 Watershed Analysis and Key Watersheds 9 Watershed Restoration 10 Roads 10 Riparian Habitat Enhancement 10 Stream Restoration 11 6.0 Air Quality 11 7.0 Water and Soils 11 Water - Project Implementation 11 Soils - Project Implementation 12 Water - Inventory and Monitoring 12 Soils -Inventory and Monitoring 13 State-listed Clean Water Act 303d Streams 13 RMP Best Management Practices 13 8.0 Terrestrial Species and Habitat Management 14 Survey and Manage Species 14 Threatened/Endangered Species 14 Northern Spotted Owl 14 Bald Eagle 14 Special Status Species-Animals 15 Peregrine Falcon 15 Yellow Rails 15 Bats 15 Northern Goshawk 15 Oregon Spotted Frog 15 Sage Grouse 16 vii Klamath Falls Resource Area Mollusks 16 Great Gray Owl 16 Special Status Species - Plants 16 Other Species of Concern 17 Neotropical Migratory Landbirds 17 Terrestrial Habitat Management 17 Nest Sites, Activity Centers, and Rookeries 17 Big Game Habitat 19 9.0 Aquatic Species and Habitat Management 19 Threatened/Endangered Species 19 Lost River and Shortnose Suckers 19 Bull Trout 20 Endangered Species Act Consultation 20 Aquatic Habitat Restoration 20 Klamath River Hydroelectric Facility Relicensing 21 10.0 Pathogen, Disease, and Pest Management 21 11.0 Weed Management 22 Inventories 22 Control 22 12.0 Special Areas/Management 23 Wild and Scenic Rivers 23 Wilderness 23 Areas of Critical Environmental Concern 23 Tunnel Creek Special Botanical Area 24 Klamath Canyon ACEC 24 Old Baldy Research Natural Area 24 Wood River Wetland ACEC 24 Environmental Education Areas 25 13.0 Cultural Resources 26 14.0 Visual Resources 26 15.0 Rural Interface Areas 26 16.0 Socioeconomic Conditions 27 Jobs-in-the-Woods 28 17.0 Environmental Justice 30 18.0 Recreation 30 Recreation Pipeline Restoration Funds 30 Recreation Projects 31 viii Annual Program Summary and Monitoring Report - FY2004 Recreation Fee Demonstration Project 31 Status of Recreation Plans 32 Volunteer Activities 32 Tourism 33 19.0 Forest Management and Timber Resources 33 Silvicultural Prescriptions 33 Timber Sale Planning 34 FY 2004 Timber Sale Accomplishments 34 Status of Sold & Awarded Klamath Falls RMP Timber Sales 35 Forest Development Activities 39 Stewardship Contracting 42 20.0 Special Forest Products 42 21.0 Energy and Minerals 43 22.0 Land Tenure Adjustments 44 23.0 Access and Rights-of-Way 45 24.0 Transportation and Roads 45 25.0 Hazardous Materials 46 26.0 Wildfire/Fuels Management 46 27.0 Law Enforcement 47 28.0 Rangeland Resources / Grazing Management 48 Fiscal Year 2004 Summary 49 Fiscal Years 1996-2004 Summary 50 Wild Horse Management 51 29.0 Cadastral Survey 52 30.0 Education and Outreach 52 31.0 Research 56 32.0 Coordination and Consultation 58 Federal Agencies 58 State of Oregon 58 Counties 59 Cities 59 Tribes 59 IX Klamath Falls Resource Area Watershed Councils 59 Chartered Advisory Groups 60 Other Local Coordination and Cooperation 61 33.0 National Environmental Policy Act Analysis and Documentation 63 NEPA documentation 63 Klamath Falls Resource Area Environmental Documentation 63 Protests and Appeals 63 34.0 Plan Evaluations 64 Third Year Evaluation 64 Eighth Year Evaluation 64 35.0 Plan Maintenance 65 36.0 Plan Amendments 72 Plan Revision 76 MONITORING REPORT Introduction 79 All Land Use Allocations 83 Late-Successional Reserves 86 Matrix 88 Riparian Reserves 92 Air Quality 95 Water and Soils 96 Terrestrial Species Habitat 101 Special Status and SEIS Special Attention Species Habitat 106 Aquatic Species Habitat 110 Noxious Weeds 112 Special Areas 113 Wild and Scenic Rivers 115 Cultural Resources Including American Indian Values 116 Visual Resources 118 Rural