Search

Search Results

• 1. [Article] Middle Cow Creek Watershed assessment and action plan

  The Middle Cow Creek Watershed Assessment process has been contributed to by a group of local landowners. The group met fifteen times to review data about their watershed going into the document and portions ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Middle Cow Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Kincaid, Heidi The Middle Cow Creek Watershed Assessment process has been contributed to by a group of local landowners. The group met fifteen times to review data about their watershed going into the document and portions of the watershed assessment. Members of the Middle Cow Creek landowner group represented private landowners, private industrial timber companies, rural residents, the City of Glendale, the Bureau of Land Management Medford District (BLM), the Oregon Department of Forestry, the UBWC, and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Title: Middle Cow Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Kincaid, Heidi The Middle Cow Creek Watershed Assessment process has been contributed to by a group of local landowners. The group met fifteen times to review data about their watershed going into the document and portions of the watershed assessment. Members of the Middle Cow Creek landowner group represented private landowners, private industrial timber companies, rural residents, the City of Glendale, the Bureau of Land Management Medford District (BLM), the Oregon Department of Forestry, the UBWC, and the Oregon Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ). Close

• 2. [Article] Deer Creek Watershed assessment and action plan

  The Deer Creek Watershed Assessment process has been followed by a group of local landowners. The organization of this document was constructed as a combination of the informational needs of the Deer Creek ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Deer Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Kincaid, Heidi The Deer Creek Watershed Assessment process has been followed by a group of local landowners. The organization of this document was constructed as a combination of the informational needs of the Deer Creek landowners and the framework of the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual. The group has met twelve times to review the data going into the document, followed by three meetings to review the assessment and develop the action plan. Members of the Deer Creek landowner group represented sheep ranches, cattle ranches, industry within Deer Creek, the City of Roseburg, private industrial timber companies, city residents, rural residents, the UBWC, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), the Douglas Soil and Water Conservation District (DSWCD), and the Douglas Small Woodlands Association. Title: Deer Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Kincaid, Heidi The Deer Creek Watershed Assessment process has been followed by a group of local landowners. The organization of this document was constructed as a combination of the informational needs of the Deer Creek landowners and the framework of the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual. The group has met twelve times to review the data going into the document, followed by three meetings to review the assessment and develop the action plan. Members of the Deer Creek landowner group represented sheep ranches, cattle ranches, industry within Deer Creek, the City of Roseburg, private industrial timber companies, city residents, rural residents, the UBWC, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM), the Department of Environmental Quality (DEQ), the Douglas Soil and Water Conservation District (DSWCD), and the Douglas Small Woodlands Association. Close

• 3. [Article] Lower South Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan

  The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Lower South Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 were compiled from the following documents: The Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000), and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Title: Lower South Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 were compiled from the following documents: The Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000), and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Close

• 4. [Article] Lower Cow Creek Watershed assessment and action plan

  The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Lower Cow Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Lower Cow Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2002), and the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Title: Lower Cow Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Lower Cow Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2002), and the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Close

• 5. [Article] Myrtle Creek Watershed assessment and action plan

  The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Myrtle Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 were compiled from the following documents: the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Draft Myrtle Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2002), and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Title: Myrtle Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 were compiled from the following documents: the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Draft Myrtle Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2002), and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Close

• 6. [Article] West Fork Cow Creek Watershed assessment and action plan

  The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership, and current land uses. Information in section 1.2 was compiled from the Oregon ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: West Fork Cow Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership, and current land uses. Information in section 1.2 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Lower Cow Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2002), and the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Title: West Fork Cow Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership, and current land uses. Information in section 1.2 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Lower Cow Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2002), and the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Close

• 7. [Article] Olalla / Lookingglass Watershed assessment and action plan

  The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Olalla / Lookingglass Watershed assessment and action plan Author: DeVore, Matt B., Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in Sections 1.2 and 1.3 were compiled from the following documents: The Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual, the Olalla / Lookingglass Watershed Analysis, and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis. Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Title: Olalla / Lookingglass Watershed assessment and action plan Author: DeVore, Matt B., Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in Sections 1.2 and 1.3 were compiled from the following documents: The Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual, the Olalla / Lookingglass Watershed Analysis, and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis. Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Close

