Search

Search Results

• 31. [Image] New Geothermal Site Identification and Qualification. Consultant Report

  	This study identifies remaining undeveloped geothermal resources in California and western Nevada, and it estimates the Development costs of each. It has relied on public-domain information and such additional ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: New Geothermal Site Identification and Qualification. Consultant Report Author: Klein, C.W. Year: 2004 This study identifies remaining undeveloped geothermal resources in California and western Nevada, and it estimates the Development costs of each. It has relied on public-domain information and such additional data as geothermal developers have chosen to make available. Reserve estimation has been performed by volumetric analysis with a probabilistic approach to uncertain input parameters. Incremental geothermal reserves in the California/Nevada study area have a minimum value of 2,800 gross MW and a most-likely value of 4,300 gross MW. For the state of California alone, these values are 2,000 and 3,000 gross MW, respectively. These estimates may be conservative to the extent that they do not take into account resources about which little or no public-domain information is available. The average capital cost of incremental generation capacity is estimated to average $3,100/kW for the California/Nevada study area, and $2,950/kW for the state of California alone. These cost estimates include exploration, confirmation Drilling, Development Drilling, plant construction, and transmission-line costs. For the purposes of this study, a capital cost of $2,400/kW is considered competitive with other renewable resources. The amount of incremental geothermal capacity available at or below $2,400/kW is about 1,700 gross MW for the California/Nevada study area, and the same amount (within 50-MW rounding) for the state of California alone. The capital cost estimates are only approximate, because each developer would bring its own experience, bias, and opportunities to the Development process. Nonetheless, the overall costs per project estimated in this study are believed to be reasonable Title: New Geothermal Site Identification and Qualification. Consultant Report Author: Klein, C.W. Year: 2004 This study identifies remaining undeveloped geothermal resources in California and western Nevada, and it estimates the Development costs of each. It has relied on public-domain information and such additional data as geothermal developers have chosen to make available. Reserve estimation has been performed by volumetric analysis with a probabilistic approach to uncertain input parameters. Incremental geothermal reserves in the California/Nevada study area have a minimum value of 2,800 gross MW and a most-likely value of 4,300 gross MW. For the state of California alone, these values are 2,000 and 3,000 gross MW, respectively. These estimates may be conservative to the extent that they do not take into account resources about which little or no public-domain information is available. The average capital cost of incremental generation capacity is estimated to average $3,100/kW for the California/Nevada study area, and $2,950/kW for the state of California alone. These cost estimates include exploration, confirmation Drilling, Development Drilling, plant construction, and transmission-line costs. For the purposes of this study, a capital cost of $2,400/kW is considered competitive with other renewable resources. The amount of incremental geothermal capacity available at or below $2,400/kW is about 1,700 gross MW for the California/Nevada study area, and the same amount (within 50-MW rounding) for the state of California alone. The capital cost estimates are only approximate, because each developer would bring its own experience, bias, and opportunities to the Development process. Nonetheless, the overall costs per project estimated in this study are believed to be reasonable Close

• 32. [Image] Industry participation in DOE-sponsored geopressured geothermal research development. Final report, May 1, 1979-April 30, 1982

  	Nine DOE/Industry Forum meetings where the progress of DOE's resource development program was outlined and discussed were planned, organized, conducted, and reported. These nine forum meetings included ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Industry participation in DOE-sponsored geopressured geothermal research development. Final report, May 1, 1979-April 30, 1982 Author: Coffer, H.F. Year: 1982 Nine DOE/Industry Forum meetings where the progress of DOE's resource development program was outlined and discussed were planned, organized, conducted, and reported. These nine forum meetings included three meetings of the Drilling and Testing group, two Site Selection meetings, one meeting each of the Legal and Environmental groups and two Overview meetings where the entire DOE program was discussed. Summaries of each of these meetings are included and the progress of DOE's geopressured geothermal resource evaluation program from its early beginnings to demonstration of the tremendous size and widespread availability of this supplementary energy resource are shown. Attendees at the meetings represented a broad cross section of state and federal agencies and potential users and developers of this large energy source. Attendance at meetings averages 50 to 80 with the most interest shown at meetings where reservoir testing results were discussed. In addition to the forums 16 newsletters were prepared and distributed to all participants. These were instituted to keep industry apprised of the latest developments in this DOE resource evaluation program. Three additional studies were carried out for DOE under this contract: a reservoir continuity study, a survey of gas stripping operations, and the development of a lease agreement for design well prospects; DOE/NV/10024-1 Title: Industry participation in DOE-sponsored geopressured geothermal research development. Final report, May 1, 1979-April 30, 1982 Author: Coffer, H.F. Year: 1982 Nine DOE/Industry Forum meetings where the progress of DOE's resource development program was outlined and discussed were planned, organized, conducted, and reported. These nine forum meetings included three meetings of the Drilling and Testing group, two Site Selection meetings, one meeting each of the Legal and Environmental groups and two Overview meetings where the entire DOE program was discussed. Summaries of each of these meetings are included and the progress of DOE's geopressured geothermal resource evaluation program from its early beginnings to demonstration of the tremendous size and widespread availability of this supplementary energy resource are shown. Attendees at the meetings represented a broad cross section of state and federal agencies and potential users and developers of this large energy source. Attendance at meetings averages 50 to 80 with the most interest shown at meetings where reservoir testing results were discussed. In addition to the forums 16 newsletters were prepared and distributed to all participants. These were instituted to keep industry apprised of the latest developments in this DOE resource evaluation program. Three additional studies were carried out for DOE under this contract: a reservoir continuity study, a survey of gas stripping operations, and the development of a lease agreement for design well prospects; DOE/NV/10024-1 Close

