Search

Search Results

• 1. [Image] Spencer Creek pilot watershed analysis

  	"Prepared by an interagency (BLM, USFS, EPA, USFWS), interdisplinary team as part of the pilot program for revising the federal interagency guide to watershed analysis"--P. 1-3; "The Spencer Creek Watershed ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Spencer Creek pilot watershed analysis Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office Year: 1995, 2004, 2002 "Prepared by an interagency (BLM, USFS, EPA, USFWS), interdisplinary team as part of the pilot program for revising the federal interagency guide to watershed analysis"--P. 1-3; "The Spencer Creek Watershed Analysis presents an ecosystem analysis at the watershed scale. It describes the current understanding of the processes and interactions of concern occurring within the Spencer Creek watershed. The analysis looked at the entire watershed regardless of ownership so that a more complete understanding of the watershed could be achieved. It is intended to guide management on the federal lands within the watershed. It is also meant to help us understand how past land use activities interact with the physical and biological environments in the watershed. This analysis provides a logical way to learn more about how ecological systems function within the watershed. This information is essential to protect beneficial uses and to protect and sustain the natural systems that society depends upon. The analysis provide a vehicle to efficiently identify and balance multiple concerns"-P. 1-3 [12] Title: Spencer Creek pilot watershed analysis Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office Year: 1995, 2004, 2002 "Prepared by an interagency (BLM, USFS, EPA, USFWS), interdisplinary team as part of the pilot program for revising the federal interagency guide to watershed analysis"--P. 1-3; "The Spencer Creek Watershed Analysis presents an ecosystem analysis at the watershed scale. It describes the current understanding of the processes and interactions of concern occurring within the Spencer Creek watershed. The analysis looked at the entire watershed regardless of ownership so that a more complete understanding of the watershed could be achieved. It is intended to guide management on the federal lands within the watershed. It is also meant to help us understand how past land use activities interact with the physical and biological environments in the watershed. This analysis provides a logical way to learn more about how ecological systems function within the watershed. This information is essential to protect beneficial uses and to protect and sustain the natural systems that society depends upon. The analysis provide a vehicle to efficiently identify and balance multiple concerns"-P. 1-3 [12] Close

• 2. [Image] Water resources data. Oregon. Water Year 2003

  	Cover title; Chiefly tables
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Water resources data. Oregon. Water Year 2003 Author: Geological Survey (U.S.). Water Resources Division Year: 2003, 2005 Cover title; Chiefly tables Title: Water resources data. Oregon. Water Year 2003 Author: Geological Survey (U.S.). Water Resources Division Year: 2003, 2005 Cover title; Chiefly tables Close

• 3. [Image] CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED - Looking east towards Janes Reservoir

  	KP-2452-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED - Looking east towards Janes Reservoir Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2452-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene Title: CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED - Looking east towards Janes Reservoir Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2452-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene Close

• 4. [Image] Water resources data. Oregon. Water Year 2002

  	PREFACEThe annual Oregon hydrologic data report is one of a series of annual reports that document hydrologic data gathered from the U.S. Geological Survey's surface- and ground-water data-collection networks ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Water resources data. Oregon. Water Year 2002 Author: Geological Survey (U.S.). Water Resources Division Year: 2002, 2004 PREFACEThe annual Oregon hydrologic data report is one of a series of annual reports that document hydrologic data gathered from the U.S. Geological Survey's surface- and ground-water data-collection networks in each State, Puerto Rico, and the Trust Territories. These records of streamflow, ground-water levels, and quality of water provide the hydrologic information needed by State, local and Federal agencies, and the private sector for developing and managing our Nation's land and water resources.The report is the culmination of a concerted effort by dedicated personnel of the U.S. Geological Survey who collected, compiled, analyzed, verified, and organized the data, and who edited and assembled the reports. In addition to the authors, who had primary responsibility for assuring that the information contained herein is accurate, complete, and adheres to Geological Survey policy and established guidelines, the following individuals contributed significantly to the collection, processing, and tabulation of the data: Title: Water resources data. Oregon. Water Year 2002 Author: Geological Survey (U.S.). Water Resources Division Year: 2002, 2004 PREFACEThe annual Oregon hydrologic data report is one of a series of annual reports that document hydrologic data gathered from the U.S. Geological Survey's surface- and ground-water data-collection networks in each State, Puerto Rico, and the Trust Territories. These records of streamflow, ground-water levels, and quality of water provide the hydrologic information needed by State, local and Federal agencies, and the private sector for developing and managing our Nation's land and water resources.The report is the culmination of a concerted effort by dedicated personnel of the U.S. Geological Survey who collected, compiled, analyzed, verified, and organized the data, and who edited and assembled the reports. In addition to the authors, who had primary responsibility for assuring that the information contained herein is accurate, complete, and adheres to Geological Survey policy and established guidelines, the following individuals contributed significantly to the collection, processing, and tabulation of the data: Close

