Search

Search Results

• 861. [Article] CRTCP - Monitoring of Downstream Fish Passage at Cougar Dam in the South Fork McKenzie River, Oregon 1998-00

  Abstract -- In 1993, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) began placing adult chinook salmon that were excess to hatchery operations at McKenzie and Willamette Hatchery above Cougar Dam in an ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CRTCP - Monitoring of Downstream Fish Passage at Cougar Dam in the South Fork McKenzie River, Oregon 1998-00 Abstract -- In 1993, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) began placing adult chinook salmon that were excess to hatchery operations at McKenzie and Willamette Hatchery above Cougar Dam in an attempt to restore some of the biological contributions salmon made to the ecology of the South Fork McKenzie River prior to Cougar Dam construction (Table 1). Contributions included increased nutrient input to the ecosystem and an additional food source for predators, including bull trout. In addition, the progeny of these adult salmon provided a landlocked chinook fishery in the reservoir and ODFW was able to discontinue annual releases of juvenile salmon reared in ODFW hatcheries (1996). ODFW assumed most of the salmon attempting to leave the reservoir would be killed by various means upon passage through the turbines or regulating outlet. Between 1994-97, ODFW field observations provided circumstantial evidence that some juvenile chinook were surviving passage through the dam. In 1998, we began monitoring juvenile chinook migration out of the reservoir to determine the number, size, age, and mortality rate of fish passing through the turbines and regulating outlet of Cougar Dam. Title: CRTCP - Monitoring of Downstream Fish Passage at Cougar Dam in the South Fork McKenzie River, Oregon 1998-00 Abstract -- In 1993, Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife (ODFW) began placing adult chinook salmon that were excess to hatchery operations at McKenzie and Willamette Hatchery above Cougar Dam in an attempt to restore some of the biological contributions salmon made to the ecology of the South Fork McKenzie River prior to Cougar Dam construction (Table 1). Contributions included increased nutrient input to the ecosystem and an additional food source for predators, including bull trout. In addition, the progeny of these adult salmon provided a landlocked chinook fishery in the reservoir and ODFW was able to discontinue annual releases of juvenile salmon reared in ODFW hatcheries (1996). ODFW assumed most of the salmon attempting to leave the reservoir would be killed by various means upon passage through the turbines or regulating outlet. Between 1994-97, ODFW field observations provided circumstantial evidence that some juvenile chinook were surviving passage through the dam. In 1998, we began monitoring juvenile chinook migration out of the reservoir to determine the number, size, age, and mortality rate of fish passing through the turbines and regulating outlet of Cougar Dam. Close

• 862. [Image] Environmental assessment for the proposed special regulations designating snowmobile routes in Crater Lake National Park, Oregon

  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Environmental assessment for the proposed special regulations designating snowmobile routes in Crater Lake National Park, Oregon Author: Rutter, John A. Year: 1975, 2010 Title: Environmental assessment for the proposed special regulations designating snowmobile routes in Crater Lake National Park, Oregon Author: Rutter, John A. Year: 1975, 2010 Close

• 863. [Image] State Government Workshop on Barriers and Incentives of Geothermal Energy Resources. Quarterly Report, January 15-April 30, 1978

  	The Geothermal Policy Project activities are discussed in the areas of selection of project states, development of project materials, and establishing contacts. Potential problem areas are identified and ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: State Government Workshop on Barriers and Incentives of Geothermal Energy Resources. Quarterly Report, January 15-April 30, 1978 Author: Harris, R.C. Year: 1978 The Geothermal Policy Project activities are discussed in the areas of selection of project states, development of project materials, and establishing contacts. Potential problem areas are identified and future plans are discussed including an assessment of prospects for future progress. (MHR) Title: State Government Workshop on Barriers and Incentives of Geothermal Energy Resources. Quarterly Report, January 15-April 30, 1978 Author: Harris, R.C. Year: 1978 The Geothermal Policy Project activities are discussed in the areas of selection of project states, development of project materials, and establishing contacts. Potential problem areas are identified and future plans are discussed including an assessment of prospects for future progress. (MHR) Close

