Search

Search Results

• 31. [Article] Effectiveness Monitoring for LWD Placement in South Slough Tidal Wetlands (OWEB #205-111)

  Abstract -- Effectiveness monitoring of LWD placed in South Slough’s upper estuary wasdesigned to accomplish the following: - Determine presence/absence and behavior of juvenile salmonids (i.e., cohoand ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Effectiveness Monitoring for LWD Placement in South Slough Tidal Wetlands (OWEB #205-111) Abstract -- Effectiveness monitoring of LWD placed in South Slough’s upper estuary wasdesigned to accomplish the following: - Determine presence/absence and behavior of juvenile salmonids (i.e., cohoand cutthroat trout) in and around LWD using underwater videographyand acoustic tagging methods (a late addition to the project); - Monitor abundance and species composition of juvenile salmonids in tidal creeks with (and without) LWD using fyke nets; - Monitor fish use of other subtidal habitats with beach seines; - Track changes in invertebrate abundance and composition; - Detect wood movement with sub-meter GPS tracking; - Record changes in channel profile around LWD with detailed elevationsurveys; and, - Track water temperature and flow in locations near and away from LWD. Large woody debris was placed in 29 locations in South Slough’s upper estuary. The effectiveness monitoring project focused on 12 sites, six pairs based on configuration and location Title: Effectiveness Monitoring for LWD Placement in South Slough Tidal Wetlands (OWEB #205-111) Abstract -- Effectiveness monitoring of LWD placed in South Slough’s upper estuary wasdesigned to accomplish the following: - Determine presence/absence and behavior of juvenile salmonids (i.e., cohoand cutthroat trout) in and around LWD using underwater videographyand acoustic tagging methods (a late addition to the project); - Monitor abundance and species composition of juvenile salmonids in tidal creeks with (and without) LWD using fyke nets; - Monitor fish use of other subtidal habitats with beach seines; - Track changes in invertebrate abundance and composition; - Detect wood movement with sub-meter GPS tracking; - Record changes in channel profile around LWD with detailed elevationsurveys; and, - Track water temperature and flow in locations near and away from LWD. Large woody debris was placed in 29 locations in South Slough’s upper estuary. The effectiveness monitoring project focused on 12 sites, six pairs based on configuration and location Close

• 32. [Article] Klamath River (Below Keno Dam) Trout Management Program Including Spencer Creek 1978

  Abstract -- The Klamath River is an extremely productive stream, but below Keno Dam it suffers from water fluctuation, poor water quality, lack of spawning gravel, and competition. The stream below Keno ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Klamath River (Below Keno Dam) Trout Management Program Including Spencer Creek 1978 Abstract -- The Klamath River is an extremely productive stream, but below Keno Dam it suffers from water fluctuation, poor water quality, lack of spawning gravel, and competition. The stream below Keno Dam and below the Boyle powerplant fluctuates from power production and irrigation manipulation. The five-mile section immediately downstream from Boyle Dam is the only portion that remains relatively stable. Low quantitites of dissolved oxygen and high water temperatures are chronic problems in the Keno area and adversely affect the river downstream. Most spawning gravel is located in Spencer Creek. The main river has a poor gravel supply. Competition from the various fish species in Boyle Reservoir has undoubtedly impacted the trout population and the spawning run into Spencer Creek. The Klamath River may be the most productive stream in Oregon. Although it has limitations on its production capabilities, it will be managed for wild trout only. Title: Klamath River (Below Keno Dam) Trout Management Program Including Spencer Creek 1978 Abstract -- The Klamath River is an extremely productive stream, but below Keno Dam it suffers from water fluctuation, poor water quality, lack of spawning gravel, and competition. The stream below Keno Dam and below the Boyle powerplant fluctuates from power production and irrigation manipulation. The five-mile section immediately downstream from Boyle Dam is the only portion that remains relatively stable. Low quantitites of dissolved oxygen and high water temperatures are chronic problems in the Keno area and adversely affect the river downstream. Most spawning gravel is located in Spencer Creek. The main river has a poor gravel supply. Competition from the various fish species in Boyle Reservoir has undoubtedly impacted the trout population and the spawning run into Spencer Creek. The Klamath River may be the most productive stream in Oregon. Although it has limitations on its production capabilities, it will be managed for wild trout only. Close

