Search

Search Results

• 1. [Article] Oak Habitat Mapping and Monitoring in the Southern Eugene Ridgeline

  Submitted to the Undergraduate Library Research Award scholarship competition: 2010-2011. 63 p.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Oak Habitat Mapping and Monitoring in the Southern Eugene Ridgeline Author: Bigalke, Brittany, Kimmy, Ertel, Liston, Matthew, Park, Alex, Russell, Alexandria, Silva, Matt Year: 2011 Submitted to the Undergraduate Library Research Award scholarship competition: 2010-2011. 63 p. Title: Oak Habitat Mapping and Monitoring in the Southern Eugene Ridgeline Author: Bigalke, Brittany, Kimmy, Ertel, Liston, Matthew, Park, Alex, Russell, Alexandria, Silva, Matt Year: 2011 Submitted to the Undergraduate Library Research Award scholarship competition: 2010-2011. 63 p. Close

• 2. [Article] Elkhorn Creek density management thinning, wildlife habitat enhancement, and fish habitat enhancement projects environmental assessment

  57 pp. Tables. T1S R6W sec 25 and 34; T1S R5W sec 31; T2S R5W sec 7; T2S R6W sec 4, 5, 8, 10, 16 and 19. Captured July 19, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elkhorn Creek density management thinning, wildlife habitat enhancement, and fish habitat enhancement projects environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2004 57 pp. Tables. T1S R6W sec 25 and 34; T1S R5W sec 31; T2S R5W sec 7; T2S R6W sec 4, 5, 8, 10, 16 and 19. Captured July 19, 2007. Title: Elkhorn Creek density management thinning, wildlife habitat enhancement, and fish habitat enhancement projects environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2004 57 pp. Tables. T1S R6W sec 25 and 34; T1S R5W sec 31; T2S R5W sec 7; T2S R6W sec 4, 5, 8, 10, 16 and 19. Captured July 19, 2007. Close

• 3. [Article] Elkhorn Creek density management thinning, wildlife habitat enhancement, and fish habitat enhancement projects preliminary finding of no significant impact

  22 pp. Appendices, tables, references. T1S R6W sec 25 and 34; T1S R5W sec 31; T2S R5W sec 7; T2S R6W sec 4, 5, 8, 10, 16 and 19. Captured July 19, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elkhorn Creek density management thinning, wildlife habitat enhancement, and fish habitat enhancement projects preliminary finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2004 22 pp. Appendices, tables, references. T1S R6W sec 25 and 34; T1S R5W sec 31; T2S R5W sec 7; T2S R6W sec 4, 5, 8, 10, 16 and 19. Captured July 19, 2007. Title: Elkhorn Creek density management thinning, wildlife habitat enhancement, and fish habitat enhancement projects preliminary finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2004 22 pp. Appendices, tables, references. T1S R6W sec 25 and 34; T1S R5W sec 31; T2S R5W sec 7; T2S R6W sec 4, 5, 8, 10, 16 and 19. Captured July 19, 2007. Close

• 4. [Article] Elkhorn Creek density management thinning, wildlife habitat enhancement, and fish habitat enhancement projects final decision record and finding of no significant impact

  17 pp. T1S R6W sec 25 and 34; T1S R5W sec 31; T2S R5W sec 7; T2S R6W sec 4, 5, 8, 10, 16 and 19. Captured July 19, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elkhorn Creek density management thinning, wildlife habitat enhancement, and fish habitat enhancement projects final decision record and finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2004 17 pp. T1S R6W sec 25 and 34; T1S R5W sec 31; T2S R5W sec 7; T2S R6W sec 4, 5, 8, 10, 16 and 19. Captured July 19, 2007. Title: Elkhorn Creek density management thinning, wildlife habitat enhancement, and fish habitat enhancement projects final decision record and finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2004 17 pp. T1S R6W sec 25 and 34; T1S R5W sec 31; T2S R5W sec 7; T2S R6W sec 4, 5, 8, 10, 16 and 19. Captured July 19, 2007. Close

• 5. [Article] Swiftwater 2004 instream restoration projects finding of no significant impact

  4 pp. North Fork Big Tom Folley Creek (T21S, R7W, Sections 35 and 26), Big Tom Folley Creek (T22 and 21S, R7W, Sections 2 and 36), and Susan Creek (T26S, R2W, Section 14).

