Oregon Explorer CrossSearch Search Results

1. [Image] Upper Williamson River Watershed analysis



	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Upper Williamson River Watershed analysis Year: 1996, 2004 Title: Upper Williamson River Watershed analysis Year: 1996, 2004

2. [Image] Big Bill : the Williamson River Basin Watershed analysis


	"February 1998."
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Big Bill : the Williamson River Basin Watershed analysis Author: Chemult Ranger District (Oregon) Year: 1998, 2005 "February 1998." Title: Big Bill : the Williamson River Basin Watershed analysis Author: Chemult Ranger District (Oregon) Year: 1998, 2005 "February 1998."

3. [Image] Spencer Creek pilot watershed analysis


	"Prepared by an interagency (BLM, USFS, EPA, USFWS), interdisplinary team as part of the pilot program for revising the federal interagency guide to watershed analysis"--P. 1-3; "The Spencer Creek Watershed ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Spencer Creek pilot watershed analysis Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office Year: 1995, 2004, 2002 "Prepared by an interagency (BLM, USFS, EPA, USFWS), interdisplinary team as part of the pilot program for revising the federal interagency guide to watershed analysis"--P. 1-3; "The Spencer Creek Watershed Analysis presents an ecosystem analysis at the watershed scale. It describes the current understanding of the processes and interactions of concern occurring within the Spencer Creek watershed. The analysis looked at the entire watershed regardless of ownership so that a more complete understanding of the watershed could be achieved. It is intended to guide management on the federal lands within the watershed. It is also meant to help us understand how past land use activities interact with the physical and biological environments in the watershed. This analysis provides a logical way to learn more about how ecological systems function within the watershed. This information is essential to protect beneficial uses and to protect and sustain the natural systems that society depends upon. The analysis provide a vehicle to efficiently identify and balance multiple concerns"-P. 1-3 [12] Title: Spencer Creek pilot watershed analysis Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Klamath Falls Resource Area Office Year: 1995, 2004, 2002 "Prepared by an interagency (BLM, USFS, EPA, USFWS), interdisplinary team as part of the pilot program for revising the federal interagency guide to watershed analysis"--P. 1-3; "The Spencer Creek Watershed Analysis presents an ecosystem analysis at the watershed scale. It describes the current understanding of the processes and interactions of concern occurring within the Spencer Creek watershed. The analysis looked at the entire watershed regardless of ownership so that a more complete understanding of the watershed could be achieved. It is intended to guide management on the federal lands within the watershed. It is also meant to help us understand how past land use activities interact with the physical and biological environments in the watershed. This analysis provides a logical way to learn more about how ecological systems function within the watershed. This information is essential to protect beneficial uses and to protect and sustain the natural systems that society depends upon. The analysis provide a vehicle to efficiently identify and balance multiple concerns"-P. 1-3 [12]

4. [Image] Klamath-Iron Gate watershed analysis : version 1.1.



	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Klamath-Iron Gate watershed analysis : version 1.1. Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Ashland Resource Area Year: 2000, 2005 Title: Klamath-Iron Gate watershed analysis : version 1.1. Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Ashland Resource Area Year: 2000, 2005

5. [Image] A strategy for achieving healthy watersheds in Oregon


	"January 2001."
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: A strategy for achieving healthy watersheds in Oregon Author: Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Year: 2001, 2004 "January 2001." Title: A strategy for achieving healthy watersheds in Oregon Author: Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Year: 2001, 2004 "January 2001."

6. [Image] Handbook for developing watershed plans to restore and protect our waters


	Draft; Title from title screen (viewed on Mar. 17, 2006); "October 2005."; "EPA 841-B-05-005."; Includes bibliographical references
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Handbook for developing watershed plans to restore and protect our waters Author: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Year: 2005, 2008, 2006 Draft; Title from title screen (viewed on Mar. 17, 2006); "October 2005."; "EPA 841-B-05-005."; Includes bibliographical references Title: Handbook for developing watershed plans to restore and protect our waters Author: United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Water Year: 2005, 2008, 2006 Draft; Title from title screen (viewed on Mar. 17, 2006); "October 2005."; "EPA 841-B-05-005."; Includes bibliographical references

7. [Image] GERBER WATERSHED


	KP-2538-R2-Klamath Project - GERBER WATERSHED. View east northeast from Yainax Butte. Upper end of Dry Prairie watershed shows in the lower right portion of the photo; November 25, 1959; Photo by R.G. ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2538-R2-Klamath Project - GERBER WATERSHED. View east northeast from Yainax Butte. Upper end of Dry Prairie watershed shows in the lower right portion of the photo; November 25, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan Title: GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2538-R2-Klamath Project - GERBER WATERSHED. View east northeast from Yainax Butte. Upper end of Dry Prairie watershed shows in the lower right portion of the photo; November 25, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan

8. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED


	KP-2327-R2 - Klamath Project--CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Snow cover on upper levels of relatively flat watershed during snow melting period; March 23, 1956; Photo by C. D. Lawrence
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Lawrence, C. D. Year: 1956, 2007, 2006 KP-2327-R2 - Klamath Project--CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Snow cover on upper levels of relatively flat watershed during snow melting period; March 23, 1956; Photo by C. D. Lawrence Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Lawrence, C. D. Year: 1956, 2007, 2006 KP-2327-R2 - Klamath Project--CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Snow cover on upper levels of relatively flat watershed during snow melting period; March 23, 1956; Photo by C. D. Lawrence

9. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED


	KP-2328-R2 - Klamath Project--CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Lower part of watershed southeast of Clear Lake. Note numerous ponded areas; March 23, 1956; Photo by C. D. Lawrence
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Lawrence, C. D. Year: 1956, 2007, 2006 KP-2328-R2 - Klamath Project--CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Lower part of watershed southeast of Clear Lake. Note numerous ponded areas; March 23, 1956; Photo by C. D. Lawrence Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Lawrence, C. D. Year: 1956, 2007, 2006 KP-2328-R2 - Klamath Project--CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Lower part of watershed southeast of Clear Lake. Note numerous ponded areas; March 23, 1956; Photo by C. D. Lawrence

10. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED


	KP-2329-R2 - Klamath Project--CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Intermediate level on watershed during snowmelt period. Note numerous depressions tending to hold and regulate runoff; March 23, 1956; Photo by C. D. ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Lawrence, C.D. Year: 1956, 2007, 2006 KP-2329-R2 - Klamath Project--CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Intermediate level on watershed during snowmelt period. Note numerous depressions tending to hold and regulate runoff; March 23, 1956; Photo by C. D. Lawrence Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Lawrence, C.D. Year: 1956, 2007, 2006 KP-2329-R2 - Klamath Project--CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Intermediate level on watershed during snowmelt period. Note numerous depressions tending to hold and regulate runoff; March 23, 1956; Photo by C. D. Lawrence

11. [Image] Relationship Between Flows in the Klamath River and Lower Klamath Lake Prior to 1910


	The paper discusses the changes in the hydrology and water use in the Klamath River Watershed and the Lower Klamath Lake prior to and after the Klamath Reclamation Project. Vegetation and soil conditions ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Relationship Between Flows in the Klamath River and Lower Klamath Lake Prior to 1910 Author: Weddell, B. J. Year: 2000 The paper discusses the changes in the hydrology and water use in the Klamath River Watershed and the Lower Klamath Lake prior to and after the Klamath Reclamation Project. Vegetation and soil conditions are covered Title: Relationship Between Flows in the Klamath River and Lower Klamath Lake Prior to 1910 Author: Weddell, B. J. Year: 2000 The paper discusses the changes in the hydrology and water use in the Klamath River Watershed and the Lower Klamath Lake prior to and after the Klamath Reclamation Project. Vegetation and soil conditions are covered

12. [Image] The Water Report - Watershed assessments: the Upper Klamath Basin process


	Only portions of issues of The Water Report are available in the Klamath Waters Digital Library. See the full report at http://www.thewaterreport.com/
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: The Water Report - Watershed assessments: the Upper Klamath Basin process Author: Envirotech Publications Year: 2004, 2008, 2006 Only portions of issues of The Water Report are available in the Klamath Waters Digital Library. See the full report at http://www.thewaterreport.com/ Title: The Water Report - Watershed assessments: the Upper Klamath Basin process Author: Envirotech Publications Year: 2004, 2008, 2006 Only portions of issues of The Water Report are available in the Klamath Waters Digital Library. See the full report at http://www.thewaterreport.com/

13. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking west over Weed Valley


	KP-2492- Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Water held behind dam which is located in the upper right-hand corner of the photo; April 9, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking west over Weed Valley Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2492- Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Water held behind dam which is located in the upper right-hand corner of the photo; April 9, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking west over Weed Valley Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2492- Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Water held behind dam which is located in the upper right-hand corner of the photo; April 9, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan

14. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking north at Janes Reservoir Dam


	KP-2493-R2- Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Spillway at right; April 9, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking north at Janes Reservoir Dam Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2493-R2- Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Spillway at right; April 9, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking north at Janes Reservoir Dam Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2493-R2- Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Spillway at right; April 9, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan

15. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking north over Fairchild Swamp


	KP-2494-R2- Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Note water area in distance; April 9, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollen
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking north over Fairchild Swamp Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollen, R.G. Year: 2008, 2006 KP-2494-R2- Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Note water area in distance; April 9, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollen Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking north over Fairchild Swamp Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollen, R.G. Year: 2008, 2006 KP-2494-R2- Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Note water area in distance; April 9, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollen

16. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking west at Avanzino Reservoir Dam


	KP-2495-R2- Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Spillway section in right foreground; April 9, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollen
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking west at Avanzino Reservoir Dam Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollen, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2495-R2- Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Spillway section in right foreground; April 9, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollen Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking west at Avanzino Reservoir Dam Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollen, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2495-R2- Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Spillway section in right foreground; April 9, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollen

17. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED


	KP-2531-R2-Klamath Project -- CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. View looking north along dam at "Reservoir F"; November 24, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2531-R2-Klamath Project -- CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. View looking north along dam at "Reservoir F"; November 24, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2531-R2-Klamath Project -- CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. View looking north along dam at "Reservoir F"; November 24, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan

18. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED


	KP-2532-R2-Klamath Project -- CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. View looking south from point of confluence of two sidhill drains at extreme north end of valley. Principal feature is recently excavated drain extending ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2532-R2-Klamath Project -- CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. View looking south from point of confluence of two sidhill drains at extreme north end of valley. Principal feature is recently excavated drain extending through middle of area; November 24, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2532-R2-Klamath Project -- CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. View looking south from point of confluence of two sidhill drains at extreme north end of valley. Principal feature is recently excavated drain extending through middle of area; November 24, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan

19. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED


	KP-2533-R2-Klamath Project -- CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. View toward southwest along Avanzino Reservoir Dam showing one outlet gate. A second gate, partially submerged, is at the distant end of the dam; November ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2533-R2-Klamath Project -- CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. View toward southwest along Avanzino Reservoir Dam showing one outlet gate. A second gate, partially submerged, is at the distant end of the dam; November 24, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2533-R2-Klamath Project -- CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. View toward southwest along Avanzino Reservoir Dam showing one outlet gate. A second gate, partially submerged, is at the distant end of the dam; November 24, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan

20. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED


	KP-2534-R2-Klamath Project -- CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. View north showing Janes Reservoir Dam. The new embankment on top of the dam was added during 1959; November 24, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2534-R2-Klamath Project -- CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. View north showing Janes Reservoir Dam. The new embankment on top of the dam was added during 1959; November 24, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2534-R2-Klamath Project -- CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. View north showing Janes Reservoir Dam. The new embankment on top of the dam was added during 1959; November 24, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan

21. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED


	KP-2535-R2-Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Recently constructed outlet through Janes Reservoir Dam. View looking north; November 24, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2535-R2-Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Recently constructed outlet through Janes Reservoir Dam. View looking north; November 24, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2535-R2-Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Recently constructed outlet through Janes Reservoir Dam. View looking north; November 24, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan

22. [Image] GERBER WATERSHED


	KP-2536-R2-Klamath Project - GERBER WATERSHED. View southeast from Yainax Butte. Dry Prairie is in the foreground; beyond, in the distant background, Gerber Reservoir can be seen; November 25, 1959; Photo ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2536-R2-Klamath Project - GERBER WATERSHED. View southeast from Yainax Butte. Dry Prairie is in the foreground; beyond, in the distant background, Gerber Reservoir can be seen; November 25, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan Title: GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2536-R2-Klamath Project - GERBER WATERSHED. View southeast from Yainax Butte. Dry Prairie is in the foreground; beyond, in the distant background, Gerber Reservoir can be seen; November 25, 1959; Photo by R.G. Pollan

23. [Image] GERBER WATERSHED


	KP-2537-R2-Klamath Project - GERBER WATERSHED. View south southeast from Yainax Butte. Dry Prairie is in the foreground. Horsefly Mountain is in the middle of the picture; November 25, 1959; Photo by R...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2537-R2-Klamath Project - GERBER WATERSHED. View south southeast from Yainax Butte. Dry Prairie is in the foreground. Horsefly Mountain is in the middle of the picture; November 25, 1959; Photo by R.G.Pollan Title: GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Pollan, R.G. Year: 1959, 2008, 2006 KP-2537-R2-Klamath Project - GERBER WATERSHED. View south southeast from Yainax Butte. Dry Prairie is in the foreground. Horsefly Mountain is in the middle of the picture; November 25, 1959; Photo by R.G.Pollan

24. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Butcher Swamp


	KP-2449-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Butcher Swamp. Dike in center of picture. View looking north; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Butcher Swamp Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2449-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Butcher Swamp. Dike in center of picture. View looking north; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Butcher Swamp Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2449-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Butcher Swamp. Dike in center of picture. View looking north; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene

25. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED


	KP-2450-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Boles Meadow from northwest showing dike at entrance to channel and possible dam site in Boles Creek in foreground; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2450-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Boles Meadow from northwest showing dike at entrance to channel and possible dam site in Boles Creek in foreground; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2450-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Boles Meadow from northwest showing dike at entrance to channel and possible dam site in Boles Creek in foreground; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene

26. [Image] CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED - Looking east towards Janes Reservoir


	KP-2452-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED - Looking east towards Janes Reservoir Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2452-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene Title: CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED - Looking east towards Janes Reservoir Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2452-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene

27. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking southeast over Willow Creek Ranch


	KP-2453-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Note dikes and canals; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking southeast over Willow Creek Ranch Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2453-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Note dikes and canals; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking southeast over Willow Creek Ranch Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2453-R2 - Klamath Project - CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Note dikes and canals; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene

28. [Image] Klamath Basin Water Supply Enhancement Act of 2000


	Report (to accompany S. 2882)
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Klamath Basin Water Supply Enhancement Act of 2000 Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Year: 2004 Report (to accompany S. 2882) Title: Klamath Basin Water Supply Enhancement Act of 2000 Author: United States. Congress. Senate. Committee on Energy and Natural Resources Year: 2004 Report (to accompany S. 2882)

29. [Image] ROUND VALLEY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED


	KP-2607-R2-Klamath Project - ROUND VALLEY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking east along upstream face of dam, showing outlet works; June 23, 1961; Photo by L. McAnulty
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: ROUND VALLEY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, McAnulty, L. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2607-R2-Klamath Project - ROUND VALLEY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking east along upstream face of dam, showing outlet works; June 23, 1961; Photo by L. McAnulty Title: ROUND VALLEY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, McAnulty, L. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2607-R2-Klamath Project - ROUND VALLEY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking east along upstream face of dam, showing outlet works; June 23, 1961; Photo by L. McAnulty

30. [Image] LITTLE SQUAW FLAT RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED


	KP-2608-R2-Klamath Project - LITTLE SQUAW FLAT RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking north from dam, showing area under water; June 23, 1961; Photo by L. McAnulty
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: LITTLE SQUAW FLAT RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, McAnulty, L. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2608-R2-Klamath Project - LITTLE SQUAW FLAT RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking north from dam, showing area under water; June 23, 1961; Photo by L. McAnulty Title: LITTLE SQUAW FLAT RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, McAnulty, L. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2608-R2-Klamath Project - LITTLE SQUAW FLAT RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking north from dam, showing area under water; June 23, 1961; Photo by L. McAnulty

31. [Image] DRY PRAIRIE RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED


	KP-2609-R2-Klamath Project -- DRY PRAIRIE RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking west along dam, showing spillway and water area behind dam; June 23, 1961; Photo by L. McAnulty
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: DRY PRAIRIE RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, McAnulty, L. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2609-R2-Klamath Project -- DRY PRAIRIE RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking west along dam, showing spillway and water area behind dam; June 23, 1961; Photo by L. McAnulty Title: DRY PRAIRIE RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, McAnulty, L. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2609-R2-Klamath Project -- DRY PRAIRIE RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking west along dam, showing spillway and water area behind dam; June 23, 1961; Photo by L. McAnulty

