Search

Search Results

• 1. [Article] Land Use Planning Information for the Citizens of Oregon

  This white paper seeks to provide facts about the history of land use planning in Oregon while also identifying some of the key challenges facing planning in the future. It also includes useful information ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Land Use Planning Information for the Citizens of Oregon Author: Gray, John D. (John Delton), 1919-, Shriver, Katie This white paper seeks to provide facts about the history of land use planning in Oregon while also identifying some of the key challenges facing planning in the future. It also includes useful information about the work of the Oregon Task Force on Land Use Planning (the “Big Look” task force) and about some of the key research projects that should help provide some answers to current problems. Title: Land Use Planning Information for the Citizens of Oregon Author: Gray, John D. (John Delton), 1919-, Shriver, Katie This white paper seeks to provide facts about the history of land use planning in Oregon while also identifying some of the key challenges facing planning in the future. It also includes useful information about the work of the Oregon Task Force on Land Use Planning (the “Big Look” task force) and about some of the key research projects that should help provide some answers to current problems. Close

• 2. [Article] Gates Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-08-05)

  6 pp. Adopted 2009-08-05. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gates Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-08-05) Author: Gates Year: 2014, 2009 6 pp. Adopted 2009-08-05. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Gates Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-08-05) Author: Gates Year: 2014, 2009 6 pp. Adopted 2009-08-05. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 3. [Article] Interview with Bruce Bartow

  Interview with Bruce Bartow by Michael Rupp on October 11, 2016. Bruce Bartow served as Planning Director for Josephine County, Oregon, from 1977 to 2005.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Interview with Bruce Bartow Author: Bartow, Bruce, Rupp, Michael Year: 2017 Interview with Bruce Bartow by Michael Rupp on October 11, 2016. Bruce Bartow served as Planning Director for Josephine County, Oregon, from 1977 to 2005. Title: Interview with Bruce Bartow Author: Bartow, Bruce, Rupp, Michael Year: 2017 Interview with Bruce Bartow by Michael Rupp on October 11, 2016. Bruce Bartow served as Planning Director for Josephine County, Oregon, from 1977 to 2005. Close

• 4. [Article] Interview with Keith Cubic

  Interview with Keith Cubic by Michael Rupp on March 8, 2016. Keith Cubic has served as the Planning Director for Douglas County, Oregon, since 1978.

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Interview with Keith Cubic Author: Cubic, Keith, Rupp, Michael Year: 2017 Interview with Keith Cubic by Michael Rupp on March 8, 2016. Keith Cubic has served as the Planning Director for Douglas County, Oregon, since 1978. Title: Interview with Keith Cubic Author: Cubic, Keith, Rupp, Michael Year: 2017 Interview with Keith Cubic by Michael Rupp on March 8, 2016. Keith Cubic has served as the Planning Director for Douglas County, Oregon, since 1978. Close

• 5. [Article] Interview with Andy Cotugno

  Interview with Andy Cotugno by Sy Adler on March 8, 2016. Andy Cotugno served as planning director at Metro from 1980 to 2008 and as the Metro Council's Senior Policy Advisor from 2008 until his retirement ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Interview with Andy Cotugno Author: Cotugno, Andy, Adler, Sy Year: 2017 Interview with Andy Cotugno by Sy Adler on March 8, 2016. Andy Cotugno served as planning director at Metro from 1980 to 2008 and as the Metro Council's Senior Policy Advisor from 2008 until his retirement in March 2016. Title: Interview with Andy Cotugno Author: Cotugno, Andy, Adler, Sy Year: 2017 Interview with Andy Cotugno by Sy Adler on March 8, 2016. Andy Cotugno served as planning director at Metro from 1980 to 2008 and as the Metro Council's Senior Policy Advisor from 2008 until his retirement in March 2016. Close

• 6. [Article] Marion County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-10-07)

  160 pp. Adopted 2009-10-07. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Marion County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-10-07) Author: Marion County Year: 2014, 2009 160 pp. Adopted 2009-10-07. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Marion County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-10-07) Author: Marion County Year: 2014, 2009 160 pp. Adopted 2009-10-07. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 7. [Image] Geothermal Power Development in Hawaii. Volume I. Review and Analysis