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Swiftwater 2004 instream restoration projects finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2004 4 pp. North Fork Big Tom Folley Creek (T21S, R7W, Sections 35 and 26), Big Tom Folley Creek (T22 and 21S, R7W, Sections 2 and 36), and Susan Creek (T26S, R2W, Section 14). Title: Swiftwater 2004 instream restoration projects finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2004 4 pp. North Fork Big Tom Folley Creek (T21S, R7W, Sections 35 and 26), Big Tom Folley Creek (T22 and 21S, R7W, Sections 2 and 36), and Susan Creek (T26S, R2W, Section 14). Close

• 6. [Article] Martin Creek instream restoration environmental assessment

  28 pp. References, appendix. Martin Creek, a major tributary of Middle Creek, runs through Section 35 of T. 31 S., R. 7 W., and Sections 1, 2, 12 and 13 of T. 32 S., R. 7 W. Captured July 26, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Martin Creek instream restoration environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2004 28 pp. References, appendix. Martin Creek, a major tributary of Middle Creek, runs through Section 35 of T. 31 S., R. 7 W., and Sections 1, 2, 12 and 13 of T. 32 S., R. 7 W. Captured July 26, 2007. Title: Martin Creek instream restoration environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2004 28 pp. References, appendix. Martin Creek, a major tributary of Middle Creek, runs through Section 35 of T. 31 S., R. 7 W., and Sections 1, 2, 12 and 13 of T. 32 S., R. 7 W. Captured July 26, 2007. Close

• 7. [Article] Ecoroofs in Multnomah County: Oregon as habitat for the Oregon vesper sparrow and common nighthawk

  78 pages. Examining committee chair:David Hulse

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Ecoroofs in Multnomah County: Oregon as habitat for the Oregon vesper sparrow and common nighthawk Author: Lewis, Alison Year: 2016 78 pages. Examining committee chair:David Hulse Title: Ecoroofs in Multnomah County: Oregon as habitat for the Oregon vesper sparrow and common nighthawk Author: Lewis, Alison Year: 2016 78 pages. Examining committee chair:David Hulse Close

• 8. [Article] Stouts Creek instream habitat enhancement decision document

  3 pp. Section 3, T. 31 S., R. 3 W., W.M. Captured July 24, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Stouts Creek instream habitat enhancement decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2006 3 pp. Section 3, T. 31 S., R. 3 W., W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Title: Stouts Creek instream habitat enhancement decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2006 3 pp. Section 3, T. 31 S., R. 3 W., W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Close

• 9. [Article] Upper Umpqua Watershed plan environmental assessment

  94 pp. Tables, figures, appendices, maps, glossary. Captured July 27, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Upper Umpqua Watershed plan environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2003 94 pp. Tables, figures, appendices, maps, glossary. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Upper Umpqua Watershed plan environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2003 94 pp. Tables, figures, appendices, maps, glossary. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 10. [Article] The Influence of Deep-Seated Landslides on Topographic Variability and Salmon Habitat in the Oregon Coast Range, USA

  A well-accepted idea in geomorphology is that landforms control the type and distribution of biological habitat. However, the linkages between geomorphology and ecology remain poorly understood. In rivers, ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: The Influence of Deep-Seated Landslides on Topographic Variability and Salmon Habitat in the Oregon Coast Range, USA Author: Beeson, Helen Year: 2014 A well-accepted idea in geomorphology is that landforms control the type and distribution of biological habitat. However, the linkages between geomorphology and ecology remain poorly understood. In rivers, the geomorphic template controls the hydraulic environment, partly shaping the river ecosystem. But what processes shape the geomorphic template? Here, I examine how two hillslope processes dominant in the Oregon Coast Range, debris flows and deep-seated landslides, affect valley floor width and channel slope, key components of the geomorphic template in riverine ecosystems. I then investigate how patterns in potential salmon habitat differ between streams dominated by deep-seated landslides and streams dominated by debris flows. I show that terrain influenced by deep-seated landslides exhibits (1) valley widths that are more variable throughout the network but less locally variable, (2) more variable channel slopes, and (3) more potential salmon habitat as well as significantly more connectivity between habitat types. Title: The Influence of Deep-Seated Landslides on Topographic Variability and Salmon Habitat in the Oregon Coast Range, USA Author: Beeson, Helen Year: 2014 A well-accepted idea in geomorphology is that landforms control the type and distribution of biological habitat. However, the linkages between geomorphology and ecology remain poorly understood. In rivers, the geomorphic template controls the hydraulic environment, partly shaping the river ecosystem. But what processes shape the geomorphic template? Here, I examine how two hillslope processes dominant in the Oregon Coast Range, debris flows and deep-seated landslides, affect valley floor width and channel slope, key components of the geomorphic template in riverine ecosystems. I then investigate how patterns in potential salmon habitat differ between streams dominated by deep-seated landslides and streams dominated by debris flows. I show that terrain influenced by deep-seated landslides exhibits (1) valley widths that are more variable throughout the network but less locally variable, (2) more variable channel slopes, and (3) more potential salmon habitat as well as significantly more connectivity between habitat types. Close