Interface Areas 119 Socioeconomic Conditions 120 Recreation 121 Forest Management and Timber Resources 121 Special Forest/Natural Products 122 Wildfire / Fuels Management 124 Rangeland Resources / Grazing Management 124 GLOSSARY/ACRONYMS 129 Annual Program Summary and Monitoring Report - FY2004 List of Tables Table 2.1 - Summary of Resource Management Actions, Directions, and Accomplishments 4 Table 2.1 - Summary of Resource Management Actions, Directions, and Accomplishments (Cont.).5 Table 3.1 - Resource Area Budget Fiscal Year 2004 6 Table 4.1 - Land Use Allocation 8 Table 5.1 - Watershed Analysis Schedule 10 Table 5.2-Watershed Analysis Status Fiscal Year 2004 10 Table 6.1 -Air Quality Management Fiscal Year 2004 11 Table 7.1 - Watershed Activity Fiscal Year 2004 12 Table 7.2 - KFRA Clean Water Act 303(d) Water Bodies 13 Table 8.1a - BLM /KFRA Special Status Species Designations Summary -Animals 18 Table 8.1b - BLM (KFRA) Special Status Species Designations Summary - Plants 18 Table 8.2 - Terrestrial Habitat Monitoring Fiscal Year 2004 18 Table 8.3 - Monitoring for Nest Sites, Activity Centers, Rookeries, Special Habitats 18 Table 9.1 -Aquatic Habitat/ Fish Passage Management Fiscal Year 2004 19 Table 11.1 - Managed Weed Species 20 Table 12.1 - Special Management Areas 25 Table 13.1 - Cultural Resources Management Fiscal Year 2004 26 Table 16.1 - Total Payments in Lieu of Taxes and Acres by County for FY 2004 28 Table 16.2 - O&C Payments To Counties FY 2004 29 Table 16.3 - Jobs in the Woods Program Fiscal Year 2004 29 Table 18.1 - Recreation Statistics Fiscal Year 2004 30 Table 18.2 - Recreation Fee Demonstration Project Fiscal Year 2004 32 Table 19.1 - Klamath Falls Timber Sale Volume (MBF) and Acres FY 2004 35 Table 19.2-Timber Volume Sold in FY 2004 36 Table 19.3 - Harvest Activity for FY 2004 36 Table 19.4 - Planned Timber Sales (FY 2005 & 2006) 36 Table 19.5 - Status of Sold and Awarded Timber Sales 37 Table 19.6 - Summary of Volume Sold 38 Table 19.7 -Volume and Acres Sold by Allocations 38 Table 19.8 - Timber Sales Sold by Harvest Types 38 Table 19.9 - Timber Sale Acres Sold by Age Class 39 Table 19.10 - Forest Development Activities 41 Table 20.1 - Special Forest Products Fiscal Year 2004 43 Table 21.1 - Energy and Minerals Management Fiscal Year 2004 44 Table 22.1 - Land Use Tenure Adjustments Fiscal Year 2004 45 Table 24.1 - Roads and Transportation Management Fiscal Year 2004 45 Table 25.1 - Hazardous Materials Management Fiscal Year 2004 46 Table 26.1 - Fire and Fuels Management Fiscal Year 2004 46 Table 27.1 - Law Enforcement Fiscal Year 2004 47 Table 28.1 - Range Resources Management Fiscal Year 2004 48 Table 29.1 -Cadastral Survey Summary Fiscal Year 2004 52 Table 30.1 - Environmental Education/Outreach Program Summary FY2004 54 Table 30.2 - Environmental Education/Outreach Special Events FY2004 55 Table 30.3 - Environmental Education/Outreach Programs & Tours FY 2004 56 Table 32.1 - Challenge Cost Share Fiscal Year 2004 62 XI Klamath Falls Resource Area Table 33.1 - NEPA Analyses and Documentation Fiscal Year 2004 64 Table 36.1 - Redefined Survey and Manage Categories 74 Table M.I - Projects Monitored FY 2004 80 Table M-2 - FY 2004 Implementation Monitoring Selection Categories 81 Table M-3 - Comparison of Projected vs. Actual Harvest Volume (MMBF)/Acres to Date 82 Table M-4 - Timber Sale Volume and Acres Offered (Entire Resource Area) 83 Table M-5 - Timber Sale Monitoring Summary 89 Table M-6 - Post Treatment Stand Characteristics for West Grenada Timber Sale - FY 2004 90 Table M-7 - Status of Watershed Analysis 98 List of Figures Figure 1 - General Location Map 2 Figure 2 - KFRA Land Allocations 7 Xll Title: Annual program summary 2004 Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office District Year: 2005 Annual Program Summary and Monitoring Report - FY2004 Table of Contents ANNUAL PROGRAM SUMMARY 1.0 Introduction 3 2.0 Summary of Accomplishments 3 3.0 Budget and Employment 6 4.0 Land Use Allocations within the Klamath Falls Resource Area 6 Late-Successional Reserves and Assessments 8 Matrix 8 5.0 Aquatic Conservation Strategy 9 Riparian Reserves 9 Watershed Analysis and Key Watersheds 9 Watershed Restoration 10 Roads 10 Riparian Habitat Enhancement 10 Stream Restoration 11 6.0 Air Quality 11 7.0 Water and Soils 11 Water - Project Implementation 11 Soils - Project Implementation 12 Water - Inventory and Monitoring 12 Soils -Inventory and Monitoring 13 State-listed Clean Water Act 303d Streams 13 RMP Best Management Practices 13 8.0 Terrestrial Species and Habitat Management 14 Survey and Manage Species 14 Threatened/Endangered Species 14 Northern Spotted Owl 14 Bald Eagle 14 Special Status Species-Animals 15 Peregrine Falcon 15 Yellow Rails 15 Bats 15 Northern Goshawk 15 Oregon Spotted Frog 15 Sage Grouse 16 vii Klamath Falls Resource Area Mollusks 16 Great Gray Owl 16 Special Status Species - Plants 16 Other Species of Concern 17 Neotropical Migratory Landbirds 17 Terrestrial Habitat Management 17 Nest Sites, Activity Centers, and Rookeries 17 Big Game Habitat 19 9.0 Aquatic Species and Habitat Management 19 Threatened/Endangered Species 19 Lost River and Shortnose Suckers 19 Bull Trout 20 Endangered Species Act Consultation 20 Aquatic Habitat Restoration 20 Klamath River Hydroelectric Facility Relicensing 21 10.0 Pathogen, Disease, and Pest Management 21 11.0 Weed Management 22 Inventories 22 Control 22 12.0 Special Areas/Management 23 Wild and Scenic Rivers 23 Wilderness 23 Areas of Critical Environmental Concern 23 Tunnel Creek Special Botanical Area 24 Klamath Canyon ACEC 24 Old Baldy Research Natural Area 24 Wood River Wetland ACEC 24 Environmental Education Areas 25 13.0 Cultural Resources 26 14.0 Visual Resources 26 15.0 Rural Interface Areas 26 16.0 Socioeconomic Conditions 27 Jobs-in-the-Woods 28 17.0 Environmental Justice 30 18.0 Recreation 30 Recreation Pipeline Restoration Funds 30 Recreation Projects 31 viii Annual Program Summary and Monitoring Report - FY2004 Recreation Fee Demonstration Project 31 Status of Recreation Plans 32 Volunteer Activities 32 Tourism 33 19.0 Forest Management and Timber Resources 33 Silvicultural Prescriptions 33 Timber Sale Planning 34 FY 2004 Timber Sale Accomplishments 34 Status of Sold & Awarded Klamath Falls RMP Timber Sales 35 Forest Development Activities 39 Stewardship Contracting 42 20.0 Special Forest Products 42 21.0 Energy and Minerals 43 22.0 Land Tenure Adjustments 44 23.0 Access and Rights-of-Way 45 24.0 Transportation and Roads 45 25.0 Hazardous Materials 46 26.0 Wildfire/Fuels Management 46 27.0 Law Enforcement 47 28.0 Rangeland Resources / Grazing Management 48 Fiscal Year 2004 Summary 49 Fiscal Years 1996-2004 Summary 50 Wild Horse Management 51 29.0 Cadastral Survey 52 30.0 Education and Outreach 52 31.0 Research 56 32.0 Coordination and Consultation 58 Federal Agencies 58 State of Oregon 58 Counties 59 Cities 59 Tribes 59 IX Klamath Falls Resource Area Watershed Councils 59 Chartered Advisory Groups 60 Other Local Coordination and Cooperation 61 33.0 National Environmental Policy Act Analysis and Documentation 63 NEPA documentation 63 Klamath Falls Resource Area Environmental Documentation 63 Protests and Appeals 63 34.0 Plan Evaluations 64 Third Year Evaluation 64 Eighth Year Evaluation 64 35.0 