Search

Search Results

• 1. [Article] West Fork Illinois River Watershed Analysis

  Abstract -- The West Fork Illinois River Watershed Analysis (Iteration 1.0) document was completed in June 1997 to provide an ecological context for proposed mineral development, including management recommendations. ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: West Fork Illinois River Watershed Analysis Abstract -- The West Fork Illinois River Watershed Analysis (Iteration 1.0) document was completed in June 1997 to provide an ecological context for proposed mineral development, including management recommendations. The focus of iteration 1.0 was the serpentine portion of the watershed on Forest Service lands. The purpose of the current document and analysis is to expand on this earlier analysis by adding the lower elevation BLM land areas. It identifies the various ecosystem components in the lower elevation areas of the West Fork Illinois River fifth field watershed and their interactions at a landscape scale. The analysis looks at historical ecological components, current ecological components and trends. It makes recommendations for future management actions that could be implemented to reach recommended ecological conditions. Title: West Fork Illinois River Watershed Analysis Abstract -- The West Fork Illinois River Watershed Analysis (Iteration 1.0) document was completed in June 1997 to provide an ecological context for proposed mineral development, including management recommendations. The focus of iteration 1.0 was the serpentine portion of the watershed on Forest Service lands. The purpose of the current document and analysis is to expand on this earlier analysis by adding the lower elevation BLM land areas. It identifies the various ecosystem components in the lower elevation areas of the West Fork Illinois River fifth field watershed and their interactions at a landscape scale. The analysis looks at historical ecological components, current ecological components and trends. It makes recommendations for future management actions that could be implemented to reach recommended ecological conditions. Close

• 2. [Article] Jordan/Alder Watershed Assessment

  The Jordan/Alder Watershed is a 2,459-acre watershed located in southwest Oregon immediately west of Canyonville in Douglas County. This watershed--a portion of the O'Shea Creek HUC6, or sixth-field watershed--lies ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Jordan/Alder Watershed Assessment Author: Barnes and Associates Inc. The Jordan/Alder Watershed is a 2,459-acre watershed located in southwest Oregon immediately west of Canyonville in Douglas County. This watershed--a portion of the O'Shea Creek HUC6, or sixth-field watershed--lies within the bounds of the South Umpqua River HUC5, or fifth-field watershed. Jordan Creek is a tributary to the South Umpqua River immediately downstream of the City of Canyonville, while Alder Creek is a tributary of Jordan Creek. The South Umpqua River bounds the watershed on the north. Title: Jordan/Alder Watershed Assessment Author: Barnes and Associates Inc. The Jordan/Alder Watershed is a 2,459-acre watershed located in southwest Oregon immediately west of Canyonville in Douglas County. This watershed--a portion of the O'Shea Creek HUC6, or sixth-field watershed--lies within the bounds of the South Umpqua River HUC5, or fifth-field watershed. Jordan Creek is a tributary to the South Umpqua River immediately downstream of the City of Canyonville, while Alder Creek is a tributary of Jordan Creek. The South Umpqua River bounds the watershed on the north. Close

• 3. [Article] Wildwood Footbridge maintenance decision record

  7 pp. Map. Township 2 South, Range 7 East, section 31. Captured February 16, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Wildwood Footbridge maintenance decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2008 7 pp. Map. Township 2 South, Range 7 East, section 31. Captured February 16, 2009. Title: Wildwood Footbridge maintenance decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Salem District Year: 2009, 2008 7 pp. Map. Township 2 South, Range 7 East, section 31. Captured February 16, 2009. Close

• 4. [Article] Elk Creek stream crossing upgrade project decision record

  2 pp. Sections 33 and 34, T.23S, R.4W; and Section 3, T.24S, R.4W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elk Creek stream crossing upgrade project decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2005 2 pp. Sections 33 and 34, T.23S, R.4W; and Section 3, T.24S, R.4W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Title: Elk Creek stream crossing upgrade project decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2005 2 pp. Sections 33 and 34, T.23S, R.4W; and Section 3, T.24S, R.4W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Close

• 5. [Article] Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project decision record

  2 pp. Section 17, T.21S., R.4W.; Sections 15 and 27, T.22S., R.4W.; Section 3, T.25S., R.4W.; and Section 17, T.26S., R.2W.; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2004 2 pp. Section 17, T.21S., R.4W.; Sections 15 and 27, T.22S., R.4W.; Section 3, T.25S., R.4W.; and Section 17, T.26S., R.2W.; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Title: Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2004 2 pp. Section 17, T.21S., R.4W.; Sections 15 and 27, T.22S., R.4W.; Section 3, T.25S., R.4W.; and Section 17, T.26S., R.2W.; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Close

• 6. [Article] Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project finding of no significant impact

  4 pp. Section 17, T.21S., R.4W.; Sections 15 and 27, T.22S., R.4W.; Section 3, T.25S., R.4W.; and Section 17, T.26S., R.2W. Captured July 27, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2004 4 pp. Section 17, T.21S., R.4W.; Sections 15 and 27, T.22S., R.4W.; Section 3, T.25S., R.4W.; and Section 17, T.26S., R.2W. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2004 4 pp. Section 17, T.21S., R.4W.; Sections 15 and 27, T.22S., R.4W.; Section 3, T.25S., R.4W.; and Section 17, T.26S., R.2W. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 7. [Article] Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impacts

