Search

Search Results

• 1. [Image] Klamath-Iron Gate watershed analysis : version 1.1.

  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Klamath-Iron Gate watershed analysis : version 1.1. Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Ashland Resource Area Year: 2000, 2005 Title: Klamath-Iron Gate watershed analysis : version 1.1. Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Ashland Resource Area Year: 2000, 2005 Close

• 2. [Image] Annual program summary 2003

  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual program summary 2003 Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office Year: 2003, 2004 Title: Annual program summary 2003 Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office Year: 2003, 2004 Close

• 3. [Image] Final eligibility and suitability report for the upper Klamath wild and scenic river study Upper Klamath wild and scenic river study

  	"BLM-OR-PT-90-14-1792"--P. [2] of cover ; Includes ill. and maps ; Includes bibliographical references ; "This final report evaluates the eligibility, classification, and suitability of the upper Klamath ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Final eligibility and suitability report for the upper Klamath wild and scenic river study Upper Klamath wild and scenic river study Year: 1990, 2004 "BLM-OR-PT-90-14-1792"--P. [2] of cover ; Includes ill. and maps ; Includes bibliographical references ; "This final report evaluates the eligibility, classification, and suitability of the upper Klamath River in southern Oregon and northern California for designation as a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS). The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) determined segment 1 ineligible and segments 2 and 3 both eligible and suitable for designation with a "scenic" classification. This report documents those determinations and conclusions on an evaluation of the natural values in the area. Concurrent with this study process, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is considering a license application submitted by the City of Klamath Falls for development of the Salt Caves hydroelectric project on the upper Klamath River. The BLM study does not evaluate either the Salt Caves proposal or the economic feasibility or effects associated with it. Those analyses are included in the FERC Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed Salt Caves hydroelectric project"--P. i [9]. Title: Final eligibility and suitability report for the upper Klamath wild and scenic river study Upper Klamath wild and scenic river study Year: 1990, 2004 "BLM-OR-PT-90-14-1792"--P. [2] of cover ; Includes ill. and maps ; Includes bibliographical references ; "This final report evaluates the eligibility, classification, and suitability of the upper Klamath River in southern Oregon and northern California for designation as a component of the National Wild and Scenic Rivers System (NWSRS). The Bureau of Land Management (BLM) determined segment 1 ineligible and segments 2 and 3 both eligible and suitable for designation with a "scenic" classification. This report documents those determinations and conclusions on an evaluation of the natural values in the area. Concurrent with this study process, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) is considering a license application submitted by the City of Klamath Falls for development of the Salt Caves hydroelectric project on the upper Klamath River. The BLM study does not evaluate either the Salt Caves proposal or the economic feasibility or effects associated with it. Those analyses are included in the FERC Environmental Impact Statement on the proposed Salt Caves hydroelectric project"--P. i [9]. Close

• 4. [Image] Aerial view of alkali patterns

  	KP-1724 - Klamath Project. Alkali patterns similar to those shown in this picture present an obstacle to the cultivation of certain lands on the Klamath Project. With proper land management over a period ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Aerial view of alkali patterns Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Burrows, A.J. Year: 1948, 2007, 2005 KP-1724 - Klamath Project. Alkali patterns similar to those shown in this picture present an obstacle to the cultivation of certain lands on the Klamath Project. With proper land management over a period of years these lands can in all probability become productive; June 17, 1948; Photo by A. J. Burrows Title: Aerial view of alkali patterns Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Burrows, A.J. Year: 1948, 2007, 2005 KP-1724 - Klamath Project. Alkali patterns similar to those shown in this picture present an obstacle to the cultivation of certain lands on the Klamath Project. With proper land management over a period of years these lands can in all probability become productive; June 17, 1948; Photo by A. J. Burrows Close

• 5. [Image] Draft upper Klamath River management plan environmental impact statement and resource management plan amendments. Volume 3 - Maps

  	"BLM/OR/WA/PL-02/038+1792"--P. [2] of cover ; This volume contains detailed maps of Upper Klamath River segments and features cited in Volume 1 and Volume 2.
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Draft upper Klamath River management plan environmental impact statement and resource management plan amendments. Volume 3 - Maps Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office Year: 2003, 2004 "BLM/OR/WA/PL-02/038+1792"--P. [2] of cover ; This volume contains detailed maps of Upper Klamath River segments and features cited in Volume 1 and Volume 2. Title: Draft upper Klamath River management plan environmental impact statement and resource management plan amendments. Volume 3 - Maps Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office Year: 2003, 2004 "BLM/OR/WA/PL-02/038+1792"--P. [2] of cover ; This volume contains detailed maps of Upper Klamath River segments and features cited in Volume 1 and Volume 2. Close

