Search

Search Results

• 1601. [Article] Tenmile Lake Basin Partnership - OWEB Final Report: Grant 217-2051

  Abstract -- Pacific Lamprey are native to the Tenmile Watershed and culturally important to the local Native American Tribes. Likewise, Salmon and Steelhead have both an economic and cultural significance ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Tenmile Lake Basin Partnership - OWEB Final Report: Grant 217-2051 Abstract -- Pacific Lamprey are native to the Tenmile Watershed and culturally important to the local Native American Tribes. Likewise, Salmon and Steelhead have both an economic and cultural significance to the local citizens and Tribes. Pacific Lamprey were historically harvested by the people of the Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians (CTCLUSI), but it was unknown if Pacific Lamprey were still present in the Tenmile Watershed. A fish trap was built on Eel Lake by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) in 1989 for the purpose of fish capture and rearing. The trap is effective in capturing Salmon and Steelhead but may act as a barrier to the passage of Pacific Lamprey. This monitoring effort was designed to assess the presence/absence of Pacific Lamprey in the Tenmile Watershed, identify migration timing, potential lamprey passage barriers and rearing/spawning habitats, and collect and organize data from Eel Lake Trap on native Coho, Cutthroat, and native/hatchery Steelhead returns and trends. Lamprey larvae (ammocoete) monitoring was conducted in the summer of 2017 using electro-shockers. Shocking occurred on 3 tributaries of Tenmile Lakes (Big Creek, Johnson Creek, and Shutter Creek), and 3 creeks within the Eel Lake basin (Eel Creek, Clear Creek, and Winters Arm Creek). Two species of lamprey were identified, Western Brook (Lampetra richardsoni) and Pacific (Entosphenus tridentatus). Western Brook were found in all sampled Tenmile Lakes Basin streams, but only in the streams above Eel Lake Trap in the Eel Lake Basin. No Western Brook were identified in Eel Creek below the Trap. Pacific Lamprey were found in Johnson Creek and Big Creek in the Tenmile Lakes Basin, and in Eel Creek in the Eel Lake Basin. No Pacific Lamprey were identified above the Eel Lake Trap, suggesting that it may act as a complete passage barrier to that species. In addition, over 200 adult Pacific Lamprey were salvaged from an ODOT culvert enhancement project on Eel Creek near Hwy 101. Pacific Lamprey larvae were identified upstream of this project, but it is likely that it was a partial barrier. Two other ODOT culverts were identified as potential partial lamprey barriers on Eel Cr. Spawning areas for Pacific and Western Brook Lamprey are similar to spawning areas for salmon. Upper reaches of all the Tenmile Lake tributaries have appropriate spawning gravel. Lower stream areas are often high in sediment which is conducive to rearing lamprey larvae. This was confirmed in Johnson creek with high numbers of Pacific Lamprey larvae found at the mouth as it enters South Tenmile Lake. Farther upstream in the Johnson Creek system, larvae were abundant, but much smaller with many being too small to identify (<65mm). Western Brook larvae were found, but no Pacific Lamprey larvae were identified, perhaps amongst those unidentified specimens. Western Brook ammocoetes were also found at the lower site on Johnson Creek, and in Big Creek and Shutter Creek. Pacific Lamprey migration into the watershed is difficult to determine due to the elusive nature of the species and their life cycle trait of migrating in from the ocean in the spring of one year, then holding over until the next spring before spawning. When specimens are captured, it is difficult to determine whether it is a fresh migrant or last year’s holdover. Even if it can be determined which year it is from, it is still difficult to know how long it has been in the system before it was captured. In Phase 2 of this project, we will capture Pacific Lamprey either in traps near the mouth of Eel Cr, or at the lower culverts. This should give us a better sense of migration timing. Native Coho salmon counts at Eel Lake Trap were down significantly from the recorded high at the Trap of 441 in 2012, with only 66 native Coho returning in 2018 (the winter of 2017-2018). The previous 2 years were also low with 2016 and 2017 showing returns of only 53 and 118 respectively. The Coho numbers for most of the Oregon Coast also showed low returns. Hatchery Winter Steelhead counts were 502 for 2018. This compares to a record high of 828 in 2007, 595 in 2016, and 226 in 2017. Returning native Steelhead only numbered 10 for the 2018 season. The average return for Native Steelhead is 24. In 2018, 60 Steelhead were spawned including 2 native males, but no native females. 