• 5. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking southeast over Willow Creek Ranch

  	KP-2453-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Note dikes and canals; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking southeast over Willow Creek Ranch Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2453-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Note dikes and canals; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking southeast over Willow Creek Ranch Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2453-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Note dikes and canals; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene Close

• 6. [Image] CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED

  	KP-2451-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR CREEKWATERSHED. View looking southeast to Steele Swamp in background. Confluence of Boles Creek and Willow Creek at left; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2451-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR CREEKWATERSHED. View looking southeast to Steele Swamp in background. Confluence of Boles Creek and Willow Creek at left; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene Title: CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2451-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR CREEKWATERSHED. View looking southeast to Steele Swamp in background. Confluence of Boles Creek and Willow Creek at left; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene Close

• 7. [Image] Draft upper Williamson River Watershed assessment

  	"Prepared for Klamath Basin Ecosystem Foundation, and the Upper Williamson River Catchment Group, in cooperation with the Upper Klamath Basin Working Group, and the Klamath Watershed Council."
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Draft upper Williamson River Watershed assessment Author: David Evans and Associates, Inc. Year: 2004, 2005 "Prepared for Klamath Basin Ecosystem Foundation, and the Upper Williamson River Catchment Group, in cooperation with the Upper Klamath Basin Working Group, and the Klamath Watershed Council." Title: Draft upper Williamson River Watershed assessment Author: David Evans and Associates, Inc. Year: 2004, 2005 "Prepared for Klamath Basin Ecosystem Foundation, and the Upper Williamson River Catchment Group, in cooperation with the Upper Klamath Basin Working Group, and the Klamath Watershed Council." Close

• 8. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED

  	KP-2450-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Boles Meadow from northwest showing dike at entrance to channel and possible dam site in Boles Creek in foreground; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2450-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Boles Meadow from northwest showing dike at entrance to channel and possible dam site in Boles Creek in foreground; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2450-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Boles Meadow from northwest showing dike at entrance to channel and possible dam site in Boles Creek in foreground; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene Close

• 9. [Image] Status of Oregon's bull trout : distribution, life history, limiting factors, management considerations, and status