• 8. [Article] Wilson River Watershed Assessment : final report

  The purpose of this watershed assessment is to provide an inventory and characterization of watershed conditions in the Wilson River watershed and to provide recommendations that address the issues of ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Wilson River Watershed Assessment : final report Author: E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc., Kai, Snyder U., Sullivan, Timothy J., White, Shawn, Raymond, Richard B., Binder, Susan K., Bischoff, Joseph M. The purpose of this watershed assessment is to provide an inventory and characterization of watershed conditions in the Wilson River watershed and to provide recommendations that address the issues of water quality, fisheries and fish habitat, and watershed hydrology. Title: Wilson River Watershed Assessment : final report Author: E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc., Kai, Snyder U., Sullivan, Timothy J., White, Shawn, Raymond, Richard B., Binder, Susan K., Bischoff, Joseph M. The purpose of this watershed assessment is to provide an inventory and characterization of watershed conditions in the Wilson River watershed and to provide recommendations that address the issues of water quality, fisheries and fish habitat, and watershed hydrology. Close

• 9. [Article] Necanicum River watershed assessment

  In this watershed assessment, the authors of the report summarized current conditions and data gaps within the Necanicum River watershed to help to identify how current and past resource management is ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Necanicum River watershed assessment Author: E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc., Sullivan, Timothy J., Snyder, Kai U., Raymond, Richard B., Gilbert, Erin H., Moore, Deian L. In this watershed assessment, the authors of the report summarized current conditions and data gaps within the Necanicum River watershed to help to identify how current and past resource management is impacting aquatic resources. Title: Necanicum River watershed assessment Author: E&S Environmental Chemistry, Inc., Sullivan, Timothy J., Snyder, Kai U., Raymond, Richard B., Gilbert, Erin H., Moore, Deian L. In this watershed assessment, the authors of the report summarized current conditions and data gaps within the Necanicum River watershed to help to identify how current and past resource management is impacting aquatic resources. Close

• 10. [Article] Calapooya Creek Watershed assessment and action plan

  The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Calapooya Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Calapooya Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999), and the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Title: Calapooya Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Calapooya Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999), and the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Close

• 11. [Article] Middle South Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan

  The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Middle South Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the following sources: The Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000), and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Title: Middle South Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the following sources: The Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000), and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Close

• 12. [Article] Upper Cow Creek Watershed assessment and action plan

  The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Upper Cow Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Lower Cow Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2002), and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Title: Upper Cow Creek Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Lower Cow Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2002), and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Close

• 13. [Article] Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan

  The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Calapooya Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999), the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000), and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Title: Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Calapooya Creek Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999), the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000), and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Close

• 14. [Article] South Umpqua River Watershed assessment and action plan

  The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: South Umpqua River Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000), the Myrtle Creek Watershed Analysis (Draft) (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2002) and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Title: South Umpqua River Watershed assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the watershed in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the watershed. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000), the Myrtle Creek Watershed Analysis (Draft) (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2002) and the Middle South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 1999). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases: The Oregon Climate Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Close

• 15. [Article] BLM addendum for Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment : fifth field watershed