  	The history of geothermal exploration in Hawaii is reviewed briefly. The nature and occurrences of geothermal resources are presented island by island. An overview of geothermal markets is presented. Other ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Geothermal Power Development in Hawaii. Volume I. Review and Analysis Author: Department of Planning and Economic Development Year: 1982 The history of geothermal exploration in Hawaii is reviewed briefly. The nature and occurrences of geothermal resources are presented island by island. An overview of geothermal markets is presented. Other topics covered are: potential markets of the identified geothermal areas, well drilling technology, hydrothermal fluid transport, overland and submarine electrical transmission, community aspects of geothermal development, legal and policy issues associated with mineral and land ownership, logistics and infrastructure, legislation and permitting, land use controls, Regulation 8, Public Utilities Commission, political climate and environment, state plans, county plans, geothermal development risks, and business planning guidelines Title: Geothermal Power Development in Hawaii. Volume I. Review and Analysis Author: Department of Planning and Economic Development Year: 1982 The history of geothermal exploration in Hawaii is reviewed briefly. The nature and occurrences of geothermal resources are presented island by island. An overview of geothermal markets is presented. Other topics covered are: potential markets of the identified geothermal areas, well drilling technology, hydrothermal fluid transport, overland and submarine electrical transmission, community aspects of geothermal development, legal and policy issues associated with mineral and land ownership, logistics and infrastructure, legislation and permitting, land use controls, Regulation 8, Public Utilities Commission, political climate and environment, state plans, county plans, geothermal development risks, and business planning guidelines Close

• 8. [Article] Salem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-06-20)

  26 pp. Adopted 2011-06-20. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Salem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-06-20) Author: Salem Year: 2014, 2011 26 pp. Adopted 2011-06-20. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Salem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-06-20) Author: Salem Year: 2014, 2011 26 pp. Adopted 2011-06-20. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 9. [Article] Three essays on the effectiveness of Oregon's land-use planning system : economic analysis with quasi-experimental methods