  3 pp. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7, T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 11, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 3 pp. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7, T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 11, 2009. Title: Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 3 pp. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7, T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 11, 2009. Close

• 8. [Article] Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management decision record

  5 pp. Maps. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7 T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 11, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 5 pp. Maps. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7 T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 11, 2009. Title: Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 5 pp. Maps. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7 T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 11, 2009. Close

• 9. [Article] Elk Creek stream crossing upgrade project environmental assessment

  13 pp. References, map, appendices. Section 33 and 34, T.23S, R.4W; and Section 3, T.24S, R.4W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elk Creek stream crossing upgrade project environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2005 13 pp. References, map, appendices. Section 33 and 34, T.23S, R.4W; and Section 3, T.24S, R.4W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007. Title: Elk Creek stream crossing upgrade project environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2005 13 pp. References, map, appendices. Section 33 and 34, T.23S, R.4W; and Section 3, T.24S, R.4W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007. Close

• 10. [Article] Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact

  5 pp. Sections 14, 23, and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 5 pp. Sections 14, 23, and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 5 pp. Sections 14, 23, and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 11. [Article] Middle South Umpqua/Dumont Creek commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact

  6 pp. Sections 21 and 33, T. 29 S., R. 2 W., and Sections 3, 9, 11 and 15, T. 30 S., R. 2 W. Captured February 11, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Middle South Umpqua/Dumont Creek commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 6 pp. Sections 21 and 33, T. 29 S., R. 2 W., and Sections 3, 9, 11 and 15, T. 30 S., R. 2 W. Captured February 11, 2009. Title: Middle South Umpqua/Dumont Creek commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 6 pp. Sections 21 and 33, T. 29 S., R. 2 W., and Sections 3, 9, 11 and 15, T. 30 S., R. 2 W. Captured February 11, 2009. Close

• 12. [Article] BLM addendum for Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment : fifth field watershed

  Within the Lower North Umpqua watershed, BLM has acquired approximately 6,600 acres of land specifically to manage habitat to enhance the Columbian White-tailed Deer (CWTD). This area is called the North ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: BLM addendum for Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment : fifth field watershed Author: U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Within the Lower North Umpqua watershed, BLM has acquired approximately 6,600 acres of land specifically to manage habitat to enhance the Columbian White-tailed Deer (CWTD). This area is called the North Bank Habitat Management Area (NBHMA) and will be managed as described in the NBHMA Environmental Impact Statement. The BLM also manages an additional 5,780 acres for multiple use objectives. These lands are mostly scattered in the headwater region in the north and northwest of the watershed. Within the next five to ten years, it is likely that the Swiftwater Field Manager will need to be involved in some aspect of decision-making on those 5,780 acres with the following general areas. These areas have been used to help guide the key questions, the information to answer those questions, and the resulting management opportunities. A major assumption in the development of these key questions is that the Roseburg District Resource Management Plan (RMP) has given some prescriptive measures through the landscape land use allocations. Because the RMP sets standards and guidelines on each land use allocation and the kinds of activities that can occur in those land uses, this watershed assessment seeks to provide information to guide decision making within those overarching planning parameters. Title: BLM addendum for Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment : fifth field watershed Author: U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Within the Lower North Umpqua watershed, BLM has acquired approximately 6,600 acres of land specifically to manage habitat to enhance the Columbian White-tailed Deer (CWTD). This area is called the North Bank Habitat Management Area (NBHMA) and will be managed as described in the NBHMA Environmental Impact Statement. The BLM also manages an additional 5,780 acres for multiple use objectives. These lands are mostly scattered in the headwater region in the north and northwest of the watershed. Within the next five to ten years, it is likely that the Swiftwater Field Manager will need to be involved in some aspect of decision-making on those 5,780 acres with the following general areas. These areas have been used to help guide the key questions, the information to answer those questions, and the resulting management opportunities. A major assumption in the development of these key questions is that the Roseburg District Resource Management Plan (RMP) has given some prescriptive measures through the landscape land use allocations. Because the RMP sets standards and guidelines on each land use allocation and the kinds of activities that can occur in those land uses, this watershed assessment seeks to provide information to guide decision making within those overarching planning parameters. Close

• 13. [Article] Indian Creek aquatic restoration project environmental assessment -- preliminary analysis

  64 pp. Tables, maps, references, glossary, and illus. Township 15 South, Ranges 10 West; and Township 16 South, Range 9 and 10 West. Captured February 15, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Indian Creek aquatic restoration project environmental assessment -- preliminary analysis Author: South Zone Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2005 64 pp. Tables, maps, references, glossary, and illus. Township 15 South, Ranges 10 West; and Township 16 South, Range 9 and 10 West. Captured February 15, 2007. Title: Indian Creek aquatic restoration project environmental assessment -- preliminary analysis Author: South Zone Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2005 64 pp. Tables, maps, references, glossary, and illus. Township 15 South, Ranges 10 West; and Township 16 South, Range 9 and 10 West. Captured February 15, 2007. Close

• 14. [Article] Indian Creek aquatic restoration project environmental assessment

  74 pp. Tables, maps, references, glossary, appendices, and illus. Township 15 South, Ranges 10 West; and Township 16 South, Range 9 and 10 West. Captured July 2, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Indian Creek aquatic restoration project environmental assessment Author: South Zone Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2005 74 pp. Tables, maps, references, glossary, appendices, and illus. Township 15 South, Ranges 10 West; and Township 16 South, Range 9 and 10 West. Captured July 2, 2007. Title: Indian Creek aquatic restoration project environmental assessment Author: South Zone Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2005 74 pp. Tables, maps, references, glossary, appendices, and illus. Township 15 South, Ranges 10 West; and Township 16 South, Range 9 and 10 West. Captured July 2, 2007. Close