  Within the Lower North Umpqua watershed, BLM has acquired approximately 6,600 acres of land specifically to manage habitat to enhance the Columbian White-tailed Deer (CWTD). This area is called the North ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: BLM addendum for Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment : fifth field watershed Author: U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Within the Lower North Umpqua watershed, BLM has acquired approximately 6,600 acres of land specifically to manage habitat to enhance the Columbian White-tailed Deer (CWTD). This area is called the North Bank Habitat Management Area (NBHMA) and will be managed as described in the NBHMA Environmental Impact Statement. The BLM also manages an additional 5,780 acres for multiple use objectives. These lands are mostly scattered in the headwater region in the north and northwest of the watershed. Within the next five to ten years, it is likely that the Swiftwater Field Manager will need to be involved in some aspect of decision-making on those 5,780 acres with the following general areas. These areas have been used to help guide the key questions, the information to answer those questions, and the resulting management opportunities. A major assumption in the development of these key questions is that the Roseburg District Resource Management Plan (RMP) has given some prescriptive measures through the landscape land use allocations. Because the RMP sets standards and guidelines on each land use allocation and the kinds of activities that can occur in those land uses, this watershed assessment seeks to provide information to guide decision making within those overarching planning parameters. Title: BLM addendum for Lower North Umpqua Watershed assessment : fifth field watershed Author: U.S. Department of Interior Bureau of Land Management Within the Lower North Umpqua watershed, BLM has acquired approximately 6,600 acres of land specifically to manage habitat to enhance the Columbian White-tailed Deer (CWTD). This area is called the North Bank Habitat Management Area (NBHMA) and will be managed as described in the NBHMA Environmental Impact Statement. The BLM also manages an additional 5,780 acres for multiple use objectives. These lands are mostly scattered in the headwater region in the north and northwest of the watershed. Within the next five to ten years, it is likely that the Swiftwater Field Manager will need to be involved in some aspect of decision-making on those 5,780 acres with the following general areas. These areas have been used to help guide the key questions, the information to answer those questions, and the resulting management opportunities. A major assumption in the development of these key questions is that the Roseburg District Resource Management Plan (RMP) has given some prescriptive measures through the landscape land use allocations. Because the RMP sets standards and guidelines on each land use allocation and the kinds of activities that can occur in those land uses, this watershed assessment seeks to provide information to guide decision making within those overarching planning parameters. Close

• 16. [Article] Trask Watershed assessment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Trask Watershed assessment Author: Follansbee, Bruce Title: Trask Watershed assessment Author: Follansbee, Bruce Close

• 17. [Article] Kilchis watershed analysis

  This analysis was performed for two reasons: 1) the KWG needed a way to focus and synthesize the results of applied research on the condition and trends of natural resources, and the factors affecting ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Kilchis watershed analysis Author: Follansbee, Bruce, Stark, Ann This analysis was performed for two reasons: 1) the KWG needed a way to focus and synthesize the results of applied research on the condition and trends of natural resources, and the factors affecting those resources; and 2) a detailed watershed analysis was needed to supplement watershed assessments planned for the region. Title: Kilchis watershed analysis Author: Follansbee, Bruce, Stark, Ann This analysis was performed for two reasons: 1) the KWG needed a way to focus and synthesize the results of applied research on the condition and trends of natural resources, and the factors affecting those resources; and 2) a detailed watershed analysis was needed to supplement watershed assessments planned for the region. Close

• 18. [Article] Tiller Region assessment and action plan

  The introduction provides a general description of the Tiller Region in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the region. Information ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Tiller Region assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the Tiller Region in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the region. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000), and the Myrtle Creek Watershed Analysis (Draft) (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2002). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases and staff: the USDA Forest Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Title: Tiller Region assessment and action plan Author: Geyer, Nancy A. The introduction provides a general description of the Tiller Region in terms of its natural and human-made features, ownership and current land uses, and the communities within the region. Information in sections 1.2 and 1.3 was compiled from the Oregon Watershed Assessment Manual (Watershed Professionals Network, 1999), the Lower South Umpqua Watershed Analysis (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2000), and the Myrtle Creek Watershed Analysis (Draft) (USDI Bureau of Land Management, 2002). Additional information is from the following sources’ databases and staff: the USDA Forest Service, the US Census Bureau, and the Douglas County Assessor. Close

• 19. [Article] Interactive Genetic Algorithms for watershed planning : an investigation of usability and human-centered design