  Oregon's land use planning system is often recognized as having been successful in its goals of limiting urban sprawl and protecting resource lands from development. However, it is difficult to quantify ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Three essays on the effectiveness of Oregon's land-use planning system : economic analysis with quasi-experimental methods Author: Dempsey, Judith Oregon's land use planning system is often recognized as having been successful in its goals of limiting urban sprawl and protecting resource lands from development. However, it is difficult to quantify the impact of these regulations, because we cannot observe what would have happened in the absence of land use planning. The three essays in this dissertation explore the effects of Oregon's land use planning regulations on development patterns in the state, and also examine how the land use regulations are administered at the local level. The first essay in this dissertation asks if Oregon’s land use regulations have successfully restricted sprawl outside of urban areas. Urban containment policies, including Urban Growth Boundaries (UGBs), are a common tool used by city planners to promote compact development. We analyze how well UGBs do in containing development using fine-scale GIS data on cities in Oregon. Earlier studies on UGBs yield mixed results, with some authors finding no effects of UGBs on housing market variables and urbanization rates and others finding significant effects. A challenge in measuring these effects is that the location of the UGB is unlikely to be an exogenous determinant of a land parcel's value for development. The panel structure of our dataset allows us to estimate the UGB's effect on the probability of development using a difference-in-difference estimator. This estimator controls for time-invariant unobservable variables and common temporal effects among parcels, thereby mitigating the potential for biased estimates due to the endogeneity of the UGB's location. We also pursue a novel approach to controlling for time-varying factors inspired by regression discontinuity design. We find that UGBs are effective in containing development in many of the Oregon cities we examine, although there are some cities in which development rates are the same inside and outside of the UGB. Our results show that we would greatly overstate the effects of the UGBs were we to evaluate cross-sectional differences in development rates, as is common in previous studies. Besides the creation of UGBs, another goal of Oregon's land use regulations is to encourage citizen involvement in the planning process. The second essay in this dissertation examines the use of voter annexation as a form of citizen involvement. More specifically, this paper addresses the following two questions. First, does voter annexation cause changes in city demographics and characteristics? Second, assuming that a city votes for amendments and annexations to the UGB and city limits, what factors impact the outcome of the vote? We analyze the first question using the method of propensity score matching, which has not previously been used to explore this topic. This allows us to account for the endogeneity that stems from the fact that cities with certain characteristics may be more likely to use voter annexation in the first place. The second question, which is only evaluated for cities that employ voter annexation, is analyzed with the use of the logit model. Oregon's land use regulations must be approved at the state level, but are administered locally. Therefore, unlike past studies, we are able to isolate specific differences in the way the program is administered, and are not evaluating the stringency of the program itself. Previous studies have found that voter-approved annexation causes developers to provide more public goods and increase the scale of development, thereby shifting community demographics. Once a land use decision is on the ballot, it is also noted that cities that are whiter, wealthier, and more liberal are more likely to pass referenda that promote preservation and restrict development. For the first question, we compare specific demographic indicators between the two groups of cities. Contrary to the results of previous studies, we find no effect of voter annexation on these indicators. Our results for the second question indicate that the characteristics of the voting process itself impact the outcome more than community characteristics, which also differs from the results of previous analyses. The third essay in this dissertation is an extension of the first essay, and focuses on the impact of Oregon's land use regulations on the protection of land in riparian corridors and land that has been designated for exclusive farm use (EFU). Riparian corridors are protected with the use of Oregon Goal 5, which focuses on development of natural resource lands inside of UGBs, while EFU land is protected with the use of Oregon Goal 3, which focuses on protection of agricultural land at the county level. The LCT dataset that was used in the first essay is also used in this essay. EFU land by definition has no probability of development in the initial period. Land located in riparian corridors may also face different initial levels of protection than other land. We deal with this endogeneity, and also account for location inside or outside of a UGB, with the use of the difference -in-difference-in-differences estimator. This is an approach that has not been used to explore the effect of Oregon's land use regulations on these land categories. Most of the past studies that have examined the impact of land use planning on development of agricultural land in Oregon have relied on analysis of general trends and indicators, and have concluded that land use regulations have been successful in protecting this land. Previous research on riparian zone protection has focused on protection of aquatic wildlife, and for the most part has not examined the protection of riparian corridors inside of UGBs. The limited studies that have studied the effect of these regulations in UGBs have determined them to be effective in slowing, but not stopping, development in these areas. Overall, we find that Oregon's land use regulations have been successful in protecting both county level agricultural land and riparian corridors located inside of UGBs from development. It is less