• 33. [Image] Overview of the Imperial Valley Environmental Project

  	The Lawrence Livermore Laboratory has been appointed by the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration to be the lead laboratory for carrying out a long-term project to acquire complete understanding ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Overview of the Imperial Valley Environmental Project Author: Anspaugh, L.R. (ed.) Year: 1976 The Lawrence Livermore Laboratory has been appointed by the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration to be the lead laboratory for carrying out a long-term project to acquire complete understanding of the environmental quality in the Imperial Valley of California prior to any major developments. The purpose of this project is to ensure that the development of geothermal resources proceeds on an environmentally sound basis. Consequently, the Imperial Valley Environmental Project (IVP) is committed to an intensive and comprehensive study designed to establish an environmental baseline for the Imperial Valley as well as to develop an understanding of the environmental and other effects associated with development of geothermal resources. The IVP is organized into seven main study sections, which when taken together cover all the significant issues and concerns. The sections are: Air Quality; Water Quality; Ecosystem Quality (Soil, Plants, Animals, etc.); Subsidence and Induced Seismicity; Health Effects; Socio-Economics; and an Integrated Assessment (auth) Title: Overview of the Imperial Valley Environmental Project Author: Anspaugh, L.R. (ed.) Year: 1976 The Lawrence Livermore Laboratory has been appointed by the U.S. Energy Research and Development Administration to be the lead laboratory for carrying out a long-term project to acquire complete understanding of the environmental quality in the Imperial Valley of California prior to any major developments. The purpose of this project is to ensure that the development of geothermal resources proceeds on an environmentally sound basis. Consequently, the Imperial Valley Environmental Project (IVP) is committed to an intensive and comprehensive study designed to establish an environmental baseline for the Imperial Valley as well as to develop an understanding of the environmental and other effects associated with development of geothermal resources. The IVP is organized into seven main study sections, which when taken together cover all the significant issues and concerns. The sections are: Air Quality; Water Quality; Ecosystem Quality (Soil, Plants, Animals, etc.); Subsidence and Induced Seismicity; Health Effects; Socio-Economics; and an Integrated Assessment (auth) Close

• 34. [Image] Geothermal Progress Monitor Report No. 11, December 1989

  	This issue of the Geothermal Progress Monitor (GPM) is the 11th since the inception of the publication in 1980. It continues to synthesize information on all aspects of geothermal development in this country ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Geothermal Progress Monitor Report No. 11, December 1989 Author: Assistant Secretary for Conservation and Renewable Energy, Geothermal Teahnology Division Year: 1989 This issue of the Geothermal Progress Monitor (GPM) is the 11th since the inception of the publication in 1980. It continues to synthesize information on all aspects of geothermal development in this country and abroad to permit identification and quantification of trends in the use of this energy technology. In addition, the GPM is a mechanism for transferring current information on geothermal technology development to the private sector, and, over time, provides a historical record for those interested in the development pathway of the resource. In sum, the Department of Energy makes the GPM available to the many diverse interests that make up the geothermal community for the multiple uses it may serve. This issue of the GPM points up very clearly how closely knit many of those diverse interests have become. It might well be called an international issue'' since many of its pages are devoted to news of geothermal development abroad, to the efforts of the US industry to participate in overseas development, to the support given those efforts by federal and state agencies, and to the formation of the International Geothermal Association (IGA). All of these events indicate that the geothermal community has become truly international in character, an occurrence that can only enhance the future of geothermal energy as a major source of energy supply worldwide. 15 figs. Title: Geothermal Progress Monitor Report No. 11, December 1989 Author: Assistant Secretary for Conservation and Renewable Energy, Geothermal Teahnology Division Year: 1989 This issue of the Geothermal Progress Monitor (GPM) is the 11th since the inception of the publication in 1980. It continues to synthesize information on all aspects of geothermal development in this country and abroad to permit identification and quantification of trends in the use of this energy technology. In addition, the GPM is a mechanism for transferring current information on geothermal technology development to the private sector, and, over time, provides a historical record for those interested in the development pathway of the resource. In sum, the Department of Energy makes the GPM available to the many diverse interests that make up the geothermal community for the multiple uses it may serve. This issue of the GPM points up very clearly how closely knit many of those diverse interests have become. It might well be called an international issue'' since many of its pages are devoted to news of geothermal development abroad, to the efforts of the US industry to participate in overseas development, to the support given those efforts by federal and state agencies, and to the formation of the International Geothermal Association (IGA). All of these events indicate that the geothermal community has become truly international in character, an occurrence that can only enhance the future of geothermal energy as a major source of energy supply worldwide. 15 figs. Close

