Search

Search Results

• 1. [Article] Sensitivity of Columbia Basin Runoff to Long-Term Changes in Multi-Model CMIP5 Precipitation Simulations

  In this study, we used precipitation elasticity index of streamflow, to reflect on the sensitivity of streamflow to changes in future precipitation. We estimated precipitation elasticity of streamflow ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Sensitivity of Columbia Basin Runoff to Long-Term Changes in Multi-Model CMIP5 Precipitation Simulations Author: Demirel, Mehmet, Moradkhani, Hamid Year: 2014 In this study, we used precipitation elasticity index of streamflow, to reflect on the sensitivity of streamflow to changes in future precipitation. We estimated precipitation elasticity of streamflow from: (1) simulated streamflow by the VIC model using observed precipitation for the current climate (1963–2003); (2) simulated streamflow by the VIC model using simulated precipitation from 10 GCM - CMIP5 dataset for the future climate (2010–2099) including two different pathways (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) and two different downscaled products (BCSD and MACA). The hydrological model was calibrated at 1/16 latitude-longitude resolution and the simulated streamflow was routed to the subbasin outlets of interest i.e. Hungry Horse subbasin. We used hydrological model simulations from 19063-2003 and calculated streamflow sensitivities and precipitation elasticity for the same period using observed climate (case 1) and simulated climate (case 2). The runoff sensitivity to long-term (e.g., 30-year) average annual changes in precipitation is calculated based on the elasticity of streamflow for three different 30 year blocks (2010-40, 2040-70 and 2070-99), which are of importance to reservoir management in the Columbia River basin. These two cases and different periods are compared to assess the effects of forcing by different climate models and different pathways on the precipitation elasticity of streamflow. Title: Sensitivity of Columbia Basin Runoff to Long-Term Changes in Multi-Model CMIP5 Precipitation Simulations Author: Demirel, Mehmet, Moradkhani, Hamid Year: 2014 In this study, we used precipitation elasticity index of streamflow, to reflect on the sensitivity of streamflow to changes in future precipitation. We estimated precipitation elasticity of streamflow from: (1) simulated streamflow by the VIC model using observed precipitation for the current climate (1963–2003); (2) simulated streamflow by the VIC model using simulated precipitation from 10 GCM - CMIP5 dataset for the future climate (2010–2099) including two different pathways (RCP4.5 and RCP8.5) and two different downscaled products (BCSD and MACA). The hydrological model was calibrated at 1/16 latitude-longitude resolution and the simulated streamflow was routed to the subbasin outlets of interest i.e. Hungry Horse subbasin. We used hydrological model simulations from 19063-2003 and calculated streamflow sensitivities and precipitation elasticity for the same period using observed climate (case 1) and simulated climate (case 2). The runoff sensitivity to long-term (e.g., 30-year) average annual changes in precipitation is calculated based on the elasticity of streamflow for three different 30 year blocks (2010-40, 2040-70 and 2070-99), which are of importance to reservoir management in the Columbia River basin. These two cases and different periods are compared to assess the effects of forcing by different climate models and different pathways on the precipitation elasticity of streamflow. Close

• 2. [Article] The Effect of Multi-Model Averaging of Climate Model Outputs on the Seasonality of Rainfall Over the Columbia River Basin