32. [Image] DRY PRAIRIE RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED


	KP-2610-R2-Klamath Project -- DRY PRAIRIE RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking east along dam, showing small portion of water impounded behind dam; June 23, 1961; Photo by L. McAnulty
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: DRY PRAIRIE RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, McAnulty, L. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2610-R2-Klamath Project -- DRY PRAIRIE RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking east along dam, showing small portion of water impounded behind dam; June 23, 1961; Photo by L. McAnulty Title: DRY PRAIRIE RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, McAnulty, L. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2610-R2-Klamath Project -- DRY PRAIRIE RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking east along dam, showing small portion of water impounded behind dam; June 23, 1961; Photo by L. McAnulty

33. [Image] ROUND VALLEY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED


	KP-2611-R2-Klamath Project -- ROUND VALLEY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking southwest from outlet structure, showing reservoir area and water impounded behind dam. (Reservoir nearly empty); June ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: ROUND VALLEY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, McAnulty, L. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2611-R2-Klamath Project -- ROUND VALLEY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking southwest from outlet structure, showing reservoir area and water impounded behind dam. (Reservoir nearly empty); June 23, 1961; Photo by L. McAnulty Title: ROUND VALLEY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, McAnulty, L. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2611-R2-Klamath Project -- ROUND VALLEY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking southwest from outlet structure, showing reservoir area and water impounded behind dam. (Reservoir nearly empty); June 23, 1961; Photo by L. McAnulty

34. [Image] ARKANSAS FLAT RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED


	KP-2613-R2-Klamath Project -- ARKANSAS FLAT RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking south; July 7, 1961; Photo by K.J. Greene
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: ARKANSAS FLAT RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2613-R2-Klamath Project -- ARKANSAS FLAT RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking south; July 7, 1961; Photo by K.J. Greene Title: ARKANSAS FLAT RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2613-R2-Klamath Project -- ARKANSAS FLAT RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking south; July 7, 1961; Photo by K.J. Greene

35. [Image] STRAWBERRY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED


	KP-2614-R2-Klamath Project -- STRAWBERRY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. Aerial view looking north. Storage at low stage; July 7, 1961; Photo by K.J. Greene
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: STRAWBERRY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2614-R2-Klamath Project -- STRAWBERRY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. Aerial view looking north. Storage at low stage; July 7, 1961; Photo by K.J. Greene Title: STRAWBERRY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2614-R2-Klamath Project -- STRAWBERRY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. Aerial view looking north. Storage at low stage; July 7, 1961; Photo by K.J. Greene

36. [Image] MALLORY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED


	KP-2615-R2-Klamath Project -- MALLORY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. Aerial view of empty reservoir, looking northwest; July 7, 1961; Photo by K.J. Greene
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: MALLORY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2615-R2-Klamath Project -- MALLORY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. Aerial view of empty reservoir, looking northwest; July 7, 1961; Photo by K.J. Greene Title: MALLORY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2615-R2-Klamath Project -- MALLORY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. Aerial view of empty reservoir, looking northwest; July 7, 1961; Photo by K.J. Greene

37. [Image] KENO RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED


	KP-2616-R2-Klamath Project -- KENO RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking north; July 7, 1961; Photo by K.J. Greene
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: KENO RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2616-R2-Klamath Project -- KENO RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking north; July 7, 1961; Photo by K.J. Greene Title: KENO RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1961, 2008, 2006 KP-2616-R2-Klamath Project -- KENO RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED. View looking north; July 7, 1961; Photo by K.J. Greene

38. [Image] Gerber-Willow Valley Watershed Analysis


	x, 386 p., ill., maps (some col.); Cover title; "July 2003"
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber-Willow Valley Watershed Analysis Author: U.S. Department of the Interior. Bureau of Land Management; Klamath Falls Resource Area Office; U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service; Fremont-Winema National Forests; Modoc National Forest Year: 2003, 2006, 2005 x, 386 p., ill., maps (some col.); Cover title; "July 2003" Title: Gerber-Willow Valley Watershed Analysis Author: U.S. Department of the Interior. Bureau of Land Management; Klamath Falls Resource Area Office; U.S. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service; Fremont-Winema National Forests; Modoc National Forest Year: 2003, 2006, 2005 x, 386 p., ill., maps (some col.); Cover title; "July 2003"

39. [Image] Draft upper Williamson River Watershed assessment


	"Prepared for Klamath Basin Ecosystem Foundation, and the Upper Williamson River Catchment Group, in cooperation with the Upper Klamath Basin Working Group, and the Klamath Watershed Council."
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Draft upper Williamson River Watershed assessment Author: David Evans and Associates, Inc. Year: 2004, 2005 "Prepared for Klamath Basin Ecosystem Foundation, and the Upper Williamson River Catchment Group, in cooperation with the Upper Klamath Basin Working Group, and the Klamath Watershed Council." Title: Draft upper Williamson River Watershed assessment Author: David Evans and Associates, Inc. Year: 2004, 2005 "Prepared for Klamath Basin Ecosystem Foundation, and the Upper Williamson River Catchment Group, in cooperation with the Upper Klamath Basin Working Group, and the Klamath Watershed Council."

40. [Image] Biological/conference opinion regarding the effects of operation of the Bureau of Reclamation's Klamath Project on the endangered Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus), endangered shortnose sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris), threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and proposed critical habitat for the Lost River/shortnose suckers


	Cover title; "April 2001."; Includes bibliographical references
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Biological/conference opinion regarding the effects of operation of the Bureau of Reclamation's Klamath Project on the endangered Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus), endangered shortnose sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris), threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and proposed critical habitat for the Lost River/shortnose suckers Year: 2001, 2004 Cover title; "April 2001."; Includes bibliographical references Title: Biological/conference opinion regarding the effects of operation of the Bureau of Reclamation's Klamath Project on the endangered Lost River sucker (Deltistes luxatus), endangered shortnose sucker (Chasmistes brevirostris), threatened bald eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) and proposed critical habitat for the Lost River/shortnose suckers Year: 2001, 2004 Cover title; "April 2001."; Includes bibliographical references

41. [Image] Final supplemental environmental impact statement: for clarification of language in the 1994 record of decision for the Northwest Forest Plan; national forests and Bureau of Land Management districts within the range of the northern spotted owl: proposal to amend wording about the aquatic conservation strategy


	Abstract The Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior propose limited changes to language about how to demonstrate that projects follow the Aquatic Conservation Strategy, part of the Northwest Forest ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Final supplemental environmental impact statement: for clarification of language in the 1994 record of decision for the Northwest Forest Plan; national forests and Bureau of Land Management districts within the range of the northern spotted owl: proposal to amend wording about the aquatic conservation strategy Author: United States. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service; United States. Department of the Interior. Bureau of Land Managemen Year: 2003, 2006, 2005 Abstract The Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior propose limited changes to language about how to demonstrate that projects follow the Aquatic Conservation Strategy, part of the Northwest Forest Plan. Projects needed to achieve Northwest Forest Plan goals have been delayed or stopped due to misapplication of certain passages in the Aquatic Conservation Strategy. The agencies are responding to the underlying need for increased agency success planning and implementing projects, to the extent that the current wording has hindered the agencies ability to follow Northwest Forest Plan principles and achieve its goals. The goals of the Northwest Forest Plan cannot be achieved without project implementation. Three alternatives are considered in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, No Action, the Proposed Action, and Alternative A. No Action would not change existing language within the Aquatic Conservation Strategy. The Proposed Action and Alternative A would make l Title: Final supplemental environmental impact statement: for clarification of language in the 1994 record of decision for the Northwest Forest Plan; national forests and Bureau of Land Management districts within the range of the northern spotted owl: proposal to amend wording about the aquatic conservation strategy Author: United States. Department of Agriculture. Forest Service; United States. Department of the Interior. Bureau of Land Managemen Year: 2003, 2006, 2005 Abstract The Secretaries of Agriculture and the Interior propose limited changes to language about how to demonstrate that projects follow the Aquatic Conservation Strategy, part of the Northwest Forest Plan. Projects needed to achieve Northwest Forest Plan goals have been delayed or stopped due to misapplication of certain passages in the Aquatic Conservation Strategy. The agencies are responding to the underlying need for increased agency success planning and implementing projects, to the extent that the current wording has hindered the agencies ability to follow Northwest Forest Plan principles and achieve its goals. The goals of the Northwest Forest Plan cannot be achieved without project implementation. Three alternatives are considered in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement, No Action, the Proposed Action, and Alternative A. No Action would not change existing language within the Aquatic Conservation Strategy. The Proposed Action and Alternative A would make l

42. [Image] Portions of the Gerber Reservoir watershed on the Klamath Project


	KP-1725 - Klamath Project. Portions of the Gerber Reservoir watershed on the Klamath Project comparable to this show little evidence of erosion. Localized instances of gullying have been observed in scattered ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Portions of the Gerber Reservoir watershed on the Klamath Project Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Burrows, A.J. Year: 1948, 2007, 2005 KP-1725 - Klamath Project. Portions of the Gerber Reservoir watershed on the Klamath Project comparable to this show little evidence of erosion. Localized instances of gullying have been observed in scattered instances; June 17, 1948; Photo by A. J. Burrows Title: Portions of the Gerber Reservoir watershed on the Klamath Project Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Burrows, A.J. Year: 1948, 2007, 2005 KP-1725 - Klamath Project. Portions of the Gerber Reservoir watershed on the Klamath Project comparable to this show little evidence of erosion. Localized instances of gullying have been observed in scattered instances; June 17, 1948; Photo by A. J. Burrows

43. [Image] Fire has devastated a considerable number of areas such as this on the Williamson River watershed


	KP-1726 - Klamath Project. Despite this lack of cover, erosion damage has not reached aggravated proportions resulting in damage to Upper Klamath Lake; June 18, 1948; Photo by A. J. Burrows
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Fire has devastated a considerable number of areas such as this on the Williamson River watershed Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Burrows, A.J. Year: 1948, 2007, 2005 KP-1726 - Klamath Project. Despite this lack of cover, erosion damage has not reached aggravated proportions resulting in damage to Upper Klamath Lake; June 18, 1948; Photo by A. J. Burrows Title: Fire has devastated a considerable number of areas such as this on the Williamson River watershed Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Burrows, A.J. Year: 1948, 2007, 2005 KP-1726 - Klamath Project. Despite this lack of cover, erosion damage has not reached aggravated proportions resulting in damage to Upper Klamath Lake; June 18, 1948; Photo by A. J. Burrows

44. [Image] Klamath River Basin hydrologic conditions prior to the September 2002 die-off of salmon and steelhead


	Includes bibliographical references (p. 10)
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Klamath River Basin hydrologic conditions prior to the September 2002 die-off of salmon and steelhead Author: Lynch, Dennis D. Year: 2003, 2004 Includes bibliographical references (p. 10) Title: Klamath River Basin hydrologic conditions prior to the September 2002 die-off of salmon and steelhead Author: Lynch, Dennis D. Year: 2003, 2004 Includes bibliographical references (p. 10)

45. [Image] Natural flow estimates for streams in the Klamath Basin


	"Open file report SW 04-001"
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Natural flow estimates for streams in the Klamath Basin Author: Cooper, Richard M. Year: 2004, 2005 "Open file report SW 04-001" Title: Natural flow estimates for streams in the Klamath Basin Author: Cooper, Richard M. Year: 2004, 2005 "Open file report SW 04-001"

46. [Image] Annual report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1916


	Some issues include, photographs, maps, and tables for land acquired, hydrographies, contracts, etc.; Description based on Annual rept. of the Klamath project: Oregon and California for calendar year 1913. ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1916 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1916, 2008, 2005 Some issues include, photographs, maps, and tables for land acquired, hydrographies, contracts, etc.; Description based on Annual rept. of the Klamath project: Oregon and California for calendar year 1913. Title covers: calendar years for 1913-1917. Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project Annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1916 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1916, 2008, 2005 Some issues include, photographs, maps, and tables for land acquired, hydrographies, contracts, etc.; Description based on Annual rept. of the Klamath project: Oregon and California for calendar year 1913. Title covers: calendar years for 1913-1917. Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project Annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

47. [Image] Report of the Oregon Klamath River Commission on water resources and requirements of the Upper Klamath basin


	The Oregon Klamath River Commission was given the specific assignment of cooperating with the California Klamath River Commission in formulating and submitting to the legislative assemblies of both state ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Report of the Oregon Klamath River Commission on water resources and requirements of the Upper Klamath basin Author: Stanley, Lewis A. Year: 1954, 2005 The Oregon Klamath River Commission was given the specific assignment of cooperating with the California Klamath River Commission in formulating and submitting to the legislative assemblies of both state for their approval an interstate compact relative to the distribution and use of the waters of the Klamath River. It was given authority to make the necessary surveys and investigations upon which to base such negotiations ... it is particularly fortunate that the United States Bureau of Reclamation has been engaged in a study for a Comprehensive Report on the Development of Water and Related Resources of the Upper Klamath Basin, which report was issued as a preliminary draft as of June 15, 1954, and the Bureau has been fully cooperative in making its studies and basic data available to this commission. Also, the State Water Resources Board of California has been prosecuting a study of present and potential uses of waters of the Klamath River in both states and issued an Interim Report on Klamath River Basin Investigation dated March, 1954. Both these reports have been of inestimable value in preparation of the data to be presented herein. Title: Report of the Oregon Klamath River Commission on water resources and requirements of the Upper Klamath basin Author: Stanley, Lewis A. Year: 1954, 2005 The Oregon Klamath River Commission was given the specific assignment of cooperating with the California Klamath River Commission in formulating and submitting to the legislative assemblies of both state for their approval an interstate compact relative to the distribution and use of the waters of the Klamath River. It was given authority to make the necessary surveys and investigations upon which to base such negotiations ... it is particularly fortunate that the United States Bureau of Reclamation has been engaged in a study for a Comprehensive Report on the Development of Water and Related Resources of the Upper Klamath Basin, which report was issued as a preliminary draft as of June 15, 1954, and the Bureau has been fully cooperative in making its studies and basic data available to this commission. Also, the State Water Resources Board of California has been prosecuting a study of present and potential uses of waters of the Klamath River in both states and issued an Interim Report on Klamath River Basin Investigation dated March, 1954. Both these reports have been of inestimable value in preparation of the data to be presented herein.

48. [Image] Reconnaissance investigation of water quality, bottom sediment, and biota associated with irrigation drainage in the Klamath Basin, California and Oregon, 1988-89


	"This report describes results of a reconnaissance level field investigation of the quality of irrigation drain water and the effects of its use on federally managed wildlife refuges in the Klamath Basin, ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Reconnaissance investigation of water quality, bottom sediment, and biota associated with irrigation drainage in the Klamath Basin, California and Oregon, 1988-89 Author: Sorenson, Stephen K. Year: 1991, 2005 "This report describes results of a reconnaissance level field investigation of the quality of irrigation drain water and the effects of its use on federally managed wildlife refuges in the Klamath Basin, California and Oregon. The investigation was designed to indicate the magnitude and extent of any water-quality problems that could threaten wildlife and human health. The investigation also was designed to use similar sampling strategies and sampling media as was used in all Department of the Interior reconnaissance studies throughout the Western United States, thus providing a consistency that would allow comparison between studies. Information provided by this investigation will be used by the DOI Task Group on Irrigation Drainage to evaluate the need for more detailed study. Samples of water, bottom sediment, and biological tissues were collected in 1988 at various locations on or near the refuges and analyzed for selected chemical constituents. The results of the chemical analysis were compared to various standards and criteria, baseline data, and toxicological studies. These comparisons are discussed in the context of the geological, hydrological, and biological systems in the study area"--P. 2,3 [8,9]. Title: Reconnaissance investigation of water quality, bottom sediment, and biota associated with irrigation drainage in the Klamath Basin, California and Oregon, 1988-89 Author: Sorenson, Stephen K. Year: 1991, 2005 "This report describes results of a reconnaissance level field investigation of the quality of irrigation drain water and the effects of its use on federally managed wildlife refuges in the Klamath Basin, California and Oregon. The investigation was designed to indicate the magnitude and extent of any water-quality problems that could threaten wildlife and human health. The investigation also was designed to use similar sampling strategies and sampling media as was used in all Department of the Interior reconnaissance studies throughout the Western United States, thus providing a consistency that would allow comparison between studies. Information provided by this investigation will be used by the DOI Task Group on Irrigation Drainage to evaluate the need for more detailed study. Samples of water, bottom sediment, and biological tissues were collected in 1988 at various locations on or near the refuges and analyzed for selected chemical constituents. The results of the chemical analysis were compared to various standards and criteria, baseline data, and toxicological studies. These comparisons are discussed in the context of the geological, hydrological, and biological systems in the study area"--P. 2,3 [8,9].

