Search

Search Results

• 28261. [Image] Reunion - Driver Family - 1914

  	Reunion - Driver Family - 1914 Reunion about 1914 at the Brenton Driver place at Wamic. Front Row L to R: Hazel Johnson, Lenore Woodcock, Lucille Kennedy, Harold Johnson, Erma Driver, Alma Driver and Carmel ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Reunion - Driver Family - 1914 Year: 1914 Reunion - Driver Family - 1914 Reunion about 1914 at the Brenton Driver place at Wamic. Front Row L to R: Hazel Johnson, Lenore Woodcock, Lucille Kennedy, Harold Johnson, Erma Driver, Alma Driver and Carmel Woodcock. 2nd Row L to R: Frank Driver, Issac Driver, Henry Driver, (holding grandson) Henry Renfrow and Brenton Driver of Wamic. Background L to R: Julia Driver, Jim Kennedy, Deliah Driver, Lena Woodcock, Grace Renfrow, Anne Driver, Emma Driver, Rachel (Mrs. Brenton) Driver, Gertrude Driver, Mamie Kennedy, Rin Johnson, Wm. Woodcock, Voleny Driver, Dr. Short, Edward Driver, Willis Driver, Bud Harvey, Sam Driver, Tom Driver, Jessie Woodcock, Bill Johnson, Vira Driver, Edna Driver, Lela Short, Laura Driver, Katie Driver, Nellie Harvey, Ethel Driver and Percy Driver. Title: Reunion - Driver Family - 1914 Year: 1914 Reunion - Driver Family - 1914 Reunion about 1914 at the Brenton Driver place at Wamic. Front Row L to R: Hazel Johnson, Lenore Woodcock, Lucille Kennedy, Harold Johnson, Erma Driver, Alma Driver and Carmel Woodcock. 2nd Row L to R: Frank Driver, Issac Driver, Henry Driver, (holding grandson) Henry Renfrow and Brenton Driver of Wamic. Background L to R: Julia Driver, Jim Kennedy, Deliah Driver, Lena Woodcock, Grace Renfrow, Anne Driver, Emma Driver, Rachel (Mrs. Brenton) Driver, Gertrude Driver, Mamie Kennedy, Rin Johnson, Wm. Woodcock, Voleny Driver, Dr. Short, Edward Driver, Willis Driver, Bud Harvey, Sam Driver, Tom Driver, Jessie Woodcock, Bill Johnson, Vira Driver, Edna Driver, Lela Short, Laura Driver, Katie Driver, Nellie Harvey, Ethel Driver and Percy Driver. Close

• 28262. [Image] "E" Canal, plain 2 1/2" concrete lining placed in 1924

  	KP-1735-R2 - Klamath Project. Picture at Sta. 59-10 of patched joint cracked through. Joints originally edged have opened considerably. Lining is badly fractured at several points by frost heave, with ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: "E" Canal, plain 2 1/2" concrete lining placed in 1924 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Tolley, H.F. Year: 1948, 2007, 2005 KP-1735-R2 - Klamath Project. Picture at Sta. 59-10 of patched joint cracked through. Joints originally edged have opened considerably. Lining is badly fractured at several points by frost heave, with sections being displaced into the canal. Annual procedure is to repair joints and fractures by pouring sand cement mortar over cracks just prior to irrigation season, which seals joint temporarily for service. However, subjected to winter freezing with resultant heaving, the patching is completely destroyed. It is possible that mastic joint filler may withstand this action and reduce annual maintenance. This lining is situated in side hill cut through porous material where water tightness is essential; October 19, 1948; Photo by H. F. Tolley Title: "E" Canal, plain 2 1/2" concrete lining placed in 1924 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Tolley, H.F. Year: 1948, 2007, 2005 KP-1735-R2 - Klamath Project. Picture at Sta. 59-10 of patched joint cracked through. Joints originally edged have opened considerably. Lining is badly fractured at several points by frost heave, with sections being displaced into the canal. Annual procedure is to repair joints and fractures by pouring sand cement mortar over cracks just prior to irrigation season, which seals joint temporarily for service. However, subjected to winter freezing with resultant heaving, the patching is completely destroyed. It is possible that mastic joint filler may withstand this action and reduce annual maintenance. This lining is situated in side hill cut through porous material where water tightness is essential; October 19, 1948; Photo by H. F. Tolley Close

