Search

Search Results

• 1. [Article] Key issues and future directions of mechanized harvesting : discussions and guidance from working groups

  Recognition of the problems and opportunities in mechanized harvesting should help in development of solutions and maximum realization of its potential. This paper presents feedback from five working groups, ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Key issues and future directions of mechanized harvesting : discussions and guidance from working groups Author: Oregon State University. Forest Research Laboratory, Olsen, Eldon D., Bettinger, Pete, 1962-, Kellogg, L. D. (Loren D.) Recognition of the problems and opportunities in mechanized harvesting should help in development of solutions and maximum realization of its potential. This paper presents feedback from five working groups, the members of which were involved in mechanized harvesting issues with various organizations in the Pacific Northwest. The groups identified needs and assigned priorities for research in all areas of mechanized harvesting. Most participants thought the working groups were effective. Suggestions for future workshops included encouraging a broader mix of participants, scheduling a longer session for working groups, and providing more guidance to summarizers. Plans for future studies and stronger interactions with other interests in the forest industry may develop from suggestions of the working groups. Title: Key issues and future directions of mechanized harvesting : discussions and guidance from working groups Author: Oregon State University. Forest Research Laboratory, Olsen, Eldon D., Bettinger, Pete, 1962-, Kellogg, L. D. (Loren D.) Recognition of the problems and opportunities in mechanized harvesting should help in development of solutions and maximum realization of its potential. This paper presents feedback from five working groups, the members of which were involved in mechanized harvesting issues with various organizations in the Pacific Northwest. The groups identified needs and assigned priorities for research in all areas of mechanized harvesting. Most participants thought the working groups were effective. Suggestions for future workshops included encouraging a broader mix of participants, scheduling a longer session for working groups, and providing more guidance to summarizers. Plans for future studies and stronger interactions with other interests in the forest industry may develop from suggestions of the working groups. Close

• 2. [Article] Statistical comparison of methods used in harvesting work studies

  Work-study guidelines were developed using field data from thinning sites in the Oregon Cascade Range. Regression of detailed time study and shift-level data predicted harvesting production rates. Statistical ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Statistical comparison of methods used in harvesting work studies Author: Oregon State University. Forest Research Laboratory, Miller, Mark E., Hossain, Mohammad M., Olsen, Eldon D. Work-study guidelines were developed using field data from thinning sites in the Oregon Cascade Range. Regression of detailed time study and shift-level data predicted harvesting production rates. Statistical analysis showed the relative difference in the discriminating power between shift-level studies versus detailed time studies. Indicator variables tested if there were significant differences between harvesting treatments. Confidence intervals demonstrated the improved effect of longer study lengths for both shift-level and detailed time studies. Title: Statistical comparison of methods used in harvesting work studies Author: Oregon State University. Forest Research Laboratory, Miller, Mark E., Hossain, Mohammad M., Olsen, Eldon D. Work-study guidelines were developed using field data from thinning sites in the Oregon Cascade Range. Regression of detailed time study and shift-level data predicted harvesting production rates. Statistical analysis showed the relative difference in the discriminating power between shift-level studies versus detailed time studies. Indicator variables tested if there were significant differences between harvesting treatments. Confidence intervals demonstrated the improved effect of longer study lengths for both shift-level and detailed time studies. Close

• 3. [Article] Skyline thinning production and costs : experience from the Willamette Young Stand Project

  Production rates and costs for skyline harvesting were examined over a range of residual thinning intensities, operational methods, and sites. The sites included three stands of 40- to 50-yr-old Douglas-fir ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Skyline thinning production and costs : experience from the Willamette Young Stand Project Author: Oregon State University. Forest Research Laboratory, Miller, Mark E., Olsen, Eldon D., Kellogg, L. D. (Loren D.) Production rates and costs for skyline harvesting were examined over a range of residual thinning intensities, operational methods, and sites. The sites included three stands of 40- to 50-yr-old Douglas-fir on the Willamette National Forest in the Cascade Mountains of Oregon. Three silvicultural treatments were studied at two sites, and one silvicultural treatment at the third site. Detailed time studies were conducted on manual felling and uphill skyline yarding with small or mid-size yarders. Separate regression equations were developed to predict delay-free felling cycle time and delay-free yarding cycle time at each site. The three silvicultural treatments had no consistent influence on production rates and costs, because the initial stocking levels varied among treatments and the volume harvested did not necessarily correspond to the silvicultural treatment. Cost differences within sites, where operational methods were uniform, were small. Cost differences among sites for each activity, such as felling or yarding, were larger because of differences in operational methods. Total harvesting costs among the three sites were similar, ranging from $58 to $64/100 ft³. Title: Skyline thinning production and costs : experience from the Willamette Young Stand Project Author: Oregon State University. Forest Research Laboratory, Miller, Mark E., Olsen, Eldon D., Kellogg, L. D. (Loren D.) Production rates and costs for skyline harvesting were examined over a range of residual thinning intensities, operational methods, and sites. The sites included three stands of 40- to 50-yr-old Douglas-fir on the Willamette National Forest in the Cascade Mountains of Oregon. Three silvicultural treatments were studied at two sites, and one silvicultural treatment at the third site. Detailed time studies were conducted on manual felling and uphill skyline yarding with small or mid-size yarders. Separate regression equations were developed to predict delay-free felling cycle time and delay-free yarding cycle time at each site. The three silvicultural treatments had no consistent influence on production rates and costs, because the initial stocking levels varied among treatments and the volume harvested did not necessarily correspond to the silvicultural treatment. Cost differences within sites, where operational methods were uniform, were small. Cost differences among sites for each activity, such as felling or yarding, were larger because of differences in operational methods. Total harvesting costs among the three sites were similar, ranging from $58 to $64/100 ft³. Close