Search

Search Results

• 1. [Article] ODFW Wildlife Areas

  Abstract -- Wildlife management areas owned or managed by Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: ODFW Wildlife Areas Abstract -- Wildlife management areas owned or managed by Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Title: ODFW Wildlife Areas Abstract -- Wildlife management areas owned or managed by Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Close

• 2. [Article] Vector Control - Wildlife Areas and Refuges

  Abstract -- The Wildlife Areas and Refuges dataset represents one type of “sensitive area” for the purpose of reviewing and approving Pesticide Use Plans per ODFW's obligations under ORS 452.140 and ORS ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Vector Control - Wildlife Areas and Refuges Abstract -- The Wildlife Areas and Refuges dataset represents one type of “sensitive area” for the purpose of reviewing and approving Pesticide Use Plans per ODFW's obligations under ORS 452.140 and ORS 452.245. ODFW will only make recommendations for mosquito control treatment protocols on sensitive areas, as identified in the ODFW Vector Control Guidance for Sensitive Areas document or confirmed by the local fish and wildlife biologists utilizing the guidelines in the document. In general, a sensitive area is any area where fish and wildlife and their habitats are rare or of local importance due to their special nature or role in the ecosystem. Species-specific and location-specific details are not maintained in this dataset. Title: Vector Control - Wildlife Areas and Refuges Abstract -- The Wildlife Areas and Refuges dataset represents one type of “sensitive area” for the purpose of reviewing and approving Pesticide Use Plans per ODFW's obligations under ORS 452.140 and ORS 452.245. ODFW will only make recommendations for mosquito control treatment protocols on sensitive areas, as identified in the ODFW Vector Control Guidance for Sensitive Areas document or confirmed by the local fish and wildlife biologists utilizing the guidelines in the document. In general, a sensitive area is any area where fish and wildlife and their habitats are rare or of local importance due to their special nature or role in the ecosystem. Species-specific and location-specific details are not maintained in this dataset. Close

• 3. [Article] ODFW Wildlife Management Units

  Abstract -- Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife management unit boundaries

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: ODFW Wildlife Management Units Abstract -- Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife management unit boundaries Title: ODFW Wildlife Management Units Abstract -- Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife management unit boundaries Close