• 33. [Article] Crook County Lakes and Reservoirs Master Plan for Angler Access and Associated Recreational Uses 1968

  Abstract -- Crook County, located in the central part of the state, encompasses an area of approximately 3,000 square miles. The climate of this region is semiarid, characterized by low winter and high ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Crook County Lakes and Reservoirs Master Plan for Angler Access and Associated Recreational Uses 1968 Abstract -- Crook County, located in the central part of the state, encompasses an area of approximately 3,000 square miles. The climate of this region is semiarid, characterized by low winter and high summer temperatures. There are at the present time only six bodies of water available for public angling within the county. Prineville and Ochoco Reservoirs are 3,000 and 1,200 acres respectively, and represent 95% of the total water area available to the public. The others are either small reservoirs or ponds with a combined area of less than 225 surface acres. An additional two reservoirs and two private lakes have been recommended for future development . The fishery consists primarily of rainbow trout and a light warm-water fishery in one of the reservoirs. The season opens in April and closes at the end of October, except for Prineville and Ochoco Reservoirs which are open to angling the entire year. Title: Crook County Lakes and Reservoirs Master Plan for Angler Access and Associated Recreational Uses 1968 Abstract -- Crook County, located in the central part of the state, encompasses an area of approximately 3,000 square miles. The climate of this region is semiarid, characterized by low winter and high summer temperatures. There are at the present time only six bodies of water available for public angling within the county. Prineville and Ochoco Reservoirs are 3,000 and 1,200 acres respectively, and represent 95% of the total water area available to the public. The others are either small reservoirs or ponds with a combined area of less than 225 surface acres. An additional two reservoirs and two private lakes have been recommended for future development . The fishery consists primarily of rainbow trout and a light warm-water fishery in one of the reservoirs. The season opens in April and closes at the end of October, except for Prineville and Ochoco Reservoirs which are open to angling the entire year. Close

• 34. [Article] Lake Survey of some Lakes in Deschutes and Willamette National Forests, 1954

  Abstract -- July, August and September, 1954, sixty-two Cascade Mountain lakes were surveyed by the Oregon State Game Commission to collect basic data necessarily for the future management of existing ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Lake Survey of some Lakes in Deschutes and Willamette National Forests, 1954 Abstract -- July, August and September, 1954, sixty-two Cascade Mountain lakes were surveyed by the Oregon State Game Commission to collect basic data necessarily for the future management of existing trout populations. The survey was devoted to the examination of fish populations, recording water temperatures, physical characteristics and obtaining miscellaneous information pertinent to each lake. The authors spent forty-three working days from July 8 to September 9, 1954 conducting the survey and eleven working days repairing equipment and moving camp to new locations. The location and size of lakes varied. The area of the lakes surveyed ranged from 1 to 85S surface acres Elevation ranged from 4,500 feet to 6,400 feet. Thirty-two lakes were located in the Willamette National Forest in Watershed 2 and thirty were located in Watershed 5 in the Deschutes National Forest. Page 3 contains the names of lakes arranged tn alphabetical order. The survey procedure and analysis was identical to the high lake survey of 1953. Title: Lake Survey of some Lakes in Deschutes and Willamette National Forests, 1954 Abstract -- July, August and September, 1954, sixty-two Cascade Mountain lakes were surveyed by the Oregon State Game Commission to collect basic data necessarily for the future management of existing trout populations. The survey was devoted to the examination of fish populations, recording water temperatures, physical characteristics and obtaining miscellaneous information pertinent to each lake. The authors spent forty-three working days from July 8 to September 9, 1954 conducting the survey and eleven working days repairing equipment and moving camp to new locations. The location and size of lakes varied. The area of the lakes surveyed ranged from 1 to 85S surface acres Elevation ranged from 4,500 feet to 6,400 feet. Thirty-two lakes were located in the Willamette National Forest in Watershed 2 and thirty were located in Watershed 5 in the Deschutes National Forest. Page 3 contains the names of lakes arranged tn alphabetical order. The survey procedure and analysis was identical to the high lake survey of 1953. Close