• 28263. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California

  	CN-12-200-34A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Upstream view of Wild Horse Diversion Channel headgate. Note -- stoplogs must be placed in stoplog slots to prevent water from entering ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-34A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Upstream view of Wild Horse Diversion Channel headgate. Note -- stoplogs must be placed in stoplog slots to prevent water from entering Wild Horse Diversion Channel. The width of the gate opening is 4.0 feet. The elevation of the gate sill is about 0.3 feet lower than the crest of the concrete weir which serves as Wild Horse Diversion Dam. The concrete weir is not shown, but is located to the right of Jim Bunker. The persons shown in the picture, from right to left, are Jim Bunker, manager, LVID, John Fisher, USBR, Klamath Project, and Dean Boe, BLM, Lakeview, Oregon; November 19, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Rosten, T.J. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-34A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Upstream view of Wild Horse Diversion Channel headgate. Note -- stoplogs must be placed in stoplog slots to prevent water from entering Wild Horse Diversion Channel. The width of the gate opening is 4.0 feet. The elevation of the gate sill is about 0.3 feet lower than the crest of the concrete weir which serves as Wild Horse Diversion Dam. The concrete weir is not shown, but is located to the right of Jim Bunker. The persons shown in the picture, from right to left, are Jim Bunker, manager, LVID, John Fisher, USBR, Klamath Project, and Dean Boe, BLM, Lakeview, Oregon; November 19, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Close

• 28264. [Image] Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California

  	CN-12-200-36A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Looking northeast at Wildhorse Diversion Dam from downstream side of dam. Rocks, limbs, etc., have been piled on top of dam to impede ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Stein, D.W. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-36A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Looking northeast at Wildhorse Diversion Dam from downstream side of dam. Rocks, limbs, etc., have been piled on top of dam to impede the flow of water over the structure. Water was observed running under the dam through a washed-out cavity. A level shot showed that the crest of the dam was 0.3 higher than the sill of the headgate to the Wildhorse Diversion Channel. The dam, as shown, is a concrete weir. It is in extremely poor condition. Cavities have been eroded beneath the weir -- and is being underworn on the downstream side -- by streamflow action; November 19, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Title: Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Stein, D.W. Year: 1968, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-36A Gerber Watershed - Klamath Project, Oregon-California. Looking northeast at Wildhorse Diversion Dam from downstream side of dam. Rocks, limbs, etc., have been piled on top of dam to impede the flow of water over the structure. Water was observed running under the dam through a washed-out cavity. A level shot showed that the crest of the dam was 0.3 higher than the sill of the headgate to the Wildhorse Diversion Channel. The dam, as shown, is a concrete weir. It is in extremely poor condition. Cavities have been eroded beneath the weir -- and is being underworn on the downstream side -- by streamflow action; November 19, 1968; Bureau of Reclamation photo by T.J. Rosten Close

• 28265. [Image] Closed Drain Construction in Tule Lake Sump 3 - Specs. No. 200C-821