49. [Image] Scientific evaluation of biological opinions on endangered and threatened fishes in the Klamath River basin : oversight hearing before the Committee on Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, second session, March 13, 2002



	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Scientific evaluation of biological opinions on endangered and threatened fishes in the Klamath River basin : oversight hearing before the Committee on Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, second session, March 13, 2002 Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Resources Year: 2002, 2004 Title: Scientific evaluation of biological opinions on endangered and threatened fishes in the Klamath River basin : oversight hearing before the Committee on Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, second session, March 13, 2002 Author: United States. Congress. House. Committee on Resources Year: 2002, 2004

50. [Image] Issue Backgrounder: Environment and Power: Enhancing our Fish & Wildlife Resources


	For years, BPA's only job was to market power from the 28 Federal dams on the Columbia River and its tributaries. Now BPA has a new assignment - to restore fish and wildlife damaged by the development ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Issue Backgrounder: Environment and Power: Enhancing our Fish & Wildlife Resources Author: Bonneville Power Administration Year: 1984 For years, BPA's only job was to market power from the 28 Federal dams on the Columbia River and its tributaries. Now BPA has a new assignment - to restore fish and wildlife damaged by the development and operation of the hydroelectric system Title: Issue Backgrounder: Environment and Power: Enhancing our Fish & Wildlife Resources Author: Bonneville Power Administration Year: 1984 For years, BPA's only job was to market power from the 28 Federal dams on the Columbia River and its tributaries. Now BPA has a new assignment - to restore fish and wildlife damaged by the development and operation of the hydroelectric system

51. [Image] Klamath Drainage Basin, Oregon


	Map no. 14.6 ; Scale 1:260,000 ; Polyconic projection; Relief shown by spot heights
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Klamath Drainage Basin, Oregon Author: Oregon. Water Resources Dept. Year: 1971, 2005, 2004 Map no. 14.6 ; Scale 1:260,000 ; Polyconic projection; Relief shown by spot heights Title: Klamath Drainage Basin, Oregon Author: Oregon. Water Resources Dept. Year: 1971, 2005, 2004 Map no. 14.6 ; Scale 1:260,000 ; Polyconic projection; Relief shown by spot heights

52. [Image] Annual project history: Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1956


	Klamath Project (United States); Water use -- Klamath River Watershed (Oregon and California); Water resources development -- Klamath River Watershed (Oregon and California); Irrigation --Klamath River ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history: Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1956 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1956, 2008, 2006 Klamath Project (United States); Water use -- Klamath River Watershed (Oregon and California); Water resources development -- Klamath River Watershed (Oregon and California); Irrigation --Klamath River Watershed (Oregon and California); Klamath River (Oregon and California); Klamath River Watershed (Oregon and California) -- History Title: Annual project history: Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1956 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1956, 2008, 2006 Klamath Project (United States); Water use -- Klamath River Watershed (Oregon and California); Water resources development -- Klamath River Watershed (Oregon and California); Irrigation --Klamath River Watershed (Oregon and California); Klamath River (Oregon and California); Klamath River Watershed (Oregon and California) -- History

53. [Image] Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds biennial report, 2005-2007


	The Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds Biennial Report 2005-2007. This is the sixth report on the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds. The report provides an update on the accomplishments and continuing ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds biennial report, 2005-2007 Author: Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Year: 2006, 2007 The Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds Biennial Report 2005-2007. This is the sixth report on the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds. The report provides an update on the accomplishments and continuing efforts of people throughout Oregon to improve and protect clean water and recover and maintain healthy populations offish and wildlife in our watersheds. The Oregon Plan is unique because it engages communities in the restoration and long-term stewardship of their watersheds. This extraordinary effort encourages local partnerships and voluntary actions to improve the conditions of our watersheds. Over the years, these actions have made Oregon a national leader in local cooperative conservation. This report collects project and condition data, voluntary private lands restoration information, and agency program accomplishments under the Oregon Plan. Consistent with the past two reports, this document continues to provide specific data on each of the state's fifteen reporting basins. A new element to this report is the inclusion of stories about the people, partnerships, and on-the-ground projects that are benefiting watersheds and communities across the state. Thanks to the many Oregon Plan partners who contributed to this report. Thomas M. Byler Executive Director Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Title: Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds biennial report, 2005-2007 Author: Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board Year: 2006, 2007 The Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds Biennial Report 2005-2007. This is the sixth report on the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds. The report provides an update on the accomplishments and continuing efforts of people throughout Oregon to improve and protect clean water and recover and maintain healthy populations offish and wildlife in our watersheds. The Oregon Plan is unique because it engages communities in the restoration and long-term stewardship of their watersheds. This extraordinary effort encourages local partnerships and voluntary actions to improve the conditions of our watersheds. Over the years, these actions have made Oregon a national leader in local cooperative conservation. This report collects project and condition data, voluntary private lands restoration information, and agency program accomplishments under the Oregon Plan. Consistent with the past two reports, this document continues to provide specific data on each of the state's fifteen reporting basins. A new element to this report is the inclusion of stories about the people, partnerships, and on-the-ground projects that are benefiting watersheds and communities across the state. Thanks to the many Oregon Plan partners who contributed to this report. Thomas M. Byler Executive Director Oregon Watershed Enhancement Board

54. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon


	CN-12-200-20A. Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Small reservoir excavated by BLM, during 1968, in a wet weather seep near Wagon Wheel Springs. This reservoir is located in the SW1/4NE1/4 of ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-20A. Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Small reservoir excavated by BLM, during 1968, in a wet weather seep near Wagon Wheel Springs. This reservoir is located in the SW1/4NE1/4 of Sec. 36, T. 38. S., R. 13 E., W.M. The storage capacity approximates 0.1 to 0.2 acre-foot. This reservoir is built on the side of a slope and impounds the runoff from an area no larger than two or three acres; September 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-20A. Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Small reservoir excavated by BLM, during 1968, in a wet weather seep near Wagon Wheel Springs. This reservoir is located in the SW1/4NE1/4 of Sec. 36, T. 38. S., R. 13 E., W.M. The storage capacity approximates 0.1 to 0.2 acre-foot. This reservoir is built on the side of a slope and impounds the runoff from an area no larger than two or three acres; September 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten

55. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon


	CN-12-200-21A. Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond - pit-type - constructed by BLM during the summer of 1968. This pond is located in a dry lake bed in the NE1/4 of Sec. 5, T. 39 S., ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-21A. Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond - pit-type - constructed by BLM during the summer of 1968. This pond is located in a dry lake bed in the NE1/4 of Sec. 5, T. 39 S., R. 14 E., W.M. The overall dimensions of this pond are 80'x120'x7'. The storage capacity approximates 1.1 acre-foot. The dry lake bed will spill to Gerber Reservoir only during wet years. Therefore, this impoundment will not effect the flow to Gerber Reservoir during the years that the dry lake does not overflow; September, 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-21A. Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond - pit-type - constructed by BLM during the summer of 1968. This pond is located in a dry lake bed in the NE1/4 of Sec. 5, T. 39 S., R. 14 E., W.M. The overall dimensions of this pond are 80'x120'x7'. The storage capacity approximates 1.1 acre-foot. The dry lake bed will spill to Gerber Reservoir only during wet years. Therefore, this impoundment will not effect the flow to Gerber Reservoir during the years that the dry lake does not overflow; September, 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten

56. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon


	CN-12-200-22A. Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Earthfill dam and reservoir constructed by BLM across a draw in the NE1/4 of Sec. 10, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. Earth spillway is located at left ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-22A. Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Earthfill dam and reservoir constructed by BLM across a draw in the NE1/4 of Sec. 10, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. Earth spillway is located at left end of dam. Maximum depth of water to lip (?) of spillway is about 6.5 feet. The storage capacity approximates 0.5 acre-foot; September 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-22A. Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Earthfill dam and reservoir constructed by BLM across a draw in the NE1/4 of Sec. 10, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. Earth spillway is located at left end of dam. Maximum depth of water to lip (?) of spillway is about 6.5 feet. The storage capacity approximates 0.5 acre-foot; September 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten

57. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon


	CN-12-200-23A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Earthfill dam and spillway constructed by BLM across a draw in the NE1/4 of Sec. 10, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. This is another view of the reservoir ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-23A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Earthfill dam and spillway constructed by BLM across a draw in the NE1/4 of Sec. 10, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. This is another view of the reservoir and dam shown in Photograph No.CN-12-200-22A; September 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-23A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Earthfill dam and spillway constructed by BLM across a draw in the NE1/4 of Sec. 10, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. This is another view of the reservoir and dam shown in Photograph No.CN-12-200-22A; September 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten

58. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon


	CN-12-200-24A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond - pit-type - constructed by BLM in the summer of 1968. This pond was constructed in a large flat in the NE1/4 of Sec. 3, T. 39 S., R. ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-24A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond - pit-type - constructed by BLM in the summer of 1968. This pond was constructed in a large flat in the NE1/4 of Sec. 3, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. The overall dimensions of this pond are 80'x120'x7'. The slope of both ends is about 4:1. The storage capacity approximates 1.1 acre-foot; September 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-24A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond - pit-type - constructed by BLM in the summer of 1968. This pond was constructed in a large flat in the NE1/4 of Sec. 3, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. The overall dimensions of this pond are 80'x120'x7'. The slope of both ends is about 4:1. The storage capacity approximates 1.1 acre-foot; September 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten

59. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon


	CN-12-200-25A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond - pit-type - constructed by BLM in the summer of 1968. This pond is located in a large fist in the NE1/4 of Sec. 3, T. 39 S., R. 14 ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-25A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond - pit-type - constructed by BLM in the summer of 1968. This pond is located in a large fist in the NE1/4 of Sec. 3, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. This is another view of the pond shown in Photograph No. CN-12-200-24A; September 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-25A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond - pit-type - constructed by BLM in the summer of 1968. This pond is located in a large fist in the NE1/4 of Sec. 3, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. This is another view of the pond shown in Photograph No. CN-12-200-24A; September 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten

60. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon


	CN-12-200-26A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond – pit-type – constructed by BLM in the summer of 1968. This pond is located in the NE1/4 of Sec. 14, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. The overall ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-26A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond – pit-type – constructed by BLM in the summer of 1968. This pond is located in the NE1/4 of Sec. 14, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. The overall dimensions of this pond are 80'x120'x6'. The slope of both ends is about 4:1. The storage capacity approximates 1.0 acre-foot; September 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-26A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond – pit-type – constructed by BLM in the summer of 1968. This pond is located in the NE1/4 of Sec. 14, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. The overall dimensions of this pond are 80'x120'x6'. The slope of both ends is about 4:1. The storage capacity approximates 1.0 acre-foot; September 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten

61. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon - California


	CN-12-200-28A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon - California. View of Round Valley Reservoir, looking southwest from top of dam. Note -- water has filled the approach channel to the outlet works. ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon - California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-28A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon - California. View of Round Valley Reservoir, looking southwest from top of dam. Note -- water has filled the approach channel to the outlet works. 11-19-68. Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon - California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-28A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon - California. View of Round Valley Reservoir, looking southwest from top of dam. Note -- water has filled the approach channel to the outlet works. 11-19-68. Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten

62. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon


	CN-12-200-27A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond – pit-type – constructed by BLM in the summer of 1968. This pond is located in the NE1/4 of Sec. 14, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. This is ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-27A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond – pit-type – constructed by BLM in the summer of 1968. This pond is located in the NE1/4 of Sec. 14, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. This is another view of the pond shown in Photograph No. CN-12-200-26A. Note how the earth has been stockpiled into a partially completed earthfill dam; September 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-27A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon. Stock-pond – pit-type – constructed by BLM in the summer of 1968. This pond is located in the NE1/4 of Sec. 14, T. 39 S., R. 14 E, W.M. This is another view of the pond shown in Photograph No. CN-12-200-26A. Note how the earth has been stockpiled into a partially completed earthfill dam; September 6, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten

63. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California


	CN-12-200-30A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. View showing the beginning of the water spreader system. The turnout on the left serves as the headworks of the most westerly spreader ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-30A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. View showing the beginning of the water spreader system. The turnout on the left serves as the headworks of the most westerly spreader ditch. The turnout in the center of the picture below Dean Boe, BLM, Lakeview, Oregon, is the headworks of the highest easterly ditch. A 24" diameter pipe, with stoplog slots to control the flow, is an integral part of each turnout. Don Gipe, BLM manager, Lakeview, Oregon, is shown on left of the picture; November 19, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-30A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. View showing the beginning of the water spreader system. The turnout on the left serves as the headworks of the most westerly spreader ditch. The turnout in the center of the picture below Dean Boe, BLM, Lakeview, Oregon, is the headworks of the highest easterly ditch. A 24" diameter pipe, with stoplog slots to control the flow, is an integral part of each turnout. Don Gipe, BLM manager, Lakeview, Oregon, is shown on left of the picture; November 19, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten

64. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California


	CN-12-200-32A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. View of one of many check dams in spreader area. This particular check dam is located on the upper ditch that follows the ridge top ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-32A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. View of one of many check dams in spreader area. This particular check dam is located on the upper ditch that follows the ridge top running along the northeasterly side of the spreader area. Water may be spread to either side of the ditch. Note -- the soil is generally rocky and sage brush is interspersed with pasture grasses. Good stands of clover are growing in certain localized areas; November 19, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-32A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. View of one of many check dams in spreader area. This particular check dam is located on the upper ditch that follows the ridge top running along the northeasterly side of the spreader area. Water may be spread to either side of the ditch. Note -- the soil is generally rocky and sage brush is interspersed with pasture grasses. Good stands of clover are growing in certain localized areas; November 19, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten

65. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California


	CN-12-200-33A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Looking northwest of typical portion of water spreader area near the center of Section 29, Township 39 South, Range 14 East, W.M. Note ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-33A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Looking northwest of typical portion of water spreader area near the center of Section 29, Township 39 South, Range 14 East, W.M. Note the sparseness of the grass intermingled with the sage brush; November 19, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-33A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Looking northwest of typical portion of water spreader area near the center of Section 29, Township 39 South, Range 14 East, W.M. Note the sparseness of the grass intermingled with the sage brush; November 19, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten

66. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California


	CN-12-200-35A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Looking northeast of the approach channel to Wildhorse Diversion Dam from the top of the headgate to Wildhorse Diversion Channel. The ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-35A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Looking northeast of the approach channel to Wildhorse Diversion Dam from the top of the headgate to Wildhorse Diversion Channel. The Diversion Dam, itself, is located just to the left of the water shown in the lower left-hand corner of the picture; November 19, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-35A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Looking northeast of the approach channel to Wildhorse Diversion Dam from the top of the headgate to Wildhorse Diversion Channel. The Diversion Dam, itself, is located just to the left of the water shown in the lower left-hand corner of the picture; November 19, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten

67. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California


	CN-12-200-37A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Looking easterly at Gerber Reservoir from top of Gerber Dam. Note that the boat dock located at the far end of the water area in the ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-37A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Looking easterly at Gerber Reservoir from top of Gerber Dam. Note that the boat dock located at the far end of the water area in the center of the picture is completely out of the water. Water surface elevation was 4809.62 feet above sea level (USBR Datum). Reservoir content amounted to 16,450 acre-feet; November 19, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-37A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Looking easterly at Gerber Reservoir from top of Gerber Dam. Note that the boat dock located at the far end of the water area in the center of the picture is completely out of the water. Water surface elevation was 4809.62 feet above sea level (USBR Datum). Reservoir content amounted to 16,450 acre-feet; November 19, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten

68. [Image] Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2A


	Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2A Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2A Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon

69. [Image] Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2B


	Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2B Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2B Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon

70. [Image] Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2C


	Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2C Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2C Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon

71. [Image] Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2D


	Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2D Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2D Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon

72. [Image] Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 3A


	Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 3A Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 3A Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon

73. [Image] Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 3B


	Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 3B Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 3B Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon

74. [Image] Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon: Map 3C


	Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon: Map 3C Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 1958, 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon: Map 3C Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 1958, 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon

75. [Image] Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 3D


	Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 3D Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 1958, 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon Title: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 3D Author: Newcomb, Reuben Clair Year: 1958, 2005 Map to accompany the main document: Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon

76. [Image] Butte Valley - Viewed from southwest showing saddle between Butte Valley and Klamath River watershed


	KP_2307-R2 - Klamath Project--Butte Valley; April 29, 1956; Photo by Wesley Nell
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Butte Valley - Viewed from southwest showing saddle between Butte Valley and Klamath River watershed Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Nell, Wesley Year: 1956, 2007, 2006 KP_2307-R2 - Klamath Project--Butte Valley; April 29, 1956; Photo by Wesley Nell Title: Butte Valley - Viewed from southwest showing saddle between Butte Valley and Klamath River watershed Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Nell, Wesley Year: 1956, 2007, 2006 KP_2307-R2 - Klamath Project--Butte Valley; April 29, 1956; Photo by Wesley Nell

77. [Image] Technical assistance and the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds: a statewide assessment by the Healthy Streams Partnership


	"November 2002"; 66 p. in various paginations: ill., form -- Executive summary ([6]p.)
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Technical assistance and the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds: a statewide assessment by the Healthy Streams Partnership Author: Healthy Streams Partnership Year: 2002, 2007, 2005 "November 2002"; 66 p. in various paginations: ill., form -- Executive summary ([6]p.) Title: Technical assistance and the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds: a statewide assessment by the Healthy Streams Partnership Author: Healthy Streams Partnership Year: 2002, 2007, 2005 "November 2002"; 66 p. in various paginations: ill., form -- Executive summary ([6]p.)

