Search

Search Results

• 41. [Article] Umatilla and Meacham ecosystem analysis and Upland forest vegetation analysis: Umatilla and Meacham watersheds

  296 pp. Tables, figures, references, maps, glossary, appendices. "The Umatilla-Meacham ecosystem analysis area is located on the Walla Walla Ranger District of the Umatilla National Forest. The analysis ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Umatilla and Meacham ecosystem analysis and Upland forest vegetation analysis: Umatilla and Meacham watersheds Author: Umatilla National Forest (Agency : U.S.), Powell, David C. Year: 2008, 2001 296 pp. Tables, figures, references, maps, glossary, appendices. "The Umatilla-Meacham ecosystem analysis area is located on the Walla Walla Ranger District of the Umatilla National Forest. The analysis area lies on the west flank of the Blue Mountains in the headwaters of the Umatilla River subbasin (HUC #17070103), about 25 miles east of Pendleton, Oregon (Figure 1-1). Together, the two watersheds (Umatilla and Meacham) amount to about 200,700 acres, or about 313.5 square miles in area. About 70 percent of the analysis area is National Forest land (Figure 1-2)." Date of Upland forest vegetation analysis is October 1994. Captured June 18, 2008. Title: Umatilla and Meacham ecosystem analysis and Upland forest vegetation analysis: Umatilla and Meacham watersheds Author: Umatilla National Forest (Agency : U.S.), Powell, David C. Year: 2008, 2001 296 pp. Tables, figures, references, maps, glossary, appendices. "The Umatilla-Meacham ecosystem analysis area is located on the Walla Walla Ranger District of the Umatilla National Forest. The analysis area lies on the west flank of the Blue Mountains in the headwaters of the Umatilla River subbasin (HUC #17070103), about 25 miles east of Pendleton, Oregon (Figure 1-1). Together, the two watersheds (Umatilla and Meacham) amount to about 200,700 acres, or about 313.5 square miles in area. About 70 percent of the analysis area is National Forest land (Figure 1-2)." Date of Upland forest vegetation analysis is October 1994. Captured June 18, 2008. Close

• 42. [Article] Leadership Dynamics in Collaboration: Lessons from the Middle Fork John Day River Intensively Monitored Watershed Collaboration

  This study explores leadership dynamics in collaborative governance. The research features a collaboration case study of sixteen federal and state agency and NGO stakeholders. The collaboration is conducting ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Leadership Dynamics in Collaboration: Lessons from the Middle Fork John Day River Intensively Monitored Watershed Collaboration Author: Dutterer, Andrew Year: 2016 This study explores leadership dynamics in collaborative governance. The research features a collaboration case study of sixteen federal and state agency and NGO stakeholders. The collaboration is conducting a ten-year, basin-scale monitoring project of salmonid habitat restoration projects in the Middle Fork John Day (MFJD) River basin in Eastern Oregon. The monitoring project is known as an intensively monitored watershed (IMW), one of sixteen throughout the Pacific Northwest. The research is guided by the following question: How do leadership dynamics in the MFJD IMW collaborative governance structure facilitate effective collaborative process or create limitations to that process? This study uses qualitative research methods in evaluating multiple research sources. Insights from this study may prove valuable in providing guidance on effectively structuring and managing basin-scale collaborative habitat monitoring projects, including future IMW projects. This study further aims to contribute to research on collaborative leadership for the greater scholarship on collaboration. Title: Leadership Dynamics in Collaboration: Lessons from the Middle Fork John Day River Intensively Monitored Watershed Collaboration Author: Dutterer, Andrew Year: 2016 This study explores leadership dynamics in collaborative governance. The research features a collaboration case study of sixteen federal and state agency and NGO stakeholders. The collaboration is conducting a ten-year, basin-scale monitoring project of salmonid habitat restoration projects in the Middle Fork John Day (MFJD) River basin in Eastern Oregon. The monitoring project is known as an intensively monitored watershed (IMW), one of sixteen throughout the Pacific Northwest. The research is guided by the following question: How do leadership dynamics in the MFJD IMW collaborative governance structure facilitate effective collaborative process or create limitations to that process? This study uses qualitative research methods in evaluating multiple research sources. Insights from this study may prove valuable in providing guidance on effectively structuring and managing basin-scale collaborative habitat monitoring projects, including future IMW projects. This study further aims to contribute to research on collaborative leadership for the greater scholarship on collaboration. Close