  	CN-12-200-64A Klamath Project - Oregon-California. Looking west at equipment developed and used by Contractor to excavate and install plastic drainage tubing in one operation. Note that the trencher tows ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Closed Drain Construction in Tule Lake Sump 3 - Specs. No. 200C-821 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Bryant, J.K. Year: 1971, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-64A Klamath Project - Oregon-California. Looking west at equipment developed and used by Contractor to excavate and install plastic drainage tubing in one operation. Note that the trencher tows a hopper which contains and places the cinder envelope around the drainage tubing. Metal shields support the vertical walls of the open trench between the trencher and the hopper. The guide on the bottom of the hopper positions the drainage tubing as it is pulled into the trench. Contractor Don Johnson is shown operating the trenching machine; February 18, 1971; Bureau of Recl. photo by J.K. Bryant Title: Closed Drain Construction in Tule Lake Sump 3 - Specs. No. 200C-821 Author: United States. Bureau of Reclamation, Bryant, J.K. Year: 1971, 2010, 2007 CN-12-200-64A Klamath Project - Oregon-California. Looking west at equipment developed and used by Contractor to excavate and install plastic drainage tubing in one operation. Note that the trencher tows a hopper which contains and places the cinder envelope around the drainage tubing. Metal shields support the vertical walls of the open trench between the trencher and the hopper. The guide on the bottom of the hopper positions the drainage tubing as it is pulled into the trench. Contractor Don Johnson is shown operating the trenching machine; February 18, 1971; Bureau of Recl. photo by J.K. Bryant Close

• 28266. [Article] Early forest succession following clearcuts in western Oregon : patterns and abiotic controls

  Historical aerial photos were used to examine the early phase of forest succession after stand replacement disturbance, covering the Coast Ranges Province (CRP) and the western Cascades Province (WCP) ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Early forest succession following clearcuts in western Oregon : patterns and abiotic controls Author: Yang, Zhiqiang Historical aerial photos were used to examine the early phase of forest succession after stand replacement disturbance, covering the Coast Ranges Province (CRP) and the western Cascades Province (WCP) of western Oregon. The study consisted of two components: characterizing the pattern of forest succession in western Oregon; analyzing the influence of climatic and physiographic factors on forest succession. Succession has many dimensions. In this study, I examined succession after stand replacement disturbance in terms of canopy cover change of different life forms: shrubs, hardwood trees, and conifer trees. Canopy cover changes from 1959 to 1997 for selected sample stands were obtained by photo interpretation. Canopy cover growth curves for each sample stand were developed based on a Chapman-Richards growth function. Seven successional pathways were defined to characterize forest successional processes based on projected canopy cover at age 50 and the process of canopy composition change over this 50 years period. In addition, seven parameters from the canopy cover growth curves were derived for the purpose of comparison of successional patterns in the CRP and WCP. These include time to reach 5% and 70% of canopy cover, weighted mean absolute growth rate, weighted mean relative growth rate, maximum absolute growth rate, time to reach maximum absolute growth rate, and active growth period. Results indicated that a wide range of variation in forest succession exists in western Oregon. Successional patterns for the CRP and WCP were different in terms of conifer development. Possible abiotic controls of two successional parameters were examined by stepwise regression analysis. Only 23%, 37%, and 29% of the total variation in the delay, and 29%, 25% and 57% of the total variation in rate parameters can be explained by abiotic factors for the WCP, CRP, and across provinces, respectively. Unexplained variation was likely due to stochastic, biotic, and management factors, as well as experimental error due to photo interpretation and derivation of successional paramters. The most important influential climatic factor was temperature, and the most important physiographic factor was elevation. Depending on location, interactions among climatic and physiographic factors also influenced successional delay and rate. Title: Early forest succession following clearcuts in western Oregon : patterns and abiotic controls Author: Yang, Zhiqiang Historical aerial photos were used to examine the early phase of forest succession after stand replacement disturbance, covering the Coast Ranges Province (CRP) and the western Cascades Province (WCP) of western Oregon. The study consisted of two components: characterizing the pattern of forest succession in western Oregon; analyzing the influence of climatic and physiographic factors on forest succession. Succession has many dimensions. In this study, I examined succession after stand replacement disturbance in terms of canopy cover change of different life forms: shrubs, hardwood trees, and conifer trees. Canopy cover changes from 1959 to 1997 for selected sample stands were obtained by photo interpretation. Canopy cover growth curves for each sample stand were developed based on a Chapman-Richards growth function. Seven successional pathways were defined to characterize forest successional processes based on projected canopy cover at age 50 and the process of canopy composition change over this 50 years period. In addition, seven parameters from the canopy cover growth curves were derived for the purpose of comparison of successional patterns in the CRP and WCP. These include time to reach 5% and 70% of canopy cover, weighted mean absolute growth rate, weighted mean relative growth rate, maximum absolute growth rate, time to reach maximum absolute growth rate, and active growth period. Results indicated that a wide range of variation in forest succession exists in western Oregon. Successional patterns for the CRP and WCP were different in terms of conifer development. Possible abiotic controls of two successional parameters were examined by stepwise regression analysis. Only 23%, 37%, and 29% of the total variation in the delay, and 29%, 25% and 57% of the total variation in rate parameters can be explained by abiotic factors for the WCP, CRP, and across provinces, respectively. Unexplained variation was likely due to stochastic, biotic, and management factors, as well as experimental error due to photo interpretation and derivation of successional paramters. The most important influential climatic factor was temperature, and the most important physiographic factor was elevation. Depending on location, interactions among climatic and physiographic factors also influenced successional delay and rate. Close