252 hatchery Steelhead were recycled into Saunders Lake, and 148 into Butterfield Lake. ODFW allocated 25,000 smolts for the Tenmile Watershed, which were acclimated and then released in April 2018. Title: Tenmile Lake Basin Partnership - OWEB Final Report: Grant 217-2051 Abstract -- Pacific Lamprey are native to the Tenmile Watershed and culturally important to the local Native American Tribes. Likewise, Salmon and Steelhead have both an economic and cultural significance to the local citizens and Tribes. Pacific Lamprey were historically harvested by the people of the Confederated Tribes of the Coos, Lower Umpqua and Siuslaw Indians (CTCLUSI), but it was unknown if Pacific Lamprey were still present in the Tenmile Watershed. A fish trap was built on Eel Lake by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) in 1989 for the purpose of fish capture and rearing. The trap is effective in capturing Salmon and Steelhead but may act as a barrier to the passage of Pacific Lamprey. This monitoring effort was designed to assess the presence/absence of Pacific Lamprey in the Tenmile Watershed, identify migration timing, potential lamprey passage barriers and rearing/spawning habitats, and collect and organize data from Eel Lake Trap on native Coho, Cutthroat, and native/hatchery Steelhead returns and trends. Lamprey larvae (ammocoete) monitoring was conducted in the summer of 2017 using electro-shockers. Shocking occurred on 3 tributaries of Tenmile Lakes (Big Creek, Johnson Creek, and Shutter Creek), and 3 creeks within the Eel Lake basin (Eel Creek, Clear Creek, and Winters Arm Creek). Two species of lamprey were identified, Western Brook (Lampetra richardsoni) and Pacific (Entosphenus tridentatus). Western Brook were found in all sampled Tenmile Lakes Basin streams, but only in the streams above Eel Lake Trap in the Eel Lake Basin. No Western Brook were identified in Eel Creek below the Trap. Pacific Lamprey were found in Johnson Creek and Big Creek in the Tenmile Lakes Basin, and in Eel Creek in the Eel Lake Basin. No Pacific Lamprey were identified above the Eel Lake Trap, suggesting that it may act as a complete passage barrier to that species. In addition, over 200 adult Pacific Lamprey were salvaged from an ODOT culvert enhancement project on Eel Creek near Hwy 101. Pacific Lamprey larvae were identified upstream of this project, but it is likely that it was a partial barrier. Two other ODOT culverts were identified as potential partial lamprey barriers on Eel Cr. Spawning areas for Pacific and Western Brook Lamprey are similar to spawning areas for salmon. Upper reaches of all the Tenmile Lake tributaries have appropriate spawning gravel. Lower stream areas are often high in sediment which is conducive to rearing lamprey larvae. This was confirmed in Johnson creek with high numbers of Pacific Lamprey larvae found at the mouth as it enters South Tenmile Lake. Farther upstream in the Johnson Creek system, larvae were abundant, but much smaller with many being too small to identify (<65mm). Western Brook larvae were found, but no Pacific Lamprey larvae were identified, perhaps amongst those unidentified specimens. Western Brook ammocoetes were also found at the lower site on Johnson Creek, and in Big Creek and Shutter Creek. Pacific Lamprey migration into the watershed is difficult to determine due to the elusive nature of the species and their life cycle trait of migrating in from the ocean in the spring of one year, then holding over until the next spring before spawning. When specimens are captured, it is difficult to determine whether it is a fresh migrant or last year’s holdover. Even if it can be determined which year it is from, it is still difficult to know how long it has been in the system before it was captured. In Phase 2 of this project, we will capture Pacific Lamprey either in traps near the mouth of Eel Cr, or at the lower culverts. This should give us a better sense of migration timing. Native Coho salmon counts at Eel Lake Trap were down significantly from the recorded high at the Trap of 441 in 2012, with only 66 native Coho returning in 2018 (the winter of 2017-2018). The previous 2 years were also low with 2016 and 2017 showing returns of only 53 and 118 respectively. The Coho numbers for most of the Oregon Coast also showed low returns. Hatchery Winter Steelhead counts were 502 for 2018. This compares to a record high of 828 in 2007, 595 in 2016, and 226 in 2017. Returning native Steelhead only numbered 10 for the 2018 season. The average return for Native Steelhead is 24. In 2018, 60 Steelhead were spawned including 2 native males, but no native females. 252 hatchery Steelhead were recycled into Saunders Lake, and 148 into Butterfield Lake. ODFW allocated 25,000 smolts for the Tenmile Watershed, which were acclimated and then released in April 2018. Close