• 6. [Image] Klamath Falls Resource Area record of decision and resource management plan and rangeland program summary (Map Packet)

  	"BLM/OR/WA/PL-95/022+1792"--P. [2] of cover ; Includes illustrations and maps ; "The resource management plan addresses resource management on approximately 212,000 acres of federal land and 21,000 acres ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Klamath Falls Resource Area record of decision and resource management plan and rangeland program summary (Map Packet) Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Year: 1995, 2004, 2003 "BLM/OR/WA/PL-95/022+1792"--P. [2] of cover ; Includes illustrations and maps ; "The resource management plan addresses resource management on approximately 212,000 acres of federal land and 21,000 acres of reserved mineral estate administered by the BLM. The lands and mineral estate are all located within Klamath County, Oregon. The approved resource management plan responds to the need for a healthy forest ecosystem with habitat that will contribute toward and support populations of native species, particularly those associated with late successional and old growth forests. It also responds to the need for a sustainable supply of timber, other forest products, recreation, and livestock grazing that will help maintain the stability of local and regional economies, and contribute valuable resources to the national economy on a predictable and long-term basis. As guided by the April 1994 interagency record of decision, BLM-administered lands are primarily allocated to Riparian Reserves, Late-Successional/District Designated Reserves, and Matrix (General Forest Management Areas). An Aquatic Conservation Strategy will be applied to all lands and waters under BLM administration. Major land and resource allocations of the approved resource management plan are displayed in Table R-1 found at the end of this record of decision"--P. [10]. Title: Klamath Falls Resource Area record of decision and resource management plan and rangeland program summary (Map Packet) Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Year: 1995, 2004, 2003 "BLM/OR/WA/PL-95/022+1792"--P. [2] of cover ; Includes illustrations and maps ; "The resource management plan addresses resource management on approximately 212,000 acres of federal land and 21,000 acres of reserved mineral estate administered by the BLM. The lands and mineral estate are all located within Klamath County, Oregon. The approved resource management plan responds to the need for a healthy forest ecosystem with habitat that will contribute toward and support populations of native species, particularly those associated with late successional and old growth forests. It also responds to the need for a sustainable supply of timber, other forest products, recreation, and livestock grazing that will help maintain the stability of local and regional economies, and contribute valuable resources to the national economy on a predictable and long-term basis. As guided by the April 1994 interagency record of decision, BLM-administered lands are primarily allocated to Riparian Reserves, Late-Successional/District Designated Reserves, and Matrix (General Forest Management Areas). An Aquatic Conservation Strategy will be applied to all lands and waters under BLM administration. Major land and resource allocations of the approved resource management plan are displayed in Table R-1 found at the end of this record of decision"--P. [10]. Close

• 7. [Image] Klamath Falls Resource Area record of decision and resource management plan and rangeland program summary

  	"BLM/OR/WA/PL-95/022+1792"--P. [2] of cover ; Includes illustrations and maps ; "The resource management plan addresses resource management on approximately 212,000 acres of federal land and 21,000 acres ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Klamath Falls Resource Area record of decision and resource management plan and rangeland program summary Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Year: 1995, 2004, 2003 "BLM/OR/WA/PL-95/022+1792"--P. [2] of cover ; Includes illustrations and maps ; "The resource management plan addresses resource management on approximately 212,000 acres of federal land and 21,000 acres of reserved mineral estate administered by the BLM. The lands and mineral estate are all located within Klamath County, Oregon. The approved resource management plan responds to the need for a healthy forest ecosystem with habitat that will contribute toward and support populations of native species, particularly those associated with late successional and old growth forests. It also responds to the need for a sustainable supply of timber, other forest products, recreation, and livestock grazing that will help maintain the stability of local and regional economies, and contribute valuable resources to the national economy on a predictable and long-term basis. As guided by the April 1994 interagency record of decision, BLM-administered lands are primarily allocated to Riparian Reserves, Late-Successional/District Designated Reserves, and Matrix (General Forest Management Areas). An Aquatic Conservation Strategy will be applied to all lands and waters under BLM administration. Major land and resource allocations of the approved resource management plan are displayed in Table R-1 found at the end of this record of decision"--P. [10]. Title: Klamath Falls Resource Area record of decision and resource management plan and rangeland program summary Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Year: 1995, 2004, 2003 "BLM/OR/WA/PL-95/022+1792"--P. [2] of cover ; Includes illustrations and maps ; "The resource management plan addresses resource management on approximately 212,000 acres of federal land and 21,000 acres of reserved mineral estate administered by the BLM. The lands and mineral estate are all located within Klamath County, Oregon. The approved resource management plan responds to the need for a healthy forest ecosystem with habitat that will contribute toward and support populations of native species, particularly those associated with late successional and old growth forests. It also responds to the need for a sustainable supply of timber, other forest products, recreation, and livestock grazing that will help maintain the stability of local and regional economies, and contribute valuable resources to the national economy on a predictable and long-term basis. As guided by the April 1994 interagency record of decision, BLM-administered lands are primarily allocated to Riparian Reserves, Late-Successional/District Designated Reserves, and Matrix (General Forest Management Areas). An Aquatic Conservation Strategy will be applied to all lands and waters under BLM administration. Major land and resource allocations of the approved resource management plan are displayed in Table R-1 found at the end of this record of decision"--P. [10]. Close