• 4. [Article] The Oregon Conservation Strategy, 2006

  Abstract -- State and federal agencies, as well as other organizations, have developed and led many plans during the years to guide conservation of Oregon's fish and wildlife and their habitats. Most of ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: The Oregon Conservation Strategy, 2006 Abstract -- State and federal agencies, as well as other organizations, have developed and led many plans during the years to guide conservation of Oregon's fish and wildlife and their habitats. Most of these plans have focused on a particular species, area or natural resource. Although wildlife conservation often has been an implicit concern of these plans, many were developed primarily for other purposes. With the creation of this Oregon Conservation Strategy, Oregon has its first overarching state strategy for conserving fish and wildlife. The Conservation Strategy is an effort to use the best available science to create a broad vision and conceptual framework for long-term conservation of Oregon's native fish and wildlife, as well as various in­vertebrates and native plants. As a guide to conserving the species and habitats that have defined the nature of Oregon, this strategy can help ensure that Oregon's natural treasures are passed on to future generations. The Conservation Strategy emphasizes proactively conserving declining species and habitats to reduce the possibility of future federal or state listings. It is not a regulatory document, but instead presents issues and opportunities, and recommends voluntary actions that will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of conservation in Oregon. Healthy fish and wildlife populations require adequate habitat, which is provided in natural systems and, for many species, in landscapes managed for forestry, agriculture, range and urban uses. The goals of the Conservation Strategy are to maintain healthy fish and wildlife populations by maintaining and restoring functioning habitats, preventing declines of at-risk species, and reversing declines in these resources where possible. These goals fit well with ODFW's statutory obligation to protect and enhance Oregon's fish and wildlife and their habitats for use and enjoyment by present and future generations. However, this is not a management plan for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Instead, it is a broad strategy for all of Oregon, offering potential roles and opportunities for residents, agencies and organizations. It incorporates information and insights from a broad range of natural resources assessments and conservation plans, supple­mented by the professional expertise and practical experiences of a cross-section of Oregon's resource managers and conservation interests. It is designed to have a variety of applications both inside and outside of state government. Most important, perhaps, it establishes the basis for a common understanding of the challenges facing Oregon's fish and wildlife, and provides a shared set of priorities for addressing the state's conservation needs. The heart of the Conservation Strategy is a blueprint for voluntary action to address the long-term needs of Oregon's fish and wildlife. The future for many species will depend on landowners' and land managers' willingness to voluntarily take action on their own to protect and improve fish and wildlife habitat. The strategy outlined in this document considers fish and wildlife from a statewide perspective, establishing a broader context for decisions about the species and habitats in greatest need of conservation attention. It also recognizes that these issues vary in different regions, requiring conservation actions to be tailored to the unique needs of the fish, wildlife and human communities that coexist throughout Oregon. Much good work already is being done by private landowners. water-shed councils, conservation organizations and agencies like the many soil and water conservation districts. This strategy continues building on the solid foundation these groups have set for Oregon's conservation future. This document is called a strategy, not a plan, because its purpose is to help people make decisions more strategically about how they can invest time and resources in fish and wildlife conservation. To that end, the Conservation Strategy focuses on a suite of species and habitats, many of them closely linked, that are in greatest need of conservation attention. The strategy provides guidance on the types of actions most likely to benefit these species and habitats, and describes a variety of non-regulatory programs that can help landowners and land managers with implementation. For agencies and organizations working on a larger scale, the Conservation Strategy highlights specific geographic "Conservation Opportunity Areas" that provide good opportunities to address the conservation needs of high-priority habitats and species. These landscape-scale areas include both public and private ownership where targeted investments in conservation actions and incentives for private landowners are likely to generate the greatest long-term benefits for fish and wildlife. The expanding footprint of human development and 150 years of landscape alteration have left much of Oregon's fish and wildlife at varying degrees of risk. For example, the song of Oregon's state bird, the western meadowlark, is rarely heard in the Willamette Valley any more. A grassland bird still common in eastern Oregon, the meadowlark is not going to be a candidate for listing under the Endangered Species Act any time soon. But the state bird is in trouble across a significant portion of its historic range in Oregon. Like most of Oregon's wildlife, it retains a natural resilience and will respond to improved habitat conditions. However, the meadowlark needs some conservation attention. For the western meadowlark and dozens of other similarly vulnerable species including fish, amphibians, reptiles, mammals, invertebrates and plants, the Oregon Conservation Strategy offers hope for a more secure future. Title: The Oregon Conservation Strategy, 2006 Abstract -- State and federal agencies, as well as other organizations, have developed and led many plans during the years to guide conservation of Oregon's fish and wildlife and their habitats. Most of these plans have focused on a particular species, area or natural resource. Although wildlife conservation often has been an implicit concern of these plans, many were developed primarily for other purposes. With the creation of this Oregon Conservation Strategy, Oregon has its first overarching state strategy for conserving fish and wildlife. The Conservation Strategy is an effort to use the best available science to create a broad vision and conceptual framework for long-term conservation of Oregon's native fish and wildlife, as well as various in­vertebrates and native plants. As a guide to conserving the species and habitats that have defined the nature of Oregon, this strategy can help ensure that Oregon's natural treasures are passed on to future generations. The Conservation Strategy emphasizes proactively conserving declining species and habitats to reduce the possibility of future federal or state listings. It is not a regulatory document, but instead presents issues and opportunities, and recommends voluntary actions that will improve the efficiency and effectiveness of conservation in Oregon. Healthy fish and wildlife populations require adequate habitat, which is provided in natural systems and, for many species, in landscapes managed for forestry, agriculture, range and urban uses. The goals of the Conservation Strategy are to maintain healthy fish and wildlife populations by maintaining and restoring functioning habitats, preventing declines of at-risk species, and reversing declines in these resources where possible. These goals fit well with ODFW's statutory obligation to protect and enhance Oregon's fish and wildlife and their habitats for use and enjoyment by present and future generations. However, this is not a management plan for the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife. Instead, it is a broad strategy for all of Oregon, offering potential roles and opportunities for residents, agencies and organizations. It incorporates information and insights from a broad range of natural resources assessments and conservation plans, supple­mented by the professional expertise and practical experiences of a cross-section of Oregon's resource managers and conservation interests. It is designed to have a variety of applications both inside and outside of state government. Most important, perhaps, it establishes the basis for a common understanding of the challenges facing Oregon's fish and wildlife, and provides a shared set of priorities for addressing the state's conservation needs. The heart of the Conservation Strategy is a blueprint for voluntary action to address the long-term needs of Oregon's fish and wildlife. The future for many species will depend on landowners' and land managers' willingness to voluntarily take action on their own to protect and improve fish and wildlife habitat. The strategy outlined in this document considers fish and wildlife from a statewide perspective, establishing a broader context for decisions about the species and habitats in greatest need of conservation attention. It also recognizes that these issues vary in different regions, requiring conservation actions to be tailored to the unique needs of the fish, wildlife and human communities that coexist throughout Oregon. Much good work already is being done by private landowners. water-shed councils, conservation organizations and agencies like the many soil and water conservation districts. This strategy continues building on the solid foundation these groups have set for Oregon's conservation future. This document is called a strategy, not a plan, because its purpose is to help people make decisions more strategically about how they can invest time and resources in fish and wildlife conservation. To that end, the Conservation Strategy focuses on a suite of species and habitats, many of them closely linked, that are in greatest need of conservation attention. The strategy provides guidance on the types of actions most likely to benefit these species and habitats, and describes a variety of non-regulatory programs that can help landowners and land managers with implementation. For agencies and organizations working on a larger scale, the Conservation Strategy highlights specific geographic "Conservation Opportunity Areas" that provide good opportunities to address the conservation needs of high-priority habitats and species. These landscape-scale areas include both public and private ownership where targeted investments in conservation actions and incentives for private landowners are likely to generate the greatest long-term benefits for fish and wildlife. The expanding footprint of human development and 150 years of landscape alteration have left much of Oregon's fish and wildlife at varying degrees of risk. For example, the song of Oregon's state bird, the western meadowlark, is rarely heard in the Willamette Valley any more. A grassland bird still common in eastern Oregon, the meadowlark is not going to be a candidate for listing under the Endangered Species Act any time soon. But the state bird is in trouble across a significant portion of its historic range in Oregon. Like most of Oregon's wildlife, it retains a natural resilience and will respond to improved habitat conditions. However, the meadowlark needs some conservation attention. For the western meadowlark and dozens of other similarly vulnerable species including fish, amphibians, reptiles, mammals, invertebrates and plants, the Oregon Conservation Strategy offers hope for a more secure future. Close