• 1602. [Article] Preseason Report I, Stock Abundance Analysis for 1998, Ocean Salmon Fisheries

  Abstract -- This is the second report in an annual series of four reports prepared by the Salmon Technical Team (STT) of the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) to document and help guide salmon ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Preseason Report I, Stock Abundance Analysis for 1998, Ocean Salmon Fisheries Abstract -- This is the second report in an annual series of four reports prepared by the Salmon Technical Team (STT) of the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) to document and help guide salmon fishery management off the coasts of Washington, Oregon, and California. This report will be formally reviewed at the Council's March meeting. The third and fourth reports in this series will be developed at the close of the March and April Council meetings, respectively. They will analyze the impacts of the Council's proposed and final ocean salmon fishery management recommendations for 1998. This report provides 1998 salmon stock abundance projections and an analysis of the impacts of 1997 regulations, or regulatory procedures. The report focuses on chinook and coho stocks that have been important in determining Council fisheries in recent years. However, decisions on whether or not to propose Endangered Species Act listings for several chinook stocks ranging from central California to Puget Sound are anticipated in the near future. In the event that the National Marine Fisheries Service proposes new listings, information concerning the status of these stocks may significantly affect Council deliberations on the final salmon fishing seasons. Chapter I provides a summary of the 1998 stock abundance projections. Chapters II and Ill provide detailed stock-by-stock analyses of abundance and a description of prediction methodology and accuracy of past abundance predictions for chinook and coho salmon, respectively. Chapter IV summarizes abundance information for pink salmon. Four appendices provide supplementary information as follows: Appendix A provides a summary of Council stock management goals; Appendix 8 contains pertinent data for Oregon production index (OPI) area coho; Appendix C provides historical salmon catch data for the Cape Flattery and Strait of Juan de Fuca areas; and Appendix D contains the Council's current harvest allocation schedules. Summaries of preseason and postseason abundance estimates are included in: • Table 11-2 for Central Valley Index fall chinqok since 1985; • Table 11-4 for Klamath River fall chinook since 1985; • Table 11-8 for selected Columbia River fall chinook stocks since 1984; • Table 11-9 for Puget Sound summer/fall chinook stocks since 1993; • Table 111-1 for OPI area produced coho stocks since 1992 and • Table 111-3 for selected naturally spawning Puget Sound and Washington coastal coho stocks since 1984. Differences between preseason and postseason estimates are caused by a number of factors, including: (1) inaccuracies in abundance forecasts for these and other stocks which are exploited by mixed stock fisheries, (2) deviations of actual catches and fishery patterns from preseason expectations, (3) anomalies in stock distribution and migration patterns, and (4) for the Puget Sound coho stocks, differences in assessment methodologies (postseason estimates are based on run reconstruction assumptions which differ substantially from those represented in the Fishery Regulatory Assessment Model). The STT has not been able to complete a proper evaluation of abundance estimates which would take all these factors into account. Title: Preseason Report I, Stock Abundance Analysis for 1998, Ocean Salmon Fisheries Abstract -- This is the second report in an annual series of four reports prepared by the Salmon Technical Team (STT) of the Pacific Fishery Management Council (Council) to document and help guide salmon fishery management off the coasts of Washington, Oregon, and California. This report will be formally reviewed at the Council's March meeting. The third and fourth reports in this series will be developed at the close of the March and April Council meetings, respectively. They will analyze the impacts of the Council's proposed and final ocean salmon fishery management recommendations for 1998. This report provides 1998 salmon stock abundance projections and an analysis of the impacts of 1997 regulations, or regulatory procedures. The report focuses on chinook and coho stocks that have been important in determining Council fisheries in recent years. However, decisions on whether or not to propose Endangered Species Act listings for several chinook stocks ranging from central California to Puget Sound are anticipated in the near future. In the event that the National Marine Fisheries Service proposes new listings, information concerning the status of these stocks may significantly affect Council deliberations on the final salmon fishing seasons. Chapter I provides a summary of the 1998 stock abundance projections. Chapters II and Ill provide detailed stock-by-stock analyses of abundance and a description of prediction methodology and accuracy of past abundance predictions for chinook and coho salmon, respectively. Chapter IV summarizes abundance information for pink salmon. Four appendices provide supplementary information as follows: Appendix A provides a summary of Council stock management goals; Appendix 8 contains pertinent data for Oregon production index (OPI) area coho; Appendix C provides historical salmon catch data for the Cape Flattery and Strait of Juan de Fuca areas; and Appendix D contains the Council's current harvest allocation schedules. Summaries of preseason and postseason abundance estimates are included in: • Table 11-2 for Central Valley Index fall chinqok since 1985; • Table 11-4 for Klamath River fall chinook since 1985; • Table 11-8 for selected Columbia River fall chinook stocks since 1984; • Table 11-9 for Puget Sound summer/fall chinook stocks since 1993; • Table 111-1 for OPI area produced coho stocks since 1992 and • Table 111-3 for selected naturally spawning Puget Sound and Washington coastal coho stocks since 1984. Differences between preseason and postseason estimates are caused by a number of factors, including: (1) inaccuracies in abundance forecasts for these and other stocks which are exploited by mixed stock fisheries, (2) deviations of actual catches and fishery patterns from preseason expectations, (3) anomalies in stock distribution and migration patterns, and (4) for the Puget Sound coho stocks, differences in assessment methodologies (postseason estimates are based on run reconstruction assumptions which differ substantially from those represented in the Fishery Regulatory Assessment Model). The STT has not been able to complete a proper evaluation of abundance estimates which would take all these factors into account. Close