• 35. [Article] Survey of Crescent Lake, 1964

  Abstract -- Crescent Lake, one of the impressive mountain lakes of Oregon, is located in Township 24 South, Range 6 East, on the east slope of the Cascade Range just southeast of Diamond Peak. Its south ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Survey of Crescent Lake, 1964 Abstract -- Crescent Lake, one of the impressive mountain lakes of Oregon, is located in Township 24 South, Range 6 East, on the east slope of the Cascade Range just southeast of Diamond Peak. Its south shore is skirted by the old Oregon Central Military Road, and the Southern Pacific Cascade Line passes a little to the east of the lake. It was named for its shape by B.J. Pengra and W.H. Odell in July, 1865. A dam located at the mouth of Crescent Lake was first constructed in 1922 to be used for irrigational purposes. Later, in 1954, another larger dam was constructed. The purpose of surveying Crescent Lake was to obtain the necessary physical, chemical and biological characteristics needed for fishery management. Also presented in this report are past records of creel censusing, gill netting, fish stocking, water temperatures, and water levels. Title: Survey of Crescent Lake, 1964 Abstract -- Crescent Lake, one of the impressive mountain lakes of Oregon, is located in Township 24 South, Range 6 East, on the east slope of the Cascade Range just southeast of Diamond Peak. Its south shore is skirted by the old Oregon Central Military Road, and the Southern Pacific Cascade Line passes a little to the east of the lake. It was named for its shape by B.J. Pengra and W.H. Odell in July, 1865. A dam located at the mouth of Crescent Lake was first constructed in 1922 to be used for irrigational purposes. Later, in 1954, another larger dam was constructed. The purpose of surveying Crescent Lake was to obtain the necessary physical, chemical and biological characteristics needed for fishery management. Also presented in this report are past records of creel censusing, gill netting, fish stocking, water temperatures, and water levels. Close

• 36. [Article] Little Deschutes Subbasin Watershed Assessment

  Abstract -- Many of the impacts to fish and wildlife habitat and water quality in the Little Deschutes River Subbasin are concentrated in the areas of housing, roads, and other human development. Most ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Little Deschutes Subbasin Watershed Assessment Abstract -- Many of the impacts to fish and wildlife habitat and water quality in the Little Deschutes River Subbasin are concentrated in the areas of housing, roads, and other human development. Most of the human population in the subbasin is concentrated around the community centers of La Pine, Gilchrist, Crescent, and Crescent Lake. There is significant dispersed development along the lower reaches of the Little Deschutes River between the communities of Sunriver and La Pine -an area characterized by gentle topography and depressions with forested wetlands, marshes and shallow lakes. Streams in this area, as illustrated by the Little Deschutes River , are low gradient and originate in the high elevation areas in the southwest portion of the watershed where there is higher precipitation. This ownership pattern has significant implications for natural resource management, as lower gradient floodplain areas tend to provide important wetland, fish, and wildlife habitat. Key Findings Fuel Loading: Having homes safe from wildfires is a concern for many residents. Fire suppression has increased the amount of dry wood in the area, creating a ready source for major wildfires. Riparian Areas and Wetlands: Loss of wetland and riparian areas , especially in the lower areas along the Little Deschutes River , has affected a number of resources. Water quality has been affected by the reduced wetlands that act as filters of nitrogen; the