• 35. [Image] A National Plan for Energy Research, Development and Demonstration: Creating Energy Choices for the Future. 1976. Volume 2. Program Implementation

  	The Building Blocks in Parts II and III describe programs whose objectives are supportive in nature and often cut across several energy technologies. The eight Building Blocks contained in Part II are ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: A National Plan for Energy Research, Development and Demonstration: Creating Energy Choices for the Future. 1976. Volume 2. Program Implementation Author: United States Energy Research and Development Administration Year: 1976 The Building Blocks in Parts II and III describe programs whose objectives are supportive in nature and often cut across several energy technologies. The eight Building Blocks contained in Part II are divided into Two major program areas: Environmental Research and Safety, and Basic Energy Sciences. The six activities contained in Part III are not unique to energy RD&D but are necessary for achievement of its objectives. Part IV consists of three tables. They contain cross-referencing data that will allow the reader to examine the Building Blocks from the different perspectives of the National Energy Technology Goals, Volume 1 Technologies, and Federal Agency Involvement Title: A National Plan for Energy Research, Development and Demonstration: Creating Energy Choices for the Future. 1976. Volume 2. Program Implementation Author: United States Energy Research and Development Administration Year: 1976 The Building Blocks in Parts II and III describe programs whose objectives are supportive in nature and often cut across several energy technologies. The eight Building Blocks contained in Part II are divided into Two major program areas: Environmental Research and Safety, and Basic Energy Sciences. The six activities contained in Part III are not unique to energy RD&D but are necessary for achievement of its objectives. Part IV consists of three tables. They contain cross-referencing data that will allow the reader to examine the Building Blocks from the different perspectives of the National Energy Technology Goals, Volume 1 Technologies, and Federal Agency Involvement Close

• 36. [Image] Basic research needed for the development of geothermal energy

  	Basic research needed to facilitate development of geothermal energy is identified. An attempt has been made to make the report representative of the ideas of productive workers in the field. The present ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Basic research needed for the development of geothermal energy Author: Aamodt, R.L. Year: 1980 Basic research needed to facilitate development of geothermal energy is identified. An attempt has been made to make the report representative of the ideas of productive workers in the field. The present state of knowledge of geothermal energy is presented and then specific recommendations for further research, with status and priorities, are listed. Discussion is limited to a small number of applicable concepts, namely: origin of geothermal flux; transport of geothermal energy; geothermal reservoirs; rock-water interactions, and geophysical and geochemical exploration; LA-8562-MS Title: Basic research needed for the development of geothermal energy Author: Aamodt, R.L. Year: 1980 Basic research needed to facilitate development of geothermal energy is identified. An attempt has been made to make the report representative of the ideas of productive workers in the field. The present state of knowledge of geothermal energy is presented and then specific recommendations for further research, with status and priorities, are listed. Discussion is limited to a small number of applicable concepts, namely: origin of geothermal flux; transport of geothermal energy; geothermal reservoirs; rock-water interactions, and geophysical and geochemical exploration; LA-8562-MS Close

• 37. [Image] Colorado geothermal institutional handbook: a user's guide of agencies regulations, permits, and aids for geothermal development

  	The following are included: principal state agencies, applicable state legislation, applicable state regulations, local agencies and regulations, federal agencies and regulations, information sources, ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Colorado geothermal institutional handbook: a user's guide of agencies regulations, permits, and aids for geothermal development Author: Coe, B.A. Year: 1980 The following are included: principal state agencies, applicable state legislation, applicable state regulations, local agencies and regulations, federal agencies and regulations, information sources, and agencies and individuals. (MHR); DOE/ID/12018-3; Alternative title: Regulation of geothermal energy development in Colorado Title: Colorado geothermal institutional handbook: a user's guide of agencies regulations, permits, and aids for geothermal development Author: Coe, B.A. Year: 1980 The following are included: principal state agencies, applicable state legislation, applicable state regulations, local agencies and regulations, federal agencies and regulations, information sources, and agencies and individuals. (MHR); DOE/ID/12018-3; Alternative title: Regulation of geothermal energy development in Colorado Close