• 8. [Image] Draft upper Klamath River management plan environmental impact statement and resource management plan amendments. Volume 1 - Chapters

  	"BLM/OR/WA/PL-02/038+1792"--P. [2] of cover ; Includes ill. and maps ; "This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) refers specifically to a planning area on the upper Klamath River. The upper portion ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Draft upper Klamath River management plan environmental impact statement and resource management plan amendments. Volume 1 - Chapters Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office Year: 2003, 2004 "BLM/OR/WA/PL-02/038+1792"--P. [2] of cover ; Includes ill. and maps ; "This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) refers specifically to a planning area on the upper Klamath River. The upper portion of the Klamath River is the stretch between Lake Ewauna, at Klamath Falls, Oregon, south to Irongate Dam in California. The lower Klamath River section is from Irongate Dam to the Pacific Ocean. Management of this river corridor is quite complex, owing to its unique combination of private and public land ownership, and multiple land use management designations covering portions of two states ... Specific designations have been applied to parts of the upper Klamath River that by law require special management plans be developed. The BLM's Klamath Falls Resource Area (Oregon) and the Redding Field Office (California) staff contributed to the creation of this plan, as well as the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department employees ... This planning effort is being undertaken because the current recreation plan, completed in 1983 by the BLM Medford District, is outdated. There are now overlapping jurisdictions and designations that did not exist 20 years ago. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and administrative guidance for implementing management of the Area of Critical Environmental Concern require preparation on management plans"--P. S-5 [11]. Title: Draft upper Klamath River management plan environmental impact statement and resource management plan amendments. Volume 1 - Chapters Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office Year: 2003, 2004 "BLM/OR/WA/PL-02/038+1792"--P. [2] of cover ; Includes ill. and maps ; "This Draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) refers specifically to a planning area on the upper Klamath River. The upper portion of the Klamath River is the stretch between Lake Ewauna, at Klamath Falls, Oregon, south to Irongate Dam in California. The lower Klamath River section is from Irongate Dam to the Pacific Ocean. Management of this river corridor is quite complex, owing to its unique combination of private and public land ownership, and multiple land use management designations covering portions of two states ... Specific designations have been applied to parts of the upper Klamath River that by law require special management plans be developed. The BLM's Klamath Falls Resource Area (Oregon) and the Redding Field Office (California) staff contributed to the creation of this plan, as well as the Oregon Parks and Recreation Department employees ... This planning effort is being undertaken because the current recreation plan, completed in 1983 by the BLM Medford District, is outdated. There are now overlapping jurisdictions and designations that did not exist 20 years ago. The Wild and Scenic Rivers Act and administrative guidance for implementing management of the Area of Critical Environmental Concern require preparation on management plans"--P. S-5 [11]. Close