loss of streamside trees and other vegetation reduces shade that helps to cool water temperatures. Finally, loss ofwetlands and riparian vegetation has reduced important fish and wildlife habitats. Wildlife: The growth and development have altered wildlife habitats. Loss of wetlands, streamside vegetation, and other changes in the watershed have reduced important wildlife habitat. Roads and development have impacted migrating mule deer, increasing collisions between deer and cars and altering their migration pathways. Fish: There has been a significant loss of native trout and an increase in introduced brook and brown trout in the Little Deschutes River and tributaries. Loss of native trout is from competition with introduced species and changes in aquatic habitat and water temperatures. Water Quality: A major concern about the water in the river is unusually high temperatures in the summer and the abnormal growth of algae. Other studies indicated that there are problems with groundwater loading ofnitrogen. The high water table (with associated wetlands), and porous pumice soils contributes to increased nitrates, a by-product of septic systems and an indicator of human pathogens. Title: Little Deschutes Subbasin Watershed Assessment Abstract -- Many of the impacts to fish and wildlife habitat and water quality in the Little Deschutes River Subbasin are concentrated in the areas of housing, roads, and other human development. Most of the human population in the subbasin is concentrated around the community centers of La Pine, Gilchrist, Crescent, and Crescent Lake. There is significant dispersed development along the lower reaches of the Little Deschutes River between the communities of Sunriver and La Pine -an area characterized by gentle topography and depressions with forested wetlands, marshes and shallow lakes. Streams in this area, as illustrated by the Little Deschutes River , are low gradient and originate in the high elevation areas in the southwest portion of the watershed where there is higher precipitation. This ownership pattern has significant implications for natural resource management, as lower gradient floodplain areas tend to provide important wetland, fish, and wildlife habitat. Key Findings Fuel Loading: Having homes safe from wildfires is a concern for many residents. Fire suppression has increased the amount of dry wood in the area, creating a ready source for major wildfires. Riparian Areas and Wetlands: Loss of wetland and riparian areas , especially in the lower areas along the Little Deschutes River , has affected a number of resources. Water quality has been affected by the reduced wetlands that act as filters of nitrogen; the loss of streamside trees and other vegetation reduces shade that helps to cool water temperatures. Finally, loss ofwetlands and riparian vegetation has reduced important fish and wildlife habitats. Wildlife: The growth and development have altered wildlife habitats. Loss of wetlands, streamside vegetation, and other changes in the watershed have reduced important wildlife habitat. Roads and development have impacted migrating mule deer, increasing collisions between deer and cars and altering their migration pathways. Fish: There has been a significant loss of native trout and an increase in introduced brook and brown trout in the Little Deschutes River and tributaries. Loss of native trout is from competition with introduced species and changes in aquatic habitat and water temperatures. Water Quality: A major concern about the water in the river is unusually high temperatures in the summer and the abnormal growth of algae. Other studies indicated that there are problems with groundwater loading ofnitrogen. The high water table (with associated wetlands), and porous pumice soils contributes to increased nitrates, a by-product of septic systems and an indicator of human pathogens. Close