• 15. [Article] Indian Creek aquatic restoration project decision notice and finding of no significant impact

  10 pp. Table. Township 15 South, Range 10 West; and Township 16 South, Ranges 9 and 10. Captured May 10, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Indian Creek aquatic restoration project decision notice and finding of no significant impact Author: South Zone Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2005 10 pp. Table. Township 15 South, Range 10 West; and Township 16 South, Ranges 9 and 10. Captured May 10, 2007. Title: Indian Creek aquatic restoration project decision notice and finding of no significant impact Author: South Zone Ranger District (Or.) Year: 2008, 2005 10 pp. Table. Township 15 South, Range 10 West; and Township 16 South, Ranges 9 and 10. Captured May 10, 2007. Close

• 16. [Article] Upper Umpqua Watershed plan Raider-Hubbard stream crossing upgrade project decision record

  2 pp. This action will occur at three of those sites in Section 14, (Rader Creek); and Sections 19, and 20 (Hubbard Creek); T24S R8W. Captured July 24, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Upper Umpqua Watershed plan Raider-Hubbard stream crossing upgrade project decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2003 2 pp. This action will occur at three of those sites in Section 14, (Rader Creek); and Sections 19, and 20 (Hubbard Creek); T24S R8W. Captured July 24, 2007. Title: Upper Umpqua Watershed plan Raider-Hubbard stream crossing upgrade project decision record Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2003 2 pp. This action will occur at three of those sites in Section 14, (Rader Creek); and Sections 19, and 20 (Hubbard Creek); T24S R8W. Captured July 24, 2007. Close

• 17. [Article] Dickerson Heights regeneration harvest timber sale environmental assessment

  89 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, illus. The proposed harvest would occur on approximately 150 acres located in Sections 9, 11, 15 and 21 of T. 29 S., R. 7 W., W.M., within the Olalla sixth-field ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Dickerson Heights regeneration harvest timber sale environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 89 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, illus. The proposed harvest would occur on approximately 150 acres located in Sections 9, 11, 15 and 21 of T. 29 S., R. 7 W., W.M., within the Olalla sixth-field subwatershed of the Olalla-Lookingglass fifth-field watershed. Captured July 26, 2007. Title: Dickerson Heights regeneration harvest timber sale environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 89 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, illus. The proposed harvest would occur on approximately 150 acres located in Sections 9, 11, 15 and 21 of T. 29 S., R. 7 W., W.M., within the Olalla sixth-field subwatershed of the Olalla-Lookingglass fifth-field watershed. Captured July 26, 2007. Close

• 18. [Article] Northeast Elk Creek density management environmental assessment

  74 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 27 and 35; T21S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Sections 9, ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Northeast Elk Creek density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 74 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 27 and 35; T21S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Sections 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, and 27; T22S R04W; W.M.; and Section 3; T23S R04W; W.M. Captured February 11, 2009. Title: Northeast Elk Creek density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 74 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 27 and 35; T21S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Sections 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, and 27; T22S R04W; W.M.; and Section 3; T23S R04W; W.M. Captured February 11, 2009. Close

• 19. [Article] Late-successional reserve 261 density management environmental assessment

  122 pp. Tables, figures, references, appendices, maps. Density management would be applied to approximately 665 acres of forest stands within the LSR in the Middle Fork Coquille River, East Fork Coquille ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Late-successional reserve 261 density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 122 pp. Tables, figures, references, appendices, maps. Density management would be applied to approximately 665 acres of forest stands within the LSR in the Middle Fork Coquille River, East Fork Coquille River, and Olalla Creek-Lookingglass Creek fifth-field watersheds; T 28, 29, 30 S, R 8, 9 W. Captured July 25, 2007. Title: Late-successional reserve 261 density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 122 pp. Tables, figures, references, appendices, maps. Density management would be applied to approximately 665 acres of forest stands within the LSR in the Middle Fork Coquille River, East Fork Coquille River, and Olalla Creek-Lookingglass Creek fifth-field watersheds; T 28, 29, 30 S, R 8, 9 W. Captured July 25, 2007. Close

• 20. [Article] Myrtle Creek commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment

  93 pp. References, appendices, maps. T 28 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 4 W. Captured July 26, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Myrtle Creek commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 93 pp. References, appendices, maps. T 28 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 4 W. Captured July 26, 2007. Title: Myrtle Creek commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 93 pp. References, appendices, maps. T 28 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 4 W. Captured July 26, 2007. Close

• 21. [Article] Olalla-Lookingglass LSR density management environmental assessment

  97 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. The acreage would be divided among 17 units comprising two timber sales, to be authorized individually, and designated as Deep Six (located in Section 27, T. ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Olalla-Lookingglass LSR density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 97 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. The acreage would be divided among 17 units comprising two timber sales, to be authorized individually, and designated as Deep Six (located in Section 27, T. 28 S., R. 8 W., W.M.) and Olly Cat (located in Sections 7 and 19, T. 30 S., R. 7 W., W.M.; and Sections 1, 11, 13, and 23, T. 30 S., R. 8 W., W.M.). Captured July 25, 2007. Title: Olalla-Lookingglass LSR density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 97 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. The acreage would be divided among 17 units comprising two timber sales, to be authorized individually, and designated as Deep Six (located in Section 27, T. 28 S., R. 8 W., W.M.) and Olly Cat (located in Sections 7 and 19, T. 30 S., R. 7 W., W.M.; and Sections 1, 11, 13, and 23, T. 30 S., R. 8 W., W.M.). Captured July 25, 2007. Close