• 1603. [Article] Abundance, Productivity, and Life History of Fifteenmile Creek Steelhead; Annual Report 2016

  Abstract -- The Fifteenmile Creek watershed in North Central Oregon hosts a native population of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) that is without influence of previous hatchery augmentation. The Fifteenmile ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Abundance, Productivity, and Life History of Fifteenmile Creek Steelhead; Annual Report 2016 Abstract -- The Fifteenmile Creek watershed in North Central Oregon hosts a native population of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) that is without influence of previous hatchery augmentation. The Fifteenmile Creek steelhead are a subpopulation within the Distinct Population Segment (DPS) of the Middle Columbia River steelhead and was listed as ‘threatened’ by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) first on March 25, 1999 and relisted as a DPS on January 5, 2006. Subsequently, a conservation and recovery management plan was developed for the Middle Columbia River steelhead DPS within Oregon state borders. The goal of the plan is to recover Middle Columbia River steelhead to a level that would allow the removal of threatened status, in addition to providing a long-term goal to recover the population sufficiently to provide sustainable fisheries and other ecological, cultural, social and economic benefits for future generations. The DPS-level recovery plan sets specific recovery goals for the areas within the DPS, which designates Fifteenmile Creek explicitly. The Fifteenmile Creek steelhead population is considered the most inland winter race of steelhead in the Columbia River Basin, as designated by NOAA fisheries. However review of this designation may be necessary at the next Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) Biological Opinion (BiOp) status-review because the run-timing of adult steelhead passing Bonneville Dam has been inconsistent with known winter-run steelhead in the area. The population was identified as “must have viable” status by the Interior Columbia Technical Recovery Team (ICTRT), and reaching viable status is essential for achieving DPS delisting. The ICTRT, Recovery Plan, and the Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS-BiOp) have all identified this population as high priority for improving precision and accuracy of abundance, productivity, diversity, and spatial structure information. Title: Abundance, Productivity, and Life History of Fifteenmile Creek Steelhead; Annual Report 2016 Abstract -- The Fifteenmile Creek watershed in North Central Oregon hosts a native population of steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) that is without influence of previous hatchery augmentation. The Fifteenmile Creek steelhead are a subpopulation within the Distinct Population Segment (DPS) of the Middle Columbia River steelhead and was listed as ‘threatened’ by the National Marine Fisheries Service (NMFS) first on March 25, 1999 and relisted as a DPS on January 5, 2006. Subsequently, a conservation and recovery management plan was developed for the Middle Columbia River steelhead DPS within Oregon state borders. The goal of the plan is to recover Middle Columbia River steelhead to a level that would allow the removal of threatened status, in addition to providing a long-term goal to recover the population sufficiently to provide sustainable fisheries and other ecological, cultural, social and economic benefits for future generations. The DPS-level recovery plan sets specific recovery goals for the areas within the DPS, which designates Fifteenmile Creek explicitly. The Fifteenmile Creek steelhead population is considered the most inland winter race of steelhead in the Columbia River Basin, as designated by NOAA fisheries. However review of this designation may be necessary at the next Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS) Biological Opinion (BiOp) status-review because the run-timing of adult steelhead passing Bonneville Dam has been inconsistent with known winter-run steelhead in the area. The population was identified as “must have viable” status by the Interior Columbia Technical Recovery Team (ICTRT), and reaching viable status is essential for achieving DPS delisting. The ICTRT, Recovery Plan, and the Federal Columbia River Power System (FCRPS-BiOp) have all identified this population as high priority for improving precision and accuracy of abundance, productivity, diversity, and spatial structure information. Close

• 1604. [Article] Coastal Rivers Investigations, August 26 thru December 25, 1949

  Abstract -- none

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Coastal Rivers Investigations, August 26 thru December 25, 1949 Abstract -- none Title: Coastal Rivers Investigations, August 26 thru December 25, 1949 Abstract -- none Close

• 1605. [Article] A Proposal for an Integrated Research Monitoring Program for Oregon Coastal Chinook Populations