• 9. [Image] Spencer Creek pilot watershed analysis

  	"Prepared by an interagency (BLM, USFS, EPA, USFWS), interdisplinary team as part of the pilot program for revising the federal interagency guide to watershed analysis"--P. 1-3; "The Spencer Creek Watershed ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Spencer Creek pilot watershed analysis Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office Year: 1995, 2004, 2002 "Prepared by an interagency (BLM, USFS, EPA, USFWS), interdisplinary team as part of the pilot program for revising the federal interagency guide to watershed analysis"--P. 1-3; "The Spencer Creek Watershed Analysis presents an ecosystem analysis at the watershed scale. It describes the current understanding of the processes and interactions of concern occurring within the Spencer Creek watershed. The analysis looked at the entire watershed regardless of ownership so that a more complete understanding of the watershed could be achieved. It is intended to guide management on the federal lands within the watershed. It is also meant to help us understand how past land use activities interact with the physical and biological environments in the watershed. This analysis provides a logical way to learn more about how ecological systems function within the watershed. This information is essential to protect beneficial uses and to protect and sustain the natural systems that society depends upon. The analysis provide a vehicle to efficiently identify and balance multiple concerns"-P. 1-3 [12] Title: Spencer Creek pilot watershed analysis Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office Year: 1995, 2004, 2002 "Prepared by an interagency (BLM, USFS, EPA, USFWS), interdisplinary team as part of the pilot program for revising the federal interagency guide to watershed analysis"--P. 1-3; "The Spencer Creek Watershed Analysis presents an ecosystem analysis at the watershed scale. It describes the current understanding of the processes and interactions of concern occurring within the Spencer Creek watershed. The analysis looked at the entire watershed regardless of ownership so that a more complete understanding of the watershed could be achieved. It is intended to guide management on the federal lands within the watershed. It is also meant to help us understand how past land use activities interact with the physical and biological environments in the watershed. This analysis provides a logical way to learn more about how ecological systems function within the watershed. This information is essential to protect beneficial uses and to protect and sustain the natural systems that society depends upon. The analysis provide a vehicle to efficiently identify and balance multiple concerns"-P. 1-3 [12] Close

• 10. [Image] Fourmile Hill Geothermal Development Project: Environmental Impact Statement, Environmental Impact Report, Final EIS/EIR Executive Summary

  	The Fourmile Hill Geothermal Development Project would be located in eastern Siskiyou and western Modoc Counties, California, on the Klamath and Modoc National Forests and within the Glass Mountain Known ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Fourmile Hill Geothermal Development Project: Environmental Impact Statement, Environmental Impact Report, Final EIS/EIR Executive Summary Author: Bureau of Land Management Year: 1998 The Fourmile Hill Geothermal Development Project would be located in eastern Siskiyou and western Modoc Counties, California, on the Klamath and Modoc National Forests and within the Glass Mountain Known Geothermal Resource Area (I<GRA). Calpine Corporation proposes to develop a 49.9 megawatt geothermal power plant and Wellfield and a 24-mile, 23O-kilovolt transmission line. The Glass Mountain KGRA, which is designated by the US. Geological Survey, is one of the only remaining undeveloped KGRAs in North America with a demonstrated geothermal resource. Based on the analysis presented in the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR), the project, after mitigation, would have a significant adverse effect on the environment on traditional cultural values and visual resources. After mitigation, the project would not have any other significant adverse effects on the environment. Effects on visual resources would be avoided by proposed alternatives. Effects on traditional cultural values would be unavoidable. The project could also result in significant cumulative effects through conflicts with religious use of the area by local tribal members. Potentially significant cumulative effects in the Medicine Lake area would be avoided by the preferred alternative. The Final EIS/EIR is distributed for a 30-day notification period that begins October 2 and ends November 2, 1998 Title: Fourmile Hill Geothermal Development Project: Environmental Impact Statement, Environmental Impact Report, Final EIS/EIR Executive Summary Author: Bureau of Land Management Year: 1998 The Fourmile Hill Geothermal Development Project would be located in eastern Siskiyou and western Modoc Counties, California, on the Klamath and Modoc National Forests and within the Glass Mountain Known Geothermal Resource Area (I<GRA). Calpine Corporation proposes to develop a 49.9 megawatt geothermal power plant and Wellfield and a 24-mile, 23O-kilovolt transmission line. The Glass Mountain KGRA, which is designated by the US. Geological Survey, is one of the only remaining undeveloped KGRAs in North America with a demonstrated geothermal resource. Based on the analysis presented in the Final Environmental Impact Statement and Environmental Impact Report (EIS/EIR), the project, after mitigation, would have a significant adverse effect on the environment on traditional cultural values and visual resources. After mitigation, the project would not have any other significant adverse effects on the environment. Effects on visual resources would be avoided by proposed alternatives. Effects on traditional cultural values would be unavoidable. The project could also result in significant cumulative effects through conflicts with religious use of the area by local tribal members. Potentially significant cumulative effects in the Medicine Lake area would be avoided by the preferred alternative. The Final EIS/EIR is distributed for a 30-day notification period that begins October 2 and ends November 2, 1998 Close