• 28267. [Article] Analyzing fire mosaics in temperate coniferous forests with GIS and remote sensing

  This investigation on fire mosaics addressed several aspects: (1) quantifying the role of terrain variables in fire-related mortality and historical mean fire return interval (MFRI), (2) comparing post-burn ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Analyzing fire mosaics in temperate coniferous forests with GIS and remote sensing Author: Kushla, John D. This investigation on fire mosaics addressed several aspects: (1) quantifying the role of terrain variables in fire-related mortality and historical mean fire return interval (MFRI), (2) comparing post-burn Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery, TM difference imagery, and aerial photo interpretation to map forest survival after wildfire, and (3) to describe and discuss wildfire effects on successional stage patterns and wildlife habitat. The two study sites were located on the Willamette National Forest in the Oregon Cascades. The Warner Creek burn was the location of a 1991 wildfire covering 3669 ha; the Upper McKenzie site was the location of ecological and historical fire studies. Historical MFRI, terrain, and vegetation data were input into a geographical information system. Random sampling was conducted on all layers, and was also used to ground truth forest survival, primarily with aerial photography. Relationships of terrain to forest survival and historical MFRI were analyzed with regression. Regression was also used to model forest survival with TM data. Error matrices were used to compare classified TM data and aerial photo interpretation in mapping survival. At both sites, terrain variables accounted for more variation in forest survival (12-62%) or historical MFRI (4.8-21.9%) within individual physiographic areas, than across the respective study areas. Moreover, the significant topographic variables differed among individual physiographic areas. Regressions of TM band transformations were used to evaluate forest survival. The TM difference imagery with stratification by pre-f ire tasseled cap (TC) wetness explained 75% of the variation in live canopy ratio, and post-burn TM Structural Index (SI) accounted for 72%. Classification of the TM difference imagery with pre-f ire TC wetness had an overall accuracy of 68%, that of the post-burn SI was 63%, and that from aerial photo interpretation was 56%. Before the burn, landscape matrix was closed mature/old-growth. After the burn, the early seral/rock stage expanded, the open mature/old-growth stage was created, and the closed mature/old-growth was reduced and fragmented. Thus, overall habitat diversity and edge increased, but interior habitat decreased. Also, patches of early seral/rock were more variable in size and complex in shape than staggered setting clearcuts on public lands. Title: Analyzing fire mosaics in temperate coniferous forests with GIS and remote sensing Author: Kushla, John D. This investigation on fire mosaics addressed several aspects: (1) quantifying the role of terrain variables in fire-related mortality and historical mean fire return interval (MFRI), (2) comparing post-burn Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) imagery, TM difference imagery, and aerial photo interpretation to map forest survival after wildfire, and (3) to describe and discuss wildfire effects on successional stage patterns and wildlife habitat. The two study sites were located on the Willamette National Forest in the Oregon Cascades. The Warner Creek burn was the location of a 1991 wildfire covering 3669 ha; the Upper McKenzie site was the location of ecological and historical fire studies. Historical MFRI, terrain, and vegetation data were input into a geographical information system. Random sampling was conducted on all layers, and was also used to ground truth forest survival, primarily with aerial photography. Relationships of terrain to forest survival and historical MFRI were analyzed with regression. Regression was also used to model forest survival with TM data. Error matrices were used to compare classified TM data and aerial photo interpretation in mapping survival. At both sites, terrain variables accounted for more variation in forest survival (12-62%) or historical MFRI (4.8-21.9%) within individual physiographic areas, than across the respective study areas. Moreover, the significant topographic variables differed among individual physiographic areas. Regressions of TM band transformations were used to evaluate forest survival. The TM difference imagery with stratification by pre-f ire tasseled cap (TC) wetness explained 75% of the variation in live canopy ratio, and post-burn TM Structural Index (SI) accounted for 72%. Classification of the TM difference imagery with pre-f ire TC wetness had an overall accuracy of 68%, that of the post-burn SI was 63%, and that from aerial photo interpretation was 56%. Before the burn, landscape matrix was closed mature/old-growth. After the burn, the early seral/rock stage expanded, the open mature/old-growth stage was created, and the closed mature/old-growth was reduced and fragmented. Thus, overall habitat diversity and edge increased, but interior habitat decreased. Also, patches of early seral/rock were more variable in size and complex in shape than staggered setting clearcuts on public lands. Close