clear whether these regulations have protected riparian corridors located inside of UGBs from other anthropogenic uses. Title: Three essays on the effectiveness of Oregon's land-use planning system : economic analysis with quasi-experimental methods Author: Dempsey, Judith Oregon's land use planning system is often recognized as having been successful in its goals of limiting urban sprawl and protecting resource lands from development. However, it is difficult to quantify the impact of these regulations, because we cannot observe what would have happened in the absence of land use planning. The three essays in this dissertation explore the effects of Oregon's land use planning regulations on development patterns in the state, and also examine how the land use regulations are administered at the local level. The first essay in this dissertation asks if Oregon’s land use regulations have successfully restricted sprawl outside of urban areas. Urban containment policies, including Urban Growth Boundaries (UGBs), are a common tool used by city planners to promote compact development. We analyze how well UGBs do in containing development using fine-scale GIS data on cities in Oregon. Earlier studies on UGBs yield mixed results, with some authors finding no effects of UGBs on housing market variables and urbanization rates and others finding significant effects. A challenge in measuring these effects is that the location of the UGB is unlikely to be an exogenous determinant of a land parcel's value for development. The panel structure of our dataset allows us to estimate the UGB's effect on the probability of development using a difference-in-difference estimator. This estimator controls for time-invariant unobservable variables and common temporal effects among parcels, thereby mitigating the potential for biased estimates due to the endogeneity of the UGB's location. We also pursue a novel approach to controlling for time-varying factors inspired by regression discontinuity design. We find that UGBs are effective in containing development in many of the Oregon cities we examine, although there are some cities in which development rates are the same inside and outside of the UGB. Our results show that we would greatly overstate the effects of the UGBs were we to evaluate cross-sectional differences in development rates, as is common in previous studies. Besides the creation of UGBs, another goal of Oregon's land use regulations is to encourage citizen involvement in the planning process. The second essay in this dissertation examines the use of voter annexation as a form of citizen involvement. More specifically, this paper addresses the following two questions. First, does voter annexation cause changes in city demographics and characteristics? Second, assuming that a city votes for amendments and annexations to the UGB and city limits, what factors impact the outcome of the vote? We analyze the first question using the method of propensity score matching, which has not previously been used to explore this topic. This allows us to account for the endogeneity that stems from the fact that cities with certain characteristics may be more likely to use voter annexation in the first place. The second question, which is only evaluated for cities that employ voter annexation, is analyzed with the use of the logit model. Oregon's land use regulations must be approved at the state level, but are administered locally. Therefore, unlike past studies, we are able to isolate specific differences in the way the program is administered, and are not evaluating the stringency of the program itself. Previous studies have found that voter-approved annexation causes developers to provide more public goods and increase the scale of development, thereby shifting community demographics. Once a land use decision is on the ballot, it is also noted that cities that are whiter, wealthier, and more liberal are more likely to pass referenda that promote preservation and restrict development. For the first question, we compare specific demographic indicators between the two groups of cities. Contrary to the results of previous studies, we find no effect of voter annexation on these indicators. Our results for the second question indicate that the characteristics of the voting process itself impact the outcome more than community characteristics, which also differs from the results of previous analyses. The third essay in this dissertation is an extension of the first essay, and focuses on the impact of Oregon's land use regulations on the protection of land in riparian corridors and land that has been designated for exclusive farm use (EFU). Riparian corridors are protected with the use of Oregon Goal 5, which focuses on development of natural resource lands inside of UGBs, while EFU land is protected with the use of Oregon Goal 3, which focuses on protection of agricultural land at the county level. The LCT dataset that was used in the first essay is also used in this essay. EFU land by definition has no probability of development in the initial period. Land located in riparian corridors may also face different initial levels of protection than other land. We deal with this endogeneity, and also account for location inside or outside of a UGB, with the use of the difference -in-difference-in-differences estimator. This is an approach that has not been used to explore the effect of Oregon's land use regulations on these land categories. Most of the past studies that have examined the impact of land use planning on development of agricultural land in Oregon have relied on analysis of general trends and indicators, and have concluded that land use regulations have been successful in protecting this land. Previous research on riparian zone protection has focused on protection of aquatic wildlife, and for the most part has not examined the protection of riparian corridors inside of UGBs. The limited studies that have studied the effect of these regulations in UGBs have determined them to be effective in slowing, but not stopping, development in these areas. Overall, we find that Oregon's land use regulations have been successful in protecting both county level agricultural land and riparian corridors located inside of UGBs from development. It is less clear whether these regulations have protected riparian corridors located inside of UGBs from other anthropogenic uses. Close