• 22. [Article] Myrtle Creek commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact

  5 pp. T 28 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 4 W. Captured July 27, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Myrtle Creek commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2006 5 pp. T 28 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 4 W. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Myrtle Creek commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2006 5 pp. T 28 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 3 W; T 29 S, R 4 W. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 23. [Article] Luts Hedden CT timber sale decision documentation

  8 pp. Tables, maps. T. 22 S., R. 08 W., Sections 17, 18, and 19. Captured January 14, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Luts Hedden CT timber sale decision documentation Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Coos Bay District Year: 2009, 2008 8 pp. Tables, maps. T. 22 S., R. 08 W., Sections 17, 18, and 19. Captured January 14, 2009. Title: Luts Hedden CT timber sale decision documentation Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Coos Bay District Year: 2009, 2008 8 pp. Tables, maps. T. 22 S., R. 08 W., Sections 17, 18, and 19. Captured January 14, 2009. Close

• 24. [Article] Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management decision document

  15 pp. Tables. Sections 14, 23, and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 15 pp. Tables. Sections 14, 23, and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Title: Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 15 pp. Tables. Sections 14, 23, and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Close

• 25. [Article] Engineering road improvement and realignment decision document

  10 pp. Sections 19 and 21; T26S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Engineering road improvement and realignment decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 10 pp. Sections 19 and 21; T26S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Title: Engineering road improvement and realignment decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 10 pp. Sections 19 and 21; T26S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Close

• 26. [Article] Whatagas regeneration harvest decision document

  13 pp. Sections 7, and 19; T25S R3W, and Section 13; T25S R4W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Whatagas regeneration harvest decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2006 13 pp. Sections 7, and 19; T25S R3W, and Section 13; T25S R4W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Title: Whatagas regeneration harvest decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2006 13 pp. Sections 7, and 19; T25S R3W, and Section 13; T25S R4W; W.M. Captured July 24, 2007. Close

• 27. [Article] Engineering improvement and realignment finding of no significant impact

  4 pp. Sections 19 and 21; T26S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Engineering improvement and realignment finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 4 pp. Sections 19 and 21; T26S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Engineering improvement and realignment finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 4 pp. Sections 19 and 21; T26S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 28. [Article] Powell's Bottle commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact

  4 pp. Sections 3, 5, and 9 of T. 25 S., R. 7 W., and Section 33 of T. 24 S., R. 7W. Captured March 7, 2008.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Powell's Bottle commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008 4 pp. Sections 3, 5, and 9 of T. 25 S., R. 7 W., and Section 33 of T. 24 S., R. 7W. Captured March 7, 2008. Title: Powell's Bottle commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008 4 pp. Sections 3, 5, and 9 of T. 25 S., R. 7 W., and Section 33 of T. 24 S., R. 7W. Captured March 7, 2008. Close

• 29. [Article] Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management August 20, 2007 finding of no significant impacts

  5 pp. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management August 20, 2007 finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008 5 pp. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008. Title: Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management August 20, 2007 finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008 5 pp. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008. Close

• 30. [Article] Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management August 21, 2007 finding of no significant impacts

  5 pp. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management August 21, 2007 finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 5 pp. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008. Title: Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management August 21, 2007 finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 5 pp. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008. Close

• 31. [Article] Whatagas regeneration harvest finding of no significant impact

  4 pp. Sections 7, and 19; T25S R3W, and Section 13; T25S R4W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Whatagas regeneration harvest finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2006 4 pp. Sections 7, and 19; T25S R3W, and Section 13; T25S R4W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Whatagas regeneration harvest finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2006 4 pp. Sections 7, and 19; T25S R3W, and Section 13; T25S R4W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 32. [Article] Northeast Elk Creek density management finding of no significant impacts

  3 pp. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 27 and 35; T21S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Sections 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, and 27; T22S R04W; W.M.; ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Northeast Elk Creek density management finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 3 pp. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 27 and 35; T21S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Sections 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, and 27; T22S R04W; W.M.; and Section 3; T23S R04W; W.M. Captured February 11, 2009. Title: Northeast Elk Creek density management finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 3 pp. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 27 and 35; T21S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Sections 9, 15, 20, 21, 23, and 27; T22S R04W; W.M.; and Section 3; T23S R04W; W.M. Captured February 11, 2009. Close

• 33. [Article] Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment

  63 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7 T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 12, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 63 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7 T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 12, 2009. Title: Elementary Watson commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 63 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Section 13, T.27 S., R. 4 W. and section 7 T.27 S., R. 3 W. Captured February 12, 2009. Close

• 34. [Article] Dog Bone commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impacts

  4 pp. Sections 17, 18, and 19, T. 26 S., R. 07 W. Captured February 12, 2009.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Dog Bone commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 4 pp. Sections 17, 18, and 19, T. 26 S., R. 07 W. Captured February 12, 2009. Title: Dog Bone commercial thinning and density management finding of no significant impacts Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2009, 2008 4 pp. Sections 17, 18, and 19, T. 26 S., R. 07 W. Captured February 12, 2009. Close