• 5. [Article] McKenzie Watershed Action Plan for Water Quality and Fish and Wildlife Habitat

  Abstract -- This draft document refers to maps that are not included. It does include sections on the goals and objectives for water quality and fish and wildlife habitat in the McKenzie River watershed. ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: McKenzie Watershed Action Plan for Water Quality and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Abstract -- This draft document refers to maps that are not included. It does include sections on the goals and objectives for water quality and fish and wildlife habitat in the McKenzie River watershed. It also lists priority actions and presents plans for monitoring and evaluation. Title: McKenzie Watershed Action Plan for Water Quality and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Abstract -- This draft document refers to maps that are not included. It does include sections on the goals and objectives for water quality and fish and wildlife habitat in the McKenzie River watershed. It also lists priority actions and presents plans for monitoring and evaluation. Close

• 6. [Article] Willamette Valley and Oregon Coastal Refuge Complex; William L. Finlay National Wildlife Refuge Summary - 1979 Hunt Program

  Abstract -- None

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Willamette Valley and Oregon Coastal Refuge Complex; William L. Finlay National Wildlife Refuge Summary - 1979 Hunt Program Abstract -- None Title: Willamette Valley and Oregon Coastal Refuge Complex; William L. Finlay National Wildlife Refuge Summary - 1979 Hunt Program Abstract -- None Close