• 10. [Article] Determining relative benefits to communities from urban and agricultural land use change in Napa County, California

  Urban sprawl and the establishment of greenbelts to separate growing cities and towns has become a popular topic of conversation among land use professionals. Economists focus on urban growth in terms ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Determining relative benefits to communities from urban and agricultural land use change in Napa County, California Author: Bernard, Mark A. Urban sprawl and the establishment of greenbelts to separate growing cities and towns has become a popular topic of conversation among land use professionals. Economists focus on urban growth in terms of land rents and have sought market solutions such as transfers and purchases of development rights to slow this growth. Land use planners have offered alternative solutions in the form of conservation easements, land trusts and agricultural zoning restrictions. Few, if any, studies have taken a balance sheet approach to the preservation of greenbelts through strict market mechanisms. The value of fine wine has made the premium wine grape producing area of Napa County, California a good candidate for investigating how changes in agricultural and low density urban growth affect community income and expenses. The premium wine grape growing area of Napa County may offer a rare example of agricultural land rivaling urban land in value This study will demonstrate the fiscal viability of preserving wine grape production and related activities in Napa County through an analysis of urban and agricultural growth and revenue streams to communities resulting from changes in each land use. Scarce housing, rising land prices and economic growth, dynamics attributable to an influx of wealth driven by aesthetic beauty and cultural attributes, are manifestations of the popularity of Napa County and symbolize the challenges facing agricultural preservationists. Title: Determining relative benefits to communities from urban and agricultural land use change in Napa County, California Author: Bernard, Mark A. Urban sprawl and the establishment of greenbelts to separate growing cities and towns has become a popular topic of conversation among land use professionals. Economists focus on urban growth in terms of land rents and have sought market solutions such as transfers and purchases of development rights to slow this growth. Land use planners have offered alternative solutions in the form of conservation easements, land trusts and agricultural zoning restrictions. Few, if any, studies have taken a balance sheet approach to the preservation of greenbelts through strict market mechanisms. The value of fine wine has made the premium wine grape producing area of Napa County, California a good candidate for investigating how changes in agricultural and low density urban growth affect community income and expenses. The premium wine grape growing area of Napa County may offer a rare example of agricultural land rivaling urban land in value This study will demonstrate the fiscal viability of preserving wine grape production and related activities in Napa County through an analysis of urban and agricultural growth and revenue streams to communities resulting from changes in each land use. Scarce housing, rising land prices and economic growth, dynamics attributable to an influx of wealth driven by aesthetic beauty and cultural attributes, are manifestations of the popularity of Napa County and symbolize the challenges facing agricultural preservationists. Close

• 11. [Article] Albany Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-02-08)

  71 pp. Adopted 2010-02-08. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Albany Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-02-08) Author: Albany (Or.) Year: 2014, 2010 71 pp. Adopted 2010-02-08. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Albany Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-02-08) Author: Albany (Or.) Year: 2014, 2010 71 pp. Adopted 2010-02-08. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 12. [Article] Salem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-10-03)

  53 pp. Adopted 2011-10-03. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Salem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-10-03) Author: Salem Year: 2014, 2011 53 pp. Adopted 2011-10-03. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Salem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-10-03) Author: Salem Year: 2014, 2011 53 pp. Adopted 2011-10-03. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 13. [Article] Cottage Grove Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-11-17)

  9 pp. Adopted 2010-11-17. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Cottage Grove Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-11-17) Author: Cottage Grove Year: 2014, 2010 9 pp. Adopted 2010-11-17. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Cottage Grove Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-11-17) Author: Cottage Grove Year: 2014, 2010 9 pp. Adopted 2010-11-17. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 14. [Article] Happy Valley Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-12-27)

  47 pp. Adopted 2012-12-27. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Happy Valley Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-12-27) Author: Happy Valley Year: 2014, 2012 47 pp. Adopted 2012-12-27. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Happy Valley Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-12-27) Author: Happy Valley Year: 2014, 2012 47 pp. Adopted 2012-12-27. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 15. [Article] Durham Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-12-12)

  5 pp. Adopted 2007-12-12. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Durham Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-12-12) Author: Durham Year: 2014, 2007 5 pp. Adopted 2007-12-12. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Durham Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-12-12) Author: Durham Year: 2014, 2007 5 pp. Adopted 2007-12-12. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 16. [Article] Pay or Waive: An Economic Assessment of Property Owner Compensation Laws in the U. S.

  This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, following peer review. The published article is copyrighted by the ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Pay or Waive: An Economic Assessment of Property Owner Compensation Laws in the U. S. Author: Plantinga, Andrew J., Grout, Cyrus, Jaeger, William K. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, following peer review. The published article is copyrighted by the Author(s) and published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at: http://reep.oxfordjournals.org/content/8/1/103 Title: Pay or Waive: An Economic Assessment of Property Owner Compensation Laws in the U. S. Author: Plantinga, Andrew J., Grout, Cyrus, Jaeger, William K. This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Review of Environmental Economics and Policy, following peer review. The published article is copyrighted by the Author(s) and published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Association of Environmental and Resource Economists. The definitive publisher-authenticated version is available online at: http://reep.oxfordjournals.org/content/8/1/103 Close