• 11. [Article] Portland : Downtown riverfront habitat opportunities report

  24 pp. OCR and bookmarks supplied by UO. Maps, figures, illus. Published August, 2002. Captured February 19, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Portland : Downtown riverfront habitat opportunities report Author: Portland Development Commission, KPFF Consulting Engineers, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Fishman Environmental Services, GreenWorks PC, Portland (Or.) Year: 2009, 2002 24 pp. OCR and bookmarks supplied by UO. Maps, figures, illus. Published August, 2002. Captured February 19, 2009. Title: Portland : Downtown riverfront habitat opportunities report Author: Portland Development Commission, KPFF Consulting Engineers, National Fish and Wildlife Foundation, Fishman Environmental Services, GreenWorks PC, Portland (Or.) Year: 2009, 2002 24 pp. OCR and bookmarks supplied by UO. Maps, figures, illus. Published August, 2002. Captured February 19, 2009. Close

• 12. [Article] East Fork Nehalem project environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact

  75 pp. Maps, appendices, tables, references. Township 5 North, Range 3 West sections 31, 32, and 33, and Township 4 North, Range 3 West sections 5-9, 16, 17, 19 and 21. Captured February 16, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: East Fork Nehalem project environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2008 75 pp. Maps, appendices, tables, references. Township 5 North, Range 3 West sections 31, 32, and 33, and Township 4 North, Range 3 West sections 5-9, 16, 17, 19 and 21. Captured February 16, 2009. Title: East Fork Nehalem project environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2008 75 pp. Maps, appendices, tables, references. Township 5 North, Range 3 West sections 31, 32, and 33, and Township 4 North, Range 3 West sections 5-9, 16, 17, 19 and 21. Captured February 16, 2009. Close

• 13. [Article] New River foredune management environmental assessment

  69 pp. Figures, tables, references, appendices, illus. T. 30S., R. 15W., Sections 3, 10, 15, 21, 22, and 28. Captured January 14, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: New River foredune management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Coos Bay District Year: 2009, 2008 69 pp. Figures, tables, references, appendices, illus. T. 30S., R. 15W., Sections 3, 10, 15, 21, 22, and 28. Captured January 14, 2009. Title: New River foredune management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Coos Bay District Year: 2009, 2008 69 pp. Figures, tables, references, appendices, illus. T. 30S., R. 15W., Sections 3, 10, 15, 21, 22, and 28. Captured January 14, 2009. Close

• 14. [Article] East Fork Nehalem project finding of no significant impact

  5 pp. Township 5 North, Range 3 West sections 31, 32, and 33, and Township 4 North, Range 3 West sections 5-9, 16, 17, 19 and 21. Captured February 17, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: East Fork Nehalem project finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2008 5 pp. Township 5 North, Range 3 West sections 31, 32, and 33, and Township 4 North, Range 3 West sections 5-9, 16, 17, 19 and 21. Captured February 17, 2009. Title: East Fork Nehalem project finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2008 5 pp. Township 5 North, Range 3 West sections 31, 32, and 33, and Township 4 North, Range 3 West sections 5-9, 16, 17, 19 and 21. Captured February 17, 2009. Close