• 7. [Article] Klamath Tribe Agreement 1981

  Abstract -- The Klamath Indian Tribe, and the Klamath Game Commission, an agency of the Klamath Indian Tribe; and the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission, The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Klamath Tribe Agreement 1981 Abstract -- The Klamath Indian Tribe, and the Klamath Game Commission, an agency of the Klamath Indian Tribe; and the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission, The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Oregon State Police, parties in the above-captioned litigation and the United States of America wish to resolve the remaining issues in this case through the following agreement. Title: Klamath Tribe Agreement 1981 Abstract -- The Klamath Indian Tribe, and the Klamath Game Commission, an agency of the Klamath Indian Tribe; and the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission, The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, and the Oregon State Police, parties in the above-captioned litigation and the United States of America wish to resolve the remaining issues in this case through the following agreement. Close

• 8. [Article] Habitat Protection Policies and Standards of Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 1991

  Abstract -- The Habitat Protection Policies and Standards collected in this document are intended to provide guidance to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife employees. It is a working and evolving document ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Habitat Protection Policies and Standards of Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 1991 Abstract -- The Habitat Protection Policies and Standards collected in this document are intended to provide guidance to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife employees. It is a working and evolving document that responds to changing laws, habitat conditions, social and political attitudes, and increased knowledge. The Habitat Conservation Division of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife developed these habitat protection policies and standards using intra-agency task forces comprised of experts from throughout the state. Those policies and standards that significantly affect the public interest have been or will be developed into administrative rules through a public review and comment process. Title: Habitat Protection Policies and Standards of Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife 1991 Abstract -- The Habitat Protection Policies and Standards collected in this document are intended to provide guidance to Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife employees. It is a working and evolving document that responds to changing laws, habitat conditions, social and political attitudes, and increased knowledge. The Habitat Conservation Division of the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife developed these habitat protection policies and standards using intra-agency task forces comprised of experts from throughout the state. Those policies and standards that significantly affect the public interest have been or will be developed into administrative rules through a public review and comment process. Close

• 9. [Article] ODFW Access and Habitat Areas and Projects in Oregon (2017)

  Abstract -- To show access areas supported by, or associated with, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) Access and Habitat Program. For more details see: https://myodfw.com/articles/hunting-private-lands-access-habitat-program; ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: ODFW Access and Habitat Areas and Projects in Oregon (2017) Abstract -- To show access areas supported by, or associated with, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) Access and Habitat Program. For more details see: https://myodfw.com/articles/hunting-private-lands-access-habitat-program; http://www.dfw.state.or.us/lands/AH/; Title: ODFW Access and Habitat Areas and Projects in Oregon (2017) Abstract -- To show access areas supported by, or associated with, the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) Access and Habitat Program. For more details see: https://myodfw.com/articles/hunting-private-lands-access-habitat-program; http://www.dfw.state.or.us/lands/AH/; Close