78. [Image] The Oregon plan for salmon and watersheds


	KCAMATH FALLS. QREEON THE OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON AND WATERSHEDS The purpose of the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds ( the " Oregon Plan") as stated in the Plan and reaffirmed in this Executive Order ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: The Oregon plan for salmon and watersheds Author: Oregon. Office of the Governor Year: 1999, 2005, 2004 KCAMATH FALLS. QREEON THE OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON AND WATERSHEDS The purpose of the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds ( the " Oregon Plan") as stated in the Plan and reaffirmed in this Executive Order is to restore Oregon's wild salmon and trout populations and fisheries to sustainable and productive levels that will provide substantial environmental, cultural, and economic benefits and to improve water quality. The Oregon Plan is a long- term, ongoing effort that began as a focused set of actions by state, local, tribal and private organizations and individuals in October of 1995. The Oregon Plan first addressed coho salmon on the Oregon Coast, was then broadened to include steelhead trout on the coast and in the Lower Columbia River, and is now expanding to all at- risk wild salmonids throughout the state. The Oregon Plan addresses all factors for decline of these species, including watershed conditions arid fisheries, to the extent those factors can be affected by the state. The Oregon Plan was endorsed and funded by the Oregon Legislature in 1997 through Oregon Senate Bill 924 ( 1 997 Or. Laws, ch. 7) and House Bill 3700 ( 1 997 Or. Laws, ch.' 8). The Oregon Plan is described in two principal documents: " The Oregon Plan," dated March 1997, and " The Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds, Supplement I - steelhbad," dated January 1998. As used in this Executive Order, + the Oregon Plan also incorporates the Healthy Streams Partnership ( Oregon Senate Bill 101 0, 1 993- Or. Laws, ch. 263). The Oregon Plan is a cooperative effort of state, local, federal, tribal and private organizations and individuals. Although the Oregon Plan contains a strong foundation of protective regulations -- continuing existing regulatory programs and speeding the implementation of others - an essential principle of the Plan is the need to move beyond prohibitions and to encourage efforts to improve conditions for salmon through non- regulatory means. Many of the most significant contributions to the Oregon Plan are private and quasi- governmental efforts to protect and . restore salmon on working landscapes, including efforts by watershed councils. Salmon and trout restoration requires action and sacrifice across the entire economic and geographic spectrum of Oregon. The commercial and sport fishing industries in Oregon have been heavily affected by complete or partial closures of fisheries. The forest industry operates under the Oregon Forest Practices Act, and has contributed substantially to salmon recovery through habitat restoration projects on private lands and by funding a large pan of the state recovery efforts. The agriculture and mining industries are also taking actions that will protect and restore salmon and trout habitat and improve water quality ( including financial support of restoration efforts by the mining industry). Urban areas are developing water conservation programs, spending funds for wastewater treatment improvements to reduce point source pollution, reducing non- point source pollution and reducing activities that degrade riparian areas. All citizens of Oregon share responsibility for declining populations of wild salmon and trout, and it is important that there be both a broad commitment to reversing these historic trends and a sense that the burdens of restoration are being shared by all of society. It is also important that there be independent scientific oversight of the Oregon Plan. This oversight is being provided by the Independent Mutidisciplinary Science Team ( IMST), established under Oregon Senate Bill 924 ( 1 997 Or. Laws, ch. 7). ~ d'ditional legislative oversight for the Oregon Plan is being provided by the Joint Legislative Committee on . Salmon and Stream Enhancement ( the " Joint Committee!'). Under the federal Endangered Species Act ( ESA) the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service . . ( F& WS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service ( NMFS) are responsible for identifying species that are threatened or endangered, and for developing programs to conserve and recover lhose species. F& WS and NMFS have now listed salmonids under the ESA on the entire Oregon Coast, the lower Columbia River ( including most of the Portland metropolitan area). the la math River basin, and in the upper Columbia and Snake River basins. More listings are expected within the next year. To date, the F& WS and NMFS generally have not had the resources to develop and implement effective recovery plans for fisheries. In addition, in many areas a large proportion of the habitat that list'ed'salmonids depend on is located on private lands, where the regulatory tools under the ESA are relatively ' ill- defined and indirect. Finally, federal agencies alone, even if they take an active regulatory approach. to recovery, will not restore listed salmonids. The federal ESA may work to prohibit certain actions, but there is simply too much habitat on private lands for restoration to succeed without pro- active involvement and incentives for individuals, groups, and local governments to take affirmative actions to restore habitat on working landscapes. In April, 1997 the State of Oregon and NMFS entered into a Memorandum of Agreement ( MOA) under which the State agreed to continue existing measures under the March 1997 Oregon Plan and to take certain additional actions to protect and restbre coho salmon on the Oregon Coast. On May 6, 1997, NMFS determined that the Oregon Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit ( ESU) of coho salmon did not warrant listing as a threatened or endangered species under the ESA. On June 2, 1998, the US. District Court for Oregon ordered NMFS to reconsider its decision without taking into account any parts of the Oregon Plan or MOA that are not " current enforceable measures." The U. S. District Court for Oregon also held that the MOA was speculative, due to the fact that it provided for termination by either party on thirty days notice, and that therefore the MOA could not be considered by NMFS ' in its listing decision. Under court order, NMFS reconsidered its decision without taking into account the application in the future of the harvest and hatchery measures contained in the Oregon Plan, or the habitat improvement programs being undertaken under the Oregon Plan, or the commitments made by the State of Oregon in the MOA for improvement of applicable habitat measures. Accordingly, NMFS listed Oregon Coast .. . coho as threatened undefthe ESA on or about October 2, 1998. - The MOA provided for the State of Oregon to take actions necessary to ensfie that - Oregon Coast coho did not warrant listing as a threatened or endangered species under the federal ESA. Now that Oregon Coast coho are listed as a threatened species as a- result of the U. S. District Court's order, the central purpose of the MOA has been eliminated. Due to the uncertainties created by the District Court's decision and the increasing extent of salmonids listed or proposed for listing under the federal ESA, it is important that the status of the State of Oregon's substantive commitments under the MOA and the purpose of the Oregon Plan be clarified. Through this Executive Order, the State of Oregon reaffirms its intent to play the leading role in protecting and restoring Oregon Coast coho and other salmonids. through the implementation of the Oregon Plan. This Executive Order provides the framework and direction for state agencies to implement ( to the extent of their authorities) the Oregon Plan in a timely and effective manner. This Executive Order also provides a framework for extending the state's efforts beyond a focus on Oregon Coast coho, to watersheds and fisheries statewide. Consistent with the principle of adaptive management, this Order applies the experience gained to date in implementing the Oregon Plan to provide additional detailed direction to state agencies. Finally, this Executive Order establishes a public involvement process to prioritize continuing efforts under the Oregon Plan. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DIRECTED: ( 1) Overall Direction ( a) Agencies of the State of Oregon will, consistent with their authorities, fully implement the state agency efforts described in the Oregon Plan and in this Executive Order. ( b) The overall objective for state agencies under the Oregon Plan and this Executive Order is to protect and restore salmonids and to improve water quality. ( c) The Governor will, in cooperation with the Joint Committee, IMST, affected state agencies, watershed councils, and other affected local entities and persons develop and implement, a process to set biological and habitat goals and objectives to protect and restore salmonids on a basin or regional basis as soon as practicable. Once these goals and objectives are established, they will be used by state agencies . . . to evaluate their regulatory and non- regulatory programs and measures relating to the protection and re'storation of salmonids. Through this on- going evaluation, state agencies will determine any changes to their programs or measures that may be necessary to meet the biological and habitat goals and objectives. In the interim, the following objectives in subsections ( d) and ( e) shall apply to agencies' implem'entation of the OregGn Plan and this Executive Order. . . ( d) Actions that state agencies take, fund and/ or authorize that are primarily for a purpose other than restoration of salmonids or the habitat they depend upon will, considering the anticipated duration and geographic scope of the actions: ( A) to the maximum extent practicable minimize and mitigate adverse effects of the actions on salmoni. ds or the habitat they depend on; and ( 8) not appreciably reduce the likelihood of the survival and recovery of salmonids in the wild. ( e) State agencies will take, fund and/ or authorize actions that are primarily for the purpose of restoring salmonids or the habitat they depend upon, including actions implementing the Oregon Plan, with the goal of producing a conservation benefit that ( if taken together with comparable and related actions by all persons and entities within the range of the species) is likely to result in sustainable population levels of salmonids in the foreseeable future, and in population levels of salmonids that provide substantial environmental, cultural and economic benefits to Oregonians in the long term. ( f) With the broadening of the Oregon Plan,' prioritizing all agency actions according to coho core areas is no longer appropriate. Each state agency participating in the Oregon Plan, in consultation with ODFW and other partners involved in the implementation of the Plan and through a public involvement process, will modify their existing work programs in the Oregon Plan to prioritize agency measures to protect and restore salmonids in a timely and effective manner. The work programs will continue to identify key specific outcomes, refine and improve designations of priority areas, and establish completion dates. These modifications will be submitted to the , Governor, the Joint Committee, and to the appropriate boards and commissions as soon as possible, but in no event later than June 1, 1999. Progress reports on action plans will be submitted to the Governor, the Joint Committee, and to the appropriate boards and commissions on an annual basis. In prioritizing their efforts,' state agencies shall consider how to maximize conservation -, benefits for salmonids and the habitat they depend on within limited resources and - . whether their- actions are likely to increase populations of salmonids in the foreseeable future. I p ( g) State agencies will work cooperatively with landowners, local entities and other persons taking actions to protect or restore salmonids. ( h) As the Oregon Plan grows in geographic scope and . in intensity of activity,' there is a growing need to streamline and prioritize state agency activity at the . regional level. One proposal has been to organize state natural resource agency field operations along hydrologic units. Therefore, state agencies will consider this proposal and, through the collective efforts of state agency directors, develop an organization plan that focuses state agency field effort on the activities and areas of highest priority under the Oregon Plan. ( i) State. agencies will continue to encourage and work with agencies of the U. S. government to implement the federal measures described in the Oregon Plan.. In addition, the state agencies will work with the federal government to develop additional means of protecting and restoring salmonids. Where appropriate, state agencies will request that federal agencies obtain incidental take permits under Section 7 of the federal ESA for state actions that ace funded or authorized by a , federal agency. ( j) State agencies will help support efforts to evaluate watershed conditions, and to develop'specific strategic plans to provide for flood management, water quality improvement, and salmonid restoration in basins around the state, including the Willamette basin through the Willamette Restoration Initiative. ( k) The IMST will continue to provide oversight to ensure the use of the best scientific information available as the basis for implementation of and for adaptive changes to the Oregon Plan. State agencies will ensure that the IMST receives data and other information reasonably required for its functions in a timely manner. The Governor's Natural Resources Office ( GNRO) has requested that the IMST's initial priority be review of the freshwater habitat needs of coho and the relationship between population levels, escapement levels, and habitat characteristics. The GNRO also will continue to request that the IMST annually review monitoring results and identify where the Oregon Plan warrants change for scientific or technical reasons and make recommend& ions to the appropriate agency on those adjustments that appear necessary. Agencies will report their responses to any recommendations by . . the IMST to the Governor and to the Joint Committee. Any other changes identified by the IMST as necessary to achieve properly functioning riparian and aquatic habitat conditions required to, protect and restore salmonids will be forwarded to the appropriate governmental entity for its consideration of the adoption of new, changed, or supplemental measures as rapidly as possible while providing for public involvement: Each state agency, by June 1, 1999, will ratify a monitoring team charter through an interagency memorandum. A draft of the charter is contained in the 1998 Oregon Plan Annual Report. ( I) Monitoring is a key element of the Oregon Plan. Each state agency will actively support the monitoring strategy described in the Oregon Plan. Each affected agency will participate on the monitoring team to coordinate activities and integrate analyses. Each agency will implement . an appropriate monitoring program to assess the effectiveness of their programs and measures in meeting the objectives set forth in the Oregon Planon an annual basis. In addition, agencies with regulatory programs that are included in the Oregon Plan will determine levels of compliance with regulatory standards and identify and act on opportunities to improve compliance levels: ( m) If information gathered regarding the effectiveness of measures in the Oregon Plan shows that existing strategies within state control are not achie, ving expected improvements and objectives, the agency( ies1 responsible for those measures will seek appropriate changes in their regulations, policies, programs, r-measures and other areas of the Oregon Plan, as required to protect and restore coho and other sal'monids. Such modification or supplementation will be done as rapidly as possible, consistent with public involvement. ( n) Agencies are using geographically- referenced data in their efforts under the Oregon Plan, and will be using Geographic Information Systems ( GIs) in the analysis of these , data. In doing so, the State GIs Plan, developed by the Oregon Geographic lnformation Council ( OGIC) ( see Executive Order 96- 40) will be followed, with specific adherence to the Plan guidance on data documentation, coordination and data sharing. The agency with primary responsibility for gathering and updating the specific data will be responsible for meeting the requirements of the Plan, and to ensure coordination- with OGIC, the State Service Center for GIs and other' cooperating agencies. In addition, state agencies will cooperate with the Governor's Watershed Enhancement Board ( GWEB), Soil and. Water Conservation Districts ( SWCDs), local waters$ ed councils, landowners and others in making these essential data available. ( 0) Geographically- based strategies to assess and achieve habitat needs and adequate escapement levels will be used, and the state agencies will continue with the development of standardized watershed assessment protocols, including a -- cumulative effects assessment. State agencies will also continue with the development of habitat restoration guides to evaluate and direct habitat restoration efforts. ( 2) Continuation and Expansion of Existing Efforts. Without limiting the generality of section ( l)( a) of this Executive Order, the following subsections of this Executive Order describe some of the many efforts in the Oregon Plan where the initial phase of work has been completed, and where efforts will be continued. ( a) The Oregon Fish & Wildlife Commission ( OFWC), the Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife ( ODFW), and the Pacific Fishery Management Council ( PFMC) are managing ocean and terminal fisheries according to the measures set forth in the Oregon Plan ( ODFW I- A. l and Ill- A. l). These measures set a maximum mortality rate ( resulting from other fisheries) for any of four disaggregated stocks of coho of fifteen percent ( 1 5%) under poor ocean conditions. In 1997, the mortality rate. from harvest is estimated to have been between nine and eleven percent ( 9- 1 1 %). ODFW and OFWC will continue these measures in state waters, and will actively support continued implementation of the ocean harvest measures by the PFMC ( Amendment 13 to the Council's salmon management plan) until and unless a different management regime agreeable to NMFS is adopted. ( b) The OFWC and ODFW will ensure that the fish hatchery measures set forth in the Oregon Plan are continued by the OFWC and ODFW. ODFW is marking all hatchery coho on the Oregon Coast. This marking will allow increased certainty in estimating hatchery stray rates beginning in 1999. Available data on hatchery stray rates for coho and steelhead are being provided to NMFS on an annual basis. The number of hatchery coho released is estimated to have been 1.7 million in 1998 - substantially below the level called for in the Oregon Plan. This number will be reduced to 1.2 million in 1999. In addition, ODFW has, and will continue to provide. annual reports regarding: ( i) the number of juvenile hatchery coho that are released by brood year, locations and dates of release, life stage, and broodstock origin; ( ii) the number of adult coho taken for broodstock for each hatchery, the location and date of collection, and the origin ( hatchery or natural); ( iii) the number of hatchery coho . . estimated to have spawned in natural habitat by basin; ( iv) the estimated percentage of hatchery coho% the total natural spawning population; and ( v) the mortality of naturally- spawning coho resulting from each fishery. NMFS may provide comments about hatchery prograk affecting coho to ODFW, with any concerns to be resolved between NMFS and ODFW. - - ( c) ln addition to recent modifications to hatchery practices and programs, a new vision is needed for how Oregon will utilize hatcheries in the best and most effective manner. Therefore, the ODFW and the OFWC shall engage in a process to create a strategic plan for fish hatcheries in Oregon over the next decade ( including state and federally- funded hatcheries, private hatcheries, and the STEP program). The essential elements of this process are as follows: ( i) Impartial analysis - conduct an impartial analysis of the scientific bases, and the social and economic effects of Oregon hatchery programs utilizing existing analyses and review where feasible, but conducting new analyses if necessary; ( ii) Review the Wild Fish Management Policy ( WFMP) - because the future plan for hatcheries in Oregon is dependent on implementation of the WFMP, ODFW shall conduct a science and stakeholder review to determine if this significant policy should be revised and shall make any revision by July 2000; ( iii) Frame alternative strategies -- convene a group of stockholders to . frame alternative strategies, including outcomes and descriptions, of how hatcheries will be used in Oregon over the next decade ( these strategies will address the use of hatcheries for wild fish population recovery including supplementation, research and monitoring, public education, and sport and commercial fishing opportunities); ( iv) Public review and selection of a strategy -- the OFWC shall, after public review and ' ;-'-!