• 28268. [Article] Areal distribution, change, and restoration potential of wetlands within the lower Columbia River riparian zone, 1948-1991

  The lower Columbia River (LCR) riparian zone is rich in habitat diversity. However, the natural beauty and species diversity along the river have increasingly become affected by human activity. This study ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Areal distribution, change, and restoration potential of wetlands within the lower Columbia River riparian zone, 1948-1991 Author: Allen, Tracy Hunter The lower Columbia River (LCR) riparian zone is rich in habitat diversity. However, the natural beauty and species diversity along the river have increasingly become affected by human activity. This study quantifies the areal extent and degree of wetlands change and associated causes along the LCR over the past 44 years. This research examines the distribution of wetland types and their patterns of change, developing regional models which rank areas most conducive to potential wetland recovery or restoration efforts. The length of the study area totals 234 river kilometers, from the mouth of the Columbia River to Bonneville Dam. The width includes the active channel and an approximately three-kilometer swath on either side of the river. Aerial photography was the primary means for interpreting historical extent of wetlands, using five photo dates (1948, 1961, 1973, 1983, and 1991), based upon their time interval, coverage, and photo quality. For each photo throughout the entire study site, land uses and wetland habitats greater than one hectare were identified and classified. Each classified polygon was digitized and spatially analyzed using a Geographic Information System. This study indicates that wetland habitats which were once contiguously draped upon the linear features of the river are decreasing in size and becoming fragmented. There have been both increases and decreases in specific wetland habitat areas which vary by river reach, even though wetlands have diminished overall. The estuarine section of the LCR experienced a 25% net decrease in wetland area between 1948 and 1991, while the riverine tidal section fostered a 1% increase. The riverine lower perennial section sustained the greatest loss of wetlands, which decreased by 37%. Causes for wetland losses in the estuarine section were largely related to in-water activities, such as channelization, while the causes for declines in the riverine lower perennial section were correlated with rapid urbanization. Wetland increases in the riverine tidal section were generally influenced by significant growth in palustrine and forested wetlands associated with the establishment of wildlife refuges and the incremental increase of upstream flood storage capacity. This research provides a template for identifying degraded or displaced wetlands. Through the use of a GIS, each historical wetland was ranked in either low, moderate, or high categories for restoration potential. GIS technology permits focused, sequentially-refined queries to identify potential restoration or recovery sites. In the estuarine section, 74 historical wetland sites were ranked high for restoration potential, while in the riverine tidal and riverine lower perennial sections, there were 178 and 105, respectively. Overall, these sites represent only 25% of the area occupied by wetlands in 1948. While this study advocates restoration potential, restoration is not a surrogate for responsible ecosystem-wide stewardship of the riparian zone. Restoration will not succeed unless degrading factors are mitigated or eliminated. Title: Areal distribution, change, and restoration potential of wetlands within the lower Columbia River riparian zone, 1948-1991 Author: Allen, Tracy Hunter The lower Columbia River (LCR) riparian zone is rich in habitat diversity. However, the natural beauty and species diversity along the river have increasingly become affected by human activity. This study quantifies the areal extent and degree of wetlands change and associated causes along the LCR over the past 44 years. This research examines the distribution of wetland types and their patterns of change, developing regional models which rank areas most conducive to potential wetland recovery or restoration efforts. The length of the study area totals 234 river kilometers, from the mouth of the Columbia River to Bonneville Dam. The width includes the active channel and an approximately three-kilometer swath on either side of the river. Aerial photography was the primary means for interpreting historical extent of wetlands, using five photo dates (1948, 1961, 1973, 1983, and 1991), based upon their time interval, coverage, and photo quality. For each photo throughout the entire study site, land uses and wetland habitats greater than one hectare were identified and classified. Each classified polygon was digitized and spatially analyzed using a Geographic Information System. This study indicates that wetland habitats which were once contiguously draped upon the linear features of the river are decreasing in size and becoming fragmented. There have been both increases and decreases in specific wetland habitat areas which vary by river reach, even though wetlands have diminished overall. The estuarine section of the LCR experienced a 25% net decrease in wetland area between 1948 and 1991, while the riverine tidal section fostered a 1% increase. The riverine lower perennial section sustained the greatest loss of wetlands, which decreased by 37%. Causes for wetland losses in the estuarine section were largely related to in-water activities, such as channelization, while the causes for declines in the riverine lower perennial section were correlated with rapid urbanization. Wetland increases in the riverine tidal section were generally influenced by significant growth in palustrine and forested wetlands associated with the establishment of wildlife refuges and the incremental increase of upstream flood storage capacity. This research provides a template for identifying degraded or displaced wetlands. Through the use of a GIS, each historical wetland was ranked in either low, moderate, or high categories for restoration potential. GIS technology permits focused, sequentially-refined queries to identify potential restoration or recovery sites. In the estuarine section, 74 historical wetland sites were ranked high for restoration potential, while in the riverine tidal and riverine lower perennial sections, there were 178 and 105, respectively. Overall, these sites represent only 25% of the area occupied by wetlands in 1948. While this study advocates restoration potential, restoration is not a surrogate for responsible ecosystem-wide stewardship of the riparian zone. Restoration will not succeed unless degrading factors are mitigated or eliminated. Close

• 28269. [Image] Lou French ; Lou French, Walla Walla Indian, in costume, outside tipi, carrying cradled infant ; Lou French, Walla Walla Indian, in costume carrying cradled infant, outside tipi