• 10. [Article] Fish Management Plan Prineville Reservoir 1986

  Abstract -- Prineville Reservoir is a Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) on-stream multi-purpose reservoir on the Crooked River in Crook County, approximately 17 miles south of Prineville. The project was authorized ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Fish Management Plan Prineville Reservoir 1986 Abstract -- Prineville Reservoir is a Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) on-stream multi-purpose reservoir on the Crooked River in Crook County, approximately 17 miles south of Prineville. The project was authorized by Congress in 1956 with functions including irrigation, flood control and industrial water. Recreation and downstream fish and wildlife benefits were not included as project functions. Water impounding began December 12, 1960 and the reservoir became functional during the winter of 1960-61. No upstream fish passage was provided. Various agencies are involved in the reservoir operation. Ochoco Irrigation District, under BOR guidelines, operates the water control structure, thus controlling reservoir pool level as well as stream flow below the reservoir. Prineville Reservoir State Park is managed and maintained by State Parks. Crook County maintains two boat ramps on the reservoir. The Department of Fish and Wildlife manages the fish resources of the reservoir and has entered into an agreement with BOR and Crook County to manage an 18 square mile area adjacent to the upper one-third of the reservoir for waterfowl, big game and other wildlife. Prineville Reservoir is heavily used by recreationists. The 1983 BOR Recreation and Wildlife Summary indicated that the reservoir was used by 285,031 anglers, hunters, boaters, swimmers and campers. In October 1986, the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission accepted the Department's recommendation to manage Prineville Reservoir for hatchery trout and wild bass and brown bullheads. Title: Fish Management Plan Prineville Reservoir 1986 Abstract -- Prineville Reservoir is a Bureau of Reclamation (BOR) on-stream multi-purpose reservoir on the Crooked River in Crook County, approximately 17 miles south of Prineville. The project was authorized by Congress in 1956 with functions including irrigation, flood control and industrial water. Recreation and downstream fish and wildlife benefits were not included as project functions. Water impounding began December 12, 1960 and the reservoir became functional during the winter of 1960-61. No upstream fish passage was provided. Various agencies are involved in the reservoir operation. Ochoco Irrigation District, under BOR guidelines, operates the water control structure, thus controlling reservoir pool level as well as stream flow below the reservoir. Prineville Reservoir State Park is managed and maintained by State Parks. Crook County maintains two boat ramps on the reservoir. The Department of Fish and Wildlife manages the fish resources of the reservoir and has entered into an agreement with BOR and Crook County to manage an 18 square mile area adjacent to the upper one-third of the reservoir for waterfowl, big game and other wildlife. Prineville Reservoir is heavily used by recreationists. The 1983 BOR Recreation and Wildlife Summary indicated that the reservoir was used by 285,031 anglers, hunters, boaters, swimmers and campers. In October 1986, the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission accepted the Department's recommendation to manage Prineville Reservoir for hatchery trout and wild bass and brown bullheads. Close

• 11. [Article] ODFW Wildlife Linkages Datasets

  Abstract -- Two GIS datasets are contained in this record: The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, under the Oregon Wildlife Movement Strategy and in partnership with other government agencies, has ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: ODFW Wildlife Linkages Datasets Abstract -- Two GIS datasets are contained in this record: The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, under the Oregon Wildlife Movement Strategy and in partnership with other government agencies, has worked to produce this dataset of wildlife linkages, which are key movement areas for wildlife, emphasizing areas that cross paved roads. The primary goal of this dataset and its related attributes are to address the question: "Where is the best place on the landscape to provide for animal movement needs that are essential to life history function?" Title: ODFW Wildlife Linkages Datasets Abstract -- Two GIS datasets are contained in this record: The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife, under the Oregon Wildlife Movement Strategy and in partnership with other government agencies, has worked to produce this dataset of wildlife linkages, which are key movement areas for wildlife, emphasizing areas that cross paved roads. The primary goal of this dataset and its related attributes are to address the question: "Where is the best place on the landscape to provide for animal movement needs that are essential to life history function?" Close

• 12. [Article] Columbia River Basin - System Configuration Study; Snake River Drawdown, Migratory Canal, Upstream Collector Planning Aid Report