• 43. [Article] Upper and Lower Alsea River Watershed fish passage restoration environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact

  51 pp. Abstract, glossary, maps, tables, references, illus. Township 13 South, Range 8 West, Sections 12, 27 and 34 and Township 14 South, Range 8 West, Section 35. Captured February 16, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Upper and Lower Alsea River Watershed fish passage restoration environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2008 51 pp. Abstract, glossary, maps, tables, references, illus. Township 13 South, Range 8 West, Sections 12, 27 and 34 and Township 14 South, Range 8 West, Section 35. Captured February 16, 2009. Title: Upper and Lower Alsea River Watershed fish passage restoration environmental assessment and finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2008 51 pp. Abstract, glossary, maps, tables, references, illus. Township 13 South, Range 8 West, Sections 12, 27 and 34 and Township 14 South, Range 8 West, Section 35. Captured February 16, 2009. Close

• 44. [Article] South River watershed restoration environmental assessment

  64 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, figures. Sections 26, 27, T 29 S, R 9 W; Section 33, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 27, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 13, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 22, T 30 S, R 3 W; Section ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: South River watershed restoration environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2000 64 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, figures. Sections 26, 27, T 29 S, R 9 W; Section 33, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 27, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 13, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 22, T 30 S, R 3 W; Section 2, T 31 S, R 6 W; Section 10, T 31 S, R 3 W; Section 1, T 29 S, R 8 W; Section 3, T 9 S, R 8 W; Section 3, T 30 S, R 7 W; Sections 10, 14, T 31 S, R 5 W; Section 23, T 29 S, R 4 W; Section 33, T 28 S, R 3 W. Captured July 26, 2007. Title: South River watershed restoration environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2000 64 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, figures. Sections 26, 27, T 29 S, R 9 W; Section 33, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 27, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 13, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 22, T 30 S, R 3 W; Section 2, T 31 S, R 6 W; Section 10, T 31 S, R 3 W; Section 1, T 29 S, R 8 W; Section 3, T 9 S, R 8 W; Section 3, T 30 S, R 7 W; Sections 10, 14, T 31 S, R 5 W; Section 23, T 29 S, R 4 W; Section 33, T 28 S, R 3 W. Captured July 26, 2007. Close

• 45. [Article] Tucannon ecosystem analysis

  264 pp. Tables, figures, references, maps, appendices, illus. "The Tucannon River subbasin covers about 322,000 acres of Garfield and Columbia counties. Two major streams drain this subbasin, the Tucannon ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Tucannon ecosystem analysis Author: Pomeroy Ranger District (Or. and Wash.) Year: 2008, 2002 264 pp. Tables, figures, references, maps, appendices, illus. "The Tucannon River subbasin covers about 322,000 acres of Garfield and Columbia counties. Two major streams drain this subbasin, the Tucannon River, which flows into the Snake River, and Pataha Creek, which is the largest tributary to the Tucannon River. Other tributaries to the Tucannon River include Willow Creek, Kellogg Creek, Cummings Creek, Little Tucannon River, Panjab Creek, Sheep Creek, and Bear Creek. The upper portion of the Tucannon subbasin, which is the focus of this report, is contained within the Umatilla National Forest." Date of map appendix is August 2002. Captured June 18, 2008. Title: Tucannon ecosystem analysis Author: Pomeroy Ranger District (Or. and Wash.) Year: 2008, 2002 264 pp. Tables, figures, references, maps, appendices, illus. "The Tucannon River subbasin covers about 322,000 acres of Garfield and Columbia counties. Two major streams drain this subbasin, the Tucannon River, which flows into the Snake River, and Pataha Creek, which is the largest tributary to the Tucannon River. Other tributaries to the Tucannon River include Willow Creek, Kellogg Creek, Cummings Creek, Little Tucannon River, Panjab Creek, Sheep Creek, and Bear Creek. The upper portion of the Tucannon subbasin, which is the focus of this report, is contained within the Umatilla National Forest." Date of map appendix is August 2002. Captured June 18, 2008. Close

• 46. [Article] South Fork McKenzie River enhancement project environmental assessment