• 15. [Article] East Fork Nehalem project decision record

  18 pp. Maps, table. Township 5 North, Range 3 West sections 31, 32, and 33, and Township 4 North, Range 3 West sections 5-9, 16, 17, 19 and 21. Captured February 17, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: East Fork Nehalem project decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2008 18 pp. Maps, table. Township 5 North, Range 3 West sections 31, 32, and 33, and Township 4 North, Range 3 West sections 5-9, 16, 17, 19 and 21. Captured February 17, 2009. Title: East Fork Nehalem project decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2008 18 pp. Maps, table. Township 5 North, Range 3 West sections 31, 32, and 33, and Township 4 North, Range 3 West sections 5-9, 16, 17, 19 and 21. Captured February 17, 2009. Close

• 16. [Article] Straw Devil final supplemental environmental assessment

  20 pp. Tables, maps, references. T.21, 22, and 23 S., R. 4 and 5½ E. Captured May 28, 2008.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Straw Devil final supplemental environmental assessment Author: Middle Fork Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2004 20 pp. Tables, maps, references. T.21, 22, and 23 S., R. 4 and 5½ E. Captured May 28, 2008. Title: Straw Devil final supplemental environmental assessment Author: Middle Fork Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2004 20 pp. Tables, maps, references. T.21, 22, and 23 S., R. 4 and 5½ E. Captured May 28, 2008. Close

• 17. [Article] Swiftwater 2004 instream restoration projects decision record

  3 pp. North Fork Big Tom Folley Creek (T21S, R7W, Sections 35 and 26), Big Tom Folley Creek (T22 and 21S, R7W, Sections 2 and 36), and Susan Creek (T26S, R2W, Section 14; W.M.) Captured July 24, 2008.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Swiftwater 2004 instream restoration projects decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2004 3 pp. North Fork Big Tom Folley Creek (T21S, R7W, Sections 35 and 26), Big Tom Folley Creek (T22 and 21S, R7W, Sections 2 and 36), and Susan Creek (T26S, R2W, Section 14; W.M.) Captured July 24, 2008. Title: Swiftwater 2004 instream restoration projects decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2004 3 pp. North Fork Big Tom Folley Creek (T21S, R7W, Sections 35 and 26), Big Tom Folley Creek (T22 and 21S, R7W, Sections 2 and 36), and Susan Creek (T26S, R2W, Section 14; W.M.) Captured July 24, 2008. Close

• 18. [Article] Swiftwater 2004 instream restoration projects environmental assessment

  17 pp. Tables, maps, appendices, references. North Fork Big Tom Folley: Township 21 South, Range 7 West, Sections 35 and 26; Big Tom Folley Creek: Township 22 and 21 South, Range 7 West, Sections 2 and ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Swiftwater 2004 instream restoration projects environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 1995 17 pp. Tables, maps, appendices, references. North Fork Big Tom Folley: Township 21 South, Range 7 West, Sections 35 and 26; Big Tom Folley Creek: Township 22 and 21 South, Range 7 West, Sections 2 and 36; Susan Creek: Township 26 South, Range 2 West, Section 14. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Swiftwater 2004 instream restoration projects environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 1995 17 pp. Tables, maps, appendices, references. North Fork Big Tom Folley: Township 21 South, Range 7 West, Sections 35 and 26; Big Tom Folley Creek: Township 22 and 21 South, Range 7 West, Sections 2 and 36; Susan Creek: Township 26 South, Range 2 West, Section 14. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 19. [Article] Open Space as an Armature for Urban Expansion: A Future Scenarios Study to Assess the Effects of Spatial Concepts on Wildlife Populations