  Abstract -- This Planning Aid Report (PAR) is provided to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District, to assist with reconnaissance-level planning for the System Configuration Study (SCS), ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Columbia River Basin - System Configuration Study; Snake River Drawdown, Migratory Canal, Upstream Collector Planning Aid Report Abstract -- This Planning Aid Report (PAR) is provided to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District, to assist with reconnaissance-level planning for the System Configuration Study (SCS), which is a component of the Columbia River Salmon Mitigation Analysis (CRSMA). A preliminary draft and draft of the PAR were circulated for review and comment, and comments have been incorporated or addressed in the PAR. The SCS is evaluating physical changes to the configuration of the Columbia River System for the purpose of improving survival for anadromous fish. The proposed changes include modification of spillways, powerhouses and associated structures on the lower Snake River, and the construction of additional dams and structures which would permit modifications in present system operation. This specific PAR addresses the lower Snake River drawdown alternatives and the upstream collection and transport alternatives, including the migratory canal and tube. In addition, specific requests have been made from the Columbia-Snake River Drawdown Committee to evaluate designs for a side-channel spi 11 way and downstream weir at each of the lower Snake River projects. These elements were not addressed in the preliminary draft of the PAR. Other elements of SCS, such as the John Day drawdown and upstream storage, are being addressed by the Portland and Boise Fish and Wildlife Ecological Services Offices of the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. The objectives of this PAR are to: 1) Describe relevant fish and wildlife populations and habitat within the study area; 2) Describe future fish and wildlife habitat conditions without the project; 3) Appraise existing fish and wildlife utilization; 4) Evaluate impacts of project alternatives on fish and wildlife resources; 5) Identify data gaps and study needs which need to be addressed during feasibility; and 6) Identify potential mitigation opportunities and requirements. In order to evaluate a full range of alternatives to improve the survival of anadromous fish stocks in the Snake River, this PAR also recommends that alternatives to evaluate the removal of one to four dams on the lower Snake River, and permanent, partial drawdowns be included in the range of alternatives under consideration. The need to consider these alternatives has become evident as uncertainties associated with the initially proposed alternatives have developed. Title: Columbia River Basin - System Configuration Study; Snake River Drawdown, Migratory Canal, Upstream Collector Planning Aid Report Abstract -- This Planning Aid Report (PAR) is provided to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, Walla Walla District, to assist with reconnaissance-level planning for the System Configuration Study (SCS), which is a component of the Columbia River Salmon Mitigation Analysis (CRSMA). A preliminary draft and draft of the PAR were circulated for review and comment, and comments have been incorporated or addressed in the PAR. The SCS is evaluating physical changes to the configuration of the Columbia River System for the purpose of improving survival for anadromous fish. The proposed changes include modification of spillways, powerhouses and associated structures on the lower Snake River, and the construction of additional dams and structures which would permit modifications in present system operation. This specific PAR addresses the lower Snake River drawdown alternatives and the upstream collection and transport alternatives, including the migratory canal and tube. In addition, specific requests have been made from the Columbia-Snake River Drawdown Committee to evaluate designs for a side-channel spi 11 way and downstream weir at each of the lower Snake River projects. These elements were not addressed in the preliminary draft of the PAR. Other elements of SCS, such as the John Day drawdown and upstream storage, are being addressed by the Portland and Boise Fish and Wildlife Ecological Services Offices of the U.S Fish and Wildlife Service. The objectives of this PAR are to: 1) Describe relevant fish and wildlife populations and habitat within the study area; 2) Describe future fish and wildlife habitat conditions without the project; 3) Appraise existing fish and wildlife utilization; 4) Evaluate impacts of project alternatives on fish and wildlife resources; 5) Identify data gaps and study needs which need to be addressed during feasibility; and 6) Identify potential mitigation opportunities and requirements. In order to evaluate a full range of alternatives to improve the survival of anadromous fish stocks in the Snake River, this PAR also recommends that alternatives to evaluate the removal of one to four dams on the lower Snake River, and permanent, partial drawdowns be included in the range of alternatives under consideration. The need to consider these alternatives has become evident as uncertainties associated with the initially proposed alternatives have developed. Close

• 13. [Article] McKenzie River Watershed Technical Report for Water Quality and Fish and Wildlife Habitat

  Abstract -- This draft document refers to maps that are not included. It summarizes water quality and fish habitat studies for the McKenzie River and includes sections on basin characteristics, existing ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: McKenzie River Watershed Technical Report for Water Quality and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Abstract -- This draft document refers to maps that are not included. It summarizes water quality and fish habitat studies for the McKenzie River and includes sections on basin characteristics, existing conditions for water quality and fish and wildlife habitat, sub-basin condition summaries, priority actions, and lastly, monitoring, evaluation and implementation. Title: McKenzie River Watershed Technical Report for Water Quality and Fish and Wildlife Habitat Abstract -- This draft document refers to maps that are not included. It summarizes water quality and fish habitat studies for the McKenzie River and includes sections on basin characteristics, existing conditions for water quality and fish and wildlife habitat, sub-basin condition summaries, priority actions, and lastly, monitoring, evaluation and implementation. Close

• 14. [Article] White Sturgeon Mitigation and Restoration in the Columbia and Snake Rivers Upstream from Bonneville Dam