  Abstract -- Among the many chinook salmon populations contributing to large, mixed stock ocean net, troll, and recreational fisheries managed by the Pacific Salmon Commission (PSC) there is a good deal ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: A Proposal for an Integrated Research Monitoring Program for Oregon Coastal Chinook Populations Abstract -- Among the many chinook salmon populations contributing to large, mixed stock ocean net, troll, and recreational fisheries managed by the Pacific Salmon Commission (PSC) there is a good deal of diversity with respect to productivity, life history characteristics, and ocean distribution. During the years immediately following the adoption of the original 1985 Pacific Salmon Treaty (PST), lack of adequate data prevented the PSC from managing effectively for these differences. Instead, chinook management outlined in Annex IV of the original treaty was based upon long term population trends for very large aggregates of stocks. Although harvest ceilings were established as part of a PST recovery plan for over-exploited stocks, they were based on average coast-wide production trends and resulted in over harvest of weak stocks in some years and failure to take advantage of large returns in other years. By the mid-l 990's, data relative to the distribution and abundance of many salmon stocks contributing to PST fisheries was improving. At the same time, there was increasing dissatisfaction with quota-based management and strong interest in instituting annual abundance-based management for stock aggregates that share geographic proximity of spawning areas, similar life history and genetic characteristics, and similar distributions in the ocean. Abundance-based management for aggregated stocks would establish and implement annual fishery exploitation rates in fisheries that insure long-term sustainability for all aggregates and related individual stocks. In the absence of bilateral agreement between the U.S. and Canada regarding implementation of abundance-based management, the three voting U.S. PSC Commissioners signed the 1996 Letter of Agreement (LOA) that defined elements of an abundance-based management approach for chinook salmon fisheries in southeast Alaska. The LOA was designed to: 1) set the stage for future bilateral negotiations regarding abundance based management; 2) clarify the role of PST fisheries in rebuilding depressed natural stocks; and 3) provide a means for sharing conservation responsibility of far-north migrating stocks originating from watersheds in Oregon and Washington. The foundation for abundance-based management set forth in the LOA was subsequently expanded upon and incorporated as Aggregate Abundance-Based Management (AABM) in Annex IV, Chapter 3 of the 1999 PST. Application of the abundance-based management outlined in the 1996 LOA and the subsequent 1999 amendments to the PST requires knowledge of the stock recruitment relationships, biological spawning escapement goals, and annual forecasts of ocean abundance and distribution for stocks in each aggregate to regulate fishery harvest. Managers must also have annual post-season estimates of aggregate specific exploitation rates and in-river escapements to assess the effectiveness of regulatory measures. The base-monitoring program for Oregon's coastal chinook under the 1985 PSC met only a few of these data requirements. In recognition of requirements for new and more precise data, the signatories of the original LOA sought out additional federal funds for new and expanded monitoring programs. Since 1997 Congress has annually approved approximately $1.8 million for additional research and monitoring needed to implement terms of the LOA. The