&%; f$'. i comment, adopt a strategic plan to guide development of future hatchery programs, incorporating the strategy developed and adopted in accordance with subpart ( iii) of this paragraph. ( d) Criteria and guidelines directing the design of projects that may affect fish passage have been established in a Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU) between the Oregon Department of Transportation ( ODOT), ODFW, the Oregon Department of Forestry ( ODF), the Oregon Department of Agriculture ( ODA), the Division of State Lands ( DSL) and the Federal Highway Administration. These guidelines apply to the design, construction and consultations of projects affecting fish passage. Under the MOU, projects requiring regulatory approvals that follow these criteria and guidelines are expedited. Oregon agencies will continue to provide technical assistance to ensure that the criteria and guidelines are applied appropriately in restoration projects, as well as any other projects that may affect fish passage through road crossings and similar structures. ODFW will work with state agencies, local governments, and watershed councils to ensure that Oregon's standards for fish passage set forth in Exhibit A to the MOU are understood and are implemented. - ( e) Fish presence, stream habitat, road and culvert surveys have been conducted for roads within ODOT jurisdiction and county roads in coastal basins, the Lower Columbia basin, the Willamette basin, and the Grande Ronbe/ lmnaha basins. Among the results of these surveys is the finding that culvert barriers to fish passage affect a substantial quantity of salmonid habitat. For example, surveys of county and state highways in western Oregon found over 1,200 culverts that are barriers to passage. As a result, ODOT is placing additional priority on restoring fish access. For 1998, ODOT repaired or replaced 35 culverts restoring access to 101 miles of salmonid habitat. For 1999, the Oregon Transportation Commission will be asked to fund approximately $ 4.0 million for culvert modification. ODOT and the Commission will continue to examine means to speed restoration of fish passage and to coordinate priorities with ODFW. ( f) Draft watershed assessment protocols have been developed and are being field tested. Beginning in 1999, SWCDs, watershed councils and others will be able to use the protocols as the basis for action plans to identify and prioritize opportunities to protect and restore salmonids. Watershed action plans have already been completed in a number of basins including the Rogue, Coos, Coquille and Grande Ronde. State agencies will work to support these watershed assessments and plans to the maximum extent practicable. Where watershed action plans have been developed under the protocols, GWEB will ensure that projects funded through the Watershed Improvement Grant Fund are consistent with watershed action plans, and other state agencies will work with SWCDs and watershed councils to ensure that activities they authorize, fund or undertake are consistent with watershed action plans to the maximum extent practicable. ( g) The State of Oregon has developed interim aquatic habitat restoration and enhancement guidelines for 1998. State agencies involved with restoration activities ( ODFW, ODF, DSL, ODA, DEQ, and GWEB) will continue to develop and refine the interim guidelines for final publication in April 1999. The guidelines will be applied in restoration activities funded or authorized by state agencies. The purpose of ' the guidelines will be to define aquatic restoration and to identify and encourage aquatic habitat restoration techniques to restore salmonids. . . ( h) ODA and O ~ hFave each entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Oregon Department'of Environmental Quality relating to the development of . Total Maximum Daily Loads ( TMDLs) and Water Quality Management Area Plans ( WQMAPs). O Dw~ ill adopt. a nd implement WQMAPs ( through the Healthy Streams Partnership) and ODF , will review the adequacy of forest practices rules to meet water quality standards. ODF and ODA will evaluate the effectiveness of these measures in achieving water quality standards on a regular basis and implement any changes required to meet the standards. ( i) Agencies are implementing a coordinated monitoring program, as described in the Oregon Plan. This program includes technical support and standardized protocols for watershed councils, stream habitat surveys, forest practice effectiveness monitoring, water withdrawal monitoring, ambient water quality monitoring, and biotic index studies, as well as fish presence surveys and salmonid abundance and survival monitoring in selected subbasins. State agencies are also' working to coordinate monitoring efforts by state, federal, and local entities, including watershed councils. State agencies will work actively to ensure that the monitoring measures' in the Oregon Plan are continued. - .. ( j) GWEB has put into place new processes for identifying and coordinating the delivery of financial and technical assistance to individuals, agencies, watershed councils and soil and water conservation districts as they implement watershed ' restoration projects to improve water quality and restore aquatic resources. Over $ 25 ' million has been distributed for watershed restoration projects in the last ten years. During the present ( 1 997- 99 biennium) GWEB has awarded over $ 1 2 million dollars in f- state and federal funds for technical'assistance and watershed restoration activities to implement the Oregon Plan. GWEB and state agencies will continue to seek financial resources to be allocated by GWEB for watershed restoration activities at the local and. statewide levels. ( k) State agencies will continue to encourage, support and work to provide incentives for local, tribal, and private . efforts to implement the Oregon Plan. In addition, state agencies will continue to provide financial assistance to local entities for projects to protect and restore salmonids to the extent consistent with their budgetary and legal authorities, and consistent with their work programs in the Oregon Plan. To the. maximum extent practicable, state agencies will also provide technical assistance and planning tools to provide local conservation groups to assist in and target watershed restoration efforts. These efforts ( during 1996 and 1997) are reported in " The Oregon. Plan for Salmon and Watersheds: Watershed Restoration Inventory, 1998." ~ u s c afe w of the important efforts that have been completed include: ( A) Eighty- two watershed councils have joined with forty- five Soil and Water Conservation Districts as well as private and public landowners to implement on- the- ground projects' to protect and restore salmonids. During 1996 and 1997, a reported $ 27.4 million was spent on 1,234 watershed restoration projects on non-federal lands. Both the amount spent and the number of projects represent significant increases ( of over 300 percent) over prior years. In 1996- 97, watershed councils, SWCDs and other organizations and individuals completed: ( i) 138 stream fencing projects, involving at least 301 miles of streambank; ( ii) 196 riparian area planting projects, involving at least 11 1 miles of streams; and ( iii) 458 instream habitat improvement projects. . . . ( B) Private and state forest landowners are implementing key efforts under the Oregon Plan, including the road risk and remediation program ( ODF- 1 and 2). Under this effort in 1996 and 1997, close to 4,000 miles of roads'have been surveyed to identify risks that the roads may pose to salmonid habitat. As the risks are identified, they are then prioritized for remediation following an established. protocol. Already, 52 miles of forest roads have been closed, 843 miles of road repair and reconstruction projects to - protect salmonid habitat have been completed, and an additional 14 miles of roads have been decommissioned or relocated.. In addition, 530 culverts have been replaced, upgraded or installed for fish passage purposes, improving access to a reported 146 stream miles. ( C) Organizations working in Tillamook County have developed the I ." J aw#~ t Tillamook County Performance Partnership. The Partnership is implementing the \. Tillamook Bay National Estuary Program by addressing water quality, fisheries, floodplain management and economic development in the county. Among the actions that the Partnership has already accomplished are: ( i) the closure of seven miles of degraded forest roads and the rehabilitation of 469 miles of roads to meet current standards, at a cost of $ 1 8 million; ( ii) the fencing of 53 miles of streambank, and the construction of three cattle bridges and 100 alternative cattle watering sites, at a cost of $ 214,000; and ( iii) the completion of 24 instream restoration projects and 34 barbs protecting 4,200 feet of streambank, at a cost of $ 1.3 million dollars. ( D) The Confederated Tribes of the Grande Ronde Community of Oregon have completed a forest management plan that establishes standards for the protection of aquatic resources that are comparable to those found in the Aquatic Conservation Strategy ' of the Northwest Forest Plan. . % ( E) A combination of funding from the Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation and the National Fish and Wildlife Heritage Foundation ( private, non- profit organizations) is provi, ding support for seven biologists to design restoration projects. These projects are prioritized based on stream surveys, and are carried out with the voluntary participation and support of landowners. A ten- year monitoring plan has been funded- and implemented to determine project effectiveness: ( F) The Oregon Cattlemen's Association has implemented its WESt Program that is designed to help landowners better understand their watersheds and stream functions through assessments and monitoring. h he WESt Program brings landowners together along stream reaches, and offers a series of workshops, conducted on a site specific basis, free of charge. The workshops include riparian ecology, setting goals and objectives, Proper Functioning Condition ( PFC), data. collection and monitoring. Over 25 workshops have been held, with attendance ranging from 5 to 30 landowners per workshop. The WESt Program is sponsored by the Oregon Cattlemen's Association, DEQ, Oregon State University, and GWEB. ( G) Within the Tillamook State Forest road network 1,902 culverts have been replaced or added to'improve road drainage and to disconnect storm water runoff from roads reducing stream sediment impacts. Additionally, some of these culverts also improved fish passage at stream crossings. In this process, ODF has also replaced six culverts with bridges improving fish passage to approximately four miles of stream. The Tillamook State Foresl in conjunction with many partners, such F-as the Association of Northwest Steelheaders, G W EB, Simpson Timber Company, Tillamook County, the FishAmerica Foundation, Hardrock Construction Company, the Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation, the F& WS, the Oregon Youth Conservation Corps, Columbia Helicopters and Terra Helicopters, has also recently completed instream placement of over 400 rootwads, trees and boulders at a cost of $ 300,000 for habitat enhancement. ( 3) Key Agency Efforts. Continuation and completion of the following state agency efforts is critical to the success of the Oregon Plan. State agencies will make continuation or completion ( as appropriate) of the following efforts a high priority. ( a) The State of Oregon and the US. Department of Agriculture have entered into a Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program ( CREP). This cost- share program, one of the first of its kind, . will be used to reduce the impacts of agricultural practices through water quality. add habitat improvement. The objectives of the CREP are to: ( i) provide incentives'for farmers and ranchers to establish riparian buffers; ( ii) protect - . and restore at least 4,000 miles of stream habitat by providing up to 95,000 acres of riparian buffeis; ( i4) restore up to 5,000 acres of wetlands that will benefit salmonids; and ( iv) provide a mechanism for farmers and ranchers to comply with Oregon's ,- Senate Bill 101 0 ( 1 993 Or. Laws, ch. 263). ( b) ODF will work with non- industrial forest landowners to'administer the Stewardship Incentive Program and the Forest Resources Trust programs to protect and restore riparian and wetland areas that benefit salmonids. ( c) The Oregon Board of Forestry will determine, with the assistance of an advisory committee, to what extent changes to forest practices are needed to meet state water quality standards and to protect and restore salmonids. A substantial body of information regarding the effectiveness of current practices is being . developed. This information includes: ( i) the IMST report regarding . the role of forest practices and forest habitat in protecting and restoring salmonids; and ( ii) a series of - monitoring projects that include the Storms of 1996 study, a riparian areas study, a stream temperature study, and a road drainage study. Using this information, as well as other available scientific information including scientific information from NMFS, the advisory committee will make recommendations to the Board at both site and watershed scales on threats to salmonid habitat relating to sediment, water temperature, freshwater habitat needs, roads and fish passage. Based on the advisory committee's recommendations and other scientific information, the Board will make every effort to make its determinations by June 1999. The Board may . . determine that the most effective means of achieving any necessary changes to . - d;.~ .; i;. z . I:@;.. %- .~ + k forest practices is through regulatory changes, statutory changes or through other programs . including programs to create incentives for forest landowners. In the event that the Board determines that legislative changes. are necessary to carry out its determinations, the Board will transmit any recommendations for such changes to the . Governor and to the Joint Committee at the earliest possible date. ( d) Consistent with administrative rule, and statutory and constitutional mandates for the management of state forests, ODF State Forest management plans will include an aquatic conservation strategy that has a high likelihood of protecting and restoring properly functioning aquatic habitat for salmonids on state forest lands. ( e) ODF will present to NMFS a Habitat Conservation Plan ( HCP) under Section 10 of the federal ESA that includes the Clatsop and Tillamook State Forests. ODF has already completed scierkific review and has public review underway for this draft HCP. The scientific and public review comments will be considered by ODF in . . completing the draft HCP. The draft HCP will be presented to NMFS by June 1999. An HCP for the ~ jliotSt tate Forest was approved by the US. Fish & Wildlife Service in 1995. In October af 1997, ODF and DSL forwarded the Elliott State Forest HCP to NMFS with the request that it be reviewed to determine whether it has a high likelihood of protecting and restoring properly functioning aquatic habitat conditions on state forest lands necessary to protect and restore salmonids. Based on discussions surrounding the NMFS review, ODF and DSL will determine what revisions, if any, are required to the Elliott HCP and/ or Forest Management Plan to ensure a high likelihood of protecting and restoring properly functioning aquatic habitat for salmonids. ( f) Before the OFWC adopts and implements fishery regulations that may result in taking of coho, ODFW will provide NMFS with'all available scientific information and analyses pertinent to the proposed regulation where the harvest measures are not under the jurisdiction of the PFMC, including results of the Oregon Plan monitoring and evaluation program. This information, together with the proposed regulation and supporting analysis, will be provided at least two weeks prior to the OFWC's action, to give NMFS time to review and comment on the proposed regulations. ( g) ODFW will evaluate the effects of predation on salmonids, and . will . work with . affected federal agencies to determine whether changes to programs and law relating to predation are warranted in order to protect and restore salmonids. P ( h) Under Oregon Senate Bill 101 0 ( 1 993 Or. Laws, ch. 2631, ODA will adopt Agricultural Water Qualify Management Area Plans ( AWQMAPs) for Tier I and Tier ll watersheds by the end of 2002. The AWQMAPs will be designed and implemented to meet load allocations for agriculture needed to achieve state water quality . . standards. In addition, ODA will work with ODFW, DEQ, GWEB, SWCDs, federal . agencies and watershed councils to determine to what extent additional measures related to achieving properly functioning riparian and aquatic habitat on agricultural lands are needed to protect and restore salmonids, giving attention first to priority areas identified in. the Oregon Plan. In the event ODA is unable to reach a consensus regarding such measures, ODA will ask the IMST to review areas of substantive ' scientific disagreement and to'make recommendations to ODA regarding how they should be resolved. In the event that legislative changes are needed to implement such measures, ODA will transmit any recommendations for such changes to. the Governor and to the Joint Committee at the earliest possible date. In addition, any measures identified as rieeded by ODA will be implemented at the earliest practicable time. * . ( i) ODFW will expedite its applications for instream water rights and OWRD will process such applications promptly where flow deficits are identified as adversely affecting salmonids, and where such rights. are not already in place. The Oregon - water Resources Department ( OWRD) and the Oregon Water Resources Commission ( OWRC) will- also seek to facilitate flow restoration targeted to streams identified by OWRD and ODFW as posing the most critical low- flow barriers to salmonids. In addition, where necessary, OWRD will continue to work with the Oregon State Police to provide enforcement of water use. Where illegal water uses are identified, OWRD will ensure outcomes consistent with maintenance and restoration of flows. ( j) The Oregon Environmental Quality commission ( EQC). and DEQ will evaluate and will make every effort to utilize their authorities to continue to provide additional protection to . priority areas ( as determined under section 1 ( f) of this Executive Order), including in- stream flow protection under state law, and antidegradation policy under . the federal Clean Water Act ( including Outstanding Resource Waters designations . and high quality waters designations). . ( k) DSL has proposed to adopt changes to its Essential Salmonid Habitat rules that will provide additional protection for spawning and rearing areas of anadromous salmonids. In addition, ODFW and DSL will consult with the OWRC to determine where it is necessary to administratively close priority areas ( including ' work under General Authorizations) to fill and removal activities in order to protect salmonids. . . DSL, ODFW, ODF and ODA also will work together to identify means of regulating the . uy- w :.-:: st. removal of organic material ( such as large woody debris) from streams where such removal would adversely affect salmonids and would not be contrary to other agency mandates. ( I) DSL will seek the advice of the IMST regarding whether gravel removal affects gravel and/ or sediment budgets in a manner that adversely affects salmonids. ( m) The Department of Land Conservation and ~ e v e l o p r n e n t ' ( ~ ~ acn~ d ) th, e Land Conservation- and Development Commission ( LCDC) will evaluate and, to the extent feasible, speed implementation of existing Goal 5 requirements for riparian corridors. ( n) DLCD, DEQ, ODF, ODA, ODFW, and DSL and their respective boards and commissions will evaluate and implement programs to protect and restore riparian vegetation for the purposes of achieving statewide water quality standards and . . protecting and restoring a aquatic habitat for salmonids. ' ( 0) DLCD, with, the assistance of DSL and ODFW, and in consultation with coastal cities and counties, shall review the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal i 6 as they pertain to estuarine resources important to the restoration of salmonids, and shall, report its findings to LCDC for its consideration. ( p) The Oregon State Police will work to facilitate the existing cooperative relationship with the NMFS Office of ~ a Ewnfo rcement, as well as tomaintain cooperation with other enforcement entities, in order to enhance law enforcement, public awareness and voluntary compliance related to harvest, habitat and other issues addressed in the Oregon Plan. ( q) The Oregon Parks and Recreation Department will continue to work to p. rovide information and education to the public on salmon and steelhead needs through park programs and interpretive aids. ( r) The Oregon Marine Board will work to ensure fish friendly boating and to develop boating facilities that protect salmonids. ( s) State natural resource agencies will continue, to the extent feasible, to support watershed councils by providing technical assistance to develop watershed assessments, restoration plans and to develop watershed priorities to benefit 7- salmonids. In addition, state natural resource agencies will work'on a larger . .:.... watershed scale to develop basin- wide restoration priorities. ( 4) Future Modifications; Public Involvement for the Oregon Plan Generally. The GNRO will solicit public co'mments and input from participants in the Oregon Plan regarding whether there are refinements or changes to the Plan and/ or the organizational framework for implementing the Plan that are necessary or desirable based on the experience gained over the past three years, or resulting from the widespread listings and proposed listings of salmon and trout under the federal ESA. Based on this public involvement, the GNRO will provide a report and recommendations to the Governor and the Joint Committee regarding whether modifications are necessary to the Oregon Plan in order to protect and restore coho and other salmonids. ( 5) Definitions. For purioses'of this Executive Order: . . ( aj The " Oregon Plan" means the Oregon Coastal Salmon Recovery lnitiative, dated March 1991, and the Steelhead. Supplement, dated January 1998. " Oregon Plan," as used in this Order, is intended to be consistent with the definition of the' Oregon Coastal Salmon Recovery lnitiative in Oregon Senate Bill 924 ( 1997 Or. Laws, .- cti. 7), and to include the Healthy Streams Partnership ( 1 993 Or. Laws, ch. 263). -. - ( b) " Protect" has the meaning given in section ( l)( d) of this Executive Order. ( c) " Restore" has the meaning'given in section ( l)( e) of this Executive Order. Restore necessarily includes actions to manage salmonids to provide for adequate escapement levels, and actions to increase the quantity and improve the quality of properly functioning habitat upon which salmonids depend. ( d) " Coho" means native wild coho salmon found in rivers and lakes along the Oregon Coast. ( el " Salmonids" means native wild salmon, char and trout in the State of Oregon. ( 6) Effective Date; Relation to Federal ESA. This Executive Order will take effect on the date that it is filed with the Secretary of State. The State of Oregon will continue to work with NMFS to determine the appropriate relationship between the Oregon Plan and NMFS's efforts under the federal ESA. Done at Salem, Oregon, this $ day of & ~ 4 y , 1999. ha26 . ~ it& er, M. D. Suz adnd .