Search

Search Results

• 1. [Article] Sharing Transportation GIS Data

  Updating and maintaining Geographic Information Systems-Transportation data (GIS-T data) is proving difficult. Different database formats needed to support diverse applications leads to inconsistencies ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Sharing Transportation GIS Data Author: Dueker, Kenneth, Bender, Paul, Zhang, Jihong Year: 2000 Updating and maintaining Geographic Information Systems-Transportation data (GIS-T data) is proving difficult. Different database formats needed to support diverse applications leads to inconsistencies and inaccuracies, and duplication in updating. Dueker and Butler (1998) have proposed an Enterprise GIS-T data model that unbundles the various components of transportation data (network links, cartography, and attributes) to facilitate generating application-specific networks, and which eases updating and maintenance. However, developers of existing application-specific databases that employ integrated data models that bundle the network link with cartography and attributes are reluctant to step back to an intermediate form for managing their data. Consequently, attention is given in this report to the development of a method of incorporating transportation system changes directly to existing application- specific networks. Title: Sharing Transportation GIS Data Author: Dueker, Kenneth, Bender, Paul, Zhang, Jihong Year: 2000 Updating and maintaining Geographic Information Systems-Transportation data (GIS-T data) is proving difficult. Different database formats needed to support diverse applications leads to inconsistencies and inaccuracies, and duplication in updating. Dueker and Butler (1998) have proposed an Enterprise GIS-T data model that unbundles the various components of transportation data (network links, cartography, and attributes) to facilitate generating application-specific networks, and which eases updating and maintenance. However, developers of existing application-specific databases that employ integrated data models that bundle the network link with cartography and attributes are reluctant to step back to an intermediate form for managing their data. Consequently, attention is given in this report to the development of a method of incorporating transportation system changes directly to existing application- specific networks. Close

• 2. [Article] Analysis of Design Attributes and Crashes on the Oregon Highway System

  Since the passage of the Highway Safety Act of 1966, state departments of transportation have engaged in systematic safety improvement planning and programming. According to Davis (2000), the general approach ...

  Citation × Citation Citation Abstract Copy Title: Analysis of Design Attributes and Crashes on the Oregon Highway System Author: Strathman, James G., Dueker, Kenneth, Zhang, Jihong, Williams, Timothy Year: 2001 Since the passage of the Highway Safety Act of 1966, state departments of transportation have engaged in systematic safety improvement planning and programming. According to Davis (2000), the general approach to safety improvement planning employed by most states follows six principal steps: 1. Identification of hazardous roadway locations using crash records; 2. Detailed engineering study of selected hazardous locations to identify roadway design problems; 3. Identification of potential countermeasures; 4. Assessment of the costs and benefits of potential countermeasures; 5. Implementation of countermeasures with the highest net benefits; 6. Assessment of countermeasure effectiveness following implementation. All planning processes are subject to uncertainty. In safety improvement planning, the determination of benefits from implementation of countermeasures depends greatly on projected crash reductions. Such projections are acknowledged to be the most uncertain element of the safety planning process (Pfefer et al., 1999). More than 25 years ago Laughland et al. (1975) identified the need for development of a national comprehensive set of crash reduction factors (CRFs) that states could employ in evaluating safety countermeasures. However, this need has not been addressed, and is not likely to be pursued (FHWA, 1991). As a result, states have been responsible for developing their own CRFs. Title: Analysis of Design Attributes and Crashes on the Oregon Highway System Author: Strathman, James G., Dueker, Kenneth, Zhang, Jihong, Williams, Timothy Year: 2001 Since the passage of the Highway Safety Act of 1966, state departments of transportation have engaged in systematic safety improvement planning and programming. According to Davis (2000), the general approach to safety improvement planning employed by most states follows six principal steps: 1. Identification of hazardous roadway locations using crash records; 2. Detailed engineering study of selected hazardous locations to identify roadway design problems; 3. Identification of potential countermeasures; 4. Assessment of the costs and benefits of potential countermeasures; 5. Implementation of countermeasures with the highest net benefits; 6. Assessment of countermeasure effectiveness following implementation. All planning processes are subject to uncertainty. In safety improvement planning, the determination of benefits from implementation of countermeasures depends greatly on projected crash reductions. Such projections are acknowledged to be the most uncertain element of the safety planning process (Pfefer et al., 1999). More than 25 years ago Laughland et al. (1975) identified the need for development of a national comprehensive set of crash reduction factors (CRFs) that states could employ in evaluating safety countermeasures. However, this need has not been addressed, and is not likely to be pursued (FHWA, 1991). As a result, states have been responsible for developing their own CRFs. Close