Plan Maintenance 65 36.0 Plan Amendments 72 Plan Revision 76 MONITORING REPORT Introduction 79 All Land Use Allocations 83 Late-Successional Reserves 86 Matrix 88 Riparian Reserves 92 Air Quality 95 Water and Soils 96 Terrestrial Species Habitat 101 Special Status and SEIS Special Attention Species Habitat 106 Aquatic Species Habitat 110 Noxious Weeds 112 Special Areas 113 Wild and Scenic Rivers 115 Cultural Resources Including American Indian Values 116 Visual Resources 118 Rural Interface Areas 119 Socioeconomic Conditions 120 Recreation 121 Forest Management and Timber Resources 121 Special Forest/Natural Products 122 Wildfire / Fuels Management 124 Rangeland Resources / Grazing Management 124 GLOSSARY/ACRONYMS 129 Annual Program Summary and Monitoring Report - FY2004 List of Tables Table 2.1 - Summary of Resource Management Actions, Directions, and Accomplishments 4 Table 2.1 - Summary of Resource Management Actions, Directions, and Accomplishments (Cont.).5 Table 3.1 - Resource Area Budget Fiscal Year 2004 6 Table 4.1 - Land Use Allocation 8 Table 5.1 - Watershed Analysis Schedule 10 Table 5.2-Watershed Analysis Status Fiscal Year 2004 10 Table 6.1 -Air Quality Management Fiscal Year 2004 11 Table 7.1 - Watershed Activity Fiscal Year 2004 12 Table 7.2 - KFRA Clean Water Act 303(d) Water Bodies 13 Table 8.1a - BLM /KFRA Special Status Species Designations Summary -Animals 18 Table 8.1b - BLM (KFRA) Special Status Species Designations Summary - Plants 18 Table 8.2 - Terrestrial Habitat Monitoring Fiscal Year 2004 18 Table 8.3 - Monitoring for Nest Sites, Activity Centers, Rookeries, Special Habitats 18 Table 9.1 -Aquatic Habitat/ Fish Passage Management Fiscal Year 2004 19 Table 11.1 - Managed Weed Species 20 Table 12.1 - Special Management Areas 25 Table 13.1 - Cultural Resources Management Fiscal Year 2004 26 Table 16.1 - Total Payments in Lieu of Taxes and Acres by County for FY 2004 28 Table 16.2 - O&C Payments To Counties FY 2004 29 Table 16.3 - Jobs in the Woods Program Fiscal Year 2004 29 Table 18.1 - Recreation Statistics Fiscal Year 2004 30 Table 18.2 - Recreation Fee Demonstration Project Fiscal Year 2004 32 Table 19.1 - Klamath Falls Timber Sale Volume (MBF) and Acres FY 2004 35 Table 19.2-Timber Volume Sold in FY 2004 36 Table 19.3 - Harvest Activity for FY 2004 36 Table 19.4 - Planned Timber Sales (FY 2005 & 2006) 36 Table 19.5 - Status of Sold and Awarded Timber Sales 37 Table 19.6 - Summary of Volume Sold 38 Table 19.7 -Volume and Acres Sold by Allocations 38 Table 19.8 - Timber Sales Sold by Harvest Types 38 Table 19.9 - Timber Sale Acres Sold by Age Class 39 Table 19.10 - Forest Development Activities 41 Table 20.1 - Special Forest Products Fiscal Year 2004 43 Table 21.1 - Energy and Minerals Management Fiscal Year 2004 44 Table 22.1 - Land Use Tenure Adjustments Fiscal Year 2004 45 Table 24.1 - Roads and Transportation Management Fiscal Year 2004 45 Table 25.1 - Hazardous Materials Management Fiscal Year 2004 46 Table 26.1 - Fire and Fuels Management Fiscal Year 2004 46 Table 27.1 - Law Enforcement Fiscal Year 2004 47 Table 28.1 - Range Resources Management Fiscal Year 2004 48 Table 29.1 -Cadastral Survey Summary Fiscal Year 2004 52 Table 30.1 - Environmental Education/Outreach Program Summary FY2004 54 Table 30.2 - Environmental Education/Outreach Special Events FY2004 55 Table 30.3 - Environmental Education/Outreach Programs & Tours FY 2004 56 Table 32.1 - Challenge Cost Share Fiscal Year 2004 62 XI Klamath Falls Resource Area Table 33.1 - NEPA Analyses and Documentation Fiscal Year 2004 64 Table 36.1 - Redefined Survey and Manage Categories 74 Table M.I - Projects Monitored FY 2004 80 Table M-2 - FY 2004 Implementation Monitoring Selection Categories 81 Table M-3 - Comparison of Projected vs. Actual Harvest Volume (MMBF)/Acres to Date 82 Table M-4 - Timber Sale Volume and Acres Offered (Entire Resource Area) 83 Table M-5 - Timber Sale Monitoring Summary 89 Table M-6 - Post Treatment Stand Characteristics for West Grenada Timber Sale - FY 2004 90 Table M-7 - Status of Watershed Analysis 98 List of Figures Figure 1 - General Location Map 2 Figure 2 - KFRA Land Allocations 7 Xll Close