~. ow& end DEPUTY SECR~ ARYOF - STATE Title: The Oregon plan for salmon and watersheds Author: Oregon. Office of the Governor Year: 1999, 2005, 2004 KCAMATH FALLS. QREEON THE OREGON PLAN FOR SALMON AND WATERSHEDS The purpose of the Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds ( the " Oregon Plan") as stated in the Plan and reaffirmed in this Executive Order is to restore Oregon's wild salmon and trout populations and fisheries to sustainable and productive levels that will provide substantial environmental, cultural, and economic benefits and to improve water quality. The Oregon Plan is a long- term, ongoing effort that began as a focused set of actions by state, local, tribal and private organizations and individuals in October of 1995. The Oregon Plan first addressed coho salmon on the Oregon Coast, was then broadened to include steelhead trout on the coast and in the Lower Columbia River, and is now expanding to all at- risk wild salmonids throughout the state. The Oregon Plan addresses all factors for decline of these species, including watershed conditions arid fisheries, to the extent those factors can be affected by the state. The Oregon Plan was endorsed and funded by the Oregon Legislature in 1997 through Oregon Senate Bill 924 ( 1 997 Or. Laws, ch. 7) and House Bill 3700 ( 1 997 Or. Laws, ch.' 8). The Oregon Plan is described in two principal documents: " The Oregon Plan," dated March 1997, and " The Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds, Supplement I - steelhbad," dated January 1998. As used in this Executive Order, + the Oregon Plan also incorporates the Healthy Streams Partnership ( Oregon Senate Bill 101 0, 1 993- Or. Laws, ch. 263). The Oregon Plan is a cooperative effort of state, local, federal, tribal and private organizations and individuals. Although the Oregon Plan contains a strong foundation of protective regulations -- continuing existing regulatory programs and speeding the implementation of others - an essential principle of the Plan is the need to move beyond prohibitions and to encourage efforts to improve conditions for salmon through non- regulatory means. Many of the most significant contributions to the Oregon Plan are private and quasi- governmental efforts to protect and . restore salmon on working landscapes, including efforts by watershed councils. Salmon and trout restoration requires action and sacrifice across the entire economic and geographic spectrum of Oregon. The commercial and sport fishing industries in Oregon have been heavily affected by complete or partial closures of fisheries. The forest industry operates under the Oregon Forest Practices Act, and has contributed substantially to salmon recovery through habitat restoration projects on private lands and by funding a large pan of the state recovery efforts. The agriculture and mining industries are also taking actions that will protect and restore salmon and trout habitat and improve water quality ( including financial support of restoration efforts by the mining industry). Urban areas are developing water conservation programs, spending funds for wastewater treatment improvements to reduce point source pollution, reducing non- point source pollution and reducing activities that degrade riparian areas. All citizens of Oregon share responsibility for declining populations of wild salmon and trout, and it is important that there be both a broad commitment to reversing these historic trends and a sense that the burdens of restoration are being shared by all of society. It is also important that there be independent scientific oversight of the Oregon Plan. This oversight is being provided by the Independent Mutidisciplinary Science Team ( IMST), established under Oregon Senate Bill 924 ( 1 997 Or. Laws, ch. 7). ~ d'ditional legislative oversight for the Oregon Plan is being provided by the Joint Legislative Committee on . Salmon and Stream Enhancement ( the " Joint Committee!'). Under the federal Endangered Species Act ( ESA) the U. S. Fish & Wildlife Service . . ( F& WS) and the National Marine Fisheries Service ( NMFS) are responsible for identifying species that are threatened or endangered, and for developing programs to conserve and recover lhose species. F& WS and NMFS have now listed salmonids under the ESA on the entire Oregon Coast, the lower Columbia River ( including most of the Portland metropolitan area). the la math River basin, and in the upper Columbia and Snake River basins. More listings are expected within the next year. To date, the F& WS and NMFS generally have not had the resources to develop and implement effective recovery plans for fisheries. In addition, in many areas a large proportion of the habitat that list'ed'salmonids depend on is located on private lands, where the regulatory tools under the ESA are relatively ' ill- defined and indirect. Finally, federal agencies alone, even if they take an active regulatory approach. to recovery, will not restore listed salmonids. The federal ESA may work to prohibit certain actions, but there is simply too much habitat on private lands for restoration to succeed without pro- active involvement and incentives for individuals, groups, and local governments to take affirmative actions to restore habitat on working landscapes. In April, 1997 the State of Oregon and NMFS entered into a Memorandum of Agreement ( MOA) under which the State agreed to continue existing measures under the March 1997 Oregon Plan and to take certain additional actions to protect and restbre coho salmon on the Oregon Coast. On May 6, 1997, NMFS determined that the Oregon Coast Evolutionarily Significant Unit ( ESU) of coho salmon did not warrant listing as a threatened or endangered species under the ESA. On June 2, 1998, the US. District Court for Oregon ordered NMFS to reconsider its decision without taking into account any parts of the Oregon Plan or MOA that are not " current enforceable measures." The U. S. District Court for Oregon also held that the MOA was speculative, due to the fact that it provided for termination by either party on thirty days notice, and that therefore the MOA could not be considered by NMFS ' in its listing decision. Under court order, NMFS reconsidered its decision without taking into account the application in the future of the harvest and hatchery measures contained in the Oregon Plan, or the habitat improvement programs being undertaken under the Oregon Plan, or the commitments made by the State of Oregon in the MOA for improvement of applicable habitat measures. Accordingly, NMFS listed Oregon Coast .. . coho as threatened undefthe ESA on or about October 2, 1998. - The MOA provided for the State of Oregon to take actions necessary to ensfie that - Oregon Coast coho did not warrant listing as a threatened or endangered species under the federal ESA. Now that Oregon Coast coho are listed as a threatened species as a- result of the U. S. District Court's order, the central purpose of the MOA has been eliminated. Due to the uncertainties created by the District Court's decision and the increasing extent of salmonids listed or proposed for listing under the federal ESA, it is important that the status of the State of Oregon's substantive commitments under the MOA and the purpose of the Oregon Plan be clarified. Through this Executive Order, the State of Oregon reaffirms its intent to play the leading role in protecting and restoring Oregon Coast coho and other salmonids. through the implementation of the Oregon Plan. This Executive Order provides the framework and direction for state agencies to implement ( to the extent of their authorities) the Oregon Plan in a timely and effective manner. This Executive Order also provides a framework for extending the state's efforts beyond a focus on Oregon Coast coho, to watersheds and fisheries statewide. Consistent with the principle of adaptive management, this Order applies the experience gained to date in implementing the Oregon Plan to provide additional detailed direction to state agencies. Finally, this Executive Order establishes a public involvement process to prioritize continuing efforts under the Oregon Plan. NOW THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DIRECTED: ( 1) Overall Direction ( a) Agencies of the State of Oregon will, consistent with their authorities, fully implement the state agency efforts described in the Oregon Plan and in this Executive Order. ( b) The overall objective for state agencies under the Oregon Plan and this Executive Order is to protect and restore salmonids and to improve water quality. ( c) The Governor will, in cooperation with the Joint Committee, IMST, affected state agencies, watershed councils, and other affected local entities and persons develop and implement, a process to set biological and habitat goals and objectives to protect and restore salmonids on a basin or regional basis as soon as practicable. Once these goals and objectives are established, they will be used by state agencies . . . to evaluate their regulatory and non- regulatory programs and measures relating to the protection and re'storation of salmonids. Through this on- going evaluation, state agencies will determine any changes to their programs or measures that may be necessary to meet the biological and habitat goals and objectives. In the interim, the following objectives in subsections ( d) and ( e) shall apply to agencies' implem'entation of the OregGn Plan and this Executive Order. . . ( d) Actions that state agencies take, fund and/ or authorize that are primarily for a purpose other than restoration of salmonids or the habitat they depend upon will, considering the anticipated duration and geographic scope of the actions: ( A) to the maximum extent practicable minimize and mitigate adverse effects of the actions on salmoni. ds or the habitat they depend on; and ( 8) not appreciably reduce the likelihood of the survival and recovery of salmonids in the wild. ( e) State agencies will take, fund and/ or authorize actions that are primarily for the purpose of restoring salmonids or the habitat they depend upon, including actions implementing the Oregon Plan, with the goal of producing a conservation benefit that ( if taken together with comparable and related actions by all persons and entities within the range of the species) is likely to result in sustainable population levels of salmonids in the foreseeable future, and in population levels of salmonids that provide substantial environmental, cultural and economic benefits to Oregonians in the long term. ( f) With the broadening of the Oregon Plan,' prioritizing all agency actions according to coho core areas is no longer appropriate. Each state agency participating in the Oregon Plan, in consultation with ODFW and other partners involved in the implementation of the Plan and through a public involvement process, will modify their existing work programs in the Oregon Plan to prioritize agency measures to protect and restore salmonids in a timely and effective manner. The work programs will continue to identify key specific outcomes, refine and improve designations of priority areas, and establish completion dates. These modifications will be submitted to the , Governor, the Joint Committee, and to the appropriate boards and commissions as soon as possible, but in no event later than June 1, 1999. Progress reports on action plans will be submitted to the Governor, the Joint Committee, and to the appropriate boards and commissions on an annual basis. In prioritizing their efforts,' state agencies shall consider how to maximize conservation -, benefits for salmonids and the habitat they depend on within limited resources and - . whether their- actions are likely to increase populations of salmonids in the foreseeable future. I p ( g) State agencies will work cooperatively with landowners, local entities and other persons taking actions to protect or restore salmonids. ( h) As the Oregon Plan grows in geographic scope and . in intensity of activity,' there is a growing need to streamline and prioritize state agency activity at the . regional level. One proposal has been to organize state natural resource agency field operations along hydrologic units. Therefore, state agencies will consider this proposal and, through the collective efforts of state agency directors, develop an organization plan that focuses state agency field effort on the activities and areas of highest priority under the Oregon Plan. ( i) State. agencies will continue to encourage and work with agencies of the U. S. government to implement the federal measures described in the Oregon Plan.. In addition, the state agencies will work with the federal government to develop additional means of protecting and restoring salmonids. Where appropriate, state agencies will request that federal agencies obtain incidental take permits under Section 7 of the federal ESA for state actions that ace funded or authorized by a , federal agency. ( j) State agencies will help support efforts to evaluate watershed conditions, and to develop'specific strategic plans to provide for flood management, water quality improvement, and salmonid restoration in basins around the state, including the Willamette basin through the Willamette Restoration Initiative. ( k) The IMST will continue to provide oversight to ensure the use of the best scientific information available as the basis for implementation of and for adaptive changes to the Oregon Plan. State agencies will ensure that the IMST receives data and other information reasonably required for its functions in a timely manner. The Governor's Natural Resources Office ( GNRO) has requested that the IMST's initial priority be review of the freshwater habitat needs of coho and the relationship between population levels, escapement levels, and habitat characteristics. The GNRO also will continue to request that the IMST annually review monitoring results and identify where the Oregon Plan warrants change for scientific or technical reasons and make recommend& ions to the appropriate agency on those adjustments that appear necessary. Agencies will report their responses to any recommendations by . . the IMST to the Governor and to the Joint Committee. Any other changes identified by the IMST as necessary to achieve properly functioning riparian and aquatic habitat conditions required to, protect and restore salmonids will be forwarded to the appropriate governmental entity for its consideration of the adoption of new, changed, or supplemental measures as rapidly as possible while providing for public involvement: Each state agency, by June 1, 1999, will ratify a monitoring team charter through an interagency memorandum. A draft of the charter is contained in the 1998 Oregon Plan Annual Report. ( I) Monitoring is a key element of the Oregon Plan. Each state agency will actively support the monitoring strategy described in the Oregon Plan. Each affected agency will participate on the monitoring team to coordinate activities and integrate analyses. Each agency will implement . an appropriate monitoring program to assess the effectiveness of their programs and measures in meeting the objectives set forth in the Oregon Planon an annual basis. In addition, agencies with regulatory programs that are included in the Oregon Plan will determine levels of compliance with regulatory standards and identify and act on opportunities to improve compliance levels: ( m) If information gathered regarding the effectiveness of measures in the Oregon Plan shows that existing strategies within state control are not achie, ving expected improvements and objectives, the agency( ies1 responsible for those measures will seek appropriate changes in their regulations, policies, programs, r-measures and other areas of the Oregon Plan, as required to protect and restore coho and other sal'monids. Such modification or supplementation will be done as rapidly as possible, consistent with public involvement. ( n) Agencies are using geographically- referenced data in their efforts under the Oregon Plan, and will be using Geographic Information Systems ( GIs) in the analysis of these , data. In doing so, the State GIs Plan, developed by the Oregon Geographic lnformation Council ( OGIC) ( see Executive Order 96- 40) will be followed, with specific adherence to the Plan guidance on data documentation, coordination and data sharing. The agency with primary responsibility for gathering and updating the specific data will be responsible for meeting the requirements of the Plan, and to ensure coordination- with OGIC, the State Service Center for GIs and other' cooperating agencies. In addition, state agencies will cooperate with the Governor's Watershed Enhancement Board ( GWEB), Soil and. Water Conservation Districts ( SWCDs), local waters$ ed councils, landowners and others in making these essential data available. ( 0) Geographically- based strategies to assess and achieve habitat needs and adequate escapement levels will be used, and the state agencies will continue with the development of standardized watershed assessment protocols, including a -- cumulative effects assessment. State agencies will also continue with the development of habitat restoration guides to evaluate and direct habitat restoration efforts. ( 2) Continuation and Expansion of Existing Efforts. Without limiting the generality of section ( l)( a) of this Executive Order, the following subsections of this Executive Order describe some of the many efforts in the Oregon Plan where the initial phase of work has been completed, and where efforts will be continued. ( a) The Oregon Fish & Wildlife Commission ( OFWC), the Oregon Department of Fish & Wildlife ( ODFW), and the Pacific Fishery Management Council ( PFMC) are managing ocean and terminal fisheries according to the measures set forth in the Oregon Plan ( ODFW I- A. l and Ill- A. l). These measures set a maximum mortality rate ( resulting from other fisheries) for any of four disaggregated stocks of coho of fifteen percent ( 1 5%) under poor ocean conditions. In 1997, the mortality rate. from harvest is estimated to have been between nine and eleven percent ( 9- 1 1 %). ODFW and OFWC will continue these measures in state waters, and will actively support continued implementation of the ocean harvest measures by the PFMC ( Amendment 13 to the Council's salmon management plan) until and unless a different management regime agreeable to NMFS is adopted. ( b) The OFWC and ODFW will ensure that the fish hatchery measures set forth in the Oregon Plan are continued by the OFWC and ODFW. ODFW is marking all hatchery coho on the Oregon Coast. This marking will allow increased certainty in estimating hatchery stray rates beginning in 1999. Available data on hatchery stray rates for coho and steelhead are being provided to NMFS on an annual basis. The number of hatchery coho released is estimated to have been 1.7 million in 1998 - substantially below the level called for in the Oregon Plan. This number will be reduced to 1.2 million in 1999. In addition, ODFW has, and will continue to provide. annual reports regarding: ( i) the number of juvenile hatchery coho that are released by brood year, locations and dates of release, life stage, and broodstock origin; ( ii) the number of adult coho taken for broodstock for each hatchery, the location and date of collection, and the origin ( hatchery or natural); ( iii) the number of hatchery coho . . estimated to have spawned in natural habitat by basin; ( iv) the estimated percentage of hatchery coho% the total natural spawning population; and ( v) the mortality of naturally- spawning coho resulting from each fishery. NMFS may provide comments about hatchery prograk affecting coho to ODFW, with any concerns to be resolved between NMFS and ODFW. - - ( c) ln addition to recent modifications to hatchery practices and programs, a new vision is needed for how Oregon will utilize hatcheries in the best and most effective manner. Therefore, the ODFW and the OFWC shall engage in a process to create a strategic plan for fish hatcheries in Oregon over the next decade ( including state and federally- funded hatcheries, private hatcheries, and the STEP program). The essential elements of this process are as follows: ( i) Impartial analysis - conduct an impartial analysis of the scientific bases, and the social and economic effects of Oregon hatchery programs utilizing existing analyses and review where feasible, but conducting new analyses if necessary; ( ii) Review the Wild Fish Management Policy ( WFMP) - because the future plan for hatcheries in Oregon is dependent on implementation of the WFMP, ODFW shall conduct a science and stakeholder review to determine if this significant policy should be revised and shall make any revision by July 2000; ( iii) Frame alternative strategies -- convene a group of stockholders to . frame alternative strategies, including outcomes and descriptions, of how hatcheries will be used in Oregon over the next decade ( these strategies will address the use of hatcheries for wild fish population recovery including supplementation, research and monitoring, public education, and sport and commercial fishing opportunities); ( iv) Public review and selection of a strategy -- the OFWC shall, after public review and ' ;-'-!