• 35. [Article] Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment

  89 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Sections 14, 23 and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 89 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Sections 14, 23 and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007. Title: Bell Mountain commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 89 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Sections 14, 23 and 27; T22S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007. Close

• 36. [Article] Purdy Creek DM timber sale decision documentation

  16 pp. Tables, maps. The Purdy Creek DM timber sale, composed of EA units 1A-8, as outlined in the Table below, is part of this EA and is located in T. 21 S., R. 09 W., Section 33 and T. 22 S., R. 09 W., ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Purdy Creek DM timber sale decision documentation Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Coos Bay District Year: 2008 16 pp. Tables, maps. The Purdy Creek DM timber sale, composed of EA units 1A-8, as outlined in the Table below, is part of this EA and is located in T. 21 S., R. 09 W., Section 33 and T. 22 S., R. 09 W., Sections 03, 04, 05, & 09, Willamette Meridian. Captured July 1, 2008. Title: Purdy Creek DM timber sale decision documentation Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Coos Bay District Year: 2008 16 pp. Tables, maps. The Purdy Creek DM timber sale, composed of EA units 1A-8, as outlined in the Table below, is part of this EA and is located in T. 21 S., R. 09 W., Section 33 and T. 22 S., R. 09 W., Sections 03, 04, 05, & 09, Willamette Meridian. Captured July 1, 2008. Close

• 37. [Article] Slater Rocks Environmental Assessment and finding of no significant impact

  119 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. 29 S, 9 W, Sections 9, 21, 29, 31, and 33; 29 S, 10 W, Section 35; 30 S, 9 W, Sections 5, 7, 17, 21, 33; 30 S, 10 W, Sections 9, and 15. Captured July 1, 2...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Slater Rocks Environmental Assessment and finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Coos Bay District Year: 2008 119 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. 29 S, 9 W, Sections 9, 21, 29, 31, and 33; 29 S, 10 W, Section 35; 30 S, 9 W, Sections 5, 7, 17, 21, 33; 30 S, 10 W, Sections 9, and 15. Captured July 1, 2008. Title: Slater Rocks Environmental Assessment and finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Coos Bay District Year: 2008 119 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. 29 S, 9 W, Sections 9, 21, 29, 31, and 33; 29 S, 10 W, Section 35; 30 S, 9 W, Sections 5, 7, 17, 21, 33; 30 S, 10 W, Sections 9, and 15. Captured July 1, 2008. Close

• 38. [Article] Elkhead commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment

  84 pp. Tables, references, appendices. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 7, 15, 19, 23, and 35; T23S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Section ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Elkhead commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008 84 pp. Tables, references, appendices. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 7, 15, 19, 23, and 35; T23S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Section 13; T23S R05W; W.M.; and Section 3; T24S R04W; W.M. Captured July 7, 2008. Title: Elkhead commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008 84 pp. Tables, references, appendices. The proposed units are located in the Elk Creek/Upper Umpqua Fifth-Field Watershed in Sections 7, 15, 19, 23, and 35; T23S R04W; Willamette Meridian (W.M.) Section 13; T23S R05W; W.M.; and Section 3; T24S R04W; W.M. Captured July 7, 2008. Close

• 39. [Article] Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment

  93 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Section 27; T21S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 93 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Section 27; T21S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007. Title: Saddle Up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 93 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps. Section 27; T21S, R07W; W.M. Captured July 26, 2007. Close

• 40. [Article] Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project 2001 environmental assessment

  17 pp. Table, references. Sections 2, and 35, T24S R1W; Section 36, T24S R2W; Sections 2, 3, 18, and 22, T25S R1W; Sections 15, 28 and 30, T25S R2W; Section 36, T25S R3W; and Section 1, T25S R8W; W.M. ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project 2001 environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2001 17 pp. Table, references. Sections 2, and 35, T24S R1W; Section 36, T24S R2W; Sections 2, 3, 18, and 22, T25S R1W; Sections 15, 28 and 30, T25S R2W; Section 36, T25S R3W; and Section 1, T25S R8W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Swiftwater stream crossing upgrade project 2001 environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2001 17 pp. Table, references. Sections 2, and 35, T24S R1W; Section 36, T24S R2W; Sections 2, 3, 18, and 22, T25S R1W; Sections 15, 28 and 30, T25S R2W; Section 36, T25S R3W; and Section 1, T25S R8W; W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 41. [Article] Olalla-Lookingglass LSR density management finding of no significant impact

  5 pp. The units are located in: Section 27, T. 28 S., R. 8 W., W.M.; Sections 7 and 19, T. 30 S., R. 7 W., W.M.; and Sections 1, 11, 13, and 23, T. 30 S., R. 8 W., W.M. Captured July 27, 2007.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Olalla-Lookingglass LSR density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 5 pp. The units are located in: Section 27, T. 28 S., R. 8 W., W.M.; Sections 7 and 19, T. 30 S., R. 7 W., W.M.; and Sections 1, 11, 13, and 23, T. 30 S., R. 8 W., W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Title: Olalla-Lookingglass LSR density management finding of no significant impact Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 5 pp. The units are located in: Section 27, T. 28 S., R. 8 W., W.M.; Sections 7 and 19, T. 30 S., R. 7 W., W.M.; and Sections 1, 11, 13, and 23, T. 30 S., R. 8 W., W.M. Captured July 27, 2007. Close