  Abstract -- We report on our progress from April 2005 through March 2006 on determining the effects of mitigative measures on productivity of white sturgeon populations in the Columbia River downstream ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: White Sturgeon Mitigation and Restoration in the Columbia and Snake Rivers Upstream from Bonneville Dam Abstract -- We report on our progress from April 2005 through March 2006 on determining the effects of mitigative measures on productivity of white sturgeon populations in the Columbia River downstream from McNary Dam, and on determining the status and habitat requirements of white sturgeon populations in the Columbia and Snake rivers upstream from McNary Dam. The study is a cooperative effort by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW; Report A;), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW; Report B;), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC; Report C), and Montana State University (MSU; Report D). Title: White Sturgeon Mitigation and Restoration in the Columbia and Snake Rivers Upstream from Bonneville Dam Abstract -- We report on our progress from April 2005 through March 2006 on determining the effects of mitigative measures on productivity of white sturgeon populations in the Columbia River downstream from McNary Dam, and on determining the status and habitat requirements of white sturgeon populations in the Columbia and Snake rivers upstream from McNary Dam. The study is a cooperative effort by the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW; Report A;), Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife (WDFW; Report B;), U.S. Geological Survey (USGS), Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission (CRITFC; Report C), and Montana State University (MSU; Report D). Close

• 15. [Article] Wildlife and Vehicle Collision Hotspots - Lines

  Abstract -- High frequency wildlife carcass incidents (from Oregon Department of Transportation dispatch records of carcass reports, 1995 - 2006, all state highways.) Includes only records of deer and ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Wildlife and Vehicle Collision Hotspots - Lines Abstract -- High frequency wildlife carcass incidents (from Oregon Department of Transportation dispatch records of carcass reports, 1995 - 2006, all state highways.) Includes only records of deer and elk, with reported precision of >= 0.5 mile. Hot spots were derived from a kernel density probability analysis, and mapped using the Jenks Natural Breaks method to rank the values into five continuous categories. Model parameters include 100x100 grid cells and a 5280 foot search radius. Title: Wildlife and Vehicle Collision Hotspots - Lines Abstract -- High frequency wildlife carcass incidents (from Oregon Department of Transportation dispatch records of carcass reports, 1995 - 2006, all state highways.) Includes only records of deer and elk, with reported precision of >= 0.5 mile. Hot spots were derived from a kernel density probability analysis, and mapped using the Jenks Natural Breaks method to rank the values into five continuous categories. Model parameters include 100x100 grid cells and a 5280 foot search radius. Close

• 16. [Article] Wildlife and Vehicle Collision Hotspots - Points

  Abstract -- High frequency wildlife carcass incidents (from Oregon Department of Transportation dispatch records of carcass reports, 1995 - 2006, all state highways.) Includes only records of deer and ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Wildlife and Vehicle Collision Hotspots - Points Abstract -- High frequency wildlife carcass incidents (from Oregon Department of Transportation dispatch records of carcass reports, 1995 - 2006, all state highways.) Includes only records of deer and elk, with reported precision of >= 0.5 mile. Hot spots were derived from a kernel density probability analysis, and mapped using the Jenks Natural Breaks method to rank the values into five continuous categories. Model parameters include 100x100 grid cells and a 5280 foot search radius. Title: Wildlife and Vehicle Collision Hotspots - Points Abstract -- High frequency wildlife carcass incidents (from Oregon Department of Transportation dispatch records of carcass reports, 1995 - 2006, all state highways.) Includes only records of deer and elk, with reported precision of >= 0.5 mile. Hot spots were derived from a kernel density probability analysis, and mapped using the Jenks Natural Breaks method to rank the values into five continuous categories. Model parameters include 100x100 grid cells and a 5280 foot search radius. Close

• 17. [Article] ODFW Conservation Opportunity Areas

  Abstract -- Conservation Opportunity Areas were developed for the Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy to help identify priority areas for conservation actions that directly benefit wildlife and ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: ODFW Conservation Opportunity Areas Abstract -- Conservation Opportunity Areas were developed for the Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy to help identify priority areas for conservation actions that directly benefit wildlife and habitats. Title: ODFW Conservation Opportunity Areas Abstract -- Conservation Opportunity Areas were developed for the Comprehensive Wildlife Conservation Strategy to help identify priority areas for conservation actions that directly benefit wildlife and habitats. Close