  119 pp. Figures, tables, maps, and appendices. T.18S., R.5E., Sec. 25, 26, 36; T.18S, R.5 1/2 E, Sec. 31, 32, 33; T.19S, R.5E, Sec. 1 and 2. Captured April 25, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: South Fork McKenzie River enhancement project environmental assessment Author: McKenzie River Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2006 119 pp. Figures, tables, maps, and appendices. T.18S., R.5E., Sec. 25, 26, 36; T.18S, R.5 1/2 E, Sec. 31, 32, 33; T.19S, R.5E, Sec. 1 and 2. Captured April 25, 2007. Title: South Fork McKenzie River enhancement project environmental assessment Author: McKenzie River Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2006 119 pp. Figures, tables, maps, and appendices. T.18S., R.5E., Sec. 25, 26, 36; T.18S, R.5 1/2 E, Sec. 31, 32, 33; T.19S, R.5E, Sec. 1 and 2. Captured April 25, 2007. Close

• 47. [Article] Portland : Proposed river plan/North Reach policies, objectives, and recommendations

  130 pp. Bookmarks supplied by UO. Maps, tables, figures. Published October 28, 2008. Captured February 13, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Portland : Proposed river plan/North Reach policies, objectives, and recommendations Author: Durrant, Steve, Pettinari, James, Siegel, Darlene, Evergreen Funding Consultants, Portland (Or.). Bureau of Planning, Tetra Tech, Inc., Alta Planning and Design, Munro, David, Portland (Or.), Canty, Dennis Year: 2009, 2008 130 pp. Bookmarks supplied by UO. Maps, tables, figures. Published October 28, 2008. Captured February 13, 2009. Title: Portland : Proposed river plan/North Reach policies, objectives, and recommendations Author: Durrant, Steve, Pettinari, James, Siegel, Darlene, Evergreen Funding Consultants, Portland (Or.). Bureau of Planning, Tetra Tech, Inc., Alta Planning and Design, Munro, David, Portland (Or.), Canty, Dennis Year: 2009, 2008 130 pp. Bookmarks supplied by UO. Maps, tables, figures. Published October 28, 2008. Captured February 13, 2009. Close

• 48. [Article] Road decommissioning for aquatic restoration environmental assessment

  100 pp. Tables, figures, charts, maps, references, appendices, illus. Priority areas for watershed and aquatic habitat restoration are within the Fifteenmile Creek, Hood River, and Sandy River basins. ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Road decommissioning for aquatic restoration environmental assessment Author: United States. Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Region Year: 2009, 2008 100 pp. Tables, figures, charts, maps, references, appendices, illus. Priority areas for watershed and aquatic habitat restoration are within the Fifteenmile Creek, Hood River, and Sandy River basins. Captured March 5, 2009. Title: Road decommissioning for aquatic restoration environmental assessment Author: United States. Forest Service. Pacific Northwest Region Year: 2009, 2008 100 pp. Tables, figures, charts, maps, references, appendices, illus. Priority areas for watershed and aquatic habitat restoration are within the Fifteenmile Creek, Hood River, and Sandy River basins. Captured March 5, 2009. Close

• 49. [Article] Road decommissioning for aquatic restoration decision record

  13 pp. Tables. Priority areas for watershed and aquatic habitat restoration are within the Fifteenmile Creek, Hood River, and Sandy River basins. Captured March 5, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Road decommissioning for aquatic restoration decision record Author: Mt. Hood National Forest (Agency : U.S.) Year: 2009, 2008 13 pp. Tables. Priority areas for watershed and aquatic habitat restoration are within the Fifteenmile Creek, Hood River, and Sandy River basins. Captured March 5, 2009. Title: Road decommissioning for aquatic restoration decision record Author: Mt. Hood National Forest (Agency : U.S.) Year: 2009, 2008 13 pp. Tables. Priority areas for watershed and aquatic habitat restoration are within the Fifteenmile Creek, Hood River, and Sandy River basins. Captured March 5, 2009. Close

• 50. [Article] Ocean and Coastal Law Memo, Issue 45 : Western Water Rights, the Federal Navigation Servitude, and Salmon Restoration

  25 p.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Ocean and Coastal Law Memo, Issue 45 : Western Water Rights, the Federal Navigation Servitude, and Salmon Restoration Author: Hildreth, Richard G., Dahlstrom, Carrie, Wilde, Marshall L. Year: 2009, 1998 25 p. Title: Ocean and Coastal Law Memo, Issue 45 : Western Water Rights, the Federal Navigation Servitude, and Salmon Restoration Author: Hildreth, Richard G., Dahlstrom, Carrie, Wilde, Marshall L. Year: 2009, 1998 25 p. Close