• 42. [Article] Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan

  The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Calapooya Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999), the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000), and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Title: Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Calapooya Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999), the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000), and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Close

• 43. [Article] Deer Creek Watershed assessment and action plan

  The Deer Creek Watershed Assessment process has been followed by a group of local landowners. The organization of this document was constructed as a combination of the informational needs of the Deer Creek ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Deer Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Kincaid, Heidi The Deer Creek Watershed Assessment process has been followed by a group of local landowners. The organization of this document was constructed as a combination of the informational needs of the Deer Creek landowners and the framework of the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual. The group has met twelve times to review the data going into the document, followed by three meetings to review the assessment and develop the action plan. Members of the Deer Creek landowner group represented sheep ranches, cattle ranches, industry within Deer Creek, the City of Roseburg, private industrial timber companies, city residents, rural residents, the UBWC, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), the Douglas Soil and Water Conservation District (DSWCD), and the Douglas Small Woodlands Association. Title: Deer Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Kincaid, Heidi The Deer Creek Watershed Assessment process has been followed by a group of local landowners. The organization of this document was constructed as a combination of the informational needs of the Deer Creek landowners and the framework of the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual. The group has met twelve times to review the data going into the document, followed by three meetings to review the assessment and develop the action plan. Members of the Deer Creek landowner group represented sheep ranches, cattle ranches, industry within Deer Creek, the City of Roseburg, private industrial timber companies, city residents, rural residents, the UBWC, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), the Douglas Soil and Water Conservation District (DSWCD), and the Douglas Small Woodlands Association. Close

• 44. [Article] South River watershed restoration environmental assessment

  64 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, figures. Sections 26, 27, T 29 S, R 9 W; Section 33, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 27, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 13, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 22, T 30 S, R 3 W; Section ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: South River watershed restoration environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2000 64 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, figures. Sections 26, 27, T 29 S, R 9 W; Section 33, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 27, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 13, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 22, T 30 S, R 3 W; Section 2, T 31 S, R 6 W; Section 10, T 31 S, R 3 W; Section 1, T 29 S, R 8 W; Section 3, T 9 S, R 8 W; Section 3, T 30 S, R 7 W; Sections 10, 14, T 31 S, R 5 W; Section 23, T 29 S, R 4 W; Section 33, T 28 S, R 3 W. Captured July 26, 2007. Title: South River watershed restoration environmental assessment Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2000 64 pp. Tables, references, appendices, maps, figures. Sections 26, 27, T 29 S, R 9 W; Section 33, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 27, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 13, T 29 S, R 3 W; Section 22, T 30 S, R 3 W; Section 2, T 31 S, R 6 W; Section 10, T 31 S, R 3 W; Section 1, T 29 S, R 8 W; Section 3, T 9 S, R 8 W; Section 3, T 30 S, R 7 W; Sections 10, 14, T 31 S, R 5 W; Section 23, T 29 S, R 4 W; Section 33, T 28 S, R 3 W. Captured July 26, 2007. Close

• 45. [Article] Saddle up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management decision document

  17 pp. Tables, map. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Saddle up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 17 pp. Tables, map. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008. Title: Saddle up to Paradise commercial thinning and density management decision document Author: United States. Bureau of Land Management. Roseburg District Office Year: 2008, 2007 17 pp. Tables, map. Section 27; T21S, R07W. Captured January 28, 2008. Close

• 46. [Article] Powder River-Powder Valley Watershed Assessment

  Abstract -- The area covered by this watershed assessment is a scenic region containing a wealth of I resources. Those resources include wildlife, scenery, fisheries, clean water, mineral deposits, forests, ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Powder River-Powder Valley Watershed Assessment Abstract -- The area covered by this watershed assessment is a scenic region containing a wealth of I resources. Those resources include wildlife, scenery, fisheries, clean water, mineral deposits, forests, productive farmland, and people. The Powder River-Powder Valley Watershed Assessment is a compilation of existing information on three fifth field HUC's, minus 12,800acre HUC6 below Thief Valley Reservoir. The watershed encompasses approximately 300,000 acres. Title: Powder River-Powder Valley Watershed Assessment Abstract -- The area covered by this watershed assessment is a scenic region containing a wealth of I resources. Those resources include wildlife, scenery, fisheries, clean water, mineral deposits, forests, productive farmland, and people. The Powder River-Powder Valley Watershed Assessment is a compilation of existing information on three fifth field HUC's, minus 12,800acre HUC6 below Thief Valley Reservoir. The watershed encompasses approximately 300,000 acres. Close

• 47. [Article] The effects of hillslope and fluvial processes on particle size of the stream bed at the watershed, reach and within-reach scales in a fifth-order mountain stream