• 37. [Article] Hult Reservoir (Siuslaw Basin) Fish Species Composition Size and Relative Abundance_Final2018

  Abstract -- Seven species of fish were encountered in Hult Reservoir in 2017: largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii), tainbow trout/winter steelhead (Oncorhynchus ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Hult Reservoir (Siuslaw Basin) Fish Species Composition Size and Relative Abundance_Final2018 Abstract -- Seven species of fish were encountered in Hult Reservoir in 2017: largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii), tainbow trout/winter steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss), bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), reticulate sculpin (Cottus perplexus), brown bullhead (Ameiurus nebulosus) and western brook lamprey (Lampetra richardsoni). The most abundant fish observed were largemouth bass and bluegill in the summer and fall, and cutthroat in the winter. Cutthroat trout were much more prevalent in the fall and winter sampling than in the summer. Presumably, most cutthroat trout moved up into the tributaries to seek thermal refuge during the summer months and returned to the reservoir once the temperatures were more conducive to growth and survival. However, some of them likely moved downstream, were preyed upon, or perished from the high summer temperatures and low dissolved oxygen conditions in the reservoir in summer. Under current conditions, high surface temperature (>20?), bass predation, and hypoxic dissolved oxygen levels below four meters of depth show that reservoir conditions are inhospitable for juvenile salmonids in the summer. Currently there are well established fisheries for both cutthroat trout (spring, fall, winter) and largemouth bass (summer) in the reservoir, and we talked to several anglers who target each of these species. Habitat segregation in the summer between the salmonids who move out of the reservoir and the warm-water fish that remain and spawn in the reservoir results in a diversified year-round angling opportunity. There were no coho salmon (juvenile or adult) observed in Hult Reservoir in 2017, but adult coho salmon were observed spawning just downstream of the dam. This observation verifies that a proportion of the adult coho attempting to ascend the ladder at Lake Creek Falls are successful and continue migration upstream to the vicinity of Hult Reservoir. It may be possible to keep the current fishery in Hult Reservoir as it stands and still increase coho production in the system by improving adult passage at Lake Creek Falls, and possibly at Hult Dam. Title: Hult Reservoir (Siuslaw Basin) Fish Species Composition Size and Relative Abundance_Final2018 Abstract -- Seven species of fish were encountered in Hult Reservoir in 2017: largemouth bass (Micropterus salmoides), cutthroat trout (Oncorhynchus clarkii), tainbow trout/winter steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss), bluegill (Lepomis macrochirus), reticulate sculpin (Cottus perplexus), brown bullhead (Ameiurus nebulosus) and western brook lamprey (Lampetra richardsoni). The most abundant fish observed were largemouth bass and bluegill in the summer and fall, and cutthroat in the winter. Cutthroat trout were much more prevalent in the fall and winter sampling than in the summer. Presumably, most cutthroat trout moved up into the tributaries to seek thermal refuge during the summer months and returned to the reservoir once the temperatures were more conducive to growth and survival. However, some of them likely moved downstream, were preyed upon, or perished from the high summer temperatures and low dissolved oxygen conditions in the reservoir in summer. Under current conditions, high surface temperature (>20?), bass predation, and hypoxic dissolved oxygen levels below four meters of depth show that reservoir conditions are inhospitable for juvenile salmonids in the summer. Currently there are well established fisheries for both cutthroat trout (spring, fall, winter) and largemouth bass (summer) in the reservoir, and we talked to several anglers who target each of these species. Habitat segregation in the summer between the salmonids who move out of the reservoir and the warm-water fish that remain and spawn in the reservoir results in a diversified year-round angling opportunity. There were no coho salmon (juvenile or adult) observed in Hult Reservoir in 2017, but adult coho salmon were observed spawning just downstream of the dam. This observation verifies that a proportion of the adult coho attempting to ascend the ladder at Lake Creek Falls are successful and continue migration upstream to the vicinity of Hult Reservoir. It may be possible to keep the current fishery in Hult Reservoir as it stands and still increase coho production in the system by improving adult passage at Lake Creek Falls, and possibly at Hult Dam. Close