• 17. [Article] A statistical analysis of Oregon's land-use ballot initiative

  This paper explores predictors of support for land-use ballot initiatives in Oregon. Possible predictors include a variety of socioeconomic, spatial, and political variables. Multiple least squares regressions ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: A statistical analysis of Oregon's land-use ballot initiative Author: Fuller, Justin This paper explores predictors of support for land-use ballot initiatives in Oregon. Possible predictors include a variety of socioeconomic, spatial, and political variables. Multiple least squares regressions find that aggregate levels of education within a county and the proportion of a county's workforce engaged in farming or forestry occupations appear to play a strong role in county-level land-use ballot initiative results. These effects of education and industry sector employment are consistent across multiple elections. Real per capita income and party identification appear to play a role in specific elections and are not consistent predictors. Analysis from initiatives in 1970, 1976, 1978, 1982, 2000, and 2004 from Oregon are used to draw these conclusions. Title: A statistical analysis of Oregon's land-use ballot initiative Author: Fuller, Justin This paper explores predictors of support for land-use ballot initiatives in Oregon. Possible predictors include a variety of socioeconomic, spatial, and political variables. Multiple least squares regressions find that aggregate levels of education within a county and the proportion of a county's workforce engaged in farming or forestry occupations appear to play a strong role in county-level land-use ballot initiative results. These effects of education and industry sector employment are consistent across multiple elections. Real per capita income and party identification appear to play a role in specific elections and are not consistent predictors. Analysis from initiatives in 1970, 1976, 1978, 1982, 2000, and 2004 from Oregon are used to draw these conclusions. Close

• 18. [Article] Roseburg Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-12-17)

  88 pp. Adopted 2009-12-17. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Roseburg Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-12-17) Author: Roseburg Year: 2014, 2009 88 pp. Adopted 2009-12-17. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Roseburg Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-12-17) Author: Roseburg Year: 2014, 2009 88 pp. Adopted 2009-12-17. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 19. [Article] Washington County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-06-22)

  1050 pp. Adopted 2006-06-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Washington County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-06-22) Author: Washington County Year: 2014, 2006 1050 pp. Adopted 2006-06-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Washington County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-06-22) Author: Washington County Year: 2014, 2006 1050 pp. Adopted 2006-06-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 20. [Article] Salem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-06-19)

  32 pp. Adopted 2012-06-19. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Salem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-06-19) Author: Salem Year: 2014, 2012 32 pp. Adopted 2012-06-19. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Salem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-06-19) Author: Salem Year: 2014, 2012 32 pp. Adopted 2012-06-19. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 21. [Article] Jackson County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-09-23)

  26 pp. Adopted 2010-09-23. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Jackson County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-09-23) Author: Jackson County Year: 2014, 2010 26 pp. Adopted 2010-09-23. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Jackson County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-09-23) Author: Jackson County Year: 2014, 2010 26 pp. Adopted 2010-09-23. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 22. [Article] Lane County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-09-08)

  17 pp. Adopted 2008-09-08. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Lane County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-09-08) Author: Lane County Year: 2014, 2008 17 pp. Adopted 2008-09-08. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Lane County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-09-08) Author: Lane County Year: 2014, 2008 17 pp. Adopted 2008-09-08. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 23. [Article] Wasco County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-12-12)

  46 pp. Adopted 2006-12-12. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Wasco County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-12-12) Author: Wasco County Year: 2014, 2006 46 pp. Adopted 2006-12-12. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Wasco County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-12-12) Author: Wasco County Year: 2014, 2006 46 pp. Adopted 2006-12-12. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 24. [Article] Nehalem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-07-12)

  11 pp. Adopted 2010-07-12. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Nehalem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-07-12) Author: Nehalem Year: 2014, 2010 11 pp. Adopted 2010-07-12. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Nehalem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-07-12) Author: Nehalem Year: 2014, 2010 11 pp. Adopted 2010-07-12. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 25. [Article] Millersburg Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-11-20)

  192 pp. Adopted 2006-11-20. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Millersburg Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-11-20) Author: Millersburg Year: 2014, 2006 192 pp. Adopted 2006-11-20. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Millersburg Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-11-20) Author: Millersburg Year: 2014, 2006 192 pp. Adopted 2006-11-20. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 26. [Article] Lebanon Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-10-06)

