Search

Search Results

• 21. [Article] Glaze Forest restoration project environmental assessment

  306 pp. Maps, tables, references, illus. T14S, R9E, sections 10, 11, 14 and 15. Captured July 9, 2008.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Glaze Forest restoration project environmental assessment Author: Sisters Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008 306 pp. Maps, tables, references, illus. T14S, R9E, sections 10, 11, 14 and 15. Captured July 9, 2008. Title: Glaze Forest restoration project environmental assessment Author: Sisters Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008 306 pp. Maps, tables, references, illus. T14S, R9E, sections 10, 11, 14 and 15. Captured July 9, 2008. Close

• 22. [Article] Glaze Forest restoration project decision notice and response to public comments

  50 pp. Maps, tables, references, illus. T14S, R9E, Sections 10,11,14,15. Captured July 9, 2008.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Glaze Forest restoration project decision notice and response to public comments Author: Sisters Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008 50 pp. Maps, tables, references, illus. T14S, R9E, Sections 10,11,14,15. Captured July 9, 2008. Title: Glaze Forest restoration project decision notice and response to public comments Author: Sisters Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008 50 pp. Maps, tables, references, illus. T14S, R9E, Sections 10,11,14,15. Captured July 9, 2008. Close

• 23. [Article] Clover Creek restoration

  This project included 8 miles of fencing, 18 stock water tanks, 10 acres of riparian planting, 1 hardened crossing and 1 culvert crossing. Six landowners participated in the project.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Clover Creek restoration Author: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers This project included 8 miles of fencing, 18 stock water tanks, 10 acres of riparian planting, 1 hardened crossing and 1 culvert crossing. Six landowners participated in the project. Title: Clover Creek restoration Author: Partnership for the Umpqua Rivers This project included 8 miles of fencing, 18 stock water tanks, 10 acres of riparian planting, 1 hardened crossing and 1 culvert crossing. Six landowners participated in the project. Close

• 24. [Article] Oregon Conservation Strategy Habitats

  Abstract -- This dataset represents the extent and distribution of the habitats prioritized within the Oregon Conservation Strategy. Strategy Habitats are identified by ecoregion, and as such are only ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Oregon Conservation Strategy Habitats Abstract -- This dataset represents the extent and distribution of the habitats prioritized within the Oregon Conservation Strategy. Strategy Habitats are identified by ecoregion, and as such are only mapped within their associated Strategy Ecoregions (see http://oregonconservationstrategy.org/strategy-habitats/ for more information on all Strategy Habitats). The list of Strategy Habitats is: Aspen Woodlands, Coastal Dunes, Estuaries, Flowing Water and Riparian Habitats, Grasslands, Late Successional Mixed Conifer Forest, Natural Lakes, Oak Woodlands, Ponderosa Pine Woodlands, Sagebrush Habitats, and Wetlands. Title: Oregon Conservation Strategy Habitats Abstract -- This dataset represents the extent and distribution of the habitats prioritized within the Oregon Conservation Strategy. Strategy Habitats are identified by ecoregion, and as such are only mapped within their associated Strategy Ecoregions (see http://oregonconservationstrategy.org/strategy-habitats/ for more information on all Strategy Habitats). The list of Strategy Habitats is: Aspen Woodlands, Coastal Dunes, Estuaries, Flowing Water and Riparian Habitats, Grasslands, Late Successional Mixed Conifer Forest, Natural Lakes, Oak Woodlands, Ponderosa Pine Woodlands, Sagebrush Habitats, and Wetlands. Close

• 25. [Article] Floodplain Habitat Metric: User’s Guide

  The metric is encompassed in two documents, this Floodplain Habitat Metric User’s Guide and a Floodplain Habitat Calculator.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Floodplain Habitat Metric: User’s Guide Author: Defenders of Wildlife The metric is encompassed in two documents, this Floodplain Habitat Metric User’s Guide and a Floodplain Habitat Calculator. Title: Floodplain Habitat Metric: User’s Guide Author: Defenders of Wildlife The metric is encompassed in two documents, this Floodplain Habitat Metric User’s Guide and a Floodplain Habitat Calculator. Close

• 26. [Article] The Effects of Tide Gates on Estuarine Habitats and Migratory Fish

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: The Effects of Tide Gates on Estuarine Habitats and Migratory Fish Author: Souder, Jon A., Giannico, Guillermo R. Title: The Effects of Tide Gates on Estuarine Habitats and Migratory Fish Author: Souder, Jon A., Giannico, Guillermo R. Close

• 27. [Article] Benefits and costs of riparian habitat improvement in the Tualatin River Basin

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Benefits and costs of riparian habitat improvement in the Tualatin River Basin Author: Knoder, Erik, Oregon State University. Water Resources Research Institute Title: Benefits and costs of riparian habitat improvement in the Tualatin River Basin Author: Knoder, Erik, Oregon State University. Water Resources Research Institute Close