  Urbanization is one of the biggest threats to biodiversity. To address this problem, landscape planners have increasingly adopted landscape ecology as a theoretical basis for planning. They use spatial ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Open Space as an Armature for Urban Expansion: A Future Scenarios Study to Assess the Effects of Spatial Concepts on Wildlife Populations Author: Penteado, Homero Year: 2014 Urbanization is one of the biggest threats to biodiversity. To address this problem, landscape planners have increasingly adopted landscape ecology as a theoretical basis for planning. They use spatial concepts that express principles of landscape ecology in diagrammatic form to create frameworks for planning. This dissertation presents a quantitative approach to evaluate the application of spatial concepts developed to create an armature of open space in areas subject to urbanization. It focuses on the predicted urban expansion of Damascus, Oregon, as a case study. An alternative futures study was used to test three open space spatial concepts for patches, corridors and networks in combination with compact and dispersed urban development patterns. The resulting eight scenarios of land use and land cover were then modeled for the year 2060 to evaluate their effects on habitat quantity, quality and configuration and to identify tradeoffs between urban development and conservation for three focal wildlife species: Red-legged frog, Western meadowlark, and Douglas squirrel. Open space spatial concepts strongly influenced habitat quantity and quality differences among future scenarios. Development patterns showed less influence on those variables. Scenarios with no landscape ecological spatial concept provided the most land for urban development but reduced habitat quantity and quality. Greenway scenarios showed habitat increases but failed to provide sufficient habitat for Western meadowlark. Park system scenarios showed habitat increases, but high-quality habitats for Western meadowlark and Red-legged frog decreased. Network scenarios presented the best overall amount of habitats and high-quality habitats for the three species but constrained urban development options. Next, I used an individual-based wildlife model, HexSim, to simulate the effects of habitat configuration and to compare and contrast resulting wildlife population sizes among the eight future scenarios with the ca. 2010 baseline landscape. Network scenarios supported the largest number of Red-legged frog breeders. Park scenarios performed best for meadowlarks, while greenway scenarios showed the largest populations of squirrels. Four of the eight scenarios sustained viable populations of Western meadowlarks. Compact development scenarios performed best for most indicators, but dispersed development scenarios performed better for Western meadowlarks. This dissertation includes both previously published and unpublished material. Title: Open Space as an Armature for Urban Expansion: A Future Scenarios Study to Assess the Effects of Spatial Concepts on Wildlife Populations Author: Penteado, Homero Year: 2014 Urbanization is one of the biggest threats to biodiversity. To address this problem, landscape planners have increasingly adopted landscape ecology as a theoretical basis for planning. They use spatial concepts that express principles of landscape ecology in diagrammatic form to create frameworks for planning. This dissertation presents a quantitative approach to evaluate the application of spatial concepts developed to create an armature of open space in areas subject to urbanization. It focuses on the predicted urban expansion of Damascus, Oregon, as a case study. An alternative futures study was used to test three open space spatial concepts for patches, corridors and networks in combination with compact and dispersed urban development patterns. The resulting eight scenarios of land use and land cover were then modeled for the year 2060 to evaluate their effects on habitat quantity, quality and configuration and to identify tradeoffs between urban development and conservation for three focal wildlife species: Red-legged frog, Western meadowlark, and Douglas squirrel. Open space spatial concepts strongly influenced habitat quantity and quality differences among future scenarios. Development patterns showed less influence on those variables. Scenarios with no landscape ecological spatial concept provided the most land for urban development but reduced habitat quantity and quality. Greenway scenarios showed habitat increases but failed to provide sufficient habitat for Western meadowlark. Park system scenarios showed habitat increases, but high-quality habitats for Western meadowlark and Red-legged frog decreased. Network scenarios presented the best overall amount of habitats and high-quality habitats for the three species but constrained urban development options. Next, I used an individual-based wildlife model, HexSim, to simulate the effects of habitat configuration and to compare and contrast resulting wildlife population sizes among the eight future scenarios with the ca. 2010 baseline landscape. Network scenarios supported the largest number of Red-legged frog breeders. Park scenarios performed best for meadowlarks, while greenway scenarios showed the largest populations of squirrels. Four of the eight scenarios sustained viable populations of Western meadowlarks. Compact development scenarios performed best for most indicators, but dispersed development scenarios performed better for Western meadowlarks. This dissertation includes both previously published and unpublished material. Close

• 20. [Article] Restoring oak habitats in the Southern Willamette Valley, Oregon: A multi-objective tradeoffs analysis for landowners and managers

  xvii, 160 p. : ill. (some col.) A print copy of this thesis is available through the UO Libraries. Search the library catalog for the location and call number.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Restoring oak habitats in the Southern Willamette Valley, Oregon: A multi-objective tradeoffs analysis for landowners and managers Author: Ulrich, Nathan D., 1977- Year: 2011, 2010 xvii, 160 p. : ill. (some col.) A print copy of this thesis is available through the UO Libraries. Search the library catalog for the location and call number. Title: Restoring oak habitats in the Southern Willamette Valley, Oregon: A multi-objective tradeoffs analysis for landowners and managers Author: Ulrich, Nathan D., 1977- Year: 2011, 2010 xvii, 160 p. : ill. (some col.) A print copy of this thesis is available through the UO Libraries. Search the library catalog for the location and call number. Close