  36 pp. Adopted 2008-10-06. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Lebanon Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-10-06) Author: Lebanon Year: 2014, 2008 36 pp. Adopted 2008-10-06. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Lebanon Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-10-06) Author: Lebanon Year: 2014, 2008 36 pp. Adopted 2008-10-06. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 27. [Article] Portland Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-06-04)

  24 pp. Adopted 2012-06-04. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Portland Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-06-04) Author: Portland Year: 2014, 2012 24 pp. Adopted 2012-06-04. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Portland Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-06-04) Author: Portland Year: 2014, 2012 24 pp. Adopted 2012-06-04. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 28. [Article] Dunes City Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-12-22)

  174 pp. Adopted 2006-12-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Dunes City Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-12-22) Author: Dunes City Year: 2014, 2006 174 pp. Adopted 2006-12-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Dunes City Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-12-22) Author: Dunes City Year: 2014, 2006 174 pp. Adopted 2006-12-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 29. [Article] Hermiston Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-07-02)

  12 pp. Adopted 2007-07-02. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Hermiston Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-07-02) Author: Hermiston Year: 2014, 2007 12 pp. Adopted 2007-07-02. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Hermiston Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-07-02) Author: Hermiston Year: 2014, 2007 12 pp. Adopted 2007-07-02. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 30. [Article] Durham Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-07-24)

  162 pp. Adopted 2009-07-24. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Durham Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-07-24) Author: Durham Year: 2014, 2009 162 pp. Adopted 2009-07-24. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Durham Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-07-24) Author: Durham Year: 2014, 2009 162 pp. Adopted 2009-07-24. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 31. [Article] Keizer Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-04-16)

  16 pp. Adopted 2012-04-16. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Keizer Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-04-16) Author: Keizer Year: 2014, 2012 16 pp. Adopted 2012-04-16. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Keizer Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-04-16) Author: Keizer Year: 2014, 2012 16 pp. Adopted 2012-04-16. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 32. [Article] Stayton Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-04-29)

  10 pp. Adopted 2009-04-29. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Stayton Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-04-29) Author: Stayton Year: 2014, 2009 10 pp. Adopted 2009-04-29. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Stayton Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-04-29) Author: Stayton Year: 2014, 2009 10 pp. Adopted 2009-04-29. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 33. [Article] Roseburg Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-07-28)

  29 pp. Adopted 2010-07-28. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Roseburg Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-07-28) Author: Roseburg Year: 2014, 2010 29 pp. Adopted 2010-07-28. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Roseburg Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-07-28) Author: Roseburg Year: 2014, 2010 29 pp. Adopted 2010-07-28. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 34. [Article] Bend Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-06-15)

  62 pp. Adopted 2009-06-15. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Bend Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-06-15) Author: Bend Year: 2014, 2009 62 pp. Adopted 2009-06-15. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Bend Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-06-15) Author: Bend Year: 2014, 2009 62 pp. Adopted 2009-06-15. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 35. [Article] Durham Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-12-10)

  56 pp. Adopted 2007-12-10. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Durham Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-12-10) Author: Durham Year: 2014, 2007 56 pp. Adopted 2007-12-10. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Durham Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-12-10) Author: Durham Year: 2014, 2007 56 pp. Adopted 2007-12-10. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 36. [Article] Eugene-Springfield Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-03-15)

  26 pp. Adopted 2010-03-15. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Eugene-Springfield Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-03-15) Author: Eugene-Springfield Year: 2014, 2010 26 pp. Adopted 2010-03-15. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Eugene-Springfield Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-03-15) Author: Eugene-Springfield Year: 2014, 2010 26 pp. Adopted 2010-03-15. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 37. [Article] Milwaukie Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-03-21)

  396 pp. Adopted 2011-03-21. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Milwaukie Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-03-21) Author: Milwaukie Year: 2014, 2011 396 pp. Adopted 2011-03-21. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Milwaukie Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-03-21) Author: Milwaukie Year: 2014, 2011 396 pp. Adopted 2011-03-21. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 38. [Article] Roseburg Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-02-14)