• 864. [Image] Geothermal Resource Assessment, Kern River Canyon and Lake Isabella Area, Northeastern Kern County, California

  	A preliminary investigation was performed in northeastern Kern County in order to assess the low temperature geothermal resources. The objective was to develop an accurate inventory of the low temperature ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Geothermal Resource Assessment, Kern River Canyon and Lake Isabella Area, Northeastern Kern County, California Author: International Engineering Company, Incorporated Year: 1984 A preliminary investigation was performed in northeastern Kern County in order to assess the low temperature geothermal resources. The objective was to develop an accurate inventory of the low temperature resources and to identify alternatives for the direct use of these resources. Emphasis was placed on six areas exhibiting thermal manifestations in the Lake Isabella area and Kern River Canyon. Other reports in this study will identify applications and examine legislative, social, economic, technical and environmental barriers to the development of these resources. This report addresses Task 1 and includes: identification of the areas, preliminary analyses of each resource, interviews with resource owners, an update on information of the springs and a preliminary evaluation of the exploitation potential Title: Geothermal Resource Assessment, Kern River Canyon and Lake Isabella Area, Northeastern Kern County, California Author: International Engineering Company, Incorporated Year: 1984 A preliminary investigation was performed in northeastern Kern County in order to assess the low temperature geothermal resources. The objective was to develop an accurate inventory of the low temperature resources and to identify alternatives for the direct use of these resources. Emphasis was placed on six areas exhibiting thermal manifestations in the Lake Isabella area and Kern River Canyon. Other reports in this study will identify applications and examine legislative, social, economic, technical and environmental barriers to the development of these resources. This report addresses Task 1 and includes: identification of the areas, preliminary analyses of each resource, interviews with resource owners, an update on information of the springs and a preliminary evaluation of the exploitation potential Close

• 865. [Image] Geothermal Progress Monitor. Progress Report No. 1

  	Progress is reported on the following: electrical uses, direct-heat uses, drilling activities, leases, geothermal loan guarantee program, general activities, and legal, institutional, and regulatory activities ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Geothermal Progress Monitor. Progress Report No. 1 Author: Assistant Secretary for Resource Applications, Division of Geothermal Resource Management Year: 1979 Progress is reported on the following: electrical uses, direct-heat uses, drilling activities, leases, geothermal loan guarantee program, general activities, and legal, institutional, and regulatory activities (MHR) Title: Geothermal Progress Monitor. Progress Report No. 1 Author: Assistant Secretary for Resource Applications, Division of Geothermal Resource Management Year: 1979 Progress is reported on the following: electrical uses, direct-heat uses, drilling activities, leases, geothermal loan guarantee program, general activities, and legal, institutional, and regulatory activities (MHR) Close

• 866. [Image] Geothermal Progress Monitor Report No. 5. Progress Report, June 1981

  	Updated information is presented on activities and progress in the areas of electric power plants, direct heat applications, deep well drilling, leasing of federal lands, legislative and regulatory actions, ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Geothermal Progress Monitor Report No. 5. Progress Report, June 1981 Author: Assistant Secretary for Conservation and Renewable Energy, Division of Geothermal Energy Year: 1981 Updated information is presented on activities and progress in the areas of electric power plants, direct heat applications, deep well drilling, leasing of federal lands, legislative and regulatory actions, research and development, and others. Special attention is given in this report to 1980 highlights, particularly in the areas of electric and direct heat uses, drilling, and the Federal lands leasing program. This report also includes a summary of the DOE FY 1982 geothermal budget request to Congress Title: Geothermal Progress Monitor Report No. 5. Progress Report, June 1981 Author: Assistant Secretary for Conservation and Renewable Energy, Division of Geothermal Energy Year: 1981 Updated information is presented on activities and progress in the areas of electric power plants, direct heat applications, deep well drilling, leasing of federal lands, legislative and regulatory actions, research and development, and others. Special attention is given in this report to 1980 highlights, particularly in the areas of electric and direct heat uses, drilling, and the Federal lands leasing program. This report also includes a summary of the DOE FY 1982 geothermal budget request to Congress Close