  	A Native American woman, identified as Lou French of the Walla Walla tribe, stands to the right of a tipi, with her left side towards the photographer. She points to her left with her right arm upraised ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Lou French ; Lou French, Walla Walla Indian, in costume, outside tipi, carrying cradled infant ; Lou French, Walla Walla Indian, in costume carrying cradled infant, outside tipi Year: 1897 A Native American woman, identified as Lou French of the Walla Walla tribe, stands to the right of a tipi, with her left side towards the photographer. She points to her left with her right arm upraised and index finger outstretched. Her costume consists of a geometically decorated hat shaped like a tuncated cone, a fringed leather dress with geometric beading, and moccasins with floral beading at the ankles. She wears a number of metal bangle bracelets and what looks like a brass arm band. In her left hand she holds the string to a geometrically-beaded rectangular bag which has circular shapes made of up joined triangles, dark shapes on light bag. Over her shoulders runs a striped band which is attached to the cradleboard she wears on her back. Although the design cannot be seen clearly in this photo, what can be seen resembles almost exactly similar photos of cradleboards with bold floral designs. Attached to the cradleboard is a dark geometrically-decorated piece of cloth or blanket which acts as a hood for the baby. All that can be seen of the baby is the right side of its head, as the rest is engulfed in the bag of the cradleboard. The tipi a few yards behind her seems to be covered with woven mats, and has several long poles on the outside as well as the inside framework. Leaning upright against it are several boards and branches. Close behind is a line of low trees or high bushes, and to the right of the photo a criss-cross of lines that might be from a fence or other structure. The woman's pose is upright and self-assured as she gestures. Title: Lou French ; Lou French, Walla Walla Indian, in costume, outside tipi, carrying cradled infant ; Lou French, Walla Walla Indian, in costume carrying cradled infant, outside tipi Year: 1897 A Native American woman, identified as Lou French of the Walla Walla tribe, stands to the right of a tipi, with her left side towards the photographer. She points to her left with her right arm upraised and index finger outstretched. Her costume consists of a geometically decorated hat shaped like a tuncated cone, a fringed leather dress with geometric beading, and moccasins with floral beading at the ankles. She wears a number of metal bangle bracelets and what looks like a brass arm band. In her left hand she holds the string to a geometrically-beaded rectangular bag which has circular shapes made of up joined triangles, dark shapes on light bag. Over her shoulders runs a striped band which is attached to the cradleboard she wears on her back. Although the design cannot be seen clearly in this photo, what can be seen resembles almost exactly similar photos of cradleboards with bold floral designs. Attached to the cradleboard is a dark geometrically-decorated piece of cloth or blanket which acts as a hood for the baby. All that can be seen of the baby is the right side of its head, as the rest is engulfed in the bag of the cradleboard. The tipi a few yards behind her seems to be covered with woven mats, and has several long poles on the outside as well as the inside framework. Leaning upright against it are several boards and branches. Close behind is a line of low trees or high bushes, and to the right of the photo a criss-cross of lines that might be from a fence or other structure. The woman's pose is upright and self-assured as she gestures. Close