  73 pp. Adopted 2008-02-14. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Roseburg Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-02-14) Author: Roseburg Year: 2014, 2008 73 pp. Adopted 2008-02-14. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Roseburg Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-02-14) Author: Roseburg Year: 2014, 2008 73 pp. Adopted 2008-02-14. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 39. [Article] Portland Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-12-21)

  24 pp. Adopted 2006-12-21. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Portland Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-12-21) Author: Portland Year: 2014, 2006 24 pp. Adopted 2006-12-21. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Portland Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-12-21) Author: Portland Year: 2014, 2006 24 pp. Adopted 2006-12-21. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 40. [Article] Washington County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-10-30)

  31 pp. Adopted 2006-10-30. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Washington County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-10-30) Author: Washington County Year: 2014, 2006 31 pp. Adopted 2006-10-30. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Washington County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-10-30) Author: Washington County Year: 2014, 2006 31 pp. Adopted 2006-10-30. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 41. [Article] Benton County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-06-09)

  27 pp. Adopted 2010-06-09. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Benton County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-06-09) Author: Benton County Year: 2014, 2010 27 pp. Adopted 2010-06-09. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Benton County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-06-09) Author: Benton County Year: 2014, 2010 27 pp. Adopted 2010-06-09. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 42. [Article] Salem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-08-22)

  15 pp. Adopted 2008-08-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Salem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-08-22) Author: Salem Year: 2014, 2008 15 pp. Adopted 2008-08-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Salem Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-08-22) Author: Salem Year: 2014, 2008 15 pp. Adopted 2008-08-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 43. [Article] Turner Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-01-03)

  8 pp. Adopted 2012-01-03. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Turner Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-01-03) Author: Turner Year: 2014, 2012 8 pp. Adopted 2012-01-03. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Turner Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-01-03) Author: Turner Year: 2014, 2012 8 pp. Adopted 2012-01-03. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 44. [Article] Washington County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-06-05)

  29 pp. Adopted 2009-06-05. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Washington County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-06-05) Author: Washington County Year: 2014, 2009 29 pp. Adopted 2009-06-05. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Washington County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-06-05) Author: Washington County Year: 2014, 2009 29 pp. Adopted 2009-06-05. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 45. [Article] Lane County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-03-19)

  26 pp. Adopted 2012-03-19. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Lane County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-03-19) Author: Lane County Year: 2014, 2012 26 pp. Adopted 2012-03-19. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Lane County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2012-03-19) Author: Lane County Year: 2014, 2012 26 pp. Adopted 2012-03-19. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 46. [Article] Washington County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-09-19)

  36 pp. Adopted 2008-09-19. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Washington County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-09-19) Author: Washington County Year: 2014, 2008 36 pp. Adopted 2008-09-19. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Washington County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-09-19) Author: Washington County Year: 2014, 2008 36 pp. Adopted 2008-09-19. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 47. [Article] Jackson County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-07-22)

  20 pp. Adopted 2009-07-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Jackson County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-07-22) Author: Jackson County Year: 2014, 2009 20 pp. Adopted 2009-07-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Jackson County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-07-22) Author: Jackson County Year: 2014, 2009 20 pp. Adopted 2009-07-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 48. [Article] Jefferson County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-11-02)

  52 pp. Adopted 2011-11-02. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Jefferson County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-11-02) Author: Jefferson County Year: 2014, 2011 52 pp. Adopted 2011-11-02. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Jefferson County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-11-02) Author: Jefferson County Year: 2014, 2011 52 pp. Adopted 2011-11-02. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 49. [Article] Astoria Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-07-12)

  220 pp. Adopted 2011-07-12. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Astoria Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-07-12) Author: Astoria Year: 2014, 2011 220 pp. Adopted 2011-07-12. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Astoria Notice of Adopted Amendment (2011-07-12) Author: Astoria Year: 2014, 2011 220 pp. Adopted 2011-07-12. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 50. [Article] Veneta Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-02-22)

  220 pp. Adopted 2007-02-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Veneta Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-02-22) Author: Veneta Year: 2014, 2007 220 pp. Adopted 2007-02-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Veneta Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-02-22) Author: Veneta Year: 2014, 2007 220 pp. Adopted 2007-02-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close