  	EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Limited historical references indicate that bull trout Salvelinus confluentus in Oregon were once widely spread throughout at least 12 basins in the Klamath River and Columbia River ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Status of Oregon's bull trout : distribution, life history, limiting factors, management considerations, and status Author: Buchanan, David V; Hanson, Mary L; Hooton, Robert M Year: 1997, 2007, 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Limited historical references indicate that bull trout Salvelinus confluentus in Oregon were once widely spread throughout at least 12 basins in the Klamath River and Columbia River systems. No bull trout have been observed in Oregon's coastal systems. A total of 69 bull trout populations in 12 basins are currently identified in Oregon. A comparison of the 1991 bull trout status (Ratliff and Ho well 1992) to the revised 1996 status found that 7 populations were newly discovered and 1 population showed a positive or upgraded status while 22 populations showed a negative or downgraded status. The general downgrading of 32% of Oregon's bull trout populations appears largely due to increased survey efforts and increased survey accuracy rather than reduced numbers or distribution. However, three populations in the upper Klamath Basin, two in the Walla Walla Basin, and one in the Willamette Basin showed decreases in estimated population abundance or distribution. Some Oregon river basins have bull trout populations at extreme risk of extinction. This statewide status review listed only 19% of the bull trout populations in Oregon with a ulow risk of extinction" or "of special concern." Therefore, 81% of Oregon's bull trout populations are considered to be at a "moderate risk of extinction," "high risk of extinction," or "probably extinct." Populations in the Hood, Klamath, and Powder basins, as well as the Odell Lake population in the Deschutes basin, which contain only a few remaining bull trout, are examples of populations having a "moderate" or "high risk" of extinction. Approximately 55% of current bull trout distribution occurs on lands managed by the U.S. Forest Service. A much smaller proportion occurs on Bureau of Land Management managed lands (2%). Only 16% of current bull trout distribution occurs within a protected area defined as Wilderness, Wild and Scenic River, or within a National Park. The Northwest Forest Plan, Inland Native Fish Strategy, and Interim Strategies for Managing Anadromous Fish-producing Watersheds in Eastern Oregon and Washington, Idaho, and Portions of California have provided increased protection for bull trout habitat depending on their scope and geographic areas affected, and the extent to which they are being effectively implemented in watersheds containing bull trout. Recent reduction in timber production on National Forests (up to 50% in western Oregon National Forests and over 30% in eastern Oregon National Forests) should help improve riparian and stream habitat conditions for bull trout. The remaining bull trout distribution occurs on private, state, or tribal owned lands. A comparison of approximately 39 locations throughout the state with protective angling regulations on bull trout (in some areas more than one bull trout population is protected by one regulation) shows that all state managed areas were upgraded in a protective angling status or at least maintained in 1996 compared to 1989. Restrictive angling regulations prohibit angler harvest of all bull trout populations in Oregon except for one in the Deschutes Basin. Restrictive bull trout angling regulation changes (including the elimination of bull Vll trout harvest in all spawning areas) may be the major reasons why the Metolius River/Lake Billy Chinook and mainstem McKenzie River populations have shown significant increases in abundance. Statewide stocking of non-native brook trout, including the high lakes stocking program, has been discontinued in locations where managers believe brook trout could migrate downstream and potentially interact with native bull trout. Hatchery stocking of legal rainbow trout to promote recreational fisheries has been discontinued in most locations near bull trout populations to avoid incidental catch of bull trout. The spatial and temporal distributions of bull trout reported for each river basin in this status report should be used as an accurate baseline for fisheries managers. Current distribution and relative change of distribution should be useful indicators of population health and status. The GIS maps in this report provide a template to add new layers of data such as critical spawning and juvenile rearing areas, or as a method to compare distribution changes through time. Length frequency data are presented for most Oregon bull trout populations. This should provide estimates for the presence of multiple age classes and the percent of fluvial size life history component. Vlll Title: Status of Oregon's bull trout : distribution, life history, limiting factors, management considerations, and status Author: Buchanan, David V; Hanson, Mary L; Hooton, Robert M Year: 1997, 2007, 2005 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Limited historical references indicate that bull trout Salvelinus confluentus in Oregon were once widely spread throughout at least 12 basins in the Klamath River and Columbia River systems. No bull trout have been observed in Oregon's coastal systems. A total of 69 bull trout populations in 12 basins are currently identified in Oregon. A comparison of the 1991 bull trout status (Ratliff and Ho well 1992) to the revised 1996 status found that 7 populations were newly discovered and 1 population showed a positive or upgraded status while 22 populations showed a negative or downgraded status. The general downgrading of 32% of Oregon's bull trout populations appears largely due to increased survey efforts and increased survey accuracy rather than reduced numbers or distribution. However, three populations in the upper Klamath Basin, two in the Walla Walla Basin, and one in the Willamette Basin showed decreases in estimated population abundance or distribution. Some Oregon river basins have bull trout populations at extreme risk of extinction. This statewide status review listed only 19% of the bull trout populations in Oregon with a ulow risk of extinction" or "of special concern." Therefore, 81% of Oregon's bull trout populations are considered to be at a "moderate risk of extinction," "high risk of extinction," or "probably extinct." Populations in the Hood, Klamath, and Powder basins, as well as the Odell Lake population in the Deschutes basin, which contain only a few remaining bull trout, are examples of populations having a "moderate" or "high risk" of extinction. Approximately 55% of current bull trout distribution occurs on lands managed by the U.S. Forest Service. A much smaller proportion occurs on Bureau of Land Management managed lands (2%). Only 16% of current bull trout distribution occurs within a protected area defined as Wilderness, Wild and Scenic River, or within a National Park. The Northwest Forest Plan, Inland Native Fish Strategy, and Interim Strategies for Managing Anadromous Fish-producing Watersheds in Eastern Oregon and Washington, Idaho, and Portions of California have provided increased protection for bull trout habitat depending on their scope and geographic areas affected, and the extent to which they are being effectively implemented in watersheds containing bull trout. Recent reduction in timber production on National Forests (up to 50% in western Oregon National Forests and over 30% in eastern Oregon National Forests) should help improve riparian and stream habitat conditions for bull trout. The remaining bull trout distribution occurs on private, state, or tribal owned lands. A comparison of approximately 39 locations throughout the state with protective angling regulations on bull trout (in some areas more than one bull trout population is protected by one regulation) shows that all state managed areas were upgraded in a protective angling status or at least maintained in 1996 compared to 1989. Restrictive angling regulations prohibit angler harvest of all bull trout populations in Oregon except for one in the Deschutes Basin. Restrictive bull trout angling regulation changes (including the elimination of bull Vll trout harvest in all spawning areas) may be the major reasons why the Metolius River/Lake Billy Chinook and mainstem McKenzie River populations have shown significant increases in abundance. Statewide stocking of non-native brook trout, including the high lakes stocking program, has been discontinued in locations where managers believe brook trout could migrate downstream and potentially interact with native bull trout. Hatchery stocking of legal rainbow trout to promote recreational fisheries has been discontinued in most locations near bull trout populations to avoid incidental catch of bull trout. The spatial and temporal distributions of bull trout reported for each river basin in this status report should be used as an accurate baseline for fisheries managers. Current distribution and relative change of distribution should be useful indicators of population health and status. The GIS maps in this report provide a template to add new layers of data such as critical spawning and juvenile rearing areas, or as a method to compare distribution changes through time. Length frequency data are presented for most Oregon bull trout populations. This should provide estimates for the presence of multiple age classes and the percent of fluvial size life history component. Vlll Close