• 48. [Image] Gerber-Willow Valley Watershed Analysis

  	x, 386 p., ill., maps (some col.); Cover title; "July 2003"
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber-Willow Valley Watershed Analysis Author: U.S. Department of the Interior. Bureau of Land Management; Klamath Falls Resource Area Office; U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service; Fremont-Winema National Forests; Modoc National Forest Year: 2003, 2006, 2005 x, 386 p., ill., maps (some col.); Cover title; "July 2003" Title: Gerber-Willow Valley Watershed Analysis Author: U.S. Department of the Interior. Bureau of Land Management; Klamath Falls Resource Area Office; U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service; Fremont-Winema National Forests; Modoc National Forest Year: 2003, 2006, 2005 x, 386 p., ill., maps (some col.); Cover title; "July 2003" Close

• 49. [Image] Klamath Falls Resource Area resource management plan and environmental impact statement : final : Volume 1

  	Proposed resource management plan/final environmental impact statement for the Klamath Falls Resource Area
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Klamath Falls Resource Area resource management plan and environmental impact statement : final : Volume 1 Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office Year: 1994, 2005, 2004 Proposed resource management plan/final environmental impact statement for the Klamath Falls Resource Area Title: Klamath Falls Resource Area resource management plan and environmental impact statement : final : Volume 1 Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office Year: 1994, 2005, 2004 Proposed resource management plan/final environmental impact statement for the Klamath Falls Resource Area Close

• 50. [Article] Powder River-Powder Valley Watershed Assessment

  Abstract -- The area covered by this watershed assessment is a scenic region containing a wealth of I resources. Those resources include wildlife, scenery, fisheries, clean water, mineral deposits, forests, ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Powder River-Powder Valley Watershed Assessment Abstract -- The area covered by this watershed assessment is a scenic region containing a wealth of I resources. Those resources include wildlife, scenery, fisheries, clean water, mineral deposits, forests, productive farmland, and people. The Powder River-Powder Valley Watershed Assessment is a compilation of existing information on three fifth field HUC's, minus 12,800acre HUC6 below Thief Valley Reservoir. The watershed encompasses approximately 300,000 acres. Title: Powder River-Powder Valley Watershed Assessment Abstract -- The area covered by this watershed assessment is a scenic region containing a wealth of I resources. Those resources include wildlife, scenery, fisheries, clean water, mineral deposits, forests, productive farmland, and people. The Powder River-Powder Valley Watershed Assessment is a compilation of existing information on three fifth field HUC's, minus 12,800acre HUC6 below Thief Valley Reservoir. The watershed encompasses approximately 300,000 acres. Close