  This study addressed the effects of hilislope and fiuvial processes on spatial patterns of stream bed particle size at the watershed, reach and within-reach scales. The study was conducted in Lookout Creek ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: The effects of hillslope and fluvial processes on particle size of the stream bed at the watershed, reach and within-reach scales in a fifth-order mountain stream Author: Lambert, Beth C. This study addressed the effects of hilislope and fiuvial processes on spatial patterns of stream bed particle size at the watershed, reach and within-reach scales. The study was conducted in Lookout Creek watershed, a fifth-order, 64 km2 basin in the Western Cascades mountains of Oregon. Stream bed particle size was measured at 25 sites on first- through fifth-order streams. Boulder density was measured from the headwaters of the mainstem of Lookout Creek to its mouth, approximately 16 kilometers of stream length. In Lookout Creek watershed, spatial patterns of particle size result from a hierarchy of hydraulic and hilislope controls. At the watershed scale, hydraulic controls explain around 50% of the variation in d50 and d84. Particle size is related to watershed-scale trends in stream power and stream competence. At the reach scale, debris flows and landslides leave a patchy signature on stream bed particle size. Patches of both high and low boulder density are associated with landslides. A peak in density is associated with a February 1996 debris flow. Hydraulic controls are less evident at this scale, although the degree of reach constraint may affect particle size in fourth- and fifth-order Lookout Creek. At the within-reach scale, hydraulic controls are responsible for around 20% of the observed particle size variation. The effects of the largest flood on record at Lookout Creek were documented at 7 sites that had been sampled before the flood. At the watershed scale, a fining in particle size was observed; this is consistent with the hypothesis that Lookout Creek has an armor layer which the flood disturbed. At the within-reach scale, changes in particle size appeared stochastic, and provided little information about the role of hydraulic controls at that scale. Title: The effects of hillslope and fluvial processes on particle size of the stream bed at the watershed, reach and within-reach scales in a fifth-order mountain stream Author: Lambert, Beth C. This study addressed the effects of hilislope and fiuvial processes on spatial patterns of stream bed particle size at the watershed, reach and within-reach scales. The study was conducted in Lookout Creek watershed, a fifth-order, 64 km2 basin in the Western Cascades mountains of Oregon. Stream bed particle size was measured at 25 sites on first- through fifth-order streams. Boulder density was measured from the headwaters of the mainstem of Lookout Creek to its mouth, approximately 16 kilometers of stream length. In Lookout Creek watershed, spatial patterns of particle size result from a hierarchy of hydraulic and hilislope controls. At the watershed scale, hydraulic controls explain around 50% of the variation in d50 and d84. Particle size is related to watershed-scale trends in stream power and stream competence. At the reach scale, debris flows and landslides leave a patchy signature on stream bed particle size. Patches of both high and low boulder density are associated with landslides. A peak in density is associated with a February 1996 debris flow. Hydraulic controls are less evident at this scale, although the degree of reach constraint may affect particle size in fourth- and fifth-order Lookout Creek. At the within-reach scale, hydraulic controls are responsible for around 20% of the observed particle size variation. The effects of the largest flood on record at Lookout Creek were documented at 7 sites that had been sampled before the flood. At the watershed scale, a fining in particle size was observed; this is consistent with the hypothesis that Lookout Creek has an armor layer which the flood disturbed. At the within-reach scale, changes in particle size appeared stochastic, and provided little information about the role of hydraulic controls at that scale. Close

• 48. [Article] Water over stones : Oregon watershed stories

  The 13 personal essays in Water over Stones: Oregon Watershed Stories explore the author's experiences in dozens of Oregon watersheds. Using the genre of the personal essay, the author, a fifth-generation ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Water over stones : Oregon watershed stories Author: Oberst, Gail D. The 13 personal essays in Water over Stones: Oregon Watershed Stories explore the author's experiences in dozens of Oregon watersheds. Using the genre of the personal essay, the author, a fifth-generation Oregonian and amateur ecologist, writes about her life and family relationships in stories that are saturated with the waters in which they have lived, logged, fished, and died. These stories are no defense of her family's past. but neither are they a condemnation. Rather, these personal essays are an inside look at the conflicts that arise in the author and in her family relationships when she discovers a protective love of her watersheds, marries an environmental scientist and then tries to negotiate her family's values with environmental values attached to her home waters. This negotiation dives deep into personal waters that flow from childhood anger to religious ecstasy. The author's negotiation of these waters demonstrates the personal essay's unique use as a tool for exploring issues that underlie the science of watershed; specifically: people and their relationships to each other and to their waters. These essays are drawn from the author's experiences in watersheds as wild as Lawson Creek in the Kalmiopsis Wilderness, where her family was lost, and as tame as Ash Creek in the Willamette Valley, where she now lives. Title: Water over stones : Oregon watershed stories Author: Oberst, Gail D. The 13 personal essays in Water over Stones: Oregon Watershed Stories explore the author's experiences in dozens of Oregon watersheds. Using the genre of the personal essay, the author, a fifth-generation Oregonian and amateur ecologist, writes about her life and family relationships in stories that are saturated with the waters in which they have lived, logged, fished, and died. These stories are no defense of her family's past. but neither are they a condemnation. Rather, these personal essays are an inside look at the conflicts that arise in the author and in her family relationships when she discovers a protective love of her watersheds, marries an environmental scientist and then tries to negotiate her family's values with environmental values attached to her home waters. This negotiation dives deep into personal waters that flow from childhood anger to religious ecstasy. The author's negotiation of these waters demonstrates the personal essay's unique use as a tool for exploring issues that underlie the science of watershed; specifically: people and their relationships to each other and to their waters. These essays are drawn from the author's experiences in watersheds as wild as Lawson Creek in the Kalmiopsis Wilderness, where her family was lost, and as tame as Ash Creek in the Willamette Valley, where she now lives. Close