&%; f$'. i comment, adopt a strategic plan to guide development of future hatchery programs, incorporating the strategy developed and adopted in accordance with subpart ( iii) of this paragraph. ( d) Criteria and guidelines directing the design of projects that may affect fish passage have been established in a Memorandum of Understanding ( MOU) between the Oregon Department of Transportation ( ODOT), ODFW, the Oregon Department of Forestry ( ODF), the Oregon Department of Agriculture ( ODA), the Division of State Lands ( DSL) and the Federal Highway Administration. These guidelines apply to the design, construction and consultations of projects affecting fish passage. Under the MOU, projects requiring regulatory approvals that follow these criteria and guidelines are expedited. Oregon agencies will continue to provide technical assistance to ensure that the criteria and guidelines are applied appropriately in restoration projects, as well as any other projects that may affect fish passage through road crossings and similar structures. ODFW will work with state agencies, local governments, and watershed councils to ensure that Oregon's standards for fish passage set forth in Exhibit A to the MOU are understood and are implemented. - ( e) Fish presence, stream habitat, road and culvert surveys have been conducted for roads within ODOT jurisdiction and county roads in coastal basins, the Lower Columbia basin, the Willamette basin, and the Grande Ronbe/ lmnaha basins. Among the results of these surveys is the finding that culvert barriers to fish passage affect a substantial quantity of salmonid habitat. For example, surveys of county and state highways in western Oregon found over 1,200 culverts that are barriers to passage. As a result, ODOT is placing additional priority on restoring fish access. For 1998, ODOT repaired or replaced 35 culverts restoring access to 101 miles of salmonid habitat. For 1999, the Oregon Transportation Commission will be asked to fund approximately $ 4.0 million for culvert modification. ODOT and the Commission will continue to examine means to speed restoration of fish passage and to coordinate priorities with ODFW. ( f) Draft watershed assessment protocols have been developed and are being field tested. Beginning in 1999, SWCDs, watershed councils and others will be able to use the protocols as the basis for action plans to identify and prioritize opportunities to protect and restore salmonids. Watershed action plans have already been completed in a number of basins including the Rogue, Coos, Coquille and Grande Ronde. State agencies will work to support these watershed assessments and plans to the maximum extent practicable. Where watershed action plans have been developed under the protocols, GWEB will ensure that projects funded through the Watershed Improvement Grant Fund are consistent with watershed action plans, and other state agencies will work with SWCDs and watershed councils to ensure that activities they authorize, fund or undertake are consistent with watershed action plans to the maximum extent practicable. ( g) The State of Oregon has developed interim aquatic habitat restoration and enhancement guidelines for 1998. State agencies involved with restoration activities ( ODFW, ODF, DSL, ODA, DEQ, and GWEB) will continue to develop and refine the interim guidelines for final publication in April 1999. The guidelines will be applied in restoration activities funded or authorized by state agencies. The purpose of ' the guidelines will be to define aquatic restoration and to identify and encourage aquatic habitat restoration techniques to restore salmonids. . . ( h) ODA and O ~ hFave each entered into a Memorandum of Understanding with the Oregon Department'of Environmental Quality relating to the development of . Total Maximum Daily Loads ( TMDLs) and Water Quality Management Area Plans ( WQMAPs). O Dw~ ill adopt. a nd implement WQMAPs ( through the Healthy Streams Partnership) and ODF , will review the adequacy of forest practices rules to meet water quality standards. ODF and ODA will evaluate the effectiveness of these measures in achieving water quality standards on a regular basis and implement any changes required to meet the standards. ( i) Agencies are implementing a coordinated monitoring program, as described in the Oregon Plan. This program includes technical support and standardized protocols for watershed councils, stream habitat surveys, forest practice effectiveness monitoring, water withdrawal monitoring, ambient water quality monitoring, and biotic index studies, as well as fish presence surveys and salmonid abundance and survival monitoring in selected subbasins. State agencies are also' working to coordinate monitoring efforts by state, federal, and local entities, including watershed councils. State agencies will work actively to ensure that the monitoring measures' in the Oregon Plan are continued. - .. ( j) GWEB has put into place new processes for identifying and coordinating the delivery of financial and technical assistance to individuals, agencies, watershed councils and soil and water conservation districts as they implement watershed ' restoration projects to improve water quality and restore aquatic resources. Over $ 25 ' million has been distributed for watershed restoration projects in the last ten years. During the present ( 1 997- 99 biennium) GWEB has awarded over $ 1 2 million dollars in f- state and federal funds for technical'assistance and watershed restoration activities to implement the Oregon Plan. GWEB and state agencies will continue to seek financial resources to be allocated by GWEB for watershed restoration activities at the local and. statewide levels. ( k) State agencies will continue to encourage, support and work to provide incentives for local, tribal, and private . efforts to implement the Oregon Plan. In addition, state agencies will continue to provide financial assistance to local entities for projects to protect and restore salmonids to the extent consistent with their budgetary and legal authorities, and consistent with their work programs in the Oregon Plan. To the. maximum extent practicable, state agencies will also provide technical assistance and planning tools to provide local conservation groups to assist in and target watershed restoration efforts. These efforts ( during 1996 and 1997) are reported in " The Oregon. Plan for Salmon and Watersheds: Watershed Restoration Inventory, 1998." ~ u s c afe w of the important efforts that have been completed include: ( A) Eighty- two watershed councils have joined with forty- five Soil and Water Conservation Districts as well as private and public landowners to implement on- the- ground projects' to protect and restore salmonids. During 1996 and 1997, a reported $ 27.4 million was spent on 1,234 watershed restoration projects on non-federal lands. Both the amount spent and the number of projects represent significant increases ( of over 300 percent) over prior years. In 1996- 97, watershed councils, SWCDs and other organizations and individuals completed: ( i) 138 stream fencing projects, involving at least 301 miles of streambank; ( ii) 196 riparian area planting projects, involving at least 11 1 miles of streams; and ( iii) 458 instream habitat improvement projects. . . . ( B) Private and state forest landowners are implementing key efforts under the Oregon Plan, including the road risk and remediation program ( ODF- 1 and 2). Under this effort in 1996 and 1997, close to 4,000 miles of roads'have been surveyed to identify risks that the roads may pose to salmonid habitat. As the risks are identified, they are then prioritized for remediation following an established. protocol. Already, 52 miles of forest roads have been closed, 843 miles of road repair and reconstruction projects to - protect salmonid habitat have been completed, and an additional 14 miles of roads have been decommissioned or relocated.. In addition, 530 culverts have been replaced, upgraded or installed for fish passage purposes, improving access to a reported 146 stream miles. ( C) Organizations working in Tillamook County have developed the I ." J aw#~ t Tillamook County Performance Partnership. The Partnership is implementing the \. Tillamook Bay National Estuary Program by addressing water quality, fisheries, floodplain management and economic development in the county. Among the actions that the Partnership has already accomplished are: ( i) the closure of seven miles of degraded forest roads and the rehabilitation of 469 miles of roads to meet current standards, at a cost of $ 1 8 million; ( ii) the fencing of 53 miles of streambank, and the construction of three cattle bridges and 100 alternative cattle watering sites, at a cost of $ 214,000; and ( iii) the completion of 24 instream restoration projects and 34 barbs protecting 4,200 feet of streambank, at a cost of $ 1.3 million dollars. ( D) The Confederated Tribes of the Grande Ronde Community of Oregon have completed a forest management plan that establishes standards for the protection of aquatic resources that are comparable to those found in the Aquatic Conservation Strategy ' of the Northwest Forest Plan. . % ( E) A combination of funding from the Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation and the National Fish and Wildlife Heritage Foundation ( private, non- profit organizations) is provi, ding support for seven biologists to design restoration projects. These projects are prioritized based on stream surveys, and are carried out with the voluntary participation and support of landowners. A ten- year monitoring plan has been funded- and implemented to determine project effectiveness: ( F) The Oregon Cattlemen's Association has implemented its WESt Program that is designed to help landowners better understand their watersheds and stream functions through assessments and monitoring. h he WESt Program brings landowners together along stream reaches, and offers a series of workshops, conducted on a site specific basis, free of charge. The workshops include riparian ecology, setting goals and objectives, Proper Functioning Condition ( PFC), data. collection and monitoring. Over 25 workshops have been held, with attendance ranging from 5 to 30 landowners per workshop. The WESt Program is sponsored by the Oregon Cattlemen's Association, DEQ, Oregon State University, and GWEB. ( G) Within the Tillamook State Forest road network 1,902 culverts have been replaced or added to'improve road drainage and to disconnect storm water runoff from roads reducing stream sediment impacts. Additionally, some of these culverts also improved fish passage at stream crossings. In this process, ODF has also replaced six culverts with bridges improving fish passage to approximately four miles of stream. The Tillamook State Foresl in conjunction with many partners, such F-as the Association of Northwest Steelheaders, G W EB, Simpson Timber Company, Tillamook County, the FishAmerica Foundation, Hardrock Construction Company, the Oregon Wildlife Heritage Foundation, the F& WS, the Oregon Youth Conservation Corps, Columbia Helicopters and Terra Helicopters, has also recently completed instream placement of over 400 rootwads, trees and boulders at a cost of $ 300,000 for habitat enhancement. ( 3) Key Agency Efforts. Continuation and completion of the following state agency efforts is critical to the success of the Oregon Plan. State agencies will make continuation or completion ( as appropriate) of the following efforts a high priority. ( a) The State of Oregon and the US. Department of Agriculture have entered into a Conservation Reserve Enhancement Program ( CREP). This cost- share program, one of the first of its kind, . will be used to reduce the impacts of agricultural practices through water quality. add habitat improvement. The objectives of the CREP are to: ( i) provide incentives'for farmers and ranchers to establish riparian buffers; ( ii) protect - . and restore at least 4,000 miles of stream habitat by providing up to 95,000 acres of riparian buffeis; ( i4) restore up to 5,000 acres of wetlands that will benefit salmonids; and ( iv) provide a mechanism for farmers and ranchers to comply with Oregon's ,- Senate Bill 101 0 ( 1 993 Or. Laws, ch. 263). ( b) ODF will work with non- industrial forest landowners to'administer the Stewardship Incentive Program and the Forest Resources Trust programs to protect and restore riparian and wetland areas that benefit salmonids. ( c) The Oregon Board of Forestry will determine, with the assistance of an advisory committee, to what extent changes to forest practices are needed to meet state water quality standards and to protect and restore salmonids. A substantial body of information regarding the effectiveness of current practices is being . developed. This information includes: ( i) the IMST report regarding . the role of forest practices and forest habitat in protecting and restoring salmonids; and ( ii) a series of - monitoring projects that include the Storms of 1996 study, a riparian areas study, a stream temperature study, and a road drainage study. Using this information, as well as other available scientific information including scientific information from NMFS, the advisory committee will make recommendations to the Board at both site and watershed scales on threats to salmonid habitat relating to sediment, water temperature, freshwater habitat needs, roads and fish passage. Based on the advisory committee's recommendations and other scientific information, the Board will make every effort to make its determinations by June 1999. The Board may . . determine that the most effective means of achieving any necessary changes to . - d;.~ .; i;. z . I:@;.. %- .~ + k forest practices is through regulatory changes, statutory changes or through other programs . including programs to create incentives for forest landowners. In the event that the Board determines that legislative changes. are necessary to carry out its determinations, the Board will transmit any recommendations for such changes to the . Governor and to the Joint Committee at the earliest possible date. ( d) Consistent with administrative rule, and statutory and constitutional mandates for the management of state forests, ODF State Forest management plans will include an aquatic conservation strategy that has a high likelihood of protecting and restoring properly functioning aquatic habitat for salmonids on state forest lands. ( e) ODF will present to NMFS a Habitat Conservation Plan ( HCP) under Section 10 of the federal ESA that includes the Clatsop and Tillamook State Forests. ODF has already completed scierkific review and has public review underway for this draft HCP. The scientific and public review comments will be considered by ODF in . . completing the draft HCP. The draft HCP will be presented to NMFS by June 1999. An HCP for the ~ jliotSt tate Forest was approved by the US. Fish & Wildlife Service in 1995. In October af 1997, ODF and DSL forwarded the Elliott State Forest HCP to NMFS with the request that it be reviewed to determine whether it has a high likelihood of protecting and restoring properly functioning aquatic habitat conditions on state forest lands necessary to protect and restore salmonids. Based on discussions surrounding the NMFS review, ODF and DSL will determine what revisions, if any, are required to the Elliott HCP and/ or Forest Management Plan to ensure a high likelihood of protecting and restoring properly functioning aquatic habitat for salmonids. ( f) Before the OFWC adopts and implements fishery regulations that may result in taking of coho, ODFW will provide NMFS with'all available scientific information and analyses pertinent to the proposed regulation where the harvest measures are not under the jurisdiction of the PFMC, including results of the Oregon Plan monitoring and evaluation program. This information, together with the proposed regulation and supporting analysis, will be provided at least two weeks prior to the OFWC's action, to give NMFS time to review and comment on the proposed regulations. ( g) ODFW will evaluate the effects of predation on salmonids, and . will . work with . affected federal agencies to determine whether changes to programs and law relating to predation are warranted in order to protect and restore salmonids. P ( h) Under Oregon Senate Bill 101 0 ( 1 993 Or. Laws, ch. 2631, ODA will adopt Agricultural Water Qualify Management Area Plans ( AWQMAPs) for Tier I and Tier ll watersheds by the end of 2002. The AWQMAPs will be designed and implemented to meet load allocations for agriculture needed to achieve state water quality . . standards. In addition, ODA will work with ODFW, DEQ, GWEB, SWCDs, federal . agencies and watershed councils to determine to what extent additional measures related to achieving properly functioning riparian and aquatic habitat on agricultural lands are needed to protect and restore salmonids, giving attention first to priority areas identified in. the Oregon Plan. In the event ODA is unable to reach a consensus regarding such measures, ODA will ask the IMST to review areas of substantive ' scientific disagreement and to'make recommendations to ODA regarding how they should be resolved. In the event that legislative changes are needed to implement such measures, ODA will transmit any recommendations for such changes to. the Governor and to the Joint Committee at the earliest possible date. In addition, any measures identified as rieeded by ODA will be implemented at the earliest practicable time. * . ( i) ODFW will expedite its applications for instream water rights and OWRD will process such applications promptly where flow deficits are identified as adversely affecting salmonids, and where such rights. are not already in place. The Oregon - water Resources Department ( OWRD) and the Oregon Water Resources Commission ( OWRC) will- also seek to facilitate flow restoration targeted to streams identified by OWRD and ODFW as posing the most critical low- flow barriers to salmonids. In addition, where necessary, OWRD will continue to work with the Oregon State Police to provide enforcement of water use. Where illegal water uses are identified, OWRD will ensure outcomes consistent with maintenance and restoration of flows. ( j) The Oregon Environmental Quality commission ( EQC). and DEQ will evaluate and will make every effort to utilize their authorities to continue to provide additional protection to . priority areas ( as determined under section 1 ( f) of this Executive Order), including in- stream flow protection under state law, and antidegradation policy under . the federal Clean Water Act ( including Outstanding Resource Waters designations . and high quality waters designations). . ( k) DSL has proposed to adopt changes to its Essential Salmonid Habitat rules that will provide additional protection for spawning and rearing areas of anadromous salmonids. In addition, ODFW and DSL will consult with the OWRC to determine where it is necessary to administratively close priority areas ( including ' work under General Authorizations) to fill and removal activities in order to protect salmonids. . . DSL, ODFW, ODF and ODA also will work together to identify means of regulating the . uy- w :.-:: st. removal of organic material ( such as large woody debris) from streams where such removal would adversely affect salmonids and would not be contrary to other agency mandates. ( I) DSL will seek the advice of the IMST regarding whether gravel removal affects gravel and/ or sediment budgets in a manner that adversely affects salmonids. ( m) The Department of Land Conservation and ~ e v e l o p r n e n t ' ( ~ ~ acn~ d ) th, e Land Conservation- and Development Commission ( LCDC) will evaluate and, to the extent feasible, speed implementation of existing Goal 5 requirements for riparian corridors. ( n) DLCD, DEQ, ODF, ODA, ODFW, and DSL and their respective boards and commissions will evaluate and implement programs to protect and restore riparian vegetation for the purposes of achieving statewide water quality standards and . . protecting and restoring a aquatic habitat for salmonids. ' ( 0) DLCD, with, the assistance of DSL and ODFW, and in consultation with coastal cities and counties, shall review the requirements of Statewide Planning Goal i 6 as they pertain to estuarine resources important to the restoration of salmonids, and shall, report its findings to LCDC for its consideration. ( p) The Oregon State Police will work to facilitate the existing cooperative relationship with the NMFS Office of ~ a Ewnfo rcement, as well as tomaintain cooperation with other enforcement entities, in order to enhance law enforcement, public awareness and voluntary compliance related to harvest, habitat and other issues addressed in the Oregon Plan. ( q) The Oregon Parks and Recreation Department will continue to work to p. rovide information and education to the public on salmon and steelhead needs through park programs and interpretive aids. ( r) The Oregon Marine Board will work to ensure fish friendly boating and to develop boating facilities that protect salmonids. ( s) State natural resource agencies will continue, to the extent feasible, to support watershed councils by providing technical assistance to develop watershed assessments, restoration plans and to develop watershed priorities to benefit 7- salmonids. In addition, state natural resource agencies will work'on a larger . .:.... watershed scale to develop basin- wide restoration priorities. ( 4) Future Modifications; Public Involvement for the Oregon Plan Generally. The GNRO will solicit public co'mments and input from participants in the Oregon Plan regarding whether there are refinements or changes to the Plan and/ or the organizational framework for implementing the Plan that are necessary or desirable based on the experience gained over the past three years, or resulting from the widespread listings and proposed listings of salmon and trout under the federal ESA. Based on this public involvement, the GNRO will provide a report and recommendations to the Governor and the Joint Committee regarding whether modifications are necessary to the Oregon Plan in order to protect and restore coho and other salmonids. ( 5) Definitions. For purioses'of this Executive Order: . . ( aj The " Oregon Plan" means the Oregon Coastal Salmon Recovery lnitiative, dated March 1991, and the Steelhead. Supplement, dated January 1998. " Oregon Plan," as used in this Order, is intended to be consistent with the definition of the' Oregon Coastal Salmon Recovery lnitiative in Oregon Senate Bill 924 ( 1997 Or. Laws, .- cti. 7), and to include the Healthy Streams Partnership ( 1 993 Or. Laws, ch. 263). -. - ( b) " Protect" has the meaning given in section ( l)( d) of this Executive Order. ( c) " Restore" has the meaning'given in section ( l)( e) of this Executive Order. Restore necessarily includes actions to manage salmonids to provide for adequate escapement levels, and actions to increase the quantity and improve the quality of properly functioning habitat upon which salmonids depend. ( d) " Coho" means native wild coho salmon found in rivers and lakes along the Oregon Coast. ( el " Salmonids" means native wild salmon, char and trout in the State of Oregon. ( 6) Effective Date; Relation to Federal ESA. This Executive Order will take effect on the date that it is filed with the Secretary of State. The State of Oregon will continue to work with NMFS to determine the appropriate relationship between the Oregon Plan and NMFS's efforts under the federal ESA. Done at Salem, Oregon, this $ day of & ~ 4 y , 1999. ha26 . ~ it& er, M. D. Suz adnd .~. ow& end DEPUTY SECR~ ARYOF - STATE