• 28270. [Article] OIMB Term Photo: Summer 1974

  Summer 1974 Front Row: Greg Larson, Joe Lipsick, Shelley Vebber, Caryn Luchetti, Diane Ventre, Rick Olson, Jim Proetz, Bill Akers, Randy Berntsen, Becky McConnaughey, Bob Datsko, Dr. Bob Terwilliger. ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: OIMB Term Photo: Summer 1974 Year: 2008, 1974 Summer 1974 Front Row: Greg Larson, Joe Lipsick, Shelley Vebber, Caryn Luchetti, Diane Ventre, Rick Olson, Jim Proetz, Bill Akers, Randy Berntsen, Becky McConnaughey, Bob Datsko, Dr. Bob Terwilliger. 2nd Row: Chuck Holliday, Polly Miller, Barb Ewan, Jo Ruprecht, Susanne Christy, Linda Collins, Nory Astrachan, John Pollack, Sue Stefonik, Lisa Nerenburg, Jeanne Cook, Sandy Zornes, Larry Blumer, Kim Orrett, Linn Currey, Lisa Brezina, Ann Minor, Barbara Best, Dianne McConnaughey, Jean Hannah, Amy Stewart, Patty Barnhart, Rose Peterson, Lisa Kaye, Stephanie Brooks, Suzanne Ivey, Shirley Leegard, Bud McCall. 3rd Row: Peter Sophos, Jean DeMelvenaere, Earl Connor, Susanna Bauer, Dr. Bob Morris, Richard Salman, Gail Young, Donna Sanders, Chuck Pinkham, Larry Dangott, Bill Garlick, Paula Norris, Tom Ouellete, Cathy Corison, JoAnn Mickelson, Chris Van Bemell, Kathy Tosney, Dr. James Cather, Dr. Ed Lippert, Dr. Jack Barclay, John McConnaughey, Dan Mahony, Evelyn McConnaughey, Don Rogers, Craig Cather, Fritz Polatsek, Betty Rogers. 4th Row: Robin Hall, Ken Pletz, Dan Kuhl, Gregg Kobliska, Pete LaRochelle, Abdullah Abdullah, Dean Wells, Martin Schott, Rosemary Furfey, Steve Johnson (behind), Steve Levin, Rick Houser, Chuck Hunter (behind), John Hosler, Liz Wyckoff, Mary Omberg, Ron Pummer, Nora Terwilliger, Katherine Yerxa, Dianne Vemillion, Doug Tave, Ken DeHoff, Julie Dunn, Jack Delaini, Mary Lee Baker, Dauphi, Prince Beach, Rod Sheffer, Laura Koutsky, John Craft, Dr. Bayard McConnaughey, Toivo Kallas. Back Row: Ned Patton, Randy Atkinson, Phil Durand, Hank Chaney, Ann Einspahr, Scott Graves, Steve Dodrill, Bill Floering, John Findley, Jerry Roahrig, Tom Armentrout, Mark Kirsch, Robin Hori, Mark