• 49. [Article] MidCoast sixth field watershed assessment : final report

  The study area for this assessment is composed of the Alsea, Salmon, Siletz, Yachats, and Yaquina River watersheds and those watersheds that drain directly to the ocean between Cascade Head and Cape Creek ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: MidCoast sixth field watershed assessment : final report Author: Garono, Ralph J., Brophy, Laura The study area for this assessment is composed of the Alsea, Salmon, Siletz, Yachats, and Yaquina River watersheds and those watersheds that drain directly to the ocean between Cascade Head and Cape Creek at Heceta Head (Ocean Tributaries). Wherever possible, 1:24,000 uniform scale geographic information system (GIS) data that covered the entire study area were used in this assessment. Goals of this study include, (1) a summary of current conditions for each 6th field watershed; and (2) recommendations for monitoring and management actions for prioritized 6th field watersheds. Title: MidCoast sixth field watershed assessment : final report Author: Garono, Ralph J., Brophy, Laura The study area for this assessment is composed of the Alsea, Salmon, Siletz, Yachats, and Yaquina River watersheds and those watersheds that drain directly to the ocean between Cascade Head and Cape Creek at Heceta Head (Ocean Tributaries). Wherever possible, 1:24,000 uniform scale geographic information system (GIS) data that covered the entire study area were used in this assessment. Goals of this study include, (1) a summary of current conditions for each 6th field watershed; and (2) recommendations for monitoring and management actions for prioritized 6th field watersheds. Close

• 50. [Article] Stream channel response to peak flows in a fifth-order mountain watershed

  This investigation explored how the magnitude, style, and frequency of channel adjustments vary spatially and over time within a 5th-order mountain watershed. Historical data sets, including repeated cross ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Stream channel response to peak flows in a fifth-order mountain watershed Author: Faustini, John M. This investigation explored how the magnitude, style, and frequency of channel adjustments vary spatially and over time within a 5th-order mountain watershed. Historical data sets, including repeated cross section surveys spanning up to 20 years at five sites on 2nd to 5th-order channels and streamflow records spanning up to 50 years, were supplemented by mapping and field reconnaissance activities. The study had two major parts. The first focused on two adjacent, contrasting stream reaches to examine the influence of large woody debris (LWD) on channel morphology and channel response to peak flows in a 3rd-order stream. The upper reach flows through old-growth forest with abundant LWD, while the lower reach was clearcut in 1964-65 and contains little LWD. A 25-year flood in 1996 caused deposition upstream of LWD steps in the old-growth reach alternating with scour between steps, resulting in no net gain or loss of sediment within the reach, while extensive scour and coarsening of the bed occurred in the clearcut reach. These observations suggest that reach-scale channel response was strongly influenced by LWD abundance, but that response at finer scales depends critically on the details of the location and arrangement of LWD. The second part of the study examined the dynamics of channel response to peak flows over two decades, and to two particular large floods during that period, in different portions of the channel network. The cross section data show that the streambed at the study sites is very stable, particularly in lower-order channels. Peak flows that produced detectable change at 90% of cross sections-flows able to cause significant channel adjustments-recur approximately three times as frequently (every 6-7 years) in 4`" to 5`h-order Lookout Creek as in 3rd-order Mack Creek (20-25 years). Flows that produced detectable change at 25% of cross sections are estimated to occur on average every 1.7 to 3.0 years at the study sites. It is estimated that if peak flows of all sizes were increased by only 10% due to anthropogenic impacts (e.g., logging) or climate change, the frequency of peak flows of a magnitude observed to produce significant channel adjustments would increase by approximately 30% in Lookout Creek and 60% in Mack Creek. Title: Stream channel response to peak flows in a fifth-order mountain watershed Author: Faustini, John M. This investigation explored how the magnitude, style, and frequency of channel adjustments vary spatially and over time within a 5th-order mountain watershed. Historical data sets, including repeated cross section surveys spanning up to 20 years at five sites on 2nd to 5th-order channels and streamflow records spanning up to 50 years, were supplemented by mapping and field reconnaissance activities. The study had two major parts. The first focused on two adjacent, contrasting stream reaches to examine the influence of large woody debris (LWD) on channel morphology and channel response to peak flows in a 3rd-order stream. The upper reach flows through old-growth forest with abundant LWD, while the lower reach was clearcut in 1964-65 and contains little LWD. A 25-year flood in 1996 caused deposition upstream of LWD steps in the old-growth reach alternating with scour between steps, resulting in no net gain or loss of sediment within the reach, while extensive scour and coarsening of the bed occurred in the clearcut reach. These observations suggest that reach-scale channel response was strongly influenced by LWD abundance, but that response at finer scales depends critically on the details of the location and arrangement of LWD. The second part of the study examined the dynamics of channel response to peak flows over two decades, and to two particular large floods during that period, in different portions of the channel network. The cross section data show that the streambed at the study sites is very stable, particularly in lower-order channels. Peak flows that produced detectable change at 90% of cross sections-flows able to cause significant channel adjustments-recur approximately three times as frequently (every 6-7 years) in 4`" to 5`h-order Lookout Creek as in 3rd-order Mack Creek (20-25 years). Flows that produced detectable change at 25% of cross sections are estimated to occur on average every 1.7 to 3.0 years at the study sites. It is estimated that if peak flows of all sizes were increased by only 10% due to anthropogenic impacts (e.g., logging) or climate change, the frequency of peak flows of a magnitude observed to produce significant channel adjustments would increase by approximately 30% in Lookout Creek and 60% in Mack Creek. Close