79. [Image] Determining surface water availability in Oregon : open file report SW 02-002


	Determining Surface Water Availability in Oregon By Richard M. Cooper, PE Abstract The Oregon Water Resources Department (Department or OWRD) limits appropriation from Oregon streams to assure new applicants ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Determining surface water availability in Oregon : open file report SW 02-002 Author: Oregon. Water Resources Dept. Year: 2002, 2005 Determining Surface Water Availability in Oregon By Richard M. Cooper, PE Abstract The Oregon Water Resources Department (Department or OWRD) limits appropriation from Oregon streams to assure new applicants use of surface water a reasonable amount of time and to minimize regulatory conflict. The standards for new appropriation of water are: (1) consumptive use from allocations for out-of-stream uses can total no more than the 80-percent ex-ceedance natural stream flow, and (2) allocations for in-stream flows can be no more than the 50-percent exceedance natural stream flow. OWRD has created and maintains a database of the amount of surface water available for appropriation for most waters in the state. This database is used to evaluate applications for new uses of water. Water availability (WA) is obtained from natural stream flow (QNSF) by subtracting existing storage (ST), out-of-stream consumptive uses (CU) and in-stream demands (IS). WA = QN -ST-CU-IS Ideally, water availability would be calculated for every watershed above a point of diversion or in-stream demand. Practically, the number of watersheds must be limited. The watersheds selected for analysis are called Water Availability Basins (WABs). Stream flow can be highly variable, and it is useful to characterize it in some way, usually by a statistic, e.g., a monthly or annual mean. For water availability, it is important to know how often water is available. The appropriate statistic in this case is exceedance stream flow. This statistic tells us how often to expect a given rate of stream flow to occur. Exceedance stream flows are determined directly from gage records, or for ungaged streams, by estimation through modeling. When determined from gage records, the exceedance flows must be corrected to a common base period, and then, to natural stream flow. When determined through modeling, the exceedance flows are estimated from statistical models that relate watershed characteristics to natural stream flow. The models are derived by multiple linear regression. Storage is water retained in a reservoir. It is debited from water availability when the water is stored. It diminishes availability both upstream and downstream of the point of diversion. Consumptive use is divided into three major categories: irrigation, municipal, and all others e.g., domestic, livestock. These uses are less than 100 percent consumptive. It is assumed the non-consumed part of a diversion is returned to the stream from which it was diverted. Consumptive use from irrigation is from estimates made by the US Geological Survey (Portland). Consumption from other uses is based on the associated water rights. In these cases, consumptive use is obtained by multiplying the maximum diversion rate allowed for the water right by a consumptive use coefficient. Consumptive use diminishes availability both upstream and downstream of the point of diversion. There are two types of in-stream demands: in-stream water rights and scenic waterway flows. In-stream demands diminish availability upstream only. Because they are non-consumptive, they do not diminish stream flow downstream as do consumptive uses. Water availability has been calculated for over 2500 WABs. In general, the calculation of water availability at one WAB cannot be considered in isolation from other WABs in the same stream system. For water to be available at any given upstream point, it must be available at all points of calculation downstream. Title: Determining surface water availability in Oregon : open file report SW 02-002 Author: Oregon. Water Resources Dept. Year: 2002, 2005 Determining Surface Water Availability in Oregon By Richard M. Cooper, PE Abstract The Oregon Water Resources Department (Department or OWRD) limits appropriation from Oregon streams to assure new applicants use of surface water a reasonable amount of time and to minimize regulatory conflict. The standards for new appropriation of water are: (1) consumptive use from allocations for out-of-stream uses can total no more than the 80-percent ex-ceedance natural stream flow, and (2) allocations for in-stream flows can be no more than the 50-percent exceedance natural stream flow. OWRD has created and maintains a database of the amount of surface water available for appropriation for most waters in the state. This database is used to evaluate applications for new uses of water. Water availability (WA) is obtained from natural stream flow (QNSF) by subtracting existing storage (ST), out-of-stream consumptive uses (CU) and in-stream demands (IS). WA = QN -ST-CU-IS Ideally, water availability would be calculated for every watershed above a point of diversion or in-stream demand. Practically, the number of watersheds must be limited. The watersheds selected for analysis are called Water Availability Basins (WABs). Stream flow can be highly variable, and it is useful to characterize it in some way, usually by a statistic, e.g., a monthly or annual mean. For water availability, it is important to know how often water is available. The appropriate statistic in this case is exceedance stream flow. This statistic tells us how often to expect a given rate of stream flow to occur. Exceedance stream flows are determined directly from gage records, or for ungaged streams, by estimation through modeling. When determined from gage records, the exceedance flows must be corrected to a common base period, and then, to natural stream flow. When determined through modeling, the exceedance flows are estimated from statistical models that relate watershed characteristics to natural stream flow. The models are derived by multiple linear regression. Storage is water retained in a reservoir. It is debited from water availability when the water is stored. It diminishes availability both upstream and downstream of the point of diversion. Consumptive use is divided into three major categories: irrigation, municipal, and all others e.g., domestic, livestock. These uses are less than 100 percent consumptive. It is assumed the non-consumed part of a diversion is returned to the stream from which it was diverted. Consumptive use from irrigation is from estimates made by the US Geological Survey (Portland). Consumption from other uses is based on the associated water rights. In these cases, consumptive use is obtained by multiplying the maximum diversion rate allowed for the water right by a consumptive use coefficient. Consumptive use diminishes availability both upstream and downstream of the point of diversion. There are two types of in-stream demands: in-stream water rights and scenic waterway flows. In-stream demands diminish availability upstream only. Because they are non-consumptive, they do not diminish stream flow downstream as do consumptive uses. Water availability has been calculated for over 2500 WABs. In general, the calculation of water availability at one WAB cannot be considered in isolation from other WABs in the same stream system. For water to be available at any given upstream point, it must be available at all points of calculation downstream.

80. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1926


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1926 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1926, 2008, 2005 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1926 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1926, 2008, 2005 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

81. [Image] Annual report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California 1913


	Some issues include, photographs, maps, and tables for land acquired, hydrographies, contracts, etc.; Description based on Annual report of the Klamath project: Oregon and California for calendar year ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California 1913 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1913, 2008, 2004 Some issues include, photographs, maps, and tables for land acquired, hydrographies, contracts, etc.; Description based on Annual report of the Klamath project: Oregon and California for calendar year 1913. Title covers: calendar years for 1913-1917. Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project Annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946. Title: Annual report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California 1913 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1913, 2008, 2004 Some issues include, photographs, maps, and tables for land acquired, hydrographies, contracts, etc.; Description based on Annual report of the Klamath project: Oregon and California for calendar year 1913. Title covers: calendar years for 1913-1917. Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project Annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946.

82. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1918


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1918 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1918, 2008, 2004 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1918 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1918, 2008, 2004 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

83. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1919


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1919 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1919, 2008, 2005 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1919 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1919, 2008, 2005 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

84. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1921


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1921 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1921, 2008, 2005 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1921 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1921, 2008, 2005 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

85. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1927


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1927 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1927, 2008, 2006 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1927 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1927, 2008, 2006 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

86. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1928


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1928 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1928, 2008, 2005 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1928 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1928, 2008, 2005 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

87. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1929


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1929 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1929, 2008, 2006 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1929 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1929, 2008, 2006 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

88. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1930


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1930 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1930, 2008, 2006 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1930 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1930, 2008, 2006 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

89. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1934


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1934 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1934, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1934 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1934, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

90. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1932


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1932 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1932, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1932 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1932, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

91. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1935


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1935 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1935, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1935 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1935, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

92. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1936


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1936 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1936, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1936 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1936, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

93. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1937


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1937 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1937, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1937 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1937, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

94. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1938


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1938 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1938, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1938 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1938, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

95. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1939


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1939 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1939, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1939 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1939, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

96. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1940


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1940 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1940, 2008, 2005 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1940 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1940, 2008, 2005 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

97. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1941


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1941 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1941, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1941 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1941, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

98. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1942


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1942 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1942, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1942 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1942, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

99. [Image] Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1943


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1943 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1943, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history and O. & M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1943 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1943, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials and contracts, land acquired, land leased, project organization chart, litigations, photographs, maps, hydrographs, etc.; Includes index; Title covers: calendar years for 1918 – 1943; Description based on Annual project history and O.M. report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California Annual for calendar year 1918; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from the 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

100. [Image] Annual project history: Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1955


	Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials, maps, photographs, agricultural economics and crop yield, some grazing financial information with cost of water usage, tables for ...
	Citation Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Annual project history: Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1955 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1955, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials, maps, photographs, agricultural economics and crop yield, some grazing financial information with cost of water usage, tables for irrigation and drainage and water storage and distributions, list of steam gaging stations, weather conditions, list of evaporation stations, quality of irrigation water at pumping plants, etc.; Title covers: calendar years for 1954-1962; Description is based on: Annual project history: Klamath Project, Oregon-California 1954; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from May 1, 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946 Title: Annual project history: Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1955 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation Year: 1955, 2008, 2007 Ill., maps (some color), photographs; Includes fiscal year financials, maps, photographs, agricultural economics and crop yield, some grazing financial information with cost of water usage, tables for irrigation and drainage and water storage and distributions, list of steam gaging stations, weather conditions, list of evaporation stations, quality of irrigation water at pumping plants, etc.; Title covers: calendar years for 1954-1962; Description is based on: Annual project history: Klamath Project, Oregon-California 1954; Dates of the beginning year(s) of publication are derived from May 1, 1903 to December 31, 1912, History of the Klamath Project and from the volume information on later volumes (v. 35) Klamath District and Klamath Project annual history for 1945, dated December 1, 1946

Limit your search

Material Types

Subject

Author

Pivot Field

Database

Search

Search Results

1. [Image] Upper Williamson River Watershed analysis

2. [Image] Big Bill : the Williamson River Basin Watershed analysis

3. [Image] Spencer Creek pilot watershed analysis

4. [Image] Klamath-Iron Gate watershed analysis : version 1.1.

5. [Image] A strategy for achieving healthy watersheds in Oregon

6. [Image] Handbook for developing watershed plans to restore and protect our waters

7. [Image] GERBER WATERSHED

8. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED

9. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED

10. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED

11. [Image] Relationship Between Flows in the Klamath River and Lower Klamath Lake Prior to 1910

12. [Image] The Water Report - Watershed assessments: the Upper Klamath Basin process

13. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking west over Weed Valley

14. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking north at Janes Reservoir Dam

15. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking north over Fairchild Swamp

16. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking west at Avanzino Reservoir Dam

17. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED

18. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED

19. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED

20. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED

21. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED

22. [Image] GERBER WATERSHED

23. [Image] GERBER WATERSHED

24. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Butcher Swamp

25. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED

26. [Image] CLEAR CREEK WATERSHED - Looking east towards Janes Reservoir

27. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED - Looking southeast over Willow Creek Ranch

28. [Image] Klamath Basin Water Supply Enhancement Act of 2000

29. [Image] ROUND VALLEY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED

30. [Image] LITTLE SQUAW FLAT RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED

31. [Image] DRY PRAIRIE RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED

32. [Image] DRY PRAIRIE RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED

33. [Image] ROUND VALLEY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED

34. [Image] ARKANSAS FLAT RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED

35. [Image] STRAWBERRY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED

36. [Image] MALLORY RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED

37. [Image] KENO RESERVOIR, GERBER WATERSHED

38. [Image] Gerber-Willow Valley Watershed Analysis

39. [Image] Draft upper Williamson River Watershed assessment

42. [Image] Portions of the Gerber Reservoir watershed on the Klamath Project

43. [Image] Fire has devastated a considerable number of areas such as this on the Williamson River watershed

44. [Image] Klamath River Basin hydrologic conditions prior to the September 2002 die-off of salmon and steelhead

45. [Image] Natural flow estimates for streams in the Klamath Basin

46. [Image] Annual report of the Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1916

47. [Image] Report of the Oregon Klamath River Commission on water resources and requirements of the Upper Klamath basin

48. [Image] Reconnaissance investigation of water quality, bottom sediment, and biota associated with irrigation drainage in the Klamath Basin, California and Oregon, 1988-89

49. [Image] Scientific evaluation of biological opinions on endangered and threatened fishes in the Klamath River basin : oversight hearing before the Committee on Resources, U.S. House of Representatives, One Hundred Seventh Congress, second session, March 13, 2002

50. [Image] Issue Backgrounder: Environment and Power: Enhancing our Fish & Wildlife Resources

51. [Image] Klamath Drainage Basin, Oregon

52. [Image] Annual project history: Klamath Project, Oregon-California, 1956

53. [Image] Oregon Plan for Salmon and Watersheds biennial report, 2005-2007

54. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon

55. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon

56. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon

57. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon

58. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon

59. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon

60. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon

61. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon - California

62. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon

63. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California

64. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California

65. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California

66. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California

67. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California

68. [Image] Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2A

69. [Image] Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2B

70. [Image] Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2C

71. [Image] Preliminary report on the ground-water resources of the Klamath River Basin, Oregon : Map 2D