• 867. [Article] Vector Control - Wildlife Areas and Refuges

  Abstract -- The Wildlife Areas and Refuges dataset represents one type of “sensitive area” for the purpose of reviewing and approving Pesticide Use Plans per ODFW's obligations under ORS 452.140 and ORS ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Vector Control - Wildlife Areas and Refuges Abstract -- The Wildlife Areas and Refuges dataset represents one type of “sensitive area” for the purpose of reviewing and approving Pesticide Use Plans per ODFW's obligations under ORS 452.140 and ORS 452.245. ODFW will only make recommendations for mosquito control treatment protocols on sensitive areas, as identified in the ODFW Vector Control Guidance for Sensitive Areas document or confirmed by the local fish and wildlife biologists utilizing the guidelines in the document. In general, a sensitive area is any area where fish and wildlife and their habitats are rare or of local importance due to their special nature or role in the ecosystem. Species-specific and location-specific details are not maintained in this dataset. Title: Vector Control - Wildlife Areas and Refuges Abstract -- The Wildlife Areas and Refuges dataset represents one type of “sensitive area” for the purpose of reviewing and approving Pesticide Use Plans per ODFW's obligations under ORS 452.140 and ORS 452.245. ODFW will only make recommendations for mosquito control treatment protocols on sensitive areas, as identified in the ODFW Vector Control Guidance for Sensitive Areas document or confirmed by the local fish and wildlife biologists utilizing the guidelines in the document. In general, a sensitive area is any area where fish and wildlife and their habitats are rare or of local importance due to their special nature or role in the ecosystem. Species-specific and location-specific details are not maintained in this dataset. Close

• 868. [Image] Klamath River - Upstream face of Keno Regulation Dam from right bank

  	P12-200-2778A Klamath River - Klamath Project--Oregon. Note old timber construction and timber needles stacked on deck; January 26, 1965; Bureau of Reclamation photo by C. D. Lawrence
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Klamath River - Upstream face of Keno Regulation Dam from right bank Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Lawrence, C.D. Year: 1965, 2008, 2006 P12-200-2778A Klamath River - Klamath Project--Oregon. Note old timber construction and timber needles stacked on deck; January 26, 1965; Bureau of Reclamation photo by C. D. Lawrence Title: Klamath River - Upstream face of Keno Regulation Dam from right bank Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Lawrence, C.D. Year: 1965, 2008, 2006 P12-200-2778A Klamath River - Klamath Project--Oregon. Note old timber construction and timber needles stacked on deck; January 26, 1965; Bureau of Reclamation photo by C. D. Lawrence Close

• 869. [Image] CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED

  	KP-2329-R2 - Klamath Project--CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Intermediate level on watershed during snowmelt period. Note numerous depressions tending to hold and regulate runoff; March 23, 1956; Photo by C. D. ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Lawrence, C.D. Year: 1956, 2007, 2006 KP-2329-R2 - Klamath Project--CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Intermediate level on watershed during snowmelt period. Note numerous depressions tending to hold and regulate runoff; March 23, 1956; Photo by C. D. Lawrence Title: CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Lawrence, C.D. Year: 1956, 2007, 2006 KP-2329-R2 - Klamath Project--CLEAR LAKE WATERSHED. Intermediate level on watershed during snowmelt period. Note numerous depressions tending to hold and regulate runoff; March 23, 1956; Photo by C. D. Lawrence Close

• 870. [Image] KLAMATH RIVER

  	KP-2460-R2 - Klamath Project - KLAMATH RIVER. View looking east to Keno regulating dam in foreground and town of Keno in background; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: KLAMATH RIVER Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2460-R2 - Klamath Project - KLAMATH RIVER. View looking east to Keno regulating dam in foreground and town of Keno in background; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene Title: KLAMATH RIVER Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Greene, K.J. Year: 1958, 2008, 2006 KP-2460-R2 - Klamath Project - KLAMATH RIVER. View looking east to Keno regulating dam in foreground and town of Keno in background; February 21, 1958; Photo by K. J. Greene Close