• 38. [Article] Migration and Passage of Redband Trout in the Donner und Blitzen River, 2007-2009, Information Reports Number 2009-05

  Abstract -- Movement of redband trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri) was tracked between March 2007 and June 2009 in the Donner und Blitzen River (Blitzen River). We had three primary study objectives: ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Migration and Passage of Redband Trout in the Donner und Blitzen River, 2007-2009, Information Reports Number 2009-05 Abstract -- Movement of redband trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri) was tracked between March 2007 and June 2009 in the Donner und Blitzen River (Blitzen River). We had three primary study objectives: 1) examine redband trout spawning locations and spawning migration timing, 2) evaluate redband trout passage at diversion dams, and 3) investigate seasonal migration patterns of redband trout as they relate to stream temperature dynamics. We tagged 96 redband trout with radio transmitters and 706 with PIT tags. Radio tracking included both mobile and fixed station detections. We established PIT tag readers at Cato Bridge (Rkm 1), Busse Dam (Rkm 35), Grain Camp Dam (Rkm 48), and Page Dam (Rkm 76) for additional data on large-scale movement patterns. With the PIT antennas at the three diversion dams, we placed one antenna below the dam and one at the upstream exit of the fish ladders to evaluate the passage delays at each dam. Stream temperature was recorded at 10 locations in the Blitzen River throughout the study. Scales of 257 migratory trout were interpreted for age and spawning history. Our results indicated that the majority of Blitzen redband trout migrated upstream of Page Dam to spawn and that most trout spawned in the mainstem and not the tributaries. Upstream trout migration occurred from March to July, but the peak migration occurred during late April and early May. Passage problems were recorded at two of the three dams evaluated. Trout were delayed longest at Busse Dam and 44% of radio-tagged trout that approached the dam were never able to pass. Trout experienced less delay at Grain Camp Dam and only 8% of radio-tagged trout failed to pass the dam. At Page Dam, which has a recently upgraded fish ladder, trout delays were short and only 5% of trout that approached the dam were unable to pass. Potentially stressful or lethal temperatures (>24.3°C) were recorded at all monitoring locations downstream of Fish Creek, except at the site just below Page Springs. The migratory population ranged in age from 1+ to 5+, but only age 3+ and older trout were reproductively mature. This suggests that the spring upstream migration includes both adult trout seeking suitable spawning habitats and immature trout making a seasonal habitat shift for thermal refuge. A fraction of the PIT-tagged fish were observed to make two or three migrations from below Busse Dam to above Page Dam in the spring and returning back to the lower river in the fall. We recommend prioritizing fish passage at the Busse Dam and Grain Camp Dam for conservation and enhancement efforts. Title: Migration and Passage of Redband Trout in the Donner und Blitzen River, 2007-2009, Information Reports Number 2009-05 Abstract -- Movement of redband trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss gairdneri) was tracked between March 2007 and June 2009 in the Donner und Blitzen River (Blitzen River). We had three primary study objectives: 1) examine redband trout spawning locations and spawning migration timing, 2) evaluate redband trout passage at diversion dams, and 3) investigate seasonal migration patterns of redband trout as they relate to stream temperature dynamics. We tagged 96 redband trout with radio transmitters and 706 with PIT tags. Radio tracking included both mobile and fixed station detections. We established PIT tag readers at Cato Bridge (Rkm 1), Busse Dam (Rkm 35), Grain Camp Dam (Rkm 48), and Page Dam (Rkm 76) for additional data on large-scale movement patterns. With the PIT antennas at the three diversion dams, we placed one antenna below the dam and one at the upstream exit of the fish ladders to evaluate the passage delays at each dam. Stream temperature was recorded at 10 locations in the Blitzen River throughout the study. Scales of 257 migratory trout were interpreted for age and spawning history. Our results indicated that the majority of Blitzen redband trout migrated upstream of Page Dam to spawn and that most trout spawned in the mainstem and not the tributaries. Upstream trout migration occurred from March to July, but the peak migration occurred during late April and early May. Passage problems were recorded at two of the three dams evaluated. Trout were delayed longest at Busse Dam and 44% of radio-tagged trout that approached the dam were never able to pass. Trout experienced less delay at Grain Camp Dam and only 8% of radio-tagged trout failed to pass the dam. At Page Dam, which has a recently upgraded fish ladder, trout delays were short and only 5% of trout that approached the dam were unable to pass. Potentially stressful or lethal temperatures (>24.3°C) were recorded at all monitoring locations downstream of Fish Creek, except at the site just below Page Springs. The migratory population ranged in age from 1+ to 5+, but only age 3+ and older trout were reproductively mature. This suggests that the spring upstream migration includes both adult trout seeking suitable spawning habitats and immature trout making a seasonal habitat shift for thermal refuge. A fraction of the PIT-tagged fish were observed to make two or three migrations from below Busse Dam to above Page Dam in the spring and returning back to the lower river in the fall. We recommend prioritizing fish passage at the Busse Dam and Grain Camp Dam for conservation and enhancement efforts. Close

• 39. [Article] Fish Population Monitoring in the Middle Fork John Day River Intensively Monitored Watershed - Annual Technical Report 2011