• 10. [Image] Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds biennial report, 2005-2007

  	The Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds Biennial Report 2005-2007. This is the sixth report on the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds. The report provides an update on the accomplishments and continuing ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds biennial report, 2005-2007 Author: Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Year: 2006, 2007 The Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds Biennial Report 2005-2007. This is the sixth report on the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds. The report provides an update on the accomplishments and continuing efforts of people throughout Oregon to improve and protect clean water and recover and maintain healthy populations offish and wildlife in our watersheds. The Oregon Plan is unique because it engages communities in the restoration and long-term stewardship of their watersheds. This extraordinary effort encourages local partnerships and voluntary actions to improve the conditions of our watersheds. Over the years, these actions have made Oregon a national leader in local cooperative conservation. This report collects project and condition data, voluntary private lands restoration information, and agency program accomplishments under the Oregon Plan. Consistent with the past two reports, this document continues to provide specific data on each of the state's fifteen reporting basins. A new element to this report is the inclusion of stories about the people, partnerships, and on-the-ground projects that are benefiting watersheds and communities across the state. Thanks to the many Oregon Plan partners who contributed to this report. Thomas M. Byler Executive Director Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Title: Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds biennial report, 2005-2007 Author: Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Year: 2006, 2007 The Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds Biennial Report 2005-2007. This is the sixth report on the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds. The report provides an update on the accomplishments and continuing efforts of people throughout Oregon to improve and protect clean water and recover and maintain healthy populations offish and wildlife in our watersheds. The Oregon Plan is unique because it engages communities in the restoration and long-term stewardship of their watersheds. This extraordinary effort encourages local partnerships and voluntary actions to improve the conditions of our watersheds. Over the years, these actions have made Oregon a national leader in local cooperative conservation. This report collects project and condition data, voluntary private lands restoration information, and agency program accomplishments under the Oregon Plan. Consistent with the past two reports, this document continues to provide specific data on each of the state's fifteen reporting basins. A new element to this report is the inclusion of stories about the people, partnerships, and on-the-ground projects that are benefiting watersheds and communities across the state. Thanks to the many Oregon Plan partners who contributed to this report. Thomas M. Byler Executive Director Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Close