• 28. [Article] Biennial report--The Oregon Plan for salmon and watersheds 2003-2005 synopsis

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Biennial report--The Oregon Plan for salmon and watersheds 2003-2005 synopsis Author: Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds Title: Biennial report--The Oregon Plan for salmon and watersheds 2003-2005 synopsis Author: Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds Close

• 29. [Article] Studies of plant establishment limitations in wetlands of the Willamette Valley, Oregon

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Studies of plant establishment limitations in wetlands of the Willamette Valley, Oregon Author: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station Title: Studies of plant establishment limitations in wetlands of the Willamette Valley, Oregon Author: U.S. Army Corps of Engineers Waterways Experiment Station Close

• 30. [Article] The Influence of Riparian Habitat and Microhabitat Selection on Fish Assemblaqe Structure in the Upper John Day Basin, Oreqon

  Fish assemblage structure was determined along a longitudinal gradient for three drainages in the upper John Day basin: Middle Fork, South Fork, and upper Mainstem proper. One or two tributaries in each ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: The Influence of Riparian Habitat and Microhabitat Selection on Fish Assemblaqe Structure in the Upper John Day Basin, Oreqon Author: Leitzinger, Eric J. Fish assemblage structure was determined along a longitudinal gradient for three drainages in the upper John Day basin: Middle Fork, South Fork, and upper Mainstem proper. One or two tributaries in each drainage were included. Where possible, sites were paired: those with good versus those with poor riparian habitat. Detrended correspondence analysis was used to determine how the assemblages were structured and to determine which environmental variables influenced that structure. Two assemblages resulted: a warmwater assemblage dominated by speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus), redside shiners (Richardsonius balteatus), northern squawfish (Ptychocheilus oreqonensis), and suckers (Catostomus spp.); and a coldwater assemblage dominated by juvenile steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), but also containing mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni), piute sculpins (Cottus beldingi), and other salmonids. This coldwater assemblage had two distinct components: the chinook component and the steelhead component. The chinook component was concentrated in the mid-elevation reaches of the Mainstem and the Middle Fork, between the steelhead component and the warmwater assemblage. The primary physical gradient on which all assemblages aligned was an elevation/stream size gradient. A secondary gradient consisted of various riparian habitat and bank condition variables. Generally, riparian habitat improved moving toward the headwaters. Microhabitat use was compared for salmonids within a habitat type (i.e. pools, riffles, and runs) for mainstem and tributary streams. It was also compared for the same age classes and species between stream types (mainstem versus tributary). Finally, microhabitat selection (versus availability) was examined for significant differences between microhabitat available and that selected. Different age classes of steelhead and juvenile chinook salmon used different microhabitats in the same habitat type. These did not change significantly between habitats or stream type. All groups selected microhabitats that varied significantly from that available. The most important variables in all cases were focal point depth and focal point velocity, total depth and mean velocity. Title: The Influence of Riparian Habitat and Microhabitat Selection on Fish Assemblaqe Structure in the Upper John Day Basin, Oreqon Author: Leitzinger, Eric J. Fish assemblage structure was determined along a longitudinal gradient for three drainages in the upper John Day basin: Middle Fork, South Fork, and upper Mainstem proper. One or two tributaries in each drainage were included. Where possible, sites were paired: those with good versus those with poor riparian habitat. Detrended correspondence analysis was used to determine how the assemblages were structured and to determine which environmental variables influenced that structure. Two assemblages resulted: a warmwater assemblage dominated by speckled dace (Rhinichthys osculus), redside shiners (Richardsonius balteatus), northern squawfish (Ptychocheilus oreqonensis), and suckers (Catostomus spp.); and a coldwater assemblage dominated by juvenile steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) and chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha), but also containing mountain whitefish (Prosopium williamsoni), piute sculpins (Cottus beldingi), and other salmonids. This coldwater assemblage had two distinct components: the chinook component and the steelhead component. The chinook component was concentrated in the mid-elevation reaches of the Mainstem and the Middle Fork, between the steelhead component and the warmwater assemblage. The primary physical gradient on which all assemblages aligned was an elevation/stream size gradient. A secondary gradient consisted of various riparian habitat and bank condition variables. Generally, riparian habitat improved moving toward the headwaters. Microhabitat use was compared for salmonids within a habitat type (i.e. pools, riffles, and runs) for mainstem and tributary streams. It was also compared for the same age classes and species between stream types (mainstem versus tributary). Finally, microhabitat selection (versus availability) was examined for significant differences between microhabitat available and that selected. Different age classes of steelhead and juvenile chinook salmon used different microhabitats in the same habitat type. These did not change significantly between habitats or stream type. All groups selected microhabitats that varied significantly from that available. The most important variables in all cases were focal point depth and focal point velocity, total depth and mean velocity. Close