Lee, Sandy Spitzer, Buff Blair (on top), Dave Wilson, John Hoffnagle with Rhyncocoel, Dave Look, Bill Lindberg, Norm Rischard, Matt Leddy, Rob Olson. Title: OIMB Term Photo: Summer 1974 Year: 2008, 1974 Summer 1974 Front Row: Greg Larson, Joe Lipsick, Shelley Vebber, Caryn Luchetti, Diane Ventre, Rick Olson, Jim Proetz, Bill Akers, Randy Berntsen, Becky McConnaughey, Bob Datsko, Dr. Bob Terwilliger. 2nd Row: Chuck Holliday, Polly Miller, Barb Ewan, Jo Ruprecht, Susanne Christy, Linda Collins, Nory Astrachan, John Pollack, Sue Stefonik, Lisa Nerenburg, Jeanne Cook, Sandy Zornes, Larry Blumer, Kim Orrett, Linn Currey, Lisa Brezina, Ann Minor, Barbara Best, Dianne McConnaughey, Jean Hannah, Amy Stewart, Patty Barnhart, Rose Peterson, Lisa Kaye, Stephanie Brooks, Suzanne Ivey, Shirley Leegard, Bud McCall. 3rd Row: Peter Sophos, Jean DeMelvenaere, Earl Connor, Susanna Bauer, Dr. Bob Morris, Richard Salman, Gail Young, Donna Sanders, Chuck Pinkham, Larry Dangott, Bill Garlick, Paula Norris, Tom Ouellete, Cathy Corison, JoAnn Mickelson, Chris Van Bemell, Kathy Tosney, Dr. James Cather, Dr. Ed Lippert, Dr. Jack Barclay, John McConnaughey, Dan Mahony, Evelyn McConnaughey, Don Rogers, Craig Cather, Fritz Polatsek, Betty Rogers. 4th Row: Robin Hall, Ken Pletz, Dan Kuhl, Gregg Kobliska, Pete LaRochelle, Abdullah Abdullah, Dean Wells, Martin Schott, Rosemary Furfey, Steve Johnson (behind), Steve Levin, Rick Houser, Chuck Hunter (behind), John Hosler, Liz Wyckoff, Mary Omberg, Ron Pummer, Nora Terwilliger, Katherine Yerxa, Dianne Vemillion, Doug Tave, Ken DeHoff, Julie Dunn, Jack Delaini, Mary Lee Baker, Dauphi, Prince Beach, Rod Sheffer, Laura Koutsky, John Craft, Dr. Bayard McConnaughey, Toivo Kallas. Back Row: Ned Patton, Randy Atkinson, Phil Durand, Hank Chaney, Ann Einspahr, Scott Graves, Steve Dodrill, Bill Floering, John Findley, Jerry Roahrig, Tom Armentrout, Mark Kirsch, Robin Hori, Mark Lee, Sandy Spitzer, Buff Blair (on top), Dave Wilson, John Hoffnagle with Rhyncocoel, Dave Look, Bill Lindberg, Norm Rischard, Matt Leddy, Rob Olson. Close