  Abstract -- Within the Middle Fork John Day River IMW (MFJDR_IMW), several habitat factors have been identified as limiting for the recovery of summer steelhead. Degraded floodplain and channel structure, ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Fish Population Monitoring in the Middle Fork John Day River Intensively Monitored Watershed - Annual Technical Report 2011 Abstract -- Within the Middle Fork John Day River IMW (MFJDR_IMW), several habitat factors have been identified as limiting for the recovery of summer steelhead. Degraded floodplain and channel structure, altered sediment routing, altered hydrology, and water quality (temperature) are cited as limiting factors in the Draft Mid-Columbia Steelhead Recovery Plan (Carmichael 2008). Current and proposed restoration efforts for the MFJDR_IMW are anticipated to address these key limiting factors. In order to assess restoration effectiveness on focal fish species, monitoring and analyses must emphasize population level spatial scales. Fish population monitoring for the MFDJR_IMW includes evaluating summer steelhead and spring Chinook population productivity, survival, and abundance. While abundance is an important metric for population assessments, survival and production will also be key indicators of population responses to planned restoration activities. Freshwater survival is assessed from the parr to smolt life stages (parr to smolt survival) and ocean or out-of-basin survival is estimated as a smolt to adult return ratio (SAR). Freshwater productivity is assessed as smolts produced for constructed redds (smolts/redd). ODFW, Eastern Oregon fish Research (EOFR). Funded by Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB). Title: Fish Population Monitoring in the Middle Fork John Day River Intensively Monitored Watershed - Annual Technical Report 2011 Abstract -- Within the Middle Fork John Day River IMW (MFJDR_IMW), several habitat factors have been identified as limiting for the recovery of summer steelhead. Degraded floodplain and channel structure, altered sediment routing, altered hydrology, and water quality (temperature) are cited as limiting factors in the Draft Mid-Columbia Steelhead Recovery Plan (Carmichael 2008). Current and proposed restoration efforts for the MFJDR_IMW are anticipated to address these key limiting factors. In order to assess restoration effectiveness on focal fish species, monitoring and analyses must emphasize population level spatial scales. Fish population monitoring for the MFDJR_IMW includes evaluating summer steelhead and spring Chinook population productivity, survival, and abundance. While abundance is an important metric for population assessments, survival and production will also be key indicators of population responses to planned restoration activities. Freshwater survival is assessed from the parr to smolt life stages (parr to smolt survival) and ocean or out-of-basin survival is estimated as a smolt to adult return ratio (SAR). Freshwater productivity is assessed as smolts produced for constructed redds (smolts/redd). ODFW, Eastern Oregon fish Research (EOFR). Funded by Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB). Close

• 40. [Article] Fish Population Monitoring in the Middle Fork John Day River Intensively Monitored Watershed - Annual Technical Report 2013-2015

  Abstract -- Within the Middle Fork John Day River IMW (MFJDR_IMW), several habitat factors have been identified as limiting for the recovery of summer steelhead. Degraded floodplain and channel structure, ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Fish Population Monitoring in the Middle Fork John Day River Intensively Monitored Watershed - Annual Technical Report 2013-2015 Abstract -- Within the Middle Fork John Day River IMW (MFJDR_IMW), several habitat factors have been identified as limiting for the recovery of summer steelhead. Degraded floodplain and channel structure, altered sediment routing, altered hydrology, and water quality (temperature) are cited as limiting factors in the Draft Mid-Columbia Steelhead Recovery Plan (Carmichael 2008). Current and proposed restoration efforts for the MFJDR_IMW are anticipated to address these key limiting factors. In order to assess restoration effectiveness on focal fish species, monitoring and analyses must emphasize population level spatial scales. Fish population monitoring for the MFDJR_IMW includes evaluating summer steelhead and spring Chinook population productivity, survival, and abundance. While abundance is an important metric for population assessments, survival and production will also be key indicators of population responses to planned restoration activities. Freshwater survival is assessed from the parr to smolt life stages (parr to smolt survival) and ocean or out-of-basin survival is estimated as a smolt to adult return ratio (SAR). Freshwater productivity is assessed as smolts produced for constructed redds (smolts/redd). Originator: ODFW, Eastern Oregon Fish Research (EOFR). Funded by Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB). Title: Fish Population Monitoring in the Middle Fork John Day River Intensively Monitored Watershed - Annual Technical Report 2013-2015 Abstract -- Within the Middle Fork John Day River IMW (MFJDR_IMW), several habitat factors have been identified as limiting for the recovery of summer steelhead. Degraded floodplain and channel structure, altered sediment routing, altered hydrology, and water quality (temperature) are cited as limiting factors in the Draft Mid-Columbia Steelhead Recovery Plan (Carmichael 2008). Current and proposed restoration efforts for the MFJDR_IMW are anticipated to address these key limiting factors. In order to assess restoration effectiveness on focal fish species, monitoring and analyses must emphasize population level spatial scales. Fish population monitoring for the MFDJR_IMW includes evaluating summer steelhead and spring Chinook population productivity, survival, and abundance. While abundance is an important metric for population assessments, survival and production will also be key indicators of population responses to planned restoration activities. Freshwater survival is assessed from the parr to smolt life stages (parr to smolt survival) and ocean or out-of-basin survival is estimated as a smolt to adult return ratio (SAR). Freshwater productivity is assessed as smolts produced for constructed redds (smolts/redd). Originator: ODFW, Eastern Oregon Fish Research (EOFR). Funded by Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board (OWEB). Close