  Degradation of watersheds is a major concern in areas where adverse climate effects and unsustainable use of the natural resources have caused extensive stresses to watershed systems (e.g., increased floods, ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Interactive Genetic Algorithms for watershed planning : an investigation of usability and human-centered design Author: Piemonti, Adriana Debora Degradation of watersheds is a major concern in areas where adverse climate effects and unsustainable use of the natural resources have caused extensive stresses to watershed systems (e.g., increased floods, increased droughts, worsened in-stream water quality) through the years. While considerable efforts are being made to generate technical solutions that focus on plans of spatially-distributed conservation practices (e.g., Wetlands, Filter Strips, Grassed Waterways, Crop Management practices, etc.) for restoration of existing conditions in the watersheds, adoption and implementation of these solutions require a better understanding of constraints faced by affected stakeholders and decision makers. Participatory modeling and design approaches have, as a result, become popular in the recent past to support a community's engagement during the modeling process and during development of potential scenarios of plans (or, design alternatives). And now, with new and ongoing developments in Web 2.0 technologies, there is an even greater need for research that examines how large number of stakeholders can be engaged in the development of design alternatives via the internet-based, decision support environments. The overarching goal of this research is to investigate how stakeholder participation ("humans") and Interactive Genetic Algorithms ("computer") can be coupled in a web-based watershed decision support system (DSS) called WRESTORE (Watershed REstoration using Spatio Temporal Optimization of REsources- http://wrestore.iupui.edu/), in order to generate user-preferred design alternatives of distributed conservation practices on a watershed landscape. An important component of this goal is to also improve the understanding of how human behavior on the graphical user interface (GUI) of the DSS can be observed and evaluated in real-time, and then learned from to further improve the performance of the underlying search algorithm. Four specific objectives were addressed in this work to accomplish the overall goal: • Objective 1: Observe interactions of multiple users with the GUI of a web-based watershed DSS (WRESTORE, http://wrestore.iupui.edu/) during interactive search experiments, and then use Usability metrics (response times, clicking events and confidence levels) to evaluate the differences and similarities in user behaviors and interactions. • Objective 2: Examine relationships between the type of users (e.g., stakeholders versus surrogates), the Usability metrics, and patterns in the watershed-scale plans of conservation practices generated by the multi-objective Interactive Genetic Algorithm embedded in WRESTORE. • Objective 3: Examine relationships between the type of users, the Usability metrics, and patterns in the user-preferred, sub-basin-scale plans of conservation practices generated by the multi-objective Interactive Genetic Algorithm embedded in WRESTORE. • Objective 4: Develop and test novel human-guided search operators that adaptively learn for patterns in user-preferred alternatives generated by the multi-objective Interactive Genetic Algorithm, and, as a result, improve the convergence rate of the search algorithm for generating design alternatives that conserve these learned patterns. Results show that there is a clear difference on how different types of users interact with the Interactive Optimization system. The observed relationship between confidence levels, time spent on a task, and number of mouse clicking events, indicated that participants who were able to use the WRESTORE GUI to gather more information and had a higher rate of time per number of clicks, tended to increase their levels of self-confidence in their own feedback. Also, when engaging with watershed stakeholders versus non-stakeholders (or, surrogates), 67% of the stakeholder participants steadily increased their average self-confidence levels as they continued to interact with the tool, in contrast to only 29% of surrogate participants who also showed an increase in their self-confidence levels through time. Such usability and confidence level evaluations provide assessments on which participant was potentially generating reliable feedback data for the search algorithm to use. An analysis of design alternatives generated by the individuals in both stakeholder and non-stakeholder groups showed that a majority (67%) of the stakeholder participants found a higher percentage (on and average 52%) of preferred design alternatives via the interactive search process. Also, users who were focused on assessing the suitability of design alternatives for the entire watershed trended to demonstrate a bias for one of the watershed-scale objective functions. In contrast, users, who were focused on assessing the suitability of design alternatives at only a few local sub-basins in the watershed, did not demonstrate any clear bias for any one of the watershed-scale objective functions. Additionally, patterns were observed in the design of decision alternatives generated by the human-centered search process, which further divulged potential user preferences related to the decision space for example, whether a specific participant preferred a certain practice over another, or a certain location over another for a specific practice. Finally, to improve the convergence rates of the Interactive Genetic Algorithm in WRESTORE, we investigated whether observed patterns in decisions (especially, when users were focused on local sub-regions of the watershed) can be used to improve the search for user-desire designs. A novel Interactive Genetic Algorithm with adaptive, human-guided, selection, crossover and mutation operators was proposed. The new algorithm was tested with six types of simulated participants (three deterministic and three probabilistic users) developed from the feedback data of three real participants. Results of search experiments with the novel adaptive IGA operators indicated a faster convergence than the default IGA, for two out of three deterministic simulated users. However, none of the probabilistic user showed a convergence different than the default values. This indicates that while current results indicate promise, there is need for additional research on adaptive, human-guided IGA operators, especially when noisy/stochastic users participate in the search. Additionally, adaptation of search