Search

Search Results

• 1. [Article] Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-10-26)

  15 pp. Adopted 2007-10-26. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-10-26) Author: Yamhill County Year: 2014, 2007 15 pp. Adopted 2007-10-26. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2007-10-26) Author: Yamhill County Year: 2014, 2007 15 pp. Adopted 2007-10-26. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 2. [Article] Radical Conservation and the Politics of Planning: A Historical Study, 1917-1945

  This thesis is a historical, sociological case-study of the movement for public control and land-use planning prior to WWII. The impetus for this movement came from a radicalized faction of the forestry ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Radical Conservation and the Politics of Planning: A Historical Study, 1917-1945 Author: Jameson, Cade Year: 2017 This thesis is a historical, sociological case-study of the movement for public control and land-use planning prior to WWII. The impetus for this movement came from a radicalized faction of the forestry profession. Radicalism in forestry centered around a group of professional foresters who were followers of Gifford Pinchot, the nation's Chief Forester from 1898-1910. Pinchot commenced the movement for public control over cutting on private forestlands in in the nineteen-teens. The emphasis in this case-study is on identifying social factors responsible for giving impetus to a movement for collective environmental planning, and the social and environmental possibilities of this subject. Three specific areas are studied: first radicalism in the forestry profession; second the vision of sustainability that emerged from radical forestry; and finally the relationship between the radical foresters and organized currents of the political Left. Findings: The understanding of the scientific conservation and land-use planning movement that has developed in scholarly literature does not provide an accurate characterization of this movement. The neglected vision of sustainability through public ownership and planning associated with radical forestry might be reconsidered in light of the present environmental problems. Despite the fact there was a radical presence in the forestry profession, norms of professional behavior are significant obstacles to radicalization, hence why Pinchotist conservation is anomalous in environmental history. Even though leading personalities in forestry took up the cause of public control, the institutional environmental movement remained aloof, giving indication that there are barriers to the development of an organized movement for environmental planning. Various radical political currents, however, demonstrated signs of receptivity to the scientific conservation movement. Title: Radical Conservation and the Politics of Planning: A Historical Study, 1917-1945 Author: Jameson, Cade Year: 2017 This thesis is a historical, sociological case-study of the movement for public control and land-use planning prior to WWII. The impetus for this movement came from a radicalized faction of the forestry profession. Radicalism in forestry centered around a group of professional foresters who were followers of Gifford Pinchot, the nation's Chief Forester from 1898-1910. Pinchot commenced the movement for public control over cutting on private forestlands in in the nineteen-teens. The emphasis in this case-study is on identifying social factors responsible for giving impetus to a movement for collective environmental planning, and the social and environmental possibilities of this subject. Three specific areas are studied: first radicalism in the forestry profession; second the vision of sustainability that emerged from radical forestry; and finally the relationship between the radical foresters and organized currents of the political Left. Findings: The understanding of the scientific conservation and land-use planning movement that has developed in scholarly literature does not provide an accurate characterization of this movement. The neglected vision of sustainability through public ownership and planning associated with radical forestry might be reconsidered in light of the present environmental problems. Despite the fact there was a radical presence in the forestry profession, norms of professional behavior are significant obstacles to radicalization, hence why Pinchotist conservation is anomalous in environmental history. Even though leading personalities in forestry took up the cause of public control, the institutional environmental movement remained aloof, giving indication that there are barriers to the development of an organized movement for environmental planning. Various radical political currents, however, demonstrated signs of receptivity to the scientific conservation movement. Close

• 3. [Article] Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-12-22)

  67 pp. Adopted 2006-12-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-12-22) Author: Yamhill County Year: 2014, 2006 67 pp. Adopted 2006-12-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-12-22) Author: Yamhill County Year: 2014, 2006 67 pp. Adopted 2006-12-22. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 4. [Article] Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-11-16)

  13 pp. Adopted 2006-11-16. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-11-16) Author: Yamhill County Year: 2014, 2006 13 pp. Adopted 2006-11-16. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2006-11-16) Author: Yamhill County Year: 2014, 2006 13 pp. Adopted 2006-11-16. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 5. [Article] Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-08-25)

  13 pp. Adopted 2008-08-25. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-08-25) Author: Yamhill County Year: 2014, 2008 13 pp. Adopted 2008-08-25. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2008-08-25) Author: Yamhill County Year: 2014, 2008 13 pp. Adopted 2008-08-25. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 6. [Article] Stewarding forests and communities : the final report of the Dry Forest Zone Project

  52 pages

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Stewarding forests and communities : the final report of the Dry Forest Zone Project Author: Davis, Emily Jane Year: 2015, 2014 52 pages Title: Stewarding forests and communities : the final report of the Dry Forest Zone Project Author: Davis, Emily Jane Year: 2015, 2014 52 pages Close

• 7. [Article] Klamath County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-03-06)

  7 pp. Adopted 2009-03-06. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Klamath County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-03-06) Author: Klamath County Year: 2014, 2009 7 pp. Adopted 2009-03-06. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Klamath County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2009-03-06) Author: Klamath County Year: 2014, 2009 7 pp. Adopted 2009-03-06. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 8. [Article] Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-07-28)

  10 pp. Adopted 2010-07-28. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-07-28) Author: Yamhill County Year: 2014, 2010 10 pp. Adopted 2010-07-28. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Title: Yamhill County Notice of Adopted Amendment (2010-07-28) Author: Yamhill County Year: 2014, 2010 10 pp. Adopted 2010-07-28. Department of Land Conservation and Development Notice of Adopted Amendment Close

• 9. [Article] Landowner perceptions of potential changes to riparian rules under the Forest Practices Act in Oregon

  24 pages

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Landowner perceptions of potential changes to riparian rules under the Forest Practices Act in Oregon Author: Rosenberg, Stacy, Moseley, Cassandra Year: 2017, 2016 24 pages Title: Landowner perceptions of potential changes to riparian rules under the Forest Practices Act in Oregon Author: Rosenberg, Stacy, Moseley, Cassandra Year: 2017, 2016 24 pages Close

• 10. [Article] A midterm report on the state of the Dry Forest Zone and its communities

  2 pages

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: A midterm report on the state of the Dry Forest Zone and its communities Author: Davis, Emily Jane Year: 2015, 2012 2 pages Title: A midterm report on the state of the Dry Forest Zone and its communities Author: Davis, Emily Jane Year: 2015, 2012 2 pages Close