• 38. [Image] Arizona geothermal institutional handbook: Arizona geothermal commercialization planning team, January 1-December 31, 1979

  	The purpose of this handbook is to assist in understanding the various procedures and requirements necessary for the development of geothermal energy in the State of Arizona. It contains the names of key ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Arizona geothermal institutional handbook: Arizona geothermal commercialization planning team, January 1-December 31, 1979 Author: Malysa, L. Year: 1980 The purpose of this handbook is to assist in understanding the various procedures and requirements necessary for the development of geothermal energy in the State of Arizona. It contains the names of key persons and agencies who are directly or indirectly involved in the institutional process. A detailed assessment of all agencies and the role they play in geothermal energy development is provided. The handbook is divided into four sections: State and Local rules and regulations, the Federal rules and regulations, references, and a technical bibliography. (MHR); DOE/ID/12015-2 Title: Arizona geothermal institutional handbook: Arizona geothermal commercialization planning team, January 1-December 31, 1979 Author: Malysa, L. Year: 1980 The purpose of this handbook is to assist in understanding the various procedures and requirements necessary for the development of geothermal energy in the State of Arizona. It contains the names of key persons and agencies who are directly or indirectly involved in the institutional process. A detailed assessment of all agencies and the role they play in geothermal energy development is provided. The handbook is divided into four sections: State and Local rules and regulations, the Federal rules and regulations, references, and a technical bibliography. (MHR); DOE/ID/12015-2 Close

• 39. [Image] Geothermal energy in Montana: site data base and development status

  	A short description of the state's geothermal characteristics, economy, and climate is presented. More specific information is included under the planning regions and site specific data summaries. A brief ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Geothermal energy in Montana: site data base and development status Author: Brown, K.E. Year: 1979 A short description of the state's geothermal characteristics, economy, and climate is presented. More specific information is included under the planning regions and site specific data summaries. A brief discussion of the geothermal characteristics and a listing of a majority of the known hot springs is included. The factors which influence geothermal development were researched and presented, including: economics, financing, state leasing, federal leasing, direct-use technology, water quality laws, water rights, and the Major Facility Siting Act. (MHR); DOE/RL/01049-T6 Title: Geothermal energy in Montana: site data base and development status Author: Brown, K.E. Year: 1979 A short description of the state's geothermal characteristics, economy, and climate is presented. More specific information is included under the planning regions and site specific data summaries. A brief discussion of the geothermal characteristics and a listing of a majority of the known hot springs is included. The factors which influence geothermal development were researched and presented, including: economics, financing, state leasing, federal leasing, direct-use technology, water quality laws, water rights, and the Major Facility Siting Act. (MHR); DOE/RL/01049-T6 Close

• 40. [Image] Developments in Geothermal Resources in 1982

  	A decrease in the number of geothermal wells and the total footage drilled during 1982 reflected the deteriorating national economy and severe cutbacks in federal assistance for the exploration and development ...
  	Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Developments in Geothermal Resources in 1982 Author: Combs, J. Year: 1983 A decrease in the number of geothermal wells and the total footage drilled during 1982 reflected the deteriorating national economy and severe cutbacks in federal assistance for the exploration and development of geothermal resources; however, several significant achievements were recorded by the geothermal industry. The total number of geothermal wells drilled in 1982 decreased to 79 from 99 wells in 1981 while the total footage drilled in 1982 decreased to 559,326-feet, as compared to 676,127-feet in 1981. An increase in average depth of the wells from 6,830-feet in 1981 to 7,080-feet in 1982 indicated that operators are having to drill deeper in their efforts to extend the productive limits of proven geothermal reservoirs. Of the 79 geothermal wells completed during 1982, about 8096, i.e., 63 wells which accounted for 9096 of the total footage were drilled in California Title: Developments in Geothermal Resources in 1982 Author: Combs, J. Year: 1983 A decrease in the number of geothermal wells and the total footage drilled during 1982 reflected the deteriorating national economy and severe cutbacks in federal assistance for the exploration and development of geothermal resources; however, several significant achievements were recorded by the geothermal industry. The total number of geothermal wells drilled in 1982 decreased to 79 from 99 wells in 1981 while the total footage drilled in 1982 decreased to 559,326-feet, as compared to 676,127-feet in 1981. An increase in average depth of the wells from 6,830-feet in 1981 to 7,080-feet in 1982 indicated that operators are having to drill deeper in their efforts to extend the productive limits of proven geothermal reservoirs. Of the 79 geothermal wells completed during 1982, about 8096, i.e., 63 wells which accounted for 9096 of the total footage were drilled in California Close