• 18. [Article] Fish Management Plan Metolius River 1981

  Abstract -- The Metolius River is a major tributary to the Deschutes River and courses through an extremely popular recreation area. It is roaded almost its entire length, and is located a short drive ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Fish Management Plan Metolius River 1981 Abstract -- The Metolius River is a major tributary to the Deschutes River and courses through an extremely popular recreation area. It is roaded almost its entire length, and is located a short drive off U.S. Highway 26. The stream is a favorite of many trout anglers. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Department is currently managing the Metolius River from Lake Creek to Candle Creek (11 miles) with annual releases of hatchery yearling rainbow trout. In July 1981, the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission accepted the Department's recommendation to continue to manage the Metolius River for wild and hatchery trout. Title: Fish Management Plan Metolius River 1981 Abstract -- The Metolius River is a major tributary to the Deschutes River and courses through an extremely popular recreation area. It is roaded almost its entire length, and is located a short drive off U.S. Highway 26. The stream is a favorite of many trout anglers. The Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Department is currently managing the Metolius River from Lake Creek to Candle Creek (11 miles) with annual releases of hatchery yearling rainbow trout. In July 1981, the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission accepted the Department's recommendation to continue to manage the Metolius River for wild and hatchery trout. Close

• 19. [Article] Upper Deschutes River Subbasin Fish Management Plan: A proposal to the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission

  Abstract -- The upper Deschutes River sub basin is one of three sub basins in the upper Deschutes River basin above Round Butte and Pelton dams. The other two are the Crooked River subbasin and the Metiolius ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Upper Deschutes River Subbasin Fish Management Plan: A proposal to the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission Abstract -- The upper Deschutes River sub basin is one of three sub basins in the upper Deschutes River basin above Round Butte and Pelton dams. The other two are the Crooked River subbasin and the Metiolius River subbasin, plans for which have been adopted previously by the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission. Title: Upper Deschutes River Subbasin Fish Management Plan: A proposal to the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission Abstract -- The upper Deschutes River sub basin is one of three sub basins in the upper Deschutes River basin above Round Butte and Pelton dams. The other two are the Crooked River subbasin and the Metiolius River subbasin, plans for which have been adopted previously by the Oregon Fish and Wildlife Commission. Close

• 20. [Article] Vector Control - Unique, Rare and Vulnerable Habitats

  Abstract -- The Unique, Rare and Vulnerable Habitat dataset represents one type of “sensitive area” for the purpose of reviewing and approving Pesticide Use Plans per ODFW's obligations under ORS 452.140 ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Vector Control - Unique, Rare and Vulnerable Habitats Abstract -- The Unique, Rare and Vulnerable Habitat dataset represents one type of “sensitive area” for the purpose of reviewing and approving Pesticide Use Plans per ODFW's obligations under ORS 452.140 and ORS 452.245. ODFW will only make recommendations for mosquito control treatment protocols on sensitive areas, as identified in "ODFW's Vector Control Guidance for Sensitive Areas" (http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/water/vector_control_guidance.asp) or confirmed by the local fish and wildlife biologists utilizing the guidelines in the document. In general, a sensitive area is any area where fish and wildlife and their habitats are rare or of local importance due to their special nature or role in the ecosystem. Species-specific and location-specific details are not maintained in this dataset. Title: Vector Control - Unique, Rare and Vulnerable Habitats Abstract -- The Unique, Rare and Vulnerable Habitat dataset represents one type of “sensitive area” for the purpose of reviewing and approving Pesticide Use Plans per ODFW's obligations under ORS 452.140 and ORS 452.245. ODFW will only make recommendations for mosquito control treatment protocols on sensitive areas, as identified in "ODFW's Vector Control Guidance for Sensitive Areas" (http://www.dfw.state.or.us/fish/water/vector_control_guidance.asp) or confirmed by the local fish and wildlife biologists utilizing the guidelines in the document. In general, a sensitive area is any area where fish and wildlife and their habitats are rare or of local importance due to their special nature or role in the ecosystem. Species-specific and location-specific details are not maintained in this dataset. Close