  The rainfall seasonality index is the measure of precipitation distribution throughout the seasonal cycle. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of different multi-model averaging methods on the ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: The Effect of Multi-Model Averaging of Climate Model Outputs on the Seasonality of Rainfall Over the Columbia River Basin Author: Demirel, Mehmet, Rana, Arun, Moradkhani, Hamid Year: 2014 The rainfall seasonality index is the measure of precipitation distribution throughout the seasonal cycle. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of different multi-model averaging methods on the rainfall seasonality index at each 1/16 latitude-longitude cells covering the Columbia River Basin. In accordance with the same, ten different climate model outputs are selected from 45 available climate models from CMIP5 dataset. The reanalysis precipitation data is used to estimate the errors in rainfall seasonality for the climate model outputs. The inverse variance method and statistical multi criteria analysis (SMCA) method were used to estimate the weights for each climate model output. The precipitation amounts from the climate model outputs were then averaged using these model weights. The rainfall seasonality index was estimated from: (1) observed reanalysis data; (2) averaged precipitation amount from ten combinations of CMIP5 outputs for the current climate (1979–2005) using inverse variance method; (3) averaged precipitation amount from the ten combinations of CMIP5 outputs for the current climate using SMCA. The results showed the large differences in rainfall seasonality index for each climate model averaging. Moreover, the multi-modelling of climate models resulted in relative improvements in the performance of the rainfall seasonality over the Columbia River Basin. The estimated model weights for the current climate can be useful to combine the model outputs for the future climate. Title: The Effect of Multi-Model Averaging of Climate Model Outputs on the Seasonality of Rainfall Over the Columbia River Basin Author: Demirel, Mehmet, Rana, Arun, Moradkhani, Hamid Year: 2014 The rainfall seasonality index is the measure of precipitation distribution throughout the seasonal cycle. The aim of this study is to compare the effect of different multi-model averaging methods on the rainfall seasonality index at each 1/16 latitude-longitude cells covering the Columbia River Basin. In accordance with the same, ten different climate model outputs are selected from 45 available climate models from CMIP5 dataset. The reanalysis precipitation data is used to estimate the errors in rainfall seasonality for the climate model outputs. The inverse variance method and statistical multi criteria analysis (SMCA) method were used to estimate the weights for each climate model output. The precipitation amounts from the climate model outputs were then averaged using these model weights. The rainfall seasonality index was estimated from: (1) observed reanalysis data; (2) averaged precipitation amount from ten combinations of CMIP5 outputs for the current climate (1979–2005) using inverse variance method; (3) averaged precipitation amount from the ten combinations of CMIP5 outputs for the current climate using SMCA. The results showed the large differences in rainfall seasonality index for each climate model averaging. Moreover, the multi-modelling of climate models resulted in relative improvements in the performance of the rainfall seasonality over the Columbia River Basin. The estimated model weights for the current climate can be useful to combine the model outputs for the future climate. Close

• 3. [Article] Daily Discharge Forecasting Using Least Square Support Vector Regression and Regression Tree

  Prediction of river flow is one of the main issues in the field of water resources management. Because of the complexity of the rainfall-runoff process, data-driven methods have gained increased importance. ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Daily Discharge Forecasting Using Least Square Support Vector Regression and Regression Tree Author: Sahraei, Shahram, Andalani, Saeed Zare, Zakermoshfegh, Mohammad, Sisakht, Babak Nikeghbal, Talebbeydokhti, Nasser, Moradkhani, Hamid Year: 2015 Prediction of river flow is one of the main issues in the field of water resources management. Because of the complexity of the rainfall-runoff process, data-driven methods have gained increased importance. In the current study, two newly developed models called Least Square Support Vector Regression (LSSVR) and Regression Tree (RT) are used. The LSSVR model is based on the constrained optimization method and applies structural risk minimization in order to yield a general optimized result. Also in the RT, data movement is based on laws discovered in the tree. Both models have been applied to the data in the Kashkan watershed. Variables include (a) recorded precipitation values in the Kashkan watershed stations, and (b) outlet discharge values of one and two previous days. Present discharge is considered as output of the two models. Following that, a sensitivity analysis has been carried out on the input features and less important features has been diminished so that both models have provided better prediction on the data. The final results of both models have been compared. It was found that the LSSVR model has better performance. Finally, the results present these models as a suitable models in river flow forecasting. Title: Daily Discharge Forecasting Using Least Square Support Vector Regression and Regression Tree Author: Sahraei, Shahram, Andalani, Saeed Zare, Zakermoshfegh, Mohammad, Sisakht, Babak Nikeghbal, Talebbeydokhti, Nasser, Moradkhani, Hamid Year: 2015 Prediction of river flow is one of the main issues in the field of water resources management. Because of the complexity of the rainfall-runoff process, data-driven methods have gained increased importance. In the current study, two newly developed models called Least Square Support Vector Regression (LSSVR) and Regression Tree (RT) are used. The LSSVR model is based on the constrained optimization method and applies structural risk minimization in order to yield a general optimized result. Also in the RT, data movement is based on laws discovered in the tree. Both models have been applied to the data in the Kashkan watershed. Variables include (a) recorded precipitation values in the Kashkan watershed stations, and (b) outlet discharge values of one and two previous days. Present discharge is considered as output of the two models. Following that, a sensitivity analysis has been carried out on the input features and less important features has been diminished so that both models have provided better prediction on the data. The final results of both models have been compared. It was found that the LSSVR model has better performance. Finally, the results present these models as a suitable models in river flow forecasting. Close