operators have the potential to improve convergence rates when participatory design is done via Interactive Genetic Algorithms. Title: Interactive Genetic Algorithms for watershed planning : an investigation of usability and human-centered design Author: Piemonti, Adriana Debora Degradation of watersheds is a major concern in areas where adverse climate effects and unsustainable use of the natural resources have caused extensive stresses to watershed systems (e.g., increased floods, increased droughts, worsened in-stream water quality) through the years. While considerable efforts are being made to generate technical solutions that focus on plans of spatially-distributed conservation practices (e.g., Wetlands, Filter Strips, Grassed Waterways, Crop Management practices, etc.) for restoration of existing conditions in the watersheds, adoption and implementation of these solutions require a better understanding of constraints faced by affected stakeholders and decision makers. Participatory modeling and design approaches have, as a result, become popular in the recent past to support a community's engagement during the modeling process and during development of potential scenarios of plans (or, design alternatives). And now, with new and ongoing developments in Web 2.0 technologies, there is an even greater need for research that examines how large number of stakeholders can be engaged in the development of design alternatives via the internet-based, decision support environments. The overarching goal of this research is to investigate how stakeholder participation ("humans") and Interactive Genetic Algorithms ("computer") can be coupled in a web-based watershed decision support system (DSS) called WRESTORE (Watershed REstoration using Spatio Temporal Optimization of REsources- http://wrestore.iupui.edu/), in order to generate user-preferred design alternatives of distributed conservation practices on a watershed landscape. An important component of this goal is to also improve the understanding of how human behavior on the graphical user interface (GUI) of the DSS can be observed and evaluated in real-time, and then learned from to further improve the performance of the underlying search algorithm. Four specific objectives were addressed in this work to accomplish the overall goal: • Objective 1: Observe interactions of multiple users with the GUI of a web-based watershed DSS (WRESTORE, http://wrestore.iupui.edu/) during interactive search experiments, and then use Usability metrics (response times, clicking events and confidence levels) to evaluate the differences and similarities in user behaviors and interactions. • Objective 2: Examine relationships between the type of users (e.g., stakeholders versus surrogates), the Usability metrics, and patterns in the watershed-scale plans of conservation practices generated by the multi-objective Interactive Genetic Algorithm embedded in WRESTORE. • Objective 3: Examine relationships between the type of users, the Usability metrics, and patterns in the user-preferred, sub-basin-scale plans of conservation practices generated by the multi-objective Interactive Genetic Algorithm embedded in WRESTORE. • Objective 4: Develop and test novel human-guided search operators that adaptively learn for patterns in user-preferred alternatives generated by the multi-objective Interactive Genetic Algorithm, and, as a result, improve the convergence rate of the search algorithm for generating design alternatives that conserve these learned patterns. Results show that there is a clear difference on how different types of users interact with the Interactive Optimization system. The observed relationship between confidence levels, time spent on a task, and number of mouse clicking events, indicated that participants who were able to use the WRESTORE GUI to gather more information and had a higher rate of time per number of clicks, tended to increase their levels of self-confidence in their own feedback. Also, when engaging with watershed stakeholders versus non-stakeholders (or, surrogates), 67% of the stakeholder participants steadily increased their average self-confidence levels as they continued to interact with the tool, in contrast to only 29% of surrogate participants who also showed an increase in their self-confidence levels through time. Such usability and confidence level evaluations provide assessments on which participant was potentially generating reliable feedback data for the search algorithm to use. An analysis of design alternatives generated by the individuals in both stakeholder and non-stakeholder groups showed that a majority (67%) of the stakeholder participants found a higher percentage (on and average 52%) of preferred design alternatives via the interactive search process. Also, users who were focused on assessing the suitability of design alternatives for the entire watershed trended to demonstrate a bias for one of the watershed-scale objective functions. In contrast, users, who were focused on assessing the suitability of design alternatives at only a few local sub-basins in the watershed, did not demonstrate any clear bias for any one of the watershed-scale objective functions. Additionally, patterns were observed in the design of decision alternatives generated by the human-centered search process, which further divulged potential user preferences related to the decision space for example, whether a specific participant preferred a certain practice over another, or a certain location over another for a specific practice. Finally, to improve the convergence rates of the Interactive Genetic Algorithm in WRESTORE, we investigated whether observed patterns in decisions (especially, when users were focused on local sub-regions of the watershed) can be used to improve the search for user-desire designs. A novel Interactive Genetic Algorithm with adaptive, human-guided, selection, crossover and mutation operators was proposed. The new algorithm was tested with six types of simulated participants (three deterministic and three probabilistic users) developed from the feedback data of three real participants. Results of search experiments with the novel adaptive IGA operators indicated a faster convergence than the default IGA, for two out of three deterministic simulated users. However, none of the probabilistic user showed a convergence different than the default values. This indicates that while current results indicate promise, there is need for additional research on adaptive, human-guided IGA operators, especially when noisy/stochastic users participate in the search. Additionally, adaptation of search operators have the potential to improve convergence rates when participatory design is done via Interactive Genetic Algorithms. Close