PSC delegated discretionary authority for the use of those funds to the U.S. Section's Chinook Technical Committee (CTC). Title: A Proposal for an Integrated Research Monitoring Program for Oregon Coastal Chinook Populations Abstract -- Among the many chinook salmon populations contributing to large, mixed stock ocean net, troll, and recreational fisheries managed by the Pacific Salmon Commission (PSC) there is a good deal of diversity with respect to productivity, life history characteristics, and ocean distribution. During the years immediately following the adoption of the original 1985 Pacific Salmon Treaty (PST), lack of adequate data prevented the PSC from managing effectively for these differences. Instead, chinook management outlined in Annex IV of the original treaty was based upon long term population trends for very large aggregates of stocks. Although harvest ceilings were established as part of a PST recovery plan for over-exploited stocks, they were based on average coast-wide production trends and resulted in over harvest of weak stocks in some years and failure to take advantage of large returns in other years. By the mid-l 990's, data relative to the distribution and abundance of many salmon stocks contributing to PST fisheries was improving. At the same time, there was increasing dissatisfaction with quota-based management and strong interest in instituting annual abundance-based management for stock aggregates that share geographic proximity of spawning areas, similar life history and genetic characteristics, and similar distributions in the ocean. Abundance-based management for aggregated stocks would establish and implement annual fishery exploitation rates in fisheries that insure long-term sustainability for all aggregates and related individual stocks. In the absence of bilateral agreement between the U.S. and Canada regarding implementation of abundance-based management, the three voting U.S. PSC Commissioners signed the 1996 Letter of Agreement (LOA) that defined elements of an abundance-based management approach for chinook salmon fisheries in southeast Alaska. The LOA was designed to: 1) set the stage for future bilateral negotiations regarding abundance based management; 2) clarify the role of PST fisheries in rebuilding depressed natural stocks; and 3) provide a means for sharing conservation responsibility of far-north migrating stocks originating from watersheds in Oregon and Washington. The foundation for abundance-based management set forth in the LOA was subsequently expanded upon and incorporated as Aggregate Abundance-Based Management (AABM) in Annex IV, Chapter 3 of the 1999 PST. Application of the abundance-based management outlined in the 1996 LOA and the subsequent 1999 amendments to the PST requires knowledge of the stock recruitment relationships, biological spawning escapement goals, and annual forecasts of ocean abundance and distribution for stocks in each aggregate to regulate fishery harvest. Managers must also have annual post-season estimates of aggregate specific exploitation rates and in-river escapements to assess the effectiveness of regulatory measures. The base-monitoring program for Oregon's coastal chinook under the 1985 PSC met only a few of these data requirements. In recognition of requirements for new and more precise data, the signatories of the original LOA sought out additional federal funds for new and expanded monitoring programs. Since 1997 Congress has annually approved approximately $1.8 million for additional research and monitoring needed to implement terms of the LOA. The PSC delegated discretionary authority for the use of those funds to the U.S. Section's Chinook Technical Committee (CTC). Close

• 1606. [Article] Draft - Trout and Warm Water Fish Running Waters

  Abstract -- Running Waters: Running waters include the main Rogue, Applegate, and Illinois rivers, and all associated tributary streams in the Rogue River basin. Historical information on trout in the ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Draft - Trout and Warm Water Fish Running Waters Abstract -- Running Waters: Running waters include the main Rogue, Applegate, and Illinois rivers, and all associated tributary streams in the Rogue River basin. Historical information on trout in the Rogue River basin was summarized by Cole M. Rivers (in press) prior to 1962. Cutthroat and downstream migrating steelhead were abundant and easily caught from streams all through the settled portions of the basin. There was no need to take a trip away from home to fish for trout. Angling for trout was not thought of as a recreational pastime until the 1930s. The headwaters of the Applegate and Illinois rivers, and Jumpoff Joe and Grave creeks were preferred for trout fishing because of the easy access provided by mining roads. The California-Oregon Power Company provided access to trout fishing waters in the Prospect region as early as 1912. The completion of the Crater Lake and Diamond Lake highways in 1927 allowed access to the upper Rogue River and its tributaries. Access to other parts of the basin was provided when foot and wagon trails were made into roads by crews of the Civil Conservation Corps in the 1930's. Most natural lakes were devoid of fish life until they were stocked by miners or cattlemen who wanted a supply of trout close to their camps. Fish Lake was one of the first impoundments preferred for sport fishing because of good cattle trails leading from the Bear creek Valley into the area. Anglers were packed in by cattlemen after the dam was built in 1898. Other impoundments providing good trout fishing in the 1920s included Emigrant Lake which received heavy pressure. Many lakes were barren of fish life until rainbow, eastern brook, or cutthroat were packed in by private parties, the Forest Service, or the Oregon Game Commission in the 1920s. Prospectors and early settlers stocked some of the lakes earlier with fish that had been collected or salvaged from creeks that were drying up. There are no records of the unofficial introductions, and those of the Game Commission burned in a fire in 1936. Table 1 lists the liberations of trout recorded by the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries from 1907 to 1940. Title: Draft - Trout and Warm Water Fish Running Waters Abstract -- Running Waters: Running waters include the main Rogue, Applegate, and Illinois rivers, and all associated tributary streams in the Rogue River basin. Historical information on trout in the Rogue River basin was summarized by Cole M. Rivers (in press) prior to 1962. Cutthroat and downstream migrating steelhead were abundant and easily caught from streams all through the settled portions of the basin. There was no need to take a trip away from home to fish for trout. Angling for trout was not thought of as a recreational pastime until the 1930s. The headwaters of the Applegate and Illinois rivers, and Jumpoff Joe and Grave creeks were preferred for trout fishing because of the easy access provided by mining roads. The California-Oregon Power Company provided access to trout fishing waters in the Prospect region as early as 1912. The completion of the Crater Lake and Diamond Lake highways in 1927 allowed access to the upper Rogue River and its tributaries. Access to other parts of the basin was provided when foot and wagon trails were made into roads by crews of the Civil Conservation Corps in the 1930's. Most natural lakes were devoid of fish life until they were stocked by miners or cattlemen who wanted a supply of trout close to their camps. Fish Lake was one of the first impoundments preferred for sport fishing because of good cattle trails leading from the Bear creek Valley into the area. Anglers were packed in by cattlemen after the dam was built in 1898. Other impoundments providing good trout fishing in the 1920s included Emigrant Lake which received heavy pressure. Many lakes were barren of fish life until rainbow, eastern brook, or cutthroat were packed in by private parties, the Forest Service, or the Oregon Game Commission in the 1920s. Prospectors and early settlers stocked some of the lakes earlier with fish that had been collected or salvaged from creeks that were drying up. There are no records of the unofficial introductions, and those of the Game Commission burned in a fire in 1936. Table 1 lists the liberations of trout recorded by the U.S. Bureau of Fisheries from 1907 to 1940. Close

• 1607. [Article] Habitat use and activity patterns of Deacon Rockfish (Sebastes diaconus) at seasonal scales and in response to episodic hypoxia.

  Abstract -- Knowledge of fish movements and residency are key to design and interpretation of results from bioacoustic sonar and visual survey methods, which are being developed as tools for use in nearshore ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Habitat use and activity patterns of Deacon Rockfish (Sebastes diaconus) at seasonal scales and in response to episodic hypoxia. Abstract -- Knowledge of fish movements and residency are key to design and interpretation of results from bioacoustic sonar and visual survey methods, which are being developed as tools for use in nearshore rocky reef surveys to estimate biomass and species composition. Fishers in Oregon report that an important component of the nearshore catch, Deacon Rockfish (Sebastes diaconus), become unavailable to harvest seasonally, and suggest periodic migration away from nearshore reef areas. Seasonal and spatial variation in landings data potentially support this theory. We used a high-resolution acoustic telemetry array and a combination of presence/absence receiver arrays, to study the daily and seasonal movements and the activity patterns of 11 acoustically tagged Deacon Rockfish on a nearshore rocky reef off Seal Rock, Oregon. Over the 11-month study period, most fish (n=6) exhibited high site fidelity. For the duration of the high-resolution array (5 mo), these fish had small home ranges (mean 95% KDE=4907 m2) and consistent activity patterns, except during seasonal hypoxia (defined as dissolved oxygen concentration [DO] < 2 mg l-1). During the summer months, resident fish were strongly diurnal with high levels of daytime activity above the bottom in relatively rugose habitat, followed by nighttime rest periods in deeper water in habitat of relatively less rugosity. During hypoxia, fish exhibited moderate activity levels with no rest periods and moved well away from their core activity areas on long, erratic forays. Wintertime activity levels were moderate with less defined daily patterns, but fish continued to remain within the array area. We suggest that Deacon Rockfish remain on nearshore reefs throughout the year, but their visual capabilities and prey preferences for seasonally occurring planktonic organisms strongly influences their catchability. Habitat use and activity patterns exhibited by Deacon Rockfish are conducive to bioacoustic sonar and visual survey methods if season, daylight, and oxygen levels are considered. Title: Habitat use and activity patterns of Deacon Rockfish (Sebastes diaconus) at seasonal scales and in response to episodic hypoxia. Abstract -- Knowledge of fish movements and residency are key to design and interpretation of results from bioacoustic sonar and visual survey methods, which are being developed as tools for use in nearshore rocky reef surveys to estimate biomass and species composition. Fishers in Oregon report that an important component of the nearshore catch, Deacon Rockfish (Sebastes diaconus), become unavailable to harvest seasonally, and suggest periodic migration away from nearshore reef areas. Seasonal and spatial variation in landings data potentially support this theory. We used a high-resolution acoustic telemetry array and a combination of presence/absence receiver arrays, to study the daily and seasonal movements and the activity patterns of 11 acoustically tagged Deacon Rockfish on a nearshore rocky reef off Seal Rock, Oregon. Over the 11-month study period, most fish (n=6) exhibited high site fidelity. For the duration of the high-resolution array (5 mo), these fish had small home ranges (mean 95% KDE=4907 m2) and consistent activity patterns, except during seasonal hypoxia (defined as dissolved oxygen concentration [DO] < 2 mg l-1). During the summer months, resident fish were strongly diurnal with high levels of daytime activity above the bottom in relatively rugose habitat, followed by nighttime rest periods in deeper water in habitat of relatively less rugosity. During hypoxia, fish exhibited moderate activity levels with no rest periods and moved well away from their core activity areas on long, erratic forays. Wintertime activity levels were moderate with less defined daily patterns, but fish continued to remain within the array area. We suggest that Deacon Rockfish remain on nearshore reefs throughout the year, but their visual capabilities and prey preferences for seasonally occurring planktonic organisms strongly influences their catchability. Habitat use and activity patterns exhibited by Deacon Rockfish are conducive to bioacoustic sonar and visual survey methods if season, daylight, and oxygen levels are considered. Close