• 20. [Article] Keying forest stream protection to aquatic ecosystem values in multi-ownership watersheds

  Forested lands of western Oregon provide aquatic habitat for many fish and riparian dependent species, including a wide variety of salmon species. Current policies set riparian protections using fixed ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Keying forest stream protection to aquatic ecosystem values in multi-ownership watersheds Author: Pickard, Brian R. Forested lands of western Oregon provide aquatic habitat for many fish and riparian dependent species, including a wide variety of salmon species. Current policies set riparian protections using fixed buffers on streams for federal and private lands based on stream type or size. These buffers can create a series of disjointed riparian protections, as federal lands require buffers that are much larger than private lands. In addition, the fixed buffer approach is neither flexible nor tailored to aquatic ecosystem values. This thesis presents a framework for comprehensively assessing stream networks using site specific watershed features and then suggests riparian conservation strategies that key stream and riparian protection to aquatic ecosystem values. Seven study watersheds were used in this analysis, totaling over 2.5 million acres of forested lands in western Oregon. Employing a set of geospatial tools, called NetMap, streams in each watershed were classified into higher and lower priorities using criteria of intrinsic potential, erosion/debris flow susceptibility, and thermal loading potential. Results demonstrated the inherent variability within and among watersheds based on the geomorphic and ecological processes determined important for selected salmon species. Within each watershed, both federal and non-federal lands had many miles of higher priority fish-bearing and non-fish bearing streams, suggesting the need for comprehensive, holistic watershed conservation strategies. Based on the partitioning of streams into higher and lower priorities, an alternative riparian conservation strategy was then modeled for federal lands that allocate protection on the basis of the ecological context of a stream segment’s potential and particular location while still meeting federal aquatic conservation goals and objectives. Possible increases to the land base for long-term timber production were then identified if this strategy were applied to federal Matrix lands. Results demonstrated that 8-30 percent of the current riparian buffers could be reallocated to the land base for long-term timber production. An additional 26-45 percent of current buffers could be managed simultaneously for both timber production and aquatic ecosystem goals. Results also provided a framework for targeting of conservation and restoration efforts towards higher priority streams within each watershed. As many of the most ecologically important streams were located on non-federal lands, riparian conservation policies focused on streams classified as higher priority on those lands may be needed to protect aquatic species and their environments. Title: Keying forest stream protection to aquatic ecosystem values in multi-ownership watersheds Author: Pickard, Brian R. Forested lands of western Oregon provide aquatic habitat for many fish and riparian dependent species, including a wide variety of salmon species. Current policies set riparian protections using fixed buffers on streams for federal and private lands based on stream type or size. These buffers can create a series of disjointed riparian protections, as federal lands require buffers that are much larger than private lands. In addition, the fixed buffer approach is neither flexible nor tailored to aquatic ecosystem values. This thesis presents a framework for comprehensively assessing stream networks using site specific watershed features and then suggests riparian conservation strategies that key stream and riparian protection to aquatic ecosystem values. Seven study watersheds were used in this analysis, totaling over 2.5 million acres of forested lands in western Oregon. Employing a set of geospatial tools, called NetMap, streams in each watershed were classified into higher and lower priorities using criteria of intrinsic potential, erosion/debris flow susceptibility, and thermal loading potential. Results demonstrated the inherent variability within and among watersheds based on the geomorphic and ecological processes determined important for selected salmon species. Within each watershed, both federal and non-federal lands had many miles of higher priority fish-bearing and non-fish bearing streams, suggesting the need for comprehensive, holistic watershed conservation strategies. Based on the partitioning of streams into higher and lower priorities, an alternative riparian conservation strategy was then modeled for federal lands that allocate protection on the basis of the ecological context of a stream segment’s potential and particular location while still meeting federal aquatic conservation goals and objectives. Possible increases to the land base for long-term timber production were then identified if this strategy were applied to federal Matrix lands. Results demonstrated that 8-30 percent of the current riparian buffers could be reallocated to the land base for long-term timber production. An additional 26-45 percent of current buffers could be managed simultaneously for both timber production and aquatic ecosystem goals. Results also provided a framework for targeting of conservation and restoration efforts towards higher priority streams within each watershed. As many of the most ecologically important streams were located on non-federal lands, riparian conservation policies focused on streams classified as higher priority on those lands may be needed to protect aquatic species and their environments. Close

• 21. [Article] Penumbra : A Spatiotemporal Shade-Irradiance Analysis Tool with External Model Integration for Landscape Assessment, Habitat Enhancement, and Water Quality Improvement

  Several solar energy models exist, but all models must balance: computational runtime, light complexity, and model output volume. These models span the spectrum of simplistic global solar energy equation ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Penumbra : A Spatiotemporal Shade-Irradiance Analysis Tool with External Model Integration for Landscape Assessment, Habitat Enhancement, and Water Quality Improvement Author: Halama, Jonathan James Several solar energy models exist, but all models must balance: computational runtime, light complexity, and model output volume. These models span the spectrum of simplistic global solar energy equation sets to complex light ray-tracing models. Spatiotemporally inaccurate representations of solar energy may cause compounding simulation effects and introduce unknown modeling uncertainty. Within the current solar energy modeling spectrum was the need to advance large watershed area spatiotemporal irradiance modeling. A model utilizing methods simpler than ray-tracing that still accounted for the major environmental light reduction factors was needed. The model developed we called Penumbra. Penumbra provides solar energy reduction from topographic shadowing, forest shadowing, and cloud coverage at landscape scales. Penumbra was developed to function as a stand-alone model, but also be capable of integration within existing ecosystem models. Penumbra’s intended audience include ecosystem modelers, land owners, watershed councils, county, state, and federal entities; any group needing an enhanced understanding of how light energy impacts processes within their landscapes. The questions being asked by my intended audience regard riparian zone restoration, fish habitat restoration, and improved forest management. To address these questions, a well-functioning shade|irradiance model capable of assisting with multiyear landscape assessments was needed. Title: Penumbra : A Spatiotemporal Shade-Irradiance Analysis Tool with External Model Integration for Landscape Assessment, Habitat Enhancement, and Water Quality Improvement Author: Halama, Jonathan James Several solar energy models exist, but all models must balance: computational runtime, light complexity, and model output volume. These models span the spectrum of simplistic global solar energy equation sets to complex light ray-tracing models. Spatiotemporally inaccurate representations of solar energy may cause compounding simulation effects and introduce unknown modeling uncertainty. Within the current solar energy modeling spectrum was the need to advance large watershed area spatiotemporal irradiance modeling. A model utilizing methods simpler than ray-tracing that still accounted for the major environmental light reduction factors was needed. The model developed we called Penumbra. Penumbra provides solar energy reduction from topographic shadowing, forest shadowing, and cloud coverage at landscape scales. Penumbra was developed to function as a stand-alone model, but also be capable of integration within existing ecosystem models. Penumbra’s intended audience include ecosystem modelers, land owners, watershed councils, county, state, and federal entities; any group needing an enhanced understanding of how light energy impacts processes within their landscapes. The questions being asked by my intended audience regard riparian zone restoration, fish habitat restoration, and improved forest management. To address these questions, a well-functioning shade|irradiance model